Misc. inanity

The first ever (and probably last) "Some Came Running" contest: Caption That Screen Grab!

By June 3, 2009No Comments

I like to con­sider myself a reas­on­ably open-minded, live-and-let-live kind of guy. I fig­ure, if Noah Baumbach, whose films as a writer-director I like a good deal, wants to play pat­ron to Joe Swanberg, a film­maker I con­sider pretty much to be a supur­rat­ing wound on the face of cinema, that’s pretty much his busi­ness. And if Noah Baumbach, when asked by the Criterion Collection to inter­view both André Gregory and Wallace Shawn for a sup­ple­ment to the com­pany’s release of My Dinner With André, decides to fold those inter­views into a kind of film that con­tains a rather awful lot of extreme clos­eups of…Noah Baumbach, well, as long as I’m get­ting to hear Shawn and Gregory speak, I can live with that. And if Noah Baumbach wants to have the afore­men­tioned Mr. Swanberg as part of his cam­era crew for the shoot­ing of the afore­men­tioned inter­views, well, that would prob­ably have been okay, as I would only have become aware of it upon read­ing the end cred­its of the sup­ple­ment, whereupon I could reflect bit­ter­sweetly about a world in which Joe Swanberg is per­mit­ted to breathe the same air as André Gregory and Wallace Shawn. 

But to actu­ally place Swanberg him­self in the sup­ple­ment is, I believe, tak­ing things a little bit too far. I had no expect­a­tion that a revis­it­a­tion of Louis Malle’s won­der­ful 1981 film would even­tu­ally entail such a thor­ough sul­ly­ing of my con­scious­ness. As David Byrne once sang, “I’m mad, and that’s a fact.” So I turn to you, my loy­al and bril­liant read­ers. Lighten my load by mak­ing me laugh. Come up with a really funny cap­tion for this screen cap of Swanberg shoot­ing Shawn, and leave it in the com­ments. Myself, and a small pan­el of friends who also don’t have much use for the auteur of Butterknife, will determ­ine the fun­ni­est one. The sole (as in “there can be only one”) win­ner shall receive, upon its release, a sealed copy of the afore­men­tioned new and largely quite won­der­ful Criterion disc of My Dinner With André. I will accept sub­mis­sions until twelve noon Eastern Time on Saturday, June 6. And I will get the ball rolling with my own cap­tion for the shot, which is, “Hey, I think I’ve seen this guy on Gossip Girl.”

Go to it, comrades.

DIpshit, Dipshit, and Shawn

UPDATE: Well, an inter­est­ing exper­i­ment, let’s say. As per the dead­line stip­u­lated above, com­ments are now closed, so no fur­ther entries will be accep­ted. The win­ner will be announced Monday, along­side rumin­a­tions on my lower­ing the level of dis­course and The Meaning Of It All.

No Comments

  • Josh Ickes says:

    Hiptard auteur Joe Swanberg, is won­der­ing when he gets to shoot Wallace Shawn’s point­less, bor­ing, joy­less, sex scene.
    Mr. Shawn’s reac­tion? “That’s inconceivable!”

  • Josh Ickes says:

    Can we do more than one? Hope so.
    Joe Swanberg (seen here left) seems con­foun­ded by a new devel­op­ment; adults speak­ing about inter­est­ing things in front of his camera.

  • charlesv says:

    SHAWN: I know that you know that Joe Swanberg can­not, in real­ity, oper­ate a cam­era or cre­ate any sort of watch­able film, so I clearly can­not look at the cam­era in front of me.
    BAUMBACH: BUT! Joe Swanberg is from Chicago, home of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, and as such can­not be trus­ted! Therefore, you must choose the cam­era in front of YOU.
    SHAWN: Indeed! However, We both know that no one can with­stand the effects of being in the same room as Joe Swanberg for more than—
    SHAWN falls over, dead.
    BAUMACH: I’ve spent the last sev­er­al years of my life build­ing up an immunity to Swanberg. I’ve seen “LOL” more than once, so it’s pretty much cake from there.

  • Owain Wilson says:

    Joe Swanberg’s thinking:
    “Hey, I’m sure I can hear Rex from Toy Story in here some­where. Maybe he’s under the table with Woody and Mr. Potato Head. When this stu­pid inter­view’s over I’ll give him some candy and we’ll be best friends.”

