FestivalsMovies

The Mysteries of Cannes, #2, updated

By May 23, 2008No Comments

By day, Le Petit Majestic is about as unpre­pos­sess­ing as a corner bis­tro can get:

Pm_day

By night, it’s a spilling-into-the-street mad­house! The below shot was snapped on a slow night!

Pm_night

“But Glenn,” you ask, “what of les films?” Well, right now I’m wrest­ling with Charlie Kaufman’s almost-epic Synedoche, New York for a second Critic’s Notebook for indieWIRE. Did I like it? “Like” is kind of not applic­able. Questions per­sist as to wheth­er dens­ity equals pro­fund­ity. Just what is the state of the film’s prot­ag­on­ist? Is sol­ipsism all there is? I’m grap­pling, grappling.

Easier times were had with Philippe Garrel’s Frontier of Dawn, a nice soak for those who love the indol­ent ango­isse and tristesse of the Garrel mood, some­thing the dir­ect­or is able to con­jure, a friend noted, just by turn­ing on the cam­era. Or so it seems. The more some folks osten­ta­tiously laughed at the intro­duc­tion of a super­nat­ur­al angle into the plot (achieved via effects that date back to Cocteau if not Melies), the more I loved the film.

Atom Egoyan’s Adoration, com­ing on the heels of the largely dis­astrous Where the Truth Lies, returns the writer/director to the unstuck-in-time, jigsaw-puzzle-assembling struc­tures of his earli­er pic­tures; here, the top­ics are life fic­tions, dis­em­min­a­tion of inform­a­tion on the inter­net (this is in a sense the longest MacBook com­mer­cial ever), cul­tur­al dif­fer­ence, bigotry, and ter­ror­ism. At the heart of the pic­ture, though, is a sim­per­ing sanc­ti­mony that could well bring out the neo-con you nev­er knew you had in you. The “oh no, the nice old man is really a racist” theme is fairly tire­some, while a bit with fig­ures from a crèche is just, well, weak. Perhaps oth­ers less dam­aged than myself will be right­eously stirred.

I may or may not get into the new Cantet in any minute, and after that, more wrest­ling with Kaufman, and after that, Wenders’ The Palermo Shooting. Wenders, Hopper, Jovavich…and Lou Reed and Patti Smith as them­selves. Because when you think “Palermo,” you think Lou Reed and Patti Smith. Although, in fair­ness I have to note that I’ve heard that Palermo is a fairly hap­pen­ing gig for rock­ers of this undergound/post-underground ilk. So there’s a rationale for their pres­ence. We shall see…

UPDATE: At indieWIRE you can see what my grap­plings with Synedoche, New York, yiel­ded. Click here.

No Comments

  • bill says:

    I look for­ward to your review of “Synecdoche, New York”. So far, I remain uncon­vinced of Kaufman’s great­ness. Remove John Malkovich from “Being John Malkovich”, and you have the kind of story genre fic­tion writers of vary­ing abil­it­ies have been doing for dec­ades. The film’s stun­ning ori­gin­al­ity did­n’t stun me all that much. I was on board “Adaptation” for most of its length, but, reflect­ing back, real­ized how let down I was by the joke end­ing. And I hated “Human Nature”.
    I need to see “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” again, because I did­n’t really focus on it the one time I gave it a shot. I do remem­ber lik­ing Kaufman’s work on “Get a Life”, however.

  • bill says:

    Also, off top­ic, who wants to see the Spanish teas­er trail­er for “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”?
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=rbAPI8yZ83s
    That…uh, that looks like it might be pretty good, actually.

  • Bedheaded says:

    Terrific review of Synecdoche, Glenn, I’m really excited to see it. I pos­ted your review to my Facebook pro­file. Cheers!