CriticsFilmMisc. inanity

En attendant Breillat

By June 27, 2008No Comments

Let it nev­er be said that I am the sole mem­ber of the Kenny house­hold who gets wound up over cer­tain movie writers/writing. Somehow, My Lovely Wife has got­ten her­self on the e‑mail list of a site called Women & Hollywood (sample post excerpt: “What’s inter­est­ing is that while high brow crit­ics on the one hand berate the low art of Sex and the City, they also val­id­ate its suc­cess pre­cisely because the con­ver­sa­tion about Top Girls and its cul­tur­al implic­a­tions would not be hap­pen­ing had Sex and the City not been the suc­cess it is. Sex and the City is a change mak­ing movie,” bold­face in ori­gin­al), and every week, like clock­work, I get an e‑mail from My Lovely Wife fum­ing about the sheer tun­nel­vi­sioned banal­ity con­tained therein. 

You’re going to love this one, par­tic­u­larly the para­graph on Catherine Breillat, from this woman who claims to be so ded­ic­ated to women in film,” MLW e‑mails me this morn­ing. The graph in question:

Also on tap this week­end is French dir­ect­or Catherine Breillat’s new peri­od piece The Last Mistress in lim­ited release. Having missed the screen­ing I can­’t give any assess­ment and I am embar­rassed to admit that I have nev­er seen one of her films. I have added her to my net­flix list and will be hope­fully catch­ing up on her work.

While I nev­er cease to admire My Lovely Wife’s feisti­ness, I can­’t work up much of a froth of indig­na­tion about this. Even many putat­ively enlightened and/or “edgy” fem­in­ist crit­ics (I’m not gonna name names, it’ll only get me in trouble) would prefer to engage Nancy Meyers over Lizzie Borden, Madonna over Diamanda Galas. Breillat is a mar­gin­al­ized pres­ence but she does get more atten­tion than oth­ers on account of both the rel­at­ive access­ib­il­ity (most of her pic­tures are lin­ear nar­rat­ive) and the putat­ively sen­sa­tion­al con­tent of her works. 

That said, I would love to see the fol­lowup report from the pro­pri­et­or of Women & Hollywood. I’m only hop­ing that she does­n’t do 2002’s rel­at­ively sub­dued Brief Crossing right off the bat. Because just about any oth­er Breillat pic­ture is likely to make this writer­’s head explode. 

Chicken_plucking

I’m think­ing of the chicken-plucking scene in Une Vraie Jeune Fille. Hell, I’m think­ing of any scene in Une Vraie Jeune Fille. The finale of A Ma Soeur (Fat Girl). The tea-brewing in Anatomy of Hell. Even the non-explicit stuff, like Annie Parillaud’s psy­cho­lo­gic­al mach­in­a­tions in Sex is Comedy, are of the stuff that is not dreamed of in Women & Hollywood’s philo­sophy. I eagerly await some verdicts.

Speaking of Breillat and chick­en, incid­ent­ally, I think the tone of The Last Mistress is defin­it­ively set in the open­ing scene, in a shot in which the Count of Prony (the ever great Michael Lonsdale) bites into a chick­en leg so shock­ing pink you believe that in the next scene he’ll be pro­nounced dead of sal­mon­ella. Indulgence and fleshly rot in one pithy, queasy moment. If you’re won­der­ing, I do adore the film. 

No Comments

  • Dave says:

    Speaking of Breillat and chick­en” is my favor­ite phrase of 2008 so far, even if it brings to mind Jim Morrison a bit too much.

  • Marina says:

    I was only vaguely famil­i­ar with Breillat, and then only from bits I’d gleaned through read­ing, when I went into my first Breillat film “The Last Mistress”. I was impressed by unapo­lo­get­ic depic­tion of “women in heat” and in the blunt and some­times equally ugli­ness and beauty of a few of her scenes, like the one you men­tion, but as a whole, I found the film tedi­ous to get through. I get the sense that Breillat is a film­maker whose works need to be approached care­fully. I’m will­ing to jump in…once I recover.

  • Dan says:

    True story: there was a “fem­in­ist” I knew in col­lege, the kind of woman who sneers at men for hav­ing a penis and gen­er­ally gives actu­al fem­in­ists headaches.
    She engaged me in con­ver­sa­tion once and asked me if I knew five female dir­ect­ors (I later found out this was for a home­work assign­ment). I lis­ted a bunch, includ­ing Penelope Spheeris.
    “Who’s that?”
    “She dir­ec­ted ‘The Decline of Western Civilization’.”
    “Huh?”
    “The only thing she’s dir­ec­ted that you’ve heard of is Wayne’s World.”
    “That was dir­ec­ted by a man.”
    “No, it was dir­ec­ted by Penelope Spheeris.”
    “Please, what woman would make a movie like THAT? I need a movie dir­ec­ted by a woman about WOMEN.”
    “OK, try ‘Swept Away’. Lina Wertmuller.”
    Hey, it fit her criteria.

  • bill says:

    I’ve only seen Fat Girl. It was quite a romp, all right. I knew what was com­ing, in a vague sort of way, and I still felt like someone had punched me in the face.

  • Ray says:

    The NY Times today reviewed “Mistress” in what seemed to me to be a kind of hes­it­ant, not quite approv­ing way. I’m anxious to see it both because I’ve always been stunned by every Breillat film I’ve seen, and because I would have thought the nov­el, by Barbey D’Aurevilly, would be about the last nov­el any­body would try to film. Barbey’s pre­face, by the way, cla­ri­fies that he felt he was writ­ing a deeply Catholic nov­el. I won­der if Breillat will have read it that way … Apart from his Catholicism and her postFeminism (which, true, is a pretty big “apart from”), they do have sim­il­ar sensibilities.

  • I like the Cinema but I want to see dif­fer­ent movies about sex with via­gra could you help me with that?

  • Oh my God! What is she doing!?

  • Viagra says:

    OMG she is pluck­ing a chick­en, it looks a little nasty.

  • That looks so funny, jajaja…

  • Soft Cialis says:

    Let it nev­er be said that I am the sole mem­ber of the Kenny house­hold who gets wound up over cer­tain movie writers/writing.