HousekeepingMovies

"The People vs. George Lucas" teaser trailer

By February 13, 2009No Comments

Filmmaker Alexandre Philippe, who in 2004 made Earthlings: Ugly Bags of Mostly Water, an enga­ging doc about a par­tic­u­lar sub­set of Star Trek fans, is turn­ing his atten­tion from where no man has gone before to a galaxy far away. The People vs. George Lucas is an in-depth look at Star Wars fan­dom (not to men­tion schol­ar­ship and cri­ti­cism), par­tic­u­larly with respect to what many con­sider to be series cre­at­or George Lucas’ betray­al of his ori­gin­al vis­ion. I believe by now Alexandre and his crew have inter­viewed hun­dreds of people…as it hap­pens, two of them are myself and my buddy Todd Hanson, head writer for the Onion. Todd and I both worked on a Star-Wars-themed book a few years back that took a look at the fran­chise’s impact on the lar­ger cul­ture, and I’m grate­ful that Alexandre found it per­tin­ent enough to seek me out. Both the dis­tin­guished Mr. Hanson and I are in the teas­er trail­er seen above. (Hanson: blazer, goat­ee, long hair; me: age-inappropriate Mark Ecko Yoda t‑shirt, fat-faced, bald­ing.) I have to say the movie looks pretty good. Those whose com­puters don’t seize up at high-def rendi­tions of such stuff can find a snaz­zi­er ver­sion of the trail­er here. And by all means check out the film’s web­site

No Comments

  • Glenn,
    Some of your links in this art­icle have an extra “http//” in them, which sends you nowhere if you click on them.
    (Thought you’d like to know.)

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Thanks. Fixed.

  • Joe Leydon says:

    Dude! We’re co-stars!

  • bill says:

    That should be fas­cin­at­ing. Because my dis­ap­point­ment in the pre­quels failed to fully crush my spir­it, I was forced to con­sider the idea that I was nev­er that inves­ted in “Star Wars” to begin with. Of course, I wish I’d liked them more, and I think Lucas is an arrog­ant bone­head, but I have been able to sit back and watch so many oth­er people’s reac­tion with a kind of detached interest, which is part of the reas­on this film looks so intriguing to me.
    I really hope they spend more than a little time on the films Lucas claims he wants to make but nev­er does. That’s ref­er­enced in the trail­er, so here’s hoping.

  • Jürgen says:

    I dig the French dude who says, “The hatred that people claim they have for the new films proves how pro­foundly they love them.” A fel­low Star Wars fan once told me his stock answer for pre­quel hate was, “What did you expect?” and that made a lot of sense. What Lucas has accom­plished is unique – I don’t know of anoth­er six film saga about the life of a single char­ac­ter, planned & executed over a nearly 30 year span – so, as Les McCann said, com­pared to what? I’ll have to go with des­tiny fulfilled.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Joe Leydon: Indeed we are. Stick with me, pal, we’ll take over the char­ac­ter act­or industry!

  • markj says:

    Jürgen: “The hatred that people claim they have for the new films proves how pro­foundly they love them.” – love that line too.
    I kind of liked some of the pre­quels and hated oth­er parts. But that’s just my ration­al 34 year old brain think­ing. I did think that the last 30 minutes of ‘Clones’ was the most excit­ing thing i’d seen in the cinema for years. ‘The Matrix’? Pah!
    I recently found a pic of my 6 year old self play­ing with all his Star Wars toys. If he had seen the pre­quels they would have blown his mind. Which reminds me of the most import­ant thing any­one has ever said about the pre­quels, fun­nily enough from the cre­at­or himself:
    “Remember, the fans grow up. The films don’t.”

  • lazarus says:

    Well said, markj.
    In 50 years, I think people will be laugh­ing at the leath­er and sunglasses chic of The Matrix, when bullet-time pho­to­graphy won’t be so impress­ive any­more. But they will enjoy the pre­quels as much as its pro­ponents did when they were released. As much as people seem to think the effects were the focal point, they’re still all about the char­ac­ters and the story, even if both aren’t as clearly defined as in the originals.

  • markj says:

    I agree Lazarus. I’d say The Matrix has already been for­got­ten. Nobody talks about it any­more. The two sequels des­troyed it. I watched the three films recently (to listen to the crit­ic com­ment­ary, which is a lot of fun btw) and they’re all bad films, much worse than the pre­quels. The cutting-edge fx work in the first Matrix blinded a lot of crit­ics to its faults, bad dia­logue, wooden act­ing, a plot that does­nt hold up when examined in-depth. Basically all the things the pre­quels were attacked for.

  • That’s a nice teas­er. I liked it.

  • azshop says:

    Nice trail­er, I will wait for this movie.
    Thank for share.