Movies

My Twelve.

By September 20, 2008No Comments

Had my pal Bill tagged me with this meme—twelve hard-to-see films you haven’t seen, which has kind of morph­ed into twelve films you haven’t seen but ought to have seen, period—ten years ago, when I first became chief film crit­ic at Première, he would have got­ten a lot more jaw-droppers out of me than what you’re going to find below. Yes, I was an avid “film buff” with a pretty wide-ranging know­ledge. But I had not yet seen, at that time, Only Angels Have Wings. That’s right. Not to men­tion To Have and Have Not. Or Make Way For Tomorrow. I took the job pretty seriously—as Roger Daltrey sang, “I get my BACK into my living”—and one of the first things I applied my leis­ure time to back then was plug­ging up the afore­men­tioned holes, and others. 

A lot of people I social­ize think I know everything about movies, but I’m strictly Triple A league com­pared to guys such as Kent Jones and Dave Kehr, to name only two col­leagues who are also friends. I was chat­ting with Kent recently and the Michael-Curtiz-directed Al Jolson vehicle Mammy came up; I, with a cer­tain osten­ta­tious con­fid­ence, pro­nounced it Curtiz’s worst film. Kent wrinkled his brow, said “Well…” and reeled off three titles, one a film I had for­got­ten, two, films I had­n’t seen.

Still. When put­ting this list togeth­er I had a bunch of books by my side; going through Jonathan Rosenbaum’s “1000 Favorites” appendix in his won­der­ful Essential Cinema, I gave myself a little pat on the back. The odd extremely early Ozu and a couple of the films cited below aside, I found I was keep­ing up with one of the most thoroughly-knowledgeable-American-film-critics-ever fairly nicely. So my life has­n’t been wasted. 

Of course, a cinephile’s work is nev­er done, and a film crit­ic’s learn­ing curve nev­er goes down. So. In no par­tic­u­lar order. 
7footprints_2

1: Seven Footprints to Satan, 1929, Benjamin Christensen
Ever since I first read Carlos Clarens’ An Illustrated History of Horror and Science Fiction Films back when I was ten or so, I’ve made a pro­ject of try­ing to see every single film cited therein. With the excep­tion of the lost ones, which, you know, nobody can see. I’ve done all right. Out of the 350 or so pic­tures lis­ted in that book’s appendix, I’m miss­ing few­er than fif­teen of the ones that actu­ally still exist. Yep, I’ve seen the 1933 earth­quake movie Deluge—albeit in an Italian-dubbed print. You do what you have to. In any case, this pic­ture, the fifth American pic­ture by Danish dir­ect­or Christensen (whose 1922 Haxan is anoth­er hor­ror clas­sic) was long con­sidered lost­but is now not, and yet I have failed to keep up with it. It’s not on DVD yet. Also, those would appear to be sev­en stairs to Satan, not sev­en foot­prints. The swell rock combo Luna actu­ally made this cor­rec­tion on a song title on its album Days of Our Nights.
The_damned_1_sht_2

2: These Are The Damned, 1963, Joseph Losey
Another one I read about in Clarens. “The pic­ture is one of the most lucid in Losey’s career, and one of his most accom­plished. The director…here achieves a fine bal­ance between the elu­cid­a­tions of the obvi­ous and the enlight­en­ments of the subtle.” Plus, Oliver Reed is in it. Given that this has shown up on TCM recently in a longer print than has pre­vi­ously been seen in the U.S. (which print inspired the great Tim Lucas to new crit­ic­al height on his Video Watchdog blog), my only excuse now for not hav­ing seen this is a pretty pathet­ic one, centered around my lax­ness in keep­ing tabs on TCM’s schedule. 

3: Illusion Travels By Streetcar, 1954, Luis Bunuel
You happy now? I’m sure I’ve cited Bunuel as my favor­ite dir­ect­or on more than one occa­sion, and yet, here it is. A com­edy from his Mexican peri­od, now con­sidered suf­fi­ciently canon­ic­al that a very good new film blog is named for it. 871399lailusionviajaentranviaOne of the reas­ons I hes­it­ated in accept­ing this tag is that I feared it would be expensive—that, as I uncovered cer­tain gaps, I would feel com­pelled to fill them, with no regard for good sense. Hence, there’s what I’m quite cer­tain is going to be a wretched DVD of this film in my Amazon shop­ping cart even as we speak. Aaargh.

