AmericanaDVDMoviesTales From The Warner Archives

Tales from the Warner Archives #1: "Bye Bye Braverman" (Lumet, 1968)

By May 31, 2009No Comments

Braverman #4

“It should have been a soufflé, but it turned out a pan­cake.” So dir­ect­or Sidney Lumet described his 1968 film Bye Bye Braverman in his enter­tain­ing book Making Movies. Andrew Sarris, describ­ing the film in his book The American Cinema, is a bit kinder, cit­ing “mar­velous” and “affect­ing” work by some of its cast; still, Sarris says, the pic­ture is “as cour­ageous in its con­cep­tion as it is vul­gar in its execution.”

What’s so cour­ageous about it’s con­cep­tion, you may ask. And I’ll then ask you: how many stu­dio pic­tures do you know of con­cern­ing the mid-life crises of a small group of New York Jewish intel­lec­tu­als? So there. And this one’s plot—in which the afore­men­tioned fel­lows con­vene for the funer­al of an old pal—seems to take its cue from the “Hades” sec­tion of Joyce’s Ulysses. At least that’s what Stanley Edgar Hyman said of the Wallace Markfield nov­el upon which the Herb Sargent script is based. (Markfield him­self: “I can­’t say that Joyce is import­ant to me. But what writer has not been influ­enced by Joyce?”) Again, pretty high­brow for a Hollywood pic­ture. Then again, the town was open­ing up at that time. 

Given its milieu and the fact that Lumet is one of the most indefatig­able cine­mat­ic chron­iclers of NYC, the movie main­tains a very dis­tinct curi­os­ity value, one which can now be sat­is­fied via its DVD release from the Warner Archive. After check­ing it out for the first time in decades—I think the first and last time I saw it was in a trun­cated ver­sion on WABC’s “The 4:30 Movie” or some such program—I some­what regret hav­ing to report that Lumet’s a pretty good judge of his own work. Braverman has its moments—quite a few of them, in fact—but on the whole it’s a bit of a botch. 

Here’s Lumet again, from an inter­view I con­duc­ted with him for the DGA Quarterly in the fall of 2007: “On Braverman, I was just not that ready to deal with that level of com­edy. I was­n’t that firm about it, I was­n’t that secure about it.  I was­n’t that know­ledge­able about it.” Indeed. Had Sargent’s script had a more real­ist­ic ten­or to it, Lumet might have been on firmer foot­ing. But the pic­ture is dot­ted with fantasy sequences in which the pic­ture’s lead char­ac­ter, Monroe Rieff (George Segal), ima­gines, say, his wife’s reac­tion to his own death. Lumet handles these bits of mord­ant neur­ot­ic whimsy by hav­ing cine­ma­to­graph­er Boris Kaufman shoot them in a haze of dif­fu­sion, and stage them in a broad fash­ion that calls to mind noth­ing so much as the naughty-kitsch TV series Love American Style. Lumet’s on much surer foot­ing with the serio-sarcastic exchanges between Rieff’s fel­low intel­lec­tu­al bud­dies (played by a sur­pris­ingly effect­ive Jack Warden and a spec­tac­u­lar, pre-Boss Hogg Sorrell Booke) and their one-time pro­fess­or (a really mar­velous Joseph Wiseman—yes, Dr. No), who at first refuses to ride with the group because Booke’s driv­ing a Volkswagon. 

Also rather mov­ing is the group’s elo­quent silence in a mont­age of their drive through Brooklyn’s Williamsburg. In the ’60s, cos­mo­pol­it­an New Yorkers still saw the bor­ough as a place to escape from, not migrate to, and their com­pelled return inspires them to take on looks of mourn­ful defeat. Little touches such as that make Braverman a kind of unex­pec­tedly acute cine­mat­ic time capsule. 

