In Memoriam

The Greatest

By August 18, 2008No Comments

Mannyshow208I learned this morn­ing, via an e‑mail from a mutu­al friend who was very close to him, that the crit­ic and artist Manny Farber died last night, at his home in San Diego, aged 91. If you’ve nev­er read Farber, just stop here and get to it. His col­lec­ted cri­ti­cism, in a volume called Negative Space, is one of the touch­stone texts of film writing—tough-minded, sharp-eyed, idio­syn­crat­ic, often wildly funny, and with a bed­rock integ­rity and aes­thet­ic acu­ity that even best best of con­tem­por­ary film crit­ics are hard-pressed to approach, let alone match. He is most often cited for coin­ing the phrases “termite art” and “white-elephant art,” two opposed cat­egor­ies. What I found, and find, most valu­able in his cri­ti­cism is his abil­ity to appre­hend the entirety of a film—he got it from every angle. He could appre­ci­ate a B war pic­ture in the same sense that the guy on the street could, while fully com­pre­hend­ing its value as a work of modern/contemporary art. I’m away from my study, so I can­’t grab a copy of Space to quote from it willy-nilly. But I can say this: I doubt that Farber was par­tic­u­larly sur­prised by Godard’s Breathless, because his cri­ti­cism act­ively anti­cip­ated that film.
Farber’s sub­sequent work as a paint­er casts its own won­der­ful spell, one as exhil­ar­at­ing and spe­cif­ic as his cri­ti­cism. About Face, the cata­log from the exhib­it held at P.S. 1 in New York from a few years back, is a good intro­duc­tion. The paint­ings, in one sense, are object­ive demon­stra­tions of what he observed of “termite art,” which, accord­ing to Farber, “goes always for­ward eat­ing its own bound­ar­ies, and, like as not, leaves noth­ing in its path oth­er than the signs of eager, indus­tri­ous, unkempt activ­ity.” On the oth­er hand, they are beau­ti­fully con­tained, cogent works. 

He led a remark­able life and left us some remark­able gifts. I wish I’d known him. To those who did, my condolences. 

UPDATE: Several appre­ci­ations are now online. Here are a few.

J. Hoberman’s is here.

Ray Pride’s is here.

James Wolcott’s is here.

Jim Emerson’s is here.

The House Next Door’s Keith Uhlich has a pretty good round-up in the Links for the Day.

Finally, a short film by Paul Schrader on Manny Farber’s paint­ing Untitled: New Blue.

(Updated by Aaron Aradillas)

UPDATE, PART 2: A couple more appreciations.

Roger Ebert’s is here.

Jonathan Rosenbaum’s is here.

(Updated by Aaron Aradillas)

No Comments

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    There is an excel­lent short film about a paint­ing by Farber that Paul Schrader owns, “Untitled: New Blue”. You learn a lot about Farber from watch­ing the film. Schrader has it avail­able for view­ing at his site (which you turned me on to in one of your posts, Glenn). Here’s the link:
    http://www.paulschrader.org/untitledBlue.html

  • Well said. No oth­er crit­ic has left me feel­ing like a mote swirl­ing in his or her reful­gence. Indeed, it’s rare to find any writer so lively, con­tra­dict­ory, and thought­ful; so read­able and enga­ging; so end­lessly giv­ing in just one book of col­lec­ted essays. He’s helped me a ton. I ima­gine he will con­tin­ue to help. Words like his don’t disappear.
    And he was a dope paint­er, too. I can barely write a post every week, let alone cre­ate oth­er crap. I feel my size, and it is small. Miniscule.

  • MovieMan0283 says:

    It’s stu­pid, but I did­n’t real­ize he was still alive. Things have been tight, but I’ve been mean­ing to buy Negative Space for a few months now; I sup­pose this is extra incent­ive. The few pas­sages I’ve read were eye-opening and I think his influ­ence on cri­ti­cism and the medi­um has prob­ably been underrated.

  • Awwww, I’m sorry to hear that. I knew Manny pretty well through my father­’s work at UCSD … I enjoyed the man, and I loved his writ­ing. Thank you, Glenn, for post­ing this tribute.