Images
4: Bachelor Flat, 1962, Frank Tashlin
Longtime read­ers may also recall my ador­a­tion of Mr. Tashlin, from Son of Paleface to Artists and Models to The Girl Can’t Help It (duh) to Hollywood or Bust (duh) to Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter (duh)…and, yeah, we stop short dir­ectly before the entirely inex­plic­able The Private Navy of Sgt. O’Farrell, one of the sad­dest “what the hell happened?” pic­tures ever made. And for all that I’ve man­aged to miss this Terry-Thomas/Tuesday Weld pic­ture, which Andrew Sarris calls his best. 
Sands
5: Sands of Iwo Jima, 1949, Allan Dwan
Yeah, I’ve seen scenes from it—who hasn’t?—but I don’t believe I’ve ever sat through this icon­ic WWII pic in its entirety. “It may very well be that Dwan will turn out to be the last of the old mas­ters,” Sarris wrote in The American Cinema, and sub­sequent work on Dwan by vari­ous crit­ics has been devoted to ful­filling his quasi-prediction. As it hap­pens, Dwan is one of two Hollywood old mas­ters that I’m still pretty weak on. The oth­er is at #12.

6: Alex In Wonderland, 1970, Paul Mazursky
I don’t really con­sider this a gap­ing hole in my cine­mat­ic know­ledge, as I’ve seen a suf­fi­cient amount of Mazursky—near-great, bad, and indifferent—that I’ve got a reas­on­able handle on him. But I do enjoy movies about movie­mak­ing and movie­makers, and while I doubt this counter-culture Hollywood homage to 8 1/2 has dated par­tic­u­larly well, I ima­gine it’s got more than a bit of time-capsule interest. I’m quite curi­ous, let’s say.

7: The Reluctant Débutante, 1958, Vincente Minnelli
One of my Minnelli gaps, and a sig­ni­fic­ant one, too; check out the com­ment thread dis­cuss­ing it over at Dave Kehr’s blog. (Which I can­’t find now. It was­n’t related to an actu­al post sub­ject, it was a tan­gent about what con­sti­tuted an auteur…) Not on DVD, domest­ic or for­eign, and no sign of it to come either. Gotta keep scour­ing that TCM schedule…196841thereluctantdebutanteposter_2

8:The Rise of Louis XIV, 1966, Roberto Rossellini
This late work from the Italian mas­ter, a cos­tume doc­u­ment­ary if you will, is said to be as ground­break­ing as the early neor­eal­ist films (Open City, Germany Year Zero) and the sear­ing, intim­ate dra­mas of the ’50s (Voyage in Italy, Stromboli). All of this stuff remains shame­fully dif­fi­cult to see prop­erly. This as much as any­thing. But still. 

9: La Chambre Vert, 1978, Francois Truffaut
My sole Truffaut gap is an adapt­a­tion of a Henry James work that many have called the dir­ect­or’s most per­son­al film. He also stars, as a death-obsessed wid­ower. Sounds like a lot of laughs. But, seriously…next Truffaut reviv­al that comes around, there I am. 

10: Wild River, 1960, Elia Kazan
Kazan’s second col­or film (the first was East of Eden) is sup­posed to be a pretty intense social drama with a pretty intense romantic sub­plot and an appro­pri­ately intense per­form­ance from Montgomery Clift. Gotta get to it…

11: Alice’s Restaurant, 1969, Arthur Penn
Interesting that Penn’s feature-film fol­lowup to Bonnie and Clyde would be a por­tray­al of a dif­fer­ent sort of rebel—the coun­ter­cul­ture here embod­ied by the gentle and sar­don­ic Arlo Guthrie, son of Woody. Alices_restaurant_sc_7 Arlo was slammed at the time for being no kind of act­or, and the pic­ture itself was dis­missed as kind of des­ultory, but its repu­ta­tion has grown over time and I’m look­ing for­ward to see­ing in Anthology Film Archives’ upcom­ing Penn retrospective. 
Borzhistory_is_made__at_nightprev_2

