DVD

Nothing's perfect...

By April 3, 2009No Comments

Earlier in the week saw the domest­ic release of the Blu-ray of An American In Paris, as gor­geous a disc as you’ll ever see. I’m review­ing it for Sound + Vision so I’ve got to lim­it my com­ments here. Just go and get it. An amaz­ing pic­ture and some very nice extras—including one of my favor­ite MGM Avery’s, Symphony In Slang. Which, rather inex­plic­ably, turns up on this oth­er­wise impec­cable disc in a 1.78:1 aspect ratio, as opposed to its ori­gin­al 1.33. A small thing, I know. But a per­tin­ent remind­er of human fal­lib­il­ity. Not that the refram­ing harms any of the car­toon’s won­der­ful gags, includ­ing a “cat got your tongue?” answer that’s so nice they use it twice.

Cat #1

Cat #2

Seen in the car­toon itself, this is a great example of how lim­ited anim­a­tion can be used to enhance com­ic effect. The pic­ture lit­er­ally cuts from the cat hav­ing a for­lorn expres­sion to the imp­ish tongue-holder, with a little “ding” on the soundtrack. The lightning-fast shift of demean­or is thor­oughly hil­ari­ous. But that’s Avery for you.

UPDATE: In the com­ments, Pete Apruzzese notes that some of the extras on the American in Paris Blu-ray are standard-def, unen­hanced for widescreen TVs. Which means that the 1.33:1 fea­ture will play in its prop­er aspect ratio with your mon­it­or in the 16:9 set­ting, but the 1.33:1 car­toon will get stretched, and look as it does above. Reset the mon­it­or to the 4:3 set­ting, and you get the prop­er image ratio, like so: 

P4040440

Now I’m not gonna say that every extra on a Blu-ray disc needs to be high-def (ought to be, maybe), but if you’re going to throw stand­ard def mater­i­al in the mix, it would­n’t hurt to have in 16:9 enhanced so you could watch everything on the disc without chan­ging set­tings. I call this an unforced error on the pro­du­cer­’s part. I also wanted an excuse to run anoth­er cat/tongue image…

No Comments

  • Herman Scobie says:

    Alas,the Blu American is not yet avail­able from Netflix.

  • Glenn -
    Your screen shots look like the car­toon image is stretched to the sides rather than cropped. A couple of online reviews of the AiP Blu Ray state that the car­toon is a standard-def trans­fer presen­ted in 480i. If that’s the case then I think what you’re see­ing is your mon­it­or stretch­ing the inter­laced image to fit the screen (or your BD play­er). You might want to check the set­tings on the mon­it­or or play­er, some will auto­mat­ic­ally ‘fill the screen’ via stretch­ing when they get an inter­laced sig­nal. My Panasonic Blu play­er was stretch­ing out the SD/interlaced extras on the 1951 Day the Earth Stood Still Blu ray, a simple set­ting change fixed it.

  • Morgan Foehl says:

    I agree that as much con­tent as pos­sible on BDs should be presen­ted in HD, but your request that any stand­ard def con­tent (480i or 480p) be 16:9 enhanced would actu­ally pro­duce a lower res­ol­u­tion image on 1.33:1 con­tent than present­ing it the way “Symphony” is shown on the AMERICAN IN PARIS Blu-ray. This is because stand­ard defin­i­tion encod­ing uses a nat­ive 1:33:1 image com­prised of a grid of pixels meas­ur­ing 720×480 (the pixels aren’t square, which is why you get 1.33:1 instead of a 1.5:1).
    Content on stand­ard def DVDs that’s 16:9 enhanced omits the let­ter­box bars at the top and bot­tom of the pic­ture cre­at­ing an image that uses the entirety of the 720×480 grid, basic­ally filling a 1.33:1 frame with a 1.78:1 image. This image, of course, is stretched taller than the nat­ive source and then your DVD play­er or TV unstretches it to fill the entirety of your 16:9 tele­vi­sion. This is not unlike the pro­cess of shoot­ing a 2.4:1 movie ana­morph­ic­ally, filling the entirety of the neg­at­ive with a ver­tic­ally stretched image that becomes unstretched via a spe­cial pro­ject­or lens.
    If 1.33:1 con­tent were encoded 16:9 enhanced in 480i or 480p, that would require “pil­lar box­ing” the image with black bars on the sides of the encode so that when the con­tent becomes “unstretched” to fill your TV, it dis­plays cor­rectly. (Similar to the third pic­ture you’ve pos­ted above.) The prob­lem here would be that one quarter of your hori­zont­al pic­ture inform­a­tion would be wasted on the black bars, pro­du­cing an over­all lower res­ol­u­tion image, using only 540 of the avail­able 720 hori­zont­al lines of res­ol­u­tion on true content.
    Hence, in our unper­fect world, the best way to present 1.33:1 con­tent in 480i or 480p on a BD is to encode to the con­tent “full screen” (remem­ber both 480i and 480p are nat­ive 1.33:1 formats) and then pro­duce the pil­lar­box­ing effect on your TV as you’ve done above. The draw­back, of course, is that this requires the end user to be smart enough to know when to engage the pil­lar­box­ing func­tion on his/her TV manu­ally, which is a dicey situ­ation at best, but still, from a video­phile per­spect­ive, present­ing 1.33:1 mater­i­al “full screen” is the way to go.