  • Although I knew he was also a paint­er, the Manny Farber I first encountered in back issues of Film Culture and in col­lec­ted writ­ings like Negative Space (1971) was a bril­liant, spir­ited, clear-eyed, icon­o­clast­ic, no-nonsense film crit­ic. Essays like “White Elephant Art vs. Termite Art” (1962) were lean, mean, superbly on tar­get and amaz­ingly pres­ci­ent, cel­eb­rat­ing B‑films and mav­er­ick, mar­gin­al auteurs long before they became de rigueur among cine­astes. He was an early cham­pi­on of Howard Hawks, Preston Sturges, Val Lewton and Don Siegel, and penned some of the first American appre­ci­ations of Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Marguerite Duras, Werner Herzog, Chantal Akerman and oth­er 70s European avantgardists.
    His com­mit­ment to genre and grit, to eco­nom­ies of scale and pur­pose, to the joys of pulp and a con­trari­an, under­ground aes­thet­ic, were legendary. His prose was pugil­ist­ic, hard­boiled and decidedly inter­dis­cip­lin­ary, set­ting an example for future cul­tur­al crit­ics. He employed ref­er­ences from all over the spec­trum, draw­ing from abstract expres­sion­ist paint­ing, com­ics, pho­to­graphy, per­form­ance art, and from a wide ran­ging con­nois­seur­ship of tasty ver­nacu­lar forms. He was less lit­er­ary than visu­al, less con­cerned with polite plot ele­ments than vis­cer­ally engaged in the mise en scene. His best writ­ing seems to come from with­in the film, not as a crit­ic judging from on high but rather as a fel­low artist, intu­it­ively solv­ing prob­lems and think­ing on his feet along with the director.
    Farber elo­quently and mer­ci­lessly excor­i­ated the bloated, mind­less excesses of “good taste”, the hypo­crisy and cre­at­ive pre­ten­sions per­petu­ated by the Hollywood stu­dio sys­tem. He was a staunch foe of lazy, acqui­es­cent think­ing, of the pro­sa­ic and the middlebrow. He did not suf­fer fools gladly. In sup­port of his “small, mobile, intel­li­gent” strategy, he reveled in lan­guage that was dense, rhythmic, pun­gent and pre­cise as a jew­el cutter.
    Farber con­trib­uted reviews and essays to The New Republic, Time, The Nation, Film Comment, and Artforum, as well as to second tier stroke mags like Cavalier. Starting in the mid 70s, he was pro­fess­or at the University of California San Diego, and reg­u­larly exhib­ited his work. A ret­ro­spect­ive show of paint­ings, entitled About Face, opened at PS 1 in September 2004 after pre­vi­ously being presen­ted at the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego and the Austin Museum of Art in Texas.
    Farber began as an abstract paint­er but settled on fig­ur­a­tion in his mature work, to become a mas­ter of the idio­syn­crat­ic still life. The paint­ing below, Howard Hawks “A Dandy’s Gesture” (1978), is part of the “Auteur Series” (there are also pieces named for Anthony Mann and Luis Bunuel). It employs a scat­ter­shot arrange­ment of objects and note­pad draw­ings (ele­phant, air­plane, speed­boat, rail­road tracks, cattle, houses, chocol­ate can­dies), presen­ted out of scale and seem­ingly viewed from above, as if they are mini­atures on a workt­able or maquettes from a set design­er, a col­lec­tion of decon­tex­tu­al­ized sig­ni­fi­ers recall­ing some of the dir­ect­or’s most fam­ous efforts: To Have and Have Not, Twentieth Century, Hatari!, Red River.
    Like Robert Frank and Larry Rivers, Farber was the quint­es­sen­tial Jewish hip­ster, effort­lessly invent­ive and sub­vers­ive, an invet­er­ately wise­crack­ing word­smith, a kib­bitzer, an eld­er states­man of the coun­ter­cul­ture. Susan Sontag once said, “Manny Farber is the live­li­est, smartest, most ori­gin­al film crit­ic this coun­try has ever pro­duced … [his] mind and eye change the way you see.”

  • Carrie says:

    Lovely, Glenn. Can’t find your e‑mail address, so I’ll just link to my appreciation:
    http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/flickgrrl/