12: History Is Made At Night, 1937, Frank Borzage
Borzage is the oth­er old mas­ter I need to do some major catch­ing up with, which is one reas­on I’m look­ing for­ward to the Murnau, Borzage and Fox (is that what it’s actu­ally called?) box set com­ing out this winter. This 1937 romantic drama with Charles Boyer and Jean Arthur is in some circles con­sidered the quint­es­sen­tial sound-era Borzage pic­ture. Apparently when Bruce Springsteen and Jon Landau were try­ing to fig­ure out what title to give the album that sub­sequently became Born in the U.S.A., they combed through the index of Sarris’ The American Cinema, and very nearly settled on History.

I missed an oppor­tun­ity to see the film fairly recently. In the late spring, the Film Society of Lincoln Center had a major Boyer ret­ro­spect­ive, and I was all set to see an 11 a.m. screen­ing of it at the Walter Reed on May 8. Around 10:30 the night before I star­ted get­ting these e‑mails from someone I’ll refer to here as The Admirable Crichton. T.A.C. had recently been brought on at Hachette as the second-in-command of its new digit­al divi­sion head, the putat­ive boy won­der I’ll here refer to as Vin Ethanol. The plushly-British-accented T.A.C. some­times played Good Cop to Ethanol’s not-entirely-convincing Alpha Male, and the inquir­ies that fol­low are best read in a plummy voice. “Glenn,” read the first, “Vin believes that it’s very import­ant that you be able to attend a meet­ing in the 41st floor con­fer­ence room tomor­row at 10. Will you be able to make it?” 

Oh, my,” I thought, “is the ham­mer actu­ally going to come down NOW? Just before Cannes?” Despite my per­turb­ance, I decided to get a bit cheeky with T.A.C. “Well,” I e‑mailed back, “I have a screen­ing tomor­row at 11. Just how long is this meet­ing going to take?” Ar ar ar. “I believe,” T.A.C. wrote back, “that it would be best if you really just cleared the decks for the day.” So that was it then. I went in, the meet­ing was pushed to 10:30, Mr. Ethanol was ten minutes late for that, and I had to spend the rest of the day clean­ing out (up to a point) my office. People some­times still ask me about the getting-terminated-from-Première.com epis­ode, and when I tell them about it, I’ll gen­er­ally refer to Ethanol in terms of art along the lines of “gigant­ic douchenozzle” and “shiny-headed twat.”

Wow,” my inter­locuters will say. “You sound like you’re still pretty bit­ter about the whole thing.”

Not so much,” I reply. “Save for the exact tim­ing, I abso­lutely saw it com­ing. Thing is, that goat-felching prick made me miss History Is Made At Night.”

And with that, I tag my Close Personal Friend Filmbrain. (It was between him and Lauren Wissot.) Take it away! 

UPDATE: The Brain has respon­ded with alac­rity, and his list an eye-opener—another elev­en I’m now dying to see…

No Comments

  • Brian says:

    Definitely see La Chambre Vert– I think it’s the most under­rated of all Truffaut’s films, and one of the most heart­felt. Much more so than Day For Night, I think it cap­tures the spir­it of Truffaut’s cinephil­ia in all its mel­an­choly glory.
    I know The Reluctant Débutante was on laser­disc at one point– I dubbed a copy out of our school’s media lib­rary– so if you’re inter­ested, you might look on Ebay or the online movie source of your choice for a used copy.
    Thanks for shar­ing a cool list– I haven’t even heard of half of these, but they all sound great, par­tic­u­larly the Borzage (I’m a big fan of The Mortal Storm).