  • NEW YORK – Joe Swanberg and Noah Baumbach (at left) moon­light for the court, film­ing depos­itions for extra cash. Wallace Shawn, noted ped­es­tri­an and talk­er, has been charged with vehicu­lar man­slaughter. Swanberg, par­rot­ing Baumbach, tells us this is his “dream gig” as the two young­er men hope to fold the deposed inter­view, among oth­ers, into a cur­rent pro­ject on, you guessed it, wrongly accused vehicu­lar man­slaughter defend­ants with a pre­dilec­tion for good food and lengthy chats and young girls get­ting naked.

  • At that moment, Joe Swanberg real­ized he could film him­self hav­ing din­ner with Greta Gerwig and release it as his next film. “Pfft, that hack Louis Malle would nev­er get Wallace Shawn to jerk off in front of the cam­era,” he thought.

  • daniel a says:

    Hmmm, how ’bout a series called Old American Bodies?”

  • Trevor Jackson says:

    Luke Wilson’s inter­view in pre­par­a­tion for his remake of Andre was not off to a great start. For a couple reas­ons. His choice of cine­ma­to­graph­er for one.

  • Herman Scobie says:

    Are you sure this is how Billy Bitzer got his start?”

  • bill says:

    I know, Wallace, I know. But the cam­er­a’s not even plugged in, so just try to ignore him.

  • kennylustsjoe says:

    Swanberg: “While Kenny re-chubs his hard-on for me, I’ll just con­tin­ue actu­ally working.”

  • bill says:

    He’s still behind me, isn’t he?”

  • Rebecca says:

    Glen, man, I know that this really annoys you, but does­n’t this add to the worst part of the inter­net? Frequently the com­ments sec­tion of any post offers the very low­est form of dis­course. To actu­ally encour­age vit­ri­ol, superi­or­ity, and con­des­cen­sion seems not only unne­ces­sary, but irre­spons­ible. Making this kind of post res­ults, as you can see, in a bunch of smug com­ments. Why do we need this? How is this good? How does this not simply lower the level dis­course even fur­ther than usual?

  • Ryan Kelly says:

    And yet, in spite of all the mor­al superi­or­ity, your com­ment stands as the most smug, vit­ri­ol­ic, and con­des­cend­ing of the bunch. Not to men­tion the most use­less. And, since all the poster­’s here are infant­ile (by your defin­i­tion), what does this say about you?
    And com­ments sec­tions on posts offer a low form of dis­course? Obviously you haven’t vis­ited my very favor­ite movie blogs (Some Came Running at or near the top of that list) too frequently.

  • bill says:

    Even if Rebecca has a point, I want that DVD, so…
    SWANBERG: “This is the most opu­lent film set I’ve ever seen!! Look at the size of this place!”

  • He’s still behind me, isn’t he?” is pretty tough to beat.

  • E. Rob says:

    Since all I can think of are Princess Bride ref­er­ences too (a simple “Inconceivable!” was my first and only thought), I’m going to vote for bill’s at 9:00AM, though Rebecca’s has a cer­tain dadaist charm since it’s clearly the product of some kind of con­cern troll spambot.

  • Rasselas says:

    A celebrity! Don’t look at his fam­ous wang!”

  • Griff says:

    I think I remem­ber you, Noah – but who’s the clown behind the camera?”

  • Flosh says:

    Wallace Shawn tries not to pan­ic after remem­ber­ing that “Punk’d” was can­celed in 2007.

  • giles edwards says:

    SHAWN: “Young man, you don’t have any ear phones in, how on earth will you be able to assess the cor­rect sound levels?”
    SWANBERG “Listen, Wally, just try not to speak too clearly, okay?”
    BAUMBACH “…”
    *whistles the first bars of ‘Hey You’*

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Rebecca: I under­stand your objec­tions, I’m not par­tic­u­larly annoyed by them. But I think my read­ers can dis­tin­guish tongue-in-cheek tone from actu­al vitriol—I would hope phrases such as “a thor­ough sul­ly­ing of my con­scious­ness” might show my hand, des­pite the fact that I do genu­inely dis­like Swanberg’s films. And I think the com­ments have thus far been in keep­ing with the tongue-in-cheek spir­it. The only real vit­ri­ol so far has come from a Swanberg defend­er. (Which, I admit, pleases me no end.) So let us have our fun. I hope you’ll find the post dir­ectly above this one to be more genu­inely edifying.

  • Tom Russell says:

    Granted, as a Swanberg defend­er, enthu­si­ast, and, dare I say it, internet-friend, I should recuse myself from par­ti­cip­a­tion. After all, the guy was nice enough to be in my movie Son of a Seahorse, (plug) COMING LATER THIS MONTH ON DVD. Visit turtleneckfilms.blogspot.com for updates! (/plug)
    But, as Bill said, boy, I’d like to get my hands on this dvd. So, here’s my mea­ger attempt to jump into the fray. Ahem:
    Swanberg. Criterion. Apocalypse.

