Today sees the release of of Warner Home Video’s most ambitious Blu-Ray package since the great Blade Runner set of last holiday season: The Clint Eastwood/Dirty Harry Ultimate Collector’s Edition, a most lavishly festooned package stuffed with some bemusing geegaws (e.g., a fairly cheesy mini-replica of Inspector Callahan’s badge and I.D. card). The movies, of course, are paramount. Were I to be ungenerous, I’d say that only the first picture, Don Siegel’s 1971 Dirty Harry, and the fourth, the 1983 Eastwood-directed Sudden Impact, were deserving of Blu-Ray treatment, but in this game, as the saying goes, deserve’s got nothing to do with it.
Dirty Harry remains a staggeringly compelling film. Siegel’s direction is taut, disciplined, ruthlessly effective. Far from fascist, the film plays now—especially in the light of Eastwood’s latest film, Changeling, which I saw at Cannes and you’ll see in a few months—as one of the earliest of Eastwood’s anti-authoritarian work.
I’ve been trying to use my new camera to get Blu-Ray images off my plasma screen, and the above shot, of Harry’s post-dedication opening, is one of my more creditable efforts. The vividness of the Blu-Ray picture is pretty startling.
I remember how bitterly disappointed my pals and I were with Dirty Harry’s followup, ’73’s Magnum Force, where Siegel was replaced by Ted Post, which is rather like having Chuck Mangione sit in for Clifford Brown. It takes screenwriter John Milius all of five minutes into his commentary on the disc to admit to the picture’s “cheesiness.” Well, yes. The Enforcer’s the directorial debut of stalwart Eastwood second unit man James Fargo, who would find his water level collaborating with Chuck Norris. Sudden Impact is a weird one, with Harry confronting nightmares somewhat beyond his ken; it’s a kind of diptych with the disturbing Tightrope, which Eastwood starred in the next year, and certain scenes have more of a horror movie feel than anything. The Dead Pool is a routinely entertaining Buddy Van Horn number, featuring early film appearances by Liam Neeson, Patricia Clarkson, and as everybody knows, Jim Carrey, lip-synching “Welcome to the Jungle.”
There are a helluva lot of extras, some more useful than others (I really have no interest in Michael Madsen’s musings on film critics, and I’m sure you don’t either, but here they are, in a featurette on Magnum about the politics of the Harry films), but most pretty solid. Say what you will about Schickel, his commentaries on Harry and Impact are almost as informative as they are worshipful.
Blogging’s gonna be light the next couple of days, as I cut open the middle finger of my right hand opening a can of food last night, and hadda go off to the ER and get six stitches. This makes inputting a drag, and additionally, I’m feeling pretty lame and stupid for having cut open the finger in the first place, so I’m going to luxuriate in some self-loathing for a bit. (Kidding. Mostly.) I doubt I’ll be gone too long.…
UPDATE: My dear friend Mr. Joseph Failla writes in with a cogent and affectionate defense of Magnum Force, below the fold.
Joe Failla writes:
As one of your pals who was initially bitterly disappointed with the inferior Dirty Harry sequel Magnum Force, I’ve learned to appreciate some of its most base elements over the years. Ted (Hang Em High*) Post is no Don Siegel and you would never confuse either film with the other even on a foggy night, but I once saw both films on a double bill (in reverse order!) and found myself immensely entertained.
No two films featuring the same character (played by the same actor) could be more thematically different than these. In Force, Eastwood’s Callahan does a complete turnaround by defending the very system he showed so much contempt for in the original. As one member of the secret death squad notes to Harry, “You of all people should understand.” But let’s face it, Dirty Harry was meant to be a one shot deal. When he tosses his badge away in that film’s conclusion, Harry was a man with no future. In the sequel, he’s reborn with a conscience and for the only time in the series does he have a private life. We see his apartment (a picture of his hit and run victim wife is on display), he has a fling with a pretty neighbor, and he attempts to help an old friend he believes to be cracking under pressure. Giving Harry a past and a future seems to be incongruous with his actions and almost spectral, iconic avenger status in the original/
Stylistically it’s an 180 degree turn also—at over 2 hours it feels bloated and, compared to the original,seems to move at a snail’s pace (not what you want in an action pic). But where it succeeds is in sheer nerve, particularly in how it details the many gory killings in close up (when was the last time you saw all the dead bodies twitch after dying in a non horror film?), and in a number of incredibly sleazy set ups (such as machine gunning and bombing a pool party, a pimp pouring Drano down his girl’s throat, a sex scene interrupted with gun play climaxing with a naked blonde falling from a high rise and a gangster impailed on a crane in the front seat on his Cadillac). We also get the normally likeable Hal Holbrook, David Soul and Robert Urich as devious villians, a “humorous” hijacking sequence (“Excuse me sir, but can you fly?”), and of course Harry’s wry musings at much of the carnage (“Shows a certain sense of style.” and the famous “A man’s got to know his limitations.”). Quite an offering of mayhem, considering Warners opened Force on Christmas Day in 1973.