  • bill says:

    Sometimes – often, even – I’m reminded that I don’t even know what I don’t know about movies. I mean, this list…sheesh. At least I know who pretty much all these people are, but I’ve heard of prob­ably only half of the films them­selves, and even though I know of Tashlin and Borzage and Losey, I’ve seen none of their work. How depressing.
    I’m filling as many of my numer­ous gaps as I pos­sibly can with great­er speed now than ever before, but some­times it feels like such a slow pro­cess. I need to find a big sack of drug money that fell out of a plane, so I can quit my job and really buckle down. I’ll let you know how that goes.
    Anyway, great list, Glenn, and thanks for tak­ing part. Oh, and I have that Carlos Clarens book on my Amazon Wishlist, and it may have to be my next purchase.

  • Jandy says:

    Wow, I’ve seen films that Glenn Kenny has­n’t! Not that it mat­ters in the whole scheme of film cri­ti­cism. I think The Reluctant Débutante has been on VHS, too…I know I’ve seen it, and I’m pretty sure it was­n’t on TCM.

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    Glenn,
    I’m glad you got around to the meme. I had tagged you on this same meme back dur­ing your recent vaca­tion, but I guess you missed it.
    You should check out my list (I’m sure you’ve seen these, but I can­’t believe they’re not on video yet):
    http://www.cinemaviewfinder.com/2008/08/my-12-holy-grail-films.html
    Movieman0283 over at The Dancing Image (who com­ments here from time to time) actu­ally ori­gin­ated this iter­a­tion of the meme. Here’s his list:
    http://thedancingimage.blogspot.com/2008/08/another-dirty-dozen.html
    Anyone else have some lists they care to share?

  • Campaspe says:

    TCM does show The Reluctant Débutante from time to time, that’s how I caught it. I will have to check out the Kehr thread. Fox Movie Channel has Wild River in rota­tion at the moment, I need to see that one too.

  • Bruce Reid says:

    Just for fun I checked IMDB to see if what’s prob­ably my biggest auteur­ist blind spot could cov­er all 12–and it turns out Erich von Stroheim, whose works as a dir­ect­or I’ve nev­er seen, is cred­ited with a dozen movies.
    Which leads less to regret for my mis­spent past than excited plan­ning for my future.

  • Griff says:

    Mazursky’s ALEX IN WONDERLAND is def­in­itely worth a look. This once appeared on vhs, but the col­ors were a bit off; a shame, as Laszlo Kovacs’ fine lens­ing is one of the film’s great assets. It is slow and has many dull pas­sages, but there are three or four sequences that make the film worth­while, at least for cineastes.
    In a scene that must have been some­thing of a thrill to shoot – Mazursky dis­cusses it in his mem­oir – Donald Sutherland’s Alex hap­pens upon Fellini in his Rome cut­ting room and begins shower­ing the dir­ect­or with inar­tic­u­late praise; the Maestro, unim­pressed, just wants to be left alone to do his work. [There are Fellini allu­sions aplenty in the film.]
    Later, in an appar­ent fantasy sequence, Alex is brows­ing film stills in front of Larry Edmunds’ Bookshop on Hollywood Boulevard; Jeanne Moreau walks up. Alex is excited, prac­tic­ally recit­ing her cred­its to her. She smiles enig­mat­ic­ally, and starts to sing a song; they ride off togeth­er down the boulevard in an eleg­ant horse-drawn carriage.
    The film’s major fantasy sequence is the Vietnam war scene, set on Hollywood Blvd. (we see that the Vogue is show­ing LET IT BE), replete with explo­sions, smoke, flames, sol­diers, bod­ies, vil­la­gers, scored with Doris Day’s record­ing of “Hooray for Hollywood.” We see Alex both trapped in the war­fare and also on an impossibly high cam­era boom over­see­ing and appar­ently dir­ect­ing the action. Then, with the battle at its height, Jeanne Moreau reappears and begins to sing again…
    The oth­er sequence people remem­ber from the film is Alex’s lunch with the MGM pro­du­cer (played by Mazursky) who pro­poses sev­er­al hil­ari­ous pro­jects for the hot new dir­ect­or, includ­ing a film about a girl who has a heart trans­plant (don’t ask), and when Alex admires the Chagall on his office wall, he tries to give it to him. I don’t know wheth­er the scene works very well, but it makes its point, and one can ima­gine that Mazursky had taken quite sim­il­ar meet­ings after his suc­cess with BOB & CAROL & TED & ALICE.
    I like this film very much as a product of its time. [You will need to put your mind­set pretty firmly in 1970 to get much out of this.] It’s ter­ribly inter­est­ing, even if it is a movie about a dir­ect­or who can­’t decide what pic­ture, or even what _kind_ of pic­ture, that he wants to make. Sutherland is good – he cer­tainly does everything Mazursky asks of him – and Ellen Burstyn is funny, affect­ing, and lov­ingly annoyed. She makes a great deal out of a rel­at­ively minor part; this cer­tainly got her the LAST PICTURE SHOW role. NY theatre dir­ect­or Tom O’Horgan com­posed the film’s odd but effect­ive score.
    Almost forty years after its release, ALICE’S RESTAURANT is still one of my favor­ite movies; I hope you like it when you see it. Remember, if you see BACHELOR FLAT, you will need to see it in ‘Scope – skip the flat trans­fer. THE GREEN ROOM is small but good; this was Truffaut’s most ambi­tious film per­form­ance, and he is quietly mov­ing. WILD RIVER is really good and very ori­gin­al; it’s much dif­fer­ent from your little descrip­tion. [For one thing, the “intense” per­form­ance in the film is by Jo Van Fleet.]
    THESE ARE THE DAMNED was a great recent rev­el­a­tion – don’t both­er with the short ver­sion; the long ver­sion is the one to see.

