Asides

A final thought on "Tropic Thunder"

By November 15, 2008No Comments

My Lovely Wife and I were watch­ing the very nice Blu-ray of this tonight, and sud­denly an apo­cryph­al rock story came to mind. That being: one night in some anonym­ous dress­ing room in the ’70s one Peter Grant spies one Bob Dylan, and approaches him. Mr. Grant intro­duces him­self to Mr. Dylan thusly: “My name is Peter Grant. I man­age Led Zeppelin.” Without drop­ping a beat, Mr. Dylan replies, “I don’t come to you with my problems.”

Tropic Thunder works very hard to con­vey that Hollywood is filled with posers and pricks. First of all, no shit. Secondly, what does the film expect US to do about it? 

No Comments

  • lilspritex says:

    Secondly, what does the film expect US to do about it?”
    Nothing, except laugh and jeer.

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    It did­n’t even do a good job of that.

  • B.W. says:

    I would’ve accep­ted those no-shit mes­sages about Hollywood if the film had­n’t doubled as exactly the kind of movie it should have been mak­ing fun of: a big, bloated, bland action epic. If the ratio of laughs to explo­sions did­n’t tip so decis­ively in favor of the lat­ter, I’d be sat­is­fied. Alas, we got stuck with anoth­er damn action-comedy. This year has not been a good one for film com­ed­ies. Thank god for 30 Rock, is all I have to say.

  • D Cairns says:

    I guess the “no shit” factor works in the film’s favour, at least com­mer­cially: the shared under­stand­ing that most movie stars are assholes is the premise we can all agree on, so audi­ences turn up hop­ing to see that played out in an amus­ing way. Like “cats chase mice” is the “no shit” premise of Tom & Jerry cartoons.
    I laughed quite a bit at Tropic Thunder. Not sure I ever want to see it again, but it was enjoy­able once.
    As to the “what to do about it” thing, maybe most big-budget com­ed­ies, and most com­ed­ies gen­er­ally, aren’t really inten­ded as a call to action. Beyond invit­ing us to laugh at that which is ridiculous.
    The prob­lem for me was maybe some inde­cision as to wheth­er the char­ac­ters are sup­posed to have changed, improved, or wheth­er they’re still the same assholes. The lat­ter option, if embraced whole­heartedly, would be fun­ni­er and more true, but might inval­id­ate the movie exper­i­ence on a cer­tain level, at least for some.

  • MovieMan0283 says:

    Perhaps it expects us to admire it for dis­dain­ing the very milieu it name-drops and cel­eb­rates? I have to admit I haven’t seen this one yet. However, I’m skep­tic­al of any film which expects us to laugh WITH Tom Cruise…

  • Griff says:

    I could­n’t help think­ing the movie would have been fun­ni­er and more sat­is­fy­ing if it had been at least a bit more mod­est in scale. The idea of a super­pro­duc­tion mak­ing fun of super­pro­duc­tions just does­n’t work very well. It needed bet­ter jokes, not more scope and pro­duc­tion value.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    With that last sen­tence, you’ve also explained what’s gone wrong with the com­ics industry these past ten years.

  • Bill C says:

    How do you make fun of super­pro­duc­tions without being a super­pro­duc­tion, though? I’ve seen it attemp­ted before, but the chintzy evoc­a­tion of Hollywood bloat always gets in the way of the joke and starts to look more like sour grapes than like satire.

  • Hugo says:

    Superbly writ­ten. No won­der one Coen broth­er is part of this. And I’m sure Justin Theroux learned a thing or two from Lynch. The shuff­ling between the nes­ted real­it­ies is impeccable.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Hugo, hate to break it to you, but “Etan Cohen,” the co-writer of “Tropic Thunder,” and “Ethan Coen,” of the Coen Brothers, are two entirely dif­fer­ent people.

  • Hugo says:

    So they say.…