While Force is not up to the original’s extraordinary drama and excitement, it ranks well as one of the better sequels. The Enforcer and The Dead Pool are pretty routine follow-ups that actually spoof the character rather than expand on him. Only Sudden Impact manages to strike a real chord again with its particular view of moral outrage. But by having Harry take out a diner full of gunmen, and in the end get Sondra Locke off the hook even though he knows she’s a killer, the film’s message is diluted in playing things both ways. Besides, Force is one of Michael Cimino’s earliest writing credits and made his directorial debut Thunderbolt and Lightfoot (also with Eastwood, and still one of the most peculiar of action films) possible…and the rest is history.
* We should indeed remember that Ted Post also helmed Hang ‘Em High, Eastwood’s first stateside project after the Dollars Trilogy. His direction there is so imitative of the Leone films, I hold more of a grudge against this than Magnum Force any day.

“Far from fascist, the film plays now … as one of the earliest of Eastwood’s anti-authoritarian work.”
Didn’t Pauline consider it fascist because Harry takes it upon himself to bend the law to his will? Can it be fascist and anti-authoritarian at the same time?
Kael always treated fascism/vigilantism as interchangeable terms of abuse, the key word here being “abuse.” Intellectually fastidious she wasn’t, at least not in her New Yorker years when she was discovering the bully pulpit.
If you get time and sufficient healing, I would love to hear more about how time has played up the anti-authoritarian angle. It’s been a few years since I last saw it, but not that many, and last time I met up with Harry he seemed as rightward as ever.
my condolences on your finger! Gad, I hope this self-injury thing isn’t a film-blogger trend, after I distinguished myself in February by breaking my nose. Take care of yourself!
I would think seeing Maagnum Force before Dirty Hary is the ideal way of viewing any two Dirty Harry movies as a double feature.
It’s interesting to note that the sequel to DH forced the filmmakers to give him a backstory. It’s the opposite of the Death Wish movies. The first one showed us Bronson as a businessman and loving husband and father. As the DW series progressed he became more of a force of nature.
It would seem the fact that Magnum Force wnet out of its way to do a political 180 confirms the charge of fascism against the original. The thing is I have no problem with DH being a fascist movie. I just wish the filmmakers would admit they were playing around with the idea. (For a more upfornt fascist cop movie rent the 1988 Cop with James Woods.)
I would like to offer a defense of the final DH movie , The Dead Pool. It has a pop vitality (or vulgarity) that makes it the perfect closing chapter of the series. Harry is still Harry, but we accept his faults (and virtues). Also, it has the best supporting cast of any of the Dirty Harry movies.
Given the liberal beliefs of Siegel and the writers, I thought then–and still do–that DH was intended as a sly satire of vigilante policemen, and that most people simply didn’t dig below the surface and accepted it at face value. (And the decidedly unambiguous pro-vigilante stand of MF seems to confirm it.) Am I alone in thinking this?
Reading the account of how the script of DH evolved (multiple drafts laid out on the floor and the “best bits” cherry-picked and pasted together) makes it easy for me to believe that the political subtext just got muddled in the process.
Siegel was a liberal who would never admit to playing with fascism because that’s not what he intended to do. But things like giving Scorpio a peace-symbol, intended to “make the audience think” tend to weight the film to the right. We’re supposed to question Harry but it doesn’t feel that way because Eastwood is Eastwood and Andy Robinson is so effectively loathsome. There’s an attempt at ambiguity but it doesn’t come off.
I love the aerial nighttime zoom-out at the football field. Harry, isolated among his colleagues, becomes literally isolated, finally just a pinpoint on the screen.
Nothing to do with Dirty Harry, just a belated followup to the Scene from a Marriage thread, but I thought I’d post it here so it’s not completely lost in the mists of time. I just read over at Blender that the Dino’s they were talking about was Dean Martin’s restaurant, and some of the hijinks that went on during its heyday. The reason that that might not be the first guess that’d come to someone’s mind is because, as they admit at the end of the article, there’s no way that that Dino’s would let a bunch like them through its front doors.
Nothing to do with Dirty Harry, just a belated followup to the Scene from a Marriage thread, but I thought I’d post it here so it’s not completely lost in the mists of time. I just read over at Blender that the Dino’s they were talking about was Dean Martin’s restaurant, and some of the hijinks that went on during its heyday. The reason that that might not be the first guess that’d come to someone’s mind is because, as they admit at the end of the article, there’s no way that that Dino’s would let a bunch like them through its front doors.
I don’t know, seeing “Dirty Harry” now it really feels a lot like the rest of the movie is filler for the “best bits” they picked out of various drafts. It’s certainly got some amazing moments but I’m not as blown away by it as I feel I was supposed to be.
I’ve read that there are problems with the stereo track (the one that’s on the BD is the same one that’s been used the past 10 years or so), i.e. that there are some incorrect music takes and replaced sound effects. Since the film was always mono, I would imagine they’d have to alter it to generate the stereo. Can you compare the stereo to one of the foreign dub tracks (which I believe are mono)?
I will check. Nothing struck me as particularly amiss, sound-wise, over a couple of viewings, though. In an ideal world, the original track should always be an option. In this case, as I’m away from my system, I’m not sure that isn’t the case here.