  • Dan says:

    My list can be found here:
    http://thetathx1138.livejournal.com/626064.html
    It was amus­ing when I finally put it all togeth­er: I think the film I really want to see the most is “Pulgasauri”, just because everything about it is com­pletely mad.

  • cadavra says:

    BACHELOR FLAT also turns up on Fox Movie Channel from time to time.
    WILD RIVER is prob­ably my favor­ite Kazan–an utterly spell­bind­ing film. And if you must watch it on TV, only do so when let­ter­boxed (it, not you).
    I’m push­ing Sony to release THESE ARE THE DAMNED on DVD next year for the Losey Centennial. Stay tuned. (But has­n’t it run at the Film Forum once or twice?)
    As for SANDS OF IWO JIMA…well, you simply have no excuse, private.

  • You – and all of us – are in luck, Glenn. Rossellini’s ‘Louis’ + six or so of the “his­tory” films will be com­ing out via Criterion some time next year, it seems – across standalone-Criterion and Eclipse box-set releases (non-overlapping). Yes, ‘Louis’ is a mas­ter­piece… but all of them are. And ‘Il Messia’ / ‘The Messiah’… there are no words. (Metaphorically I mean; there is, very much, logos.)
    As for Truffaut, man, talk about being ill-served on Region 1, past 1963 (and the ‘Fahrenheit’ and ‘Day for Night’ releases, and the mar­velous Doinel box from Criterion). I don’t know what’s tak­ing so long to get ‘A Gorgeous Girl Like Me’ / ‘Une belle fille comme moi’ out here, for example…
    And won­der­ing wheth­er we’ll be wait­ing anoth­er 10 years for the next Rohmer box.
    craig.

  • Dan says:

    @craig keller
    Where’d you get the word on Criterion’s upcom­ing Eclipse release sched­ule? I know Rossellini had been hin­ted at on the blog but info is mad­den­ingly sparse on that line, a prob­lem right from the begin­ning. I can under­stand why, of course, they don’t want to prom­ise some­thing and have the rights yanked (I heard a rumor that this was why the Shepitko set was only two discs), but I love the anti­cip­a­tion of a new release.

  • bill says:

    Craig, do you know if “Paisan” will be part of that?

  • D Cairns says:

    I was moved to quote from Robert Parrish’s auto­bi­o­graphy, in ref­er­ence to History is Made at Night. Might con­tain a slight spoil­er if you don’t know about THE SHIP:
    http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/soap-gets-in-your-eyes/
    The movie has the most extraordin­ary first half – romantic bey­ond words. I struggled slightly with the end­ing, but I sus­pect I’ll be fine with it on a second view­ing. “The tri­umph of love over plaus­ib­il­ity” being one of Borzage’s abid­ing themes.
    Moonrise is the Borz film that blew my hat off. Not like any­thing else, but more like a silent film, or Night of the Hunter, than any­thing else.

