
“How do you do; my name is Sabu…”
Over at the exemplary DVD-rating website DVD Beaver, some readers chime on Beavermeister Gary W. Tooze’s review of the new Criterion edition of Korda, Powell and company’s fabulous 1940 The Thief of Bagdad, expressing disappointment over the screen caps from the new version. Part of the controversy stems from Gary’s inability to get screen grabs from the 2002 MGM disc of the same film, which some of Gary’s correspondents feel has more vivid Technicolor. Reader Thomas says: “…compared to your screen captures of the Criterion, the MGM looks much more vibrant, like Technicolor looked in the forties, in the way of (albeit 1939) Wizard of Oz or Gone with the Wind. The Criterion in your captures looks much more muted, almost as if it was a colorized black and white image. In the MGM, the scene were June Duprez looks into the pool is a lovely shot, with fresh colors in her face and a vibrant lush background. The look of the Criterion disappoints me as looking rather drab…”
Hmm. Dave Kehr, in his review of the Criterion Bagdad in yesterday’s New York Times, avers that the new edition is “a striking improvement over the out-of-print MGM disc of 2002, with tighter, brighter colors and improved definition.” Now reasonable people can disagree about matters of visual taste, but Dave Kehr’s eye is second only to that of Dr. James Xavier’s in its prime. (I was once foolhardy enough to take minor issue with him over Fox’s botched DVD rendition of The Gang’s All Here, in part due to my boyish enthusiasm over the fact that it had made it to DVD in the first place. Fox is now redressing its error with a new master of the Busby Berkeley mindblower for inclusion in an upcoming Carmen Miranda box.)
In any case, I can get screen caps from the MGM edition. I’ve made a one-shot comparison with the Criterion, below the jump.
The shot is from the June Duprez pool scene cited by Tooze’s reader. Here’s the MGM version.
Nothing to sneeze at, really, and a reason why a lot of folks felt the MGM version, which was also pretty inexpensive, was better than acceptable. Below, the Criterion:
I see a significant boost in both vividness (the red lipstick here makes the red lipstick of the MGM look a little smeary) and detail (the beading on the vest, the bracelet), so I have to call advantage: Criterion. That said, I’m looking forward to sitting down and watching the whole thing again, and checking out the fab extras, which include the wartime propaganda Korda pic The Lion Has Wings. Grrr!


http://www.criterion.com/blog/2008_01_01_archive.html
Here you go, a post from Criterion’s blog on the elements they wound up using. I wouldn’t be surprised if the MGM disc was transferred from the mid-nineties print they mention as being slightly inferior. MGM’s home video arm was rock-solid but they couldn’t operate on a Criterion level.
Thanks for the captures – as you say, the Criterion looks subtly but significantly better.
For some reason I’m not seeing the comments section at DVD Beaver. Can someone point me there?
I am pretty certain the mid nineties print was used for the Pioneer Laserdisc of 1994–5. The colors are strong but the whole image has a blue-purple bias. Thus the opening scene of the boat and its prow and sails with ochres and orange reds looking distinctly brown, followed by a cut to Connie Veidt in the Technicolor red turban, which in this print looks a little more purple. And so it goes. The same print (as the laseridsc) was used for an Australian PAL DVD released around 2000 (at the same time as Four Feathers) and displays the same blue‑y bias.
My hunch would be both the MGM and the Criterion use the 70s print.
Beyond this the most substanrtial difference in image is what looks like some brightness boosting in the Criterion.
There’s no comments section at the Beav, Bryant. The quotes I cite were in the review, taken from e‑mails to Gary.
The first step towards successful Home Improvement Remodeling is to find out how much your home is presently worth. The next thing you need to know is what is the top sales price in your area – for totally updated and refurbished homes – of the same approximate size as your home. The difference between the present value of your home and the ceiling price of ‘like’ homes in your area is your maximum home improvement remodeling budget for all and any works you plan to do around your home. http://contractor-remodeling-home-repair.blogspot.com.