MoviesRumors

Slow down, pussycat

By August 7, 2008No Comments

Pussycat
Lori Williams in Russ Meyer’s Faster Pussycat…Kill! Kill!, 1965

A couple of my esteemed col­leagues have expressed slightly guarded enthu­si­asm over the extremely shaky pro­spect that Quentin Tarantino will dir­ect Britney Spears in a remake of Russ Meyer’s 1965 exploit­a­tion clas­sic Faster Pussycat…Kill! Kill!, but I can­’t say it pushes any of my but­tons, per­son­al or oth­er­wise. Of course the argu­ment that, for what it’s worth, Pussycat got made but good the first time isn’t gonna cut any ice if in fact a remake is in the cards. But really…Britney Spears. Who cares. Her cul­tur­al currency—which is entirely dis­tinct, as I’m sure you know, from tabloid currency—is as low as it’s ever been. She has­n’t had a zeitgeist-nailing hit since “Toxic,” four years ago, and it seems highly unlikely that she’ll be able to ever pull anoth­er such piece of out of wherever she used to pull them from, or any­where else. And indeed, her afore­men­tioned tabloid cur­rency is such that there aren’t many fol­low­ers of her exploits who would be inor­din­ately sur­prised if she signed on to be a Vivid con­tract girl at this point. Now, if she’d opted to make a move along such lines instead of doing that insip­id pile Crossroads back in 2002, that might have been some­thing. But now? Shrug.

I know, I know—Tarantino revived John Travolta’s career, and he could con­ceiv­ably do the same for Brit-Brit’s. Um, no. Travolta’s turn in Pulp Fiction demon­strated that he was still a better-than-capable per­former who remained quite able to turn on the cool. But, you know, he already had movie-performer chops, and boy, does Spears not. Whatever cred­ib­il­ity she has is as a pop icon rather than a per­former, and that will always be that. Having Tarantino hand-hold her through a turn as a loud­mouth psy­cho drag-racing les­bi­an strip­per will do exactly what for her at this point? 

One is slightly reminded of that old Onion story, “Marilyn Manson Now Going Door-To-Door Trying To Shock People.”

No Comments

  • Herman Scobie says:

    You mas­ter­fully summed up this mat­ter in two words: Who cares? QT him­self is drift­ing dan­ger­ously close to who-cares ter­rit­ory. He should con­cen­trate on fin­ish­ing one pro­ject before risk­ing ridicule with one even more unpromising.

  • Shhhhh says:

    If you have any interest (Lord knows, not me) in what it would look like had Britney Spears (circa 2001) done porn, all you have to do is check out some of Ashlynn Brooke’s work. She’s about as close to Hot Brit as you’re going to get.

  • The oth­er small item of con­cern is that the ori­gin­at­or of the role of Varla, non-actress Tura Satana, was ter­ri­fy­ingly phys­ic­al, a kar­ate expert who had self-confessedly hunted down and beaten or killed a group of men who assaul­ted her as a teen­ager. Britney Spears is, um, not.

  • man, I wish Faster Pussycat would come out on DVD.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Yeah, Maxim, the idea of her play­ing Varla is also ludicrous—if she’s even vaguely “right” for any role it’s Billie, the blonde strip­per seen above, played by Lori Williams. Is it too cruel to point out that by now she’s far too old to play Sue Bernard’s Linda?
    Rodrigo: There’s a British DVD of the pic out that’s not bad look­ing (it’s where I grabbed the screen grab from).

  • bill says:

    I’m hear­ing that this story isn’t actu­ally true. Which is a relief.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Indeed. You know, I nev­er actu­ally thought it would hold up. But I needed SOMETHING today—this week’s been one of those frus­trat­ing com­bos of thin inspir­a­tion and a lot of non-blog stuff that I have to do…

  • John says:

    This rumor has been uni­ver­sally decried as non­sense (thank good­ness). AICN–which pretty much has a dir­ect pipeline to Tarantino via his Austin film festivals–even pos­ted a story spe­cific­ally deny­ing it and point­ing out Tarantino is deep with­in pre-production on Inglorious Bastards. They com­pared it too someone claim­ing James Cameron is off shoot­ing Aliens 5 with Sigourney Weaver, des­pite over­whelm­ing evid­ence that they are mak­ing Avatar.
    It seems like a story made up by some­body with a super­fi­cial know­ledge of both Tarantino’s work (like, one vei­wing of Kill Bill) and an even more lim­ited idea of exploit­a­tion cinema.

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    Sheesh… thank god.
    Now will someone please dis­pel the nasty rumor that Robert Rodriguez has cast Rose McGowan as the She-Devil Red Sonja?
    🙂

  • Dan says:

    I auto­mat­ic­ally assume any media news repor­ted by the Telegraph is bull­shit, but this is even more so than usu­al. Why would Tarantino even want to ASSOCIATE with Spears, oth­er than try­ing to bang her? And why would he remake Russ Meyer? I’m sure he’s a fan but I doubt he has any tastes for remakes, or sex­ploit­a­tion movies (unless they involve feet).

  • Herman Scobie says:

    Now that Mel Gibson has decided to resume the Lethal Weapon series, he’ll find a part for his pal BS. She does­n’t look like a cop or a crim­in­al. Maybe she could play a … paparazzo. Or would that be paparazza?

  • Found it. Thanks Glenn!

  • cadavra says:

    You mean QT has­n’t banged her already?

  • Dan says:

    Cadavra…who knows? I could care less. Maybe he did bang her and that’s how the story got star­ted. But I’m lean­ing more towards sweaty fan­boy fantasy myself.