  • D Cairns says:

    Actually, I might list 12 of my own, even if nobody tags me. It sounds like fun, and I could def­in­itely appall some people with the stuff I haven’t caught.

  • Dan says:

    Moonrise is the Borz film that blew my hat off. Not like any­thing else, but more like a silent film, or Night of the Hunter, than any­thing else.”
    Awwwww, damn it, not on Netflix. I’m intensely curi­ous about this one now.

  • Mike Grost says:

    The news about Rossellini is great!
    I saw “Louis XIV” at the cam­pus film soci­ety in 1973. But so many oth­ers have nev­er had a chance to see.
    My list of unseens would go into 1200 or 12, 000! Other people are way ahead here of me…
    Rosenbaum’s won­der­ful list is full of post-1970 movies that are so hard to see: not out on DVD, nev­er shown on cable… I’m see­ing more and more of his list, but have so many more to go. The Good News: this means lots of good view­ing ahead.
    Read A. Merritt’s nov­el “Seven Footprints to Satan”. It opens with plot events that bear a fam­ily resemb­lance to the open­ing scenes of “North By Northwest”. Not real close: second cous­ins. Have nev­er seen the movie.

  • Campaspe says:

    David, I was going to tag you! I am work­ing on mine, should be up tomorrow.

  • Jim Flannery says:

    I haven’t seen the Christensen, did­n’t even know it exis­ted (sigh … anoth­er Grail for the file … darn ya), but at least in the A. Merritt nov­el it’s based on (and named after), the Foot*prints* is a def­in­ite plot point (yes, related to the stairs in the still) that’d be unne­ces­sar­ily spoil­er­ish to explain. But it’s not an error.

  • Nathan Duke says:

    Hey Glenn,
    Great post. “Alex in Wonderland” and “Wild River” are avail­able at Kim’s on St. Marks. Maybe you can help with some of these impossible-to-find films that I’ve searched for for years:
    City of Sadness, A Brighter Summer Day, Manila in the Claws of Brightness, The Revolutionary (1970), Adalen 31, India Song, Hanyo and The Asthenic Syndrome.

  • Of your twelve, I have not seen three (Bunuel, Christensen, and Truffaut). I could have seen the Truffaut the­at­ric­ally but did­n’t. Losey is very under-represented on DVD. I have a Borzage on my list, by the way. Too bad you can­’t see Bachelor Flat on a theat­er screen to enjoy the glory that is Jessica Dachshund the way she was meant to be seen.

  • D Cairns says:

    Combining Region 1 and Region 2 releases, nearly everything by Losey is avail­able! Well, maybe I exag­ger­ate slightly, but when I decided to get into his work in a big way, there were only a few films that I had to source through unof­fi­cial chan­nels. Of course, the qual­ity of the Assassination of Trotsky DVD is so bad you might as well watch a VHS off-air…
    What is frus­trat­ing is that it’s easi­er to get a minor/unsuccessful Losey like A Doll’s House than a major one like The Damned.

  • Lost in the Sixties and Seventies: A Dozen I’d Kill to See

    I’ve been tagged by Glenn Kenny for the Twelve Films You Haven’t Seen meme, and I have to admit I was­n’t sure how to approach the sub­ject. Some people are choos­ing hard-to-find titles, while oth­ers are con­fess­ing easily-filled gaps in

  • Filmbrain says:

    Glenn –
    Thanks for the tag – that was fun. My post is up.
    http://www.filmbrain.com/filmbrain/2008/09/lost-in-the-six.html

  • Herman Scobie says:

    Of Glenn’s list, I’ve seen 2–7 and 9–12 but only because I’m the 38th old­est per­son on the plan­et. I’ve seen part of 8 but am embar­rassed to say I’ve nev­er been able to make it through any­thing by Rossellini, des­pite five tries. My 12 would come from the films Max Ophuls made before The Exile. Had a chance to see some of these at the Film Society of Lincoln Center a few years back but had the flu. Encourage list­makers to con­sider Angel on the Amazon and Shack Out on 101, two of the most fas­cin­at­ing bad films ever made.