Braverman #1

Other sights in the film pro­duce sim­il­ar fris­sons. As in, wow, look at how thick the Sunday New York Times used to be. In the sum­mer, no less. That’s Zohra Lampert car­ry­ing it. The pic­ture show­cases Lampert and two oth­er think­ing men’s sex sym­bols of the era, Jessica Walter and Phyllis Newman. Also, it’s the film in which lead act­or Segal defin­it­ively added “over-educated schlub” to his char­ac­ter quiver.

And after that…well, it’s mostly doc­u­ment­ary value for New York nuts. As in this view of Sheridan Square—the Smiler’s and the cigar shop are still there, and in large part unchanged, today!

Braverman #2  
Pintchik’s hard­ware, on the bor­der pretty much between Boerum Hill and Park Slope, had a much more elab­or­ate façade back in the day:

Braverman #3

And so on. 

No Comments

  • Griff says:

    This remains one of my favor­ite Lumet films. I prefer it, I think, to a lot of the pic­tures on which he pre­sum­ably felt on firm or know­ledge­able foot­ing – he really serves the idea of the Markfield nov­el here and gets across a lot of the (very funny) Herb Sargent screen­play. All right, some of it is a botch, but it isn’t the col­lapsed soufflé Lumet thinks it is. The cast is great, and while the movie is occa­sion­ally too thought­ful even for what it is… it keeps mov­ing at a good clip.

  • ratskiwatski says:

    I’ve always had a soft spot for Lumet’s com­ed­ies. All of them con­tain vary­ing degrees of clank, but none deserve to have fallen quite so far down between the cracks. Especially fond of Garbo Talks, a broad, sweet, sad New York picar­esque, as well as the so very… loud Just Tell Me What You Want (wherein Alan King got to do his Alan King thing at unusu­al length, and Ali McGraw blessedly and expertly (!) did not do her usu­al Ali McGraw thing.)
    The thing that finally smokes me out of lurk­dom – Sidney Lumet com­ed­ies. Jesus. Maybe I’ll drop back by when GK weighs in on a batch of lost Antonioni two-reelers. Some bib­li­oteca or oth­er col­lapses around Monica Vitti, Keaton-style. At 48 fps.

  • Zohra Lampert was a very eccent­ric act­ress (pure Method, I’m guess­ing) and sexy in her weird way.
    Glenn, you left out the best scene: the one with Godfrey Cambridge as the black cab driver who’s more Jewish than the “real” Jews. I don’t know how “good” BYE BYE BRAVERMAN is, but it sure cracks me up.
    Somebody reminded me recently how rare it’s been until now – did­n’t seem so to me, since I caught it on TV just when I was becom­ing a movie geek. Now, when’s the Archive gonna deliv­er THE LAST OF THE MOBILE HOT SHOTS / BLOOD KIN, the impossible-to-see late-60s Lumet movie that I actu­ally haven’t seen?

  • PS – I’m not sure Lumet can handle any­thing that’s not groun­ded in real­ism. That’s why THE WIZ and CRITICAL CARE are so close to unwatchable.
    The main thing I like about FIND ME GUILTY, though, is the dark comedy.

  • walter trale says:

    late to the party as i was away from com­puters but just chim­ing in to say i’ve longed to see this film for years as the wal­lace mark­field nov­el, “to an early grave”, is a mas­ter­piece. bril­liant and hil­ari­ous. as per joyce, his second nov­el “tei­tle­baum’s win­dow”, is very much a joyce in jew­ish brook­lyn nov­el. both are avail­able from dalkey archive. his third saddly remains out of print. while not up to the stand­ard of the first two its account of a lenny bruce type com­ic has some amaz­ingly funny moments (speak­ing to a jew­ish woman’s group: “ladies, nev­er be ashamed that you’re jew­ish. its enough i’m ashamed you’re jew­ish”). so yes, read “to an early grave”, per­haps the defin­it­ive book on the jew­ish new york 50’s/60’s intel­lec­tu­al scene.