  • Jim Gerow says:

    I’ve seen all of these except the Christensen, and all but the Mazursky are must-see. In addi­tion to Clift’s per­form­ance in Wild River, Lee Remick and Jo Van Fleet are breath­tak­ingly good, as are Kazan’s remark­able Scope com­pos­i­tions. I remem­ber Truffaut’s Green Room being quite odd and power­ful, but I haven’t seen it in some time.
    I’ve been an ama­teur cinephile since about 1970, so my list, aided and abet­ted by Rosenbaum’s essen­tial list, is much rarer than the aver­age, but here goes (in chro­no­lo­gic­al order), and I had to stretch it to eleven:
    Griffith’s The Avenging Conscience
    Lubitsch’s Three Women
    Renoir’s La Nuit du Carrefour
    Ophuls’s Sans lendemain
    Potter’s Hellzapoppin’
    Gremillon’s Lumière d’été
    William Castle’s When Strangers Marry
    McCarey’s Good Sam
    Schroeter’s The Death of Maria Malibran
    de Oliveira’s Doomed Love
    Edward Yang’s A Confucian Confusion
    I’d throw in sev­er­al silent Ozus and some Sacha Guitry if there was more room. The Griffith is com­ing soon to DVD from Kino, along with some unseen early 30’s Borzages in that Fox box set.

  • Dan says:

    Oh, I for­got to men­tion, Glenn, if you haven’t heard it already, seek out the Austin Lounge Lizards’ hil­ari­ous “The Illusion Travels by Stock Car”. Just go in cold. You’ll love it.

  • R. Hunt says:

    Alice’s Restaurant” is one of the best and sad­dest films about “the end of the Sixties” and would make a great double fea­ture with “The Big Chill”. “Alex in Wonderland” is a mess, though i won­der if how it com­pares to “The Pickle”. And “The Green Room” is an excel­lent and dark look at death, and a worthy inter­pret­a­tion of “The Beast in the jungle”.

  • MovieMan0283 says:

    Glenn,
    It looks like my first post did­n’t go through – I wanted to thank you for respond­ing, but also throw out my ori­gin­al post (I see Tony did that for me – thanks, Tony). One of the ori­gin­al “rules” (in fact the only one) was that par­ti­cipants give a shout-out to my blog, as well as Out 1 & Lazy Eye Theatre for get­ting the ball rolling. Could you add this to your intro?
    Sands of Iwo Jima seems to be on TCM every now and then, but like you I have yet to catch it.

  • bill says:

    Eep. Sorry, Movieman, I did­n’t know that rule. I’ll go add those links…

  • Well-chosen: Wild River, These Are the Damned, and Bachelor Flat are all under­rated gems. Alice’s Restaurant, not so much – dated hip­pie oddity, alas.

  • Ellen Kirby says:

    I recall enjoy­ing Alex quite a bit when I was a young sprout but see­ing how my rela­tion­ship to its inspir­a­tion has mutated over the years I don’t know if I’d feel the same now: I came away impressed by my first view­ing of 8 1/2, then spent three more view­ings over the years grow­ing increas­ingly annoyed, and in the middle of the third one, finally turned it off. Can’t com­pletely artic­u­late why, though a line from Robert Christgau (writ­ing about Lou Barlow) cov­ers a big chunk of it: “…Barlow, who I only wish did like Ann Powers says and paraded his faults to prove his hon­esty. As with all self-made wimps, the hustle is more insidious–his hon­esty is sup­posed to jus­ti­fy his faults.”

  • MovieMan0283 says:

    Thanks, bill – I’m hop­ing to do a com­pos­ite list soon with all the movies every­one chose. Luckily that list keeps grow­ing so I’m hold­ing off for now but it should be an inter­est­ing selection.

  • Wow, I’ve missed out on a few of those! Thanks for the great list!

  • comedy films says:

    Hey. you put some great fims on a luc­rat­ive list!i really love “Bachelor Flat”, a deep movie­its easy to see how Frank Tashlin knew what he was doing. every­one who did­nt see, must see it asap