  • JM says:

    BAUMBAUCH: This is the girl.
    SHAWN: Seriously? You really want me to hire this Swanberg kid?
    BAUMBACH: THIS IS THE GIRL.

  • The Chevalier says:

    FAMOUS FIRSTS IN THE HISTORY OF FILM: Joe Swanberg dis­cov­ers the tripod!

  • Ray Branscomb says:

    JM…I like it.
    ——————–
    BAUMBACH: “So, the guy tak­ing the pic­ture of us right now is Eggers. He’s going to be con­struct­ing the book of the film. Waiting out in the hall is Wes with a hand­held cam­era, play­ing a paparazzi type – here’s your out­line of that scene…just improv. I can­’t tell you about the next couple of things after that because your reac­tion would be spoiled. I can tell you we finally end up on a sound­stage where there’s a giant asshole that we all dis­ap­pear up.
    SHAWN: Brilliant! Envelope-pushing!

  • Scott Collette says:

    Baumbach: Uh-huh and how did that part­ner­ship come about?
    Shawn: Well, I met Louis, originally-
    Swanberg: Noah! Wallace hang on. Dude, do you want like a rack focus between the ques­tion and answer… you know, to really emphas­ize the dif­fer­ence in the dynam­ic between inter­view­er and interviewee?
    Baumbach: Hey Joe, just… no… okay, thanks. Sorry Wallace you were saying?
    Shawn: Well Louis was-
    Swanberg: Dude, check it out. I’ll dolly in slow-
    Baumbach: You’re on a tripod.
    Swanberg: Yeah but I got a dolly in the van, or check it out, we crane in on you and then we stay on sticks for Wallace. You know, really show how pro­found your ques­tions are… you know?
    Baumbach: Joe… god damn it… what the… where the fuck are you gonna get a crane?
    Swanberg: Oh you want it?
    Baumbach: No, I don’t fuck­ing… what are you…
    Shawn: Are we gonna do this or not?
    Swanberg: Yeah, I guess it’d be tough… but dude, check this out… I call the fire depart­ment and have tell them there’s a fire here… then when they raise the lad­der, I’ll get out there with the cam­era and have them dir­ect me in… and Bam, we have our fuckin’ crane shot, right brah?? Oh and check this shit out, they might not come, like with a lad­der, cause there’s no fire or whatever, but dude, let’s set the wall on fire behind Shawn to really emphas­ize… HOLY SHIT! To emphas­ize his burn­ing desire to deliv­er a qual­ity inter­view. WOW! Dude. WOW! Oh my god, then I cork­screw off of the crane and we stead­ic­am a chase down the hall with some fuckin’ vam­pire mon­keys and that shit would be OFF THE HOOK!!! They could be a meta­phor for the way the audi­ence of ANDRE is always try­ing to suck you dry, like we are in this inter­view, you know, suck­ing old bor­ing stor­ies out of you and then when they fuckin’ whip you with their tails, that’s like soci­ety try­ing to enslave your memor­ies, man. You know? I mean, they’re gonna eat you, the mon­keys… they have to. Otherwise we don’t really devour your pres­ence. But once they eat you, then we feel both like we’re inside and like you’re inside us. Like a some sort of sexu­al can­ni­bal­ist­ic fig­ure eight, you know? Turn it on its side and it’s an infin­ity sym­bol and… that’s per­fect. We etern­al­ize this shit! Holy fuck, man! AND… check it out… AND… We don’t even need to CGI it. Why? Cause I’ve GOT the fuckin’ vam­pire mon­keys down in my van.
    (Nobody says any­thing for a full minute.)
    Shawn: Can you go get them?
    (Swanberg leaves. Shawn and Noah don’t know what to do.)
    Shawn: How long do we have?
    Baumbach: He does­n’t have a van.
    (Silence)
    (Baumbach gets up and presses record on the camera)
    Baumbach: So…
    Shawn: Well I met Louis on the set of Atlantic City, I had a small role-
    [Fade out]

  • Dale says:

    I was begin­ning to real­ize that the only way to make this even­ing bear­able would be to ask Joe to see his penis. Seeing Joe’s penis always relaxes me.”

  • lazarus says:

    Swanberg dis­tin­guished him­self from his con­tem­por­ar­ies when he star­ted the ground­break­ing “Lispcore” move­ment in 2009.

  • Matt says:

    After this, we’ll all trade cartigans and make a fea­ture film about the mor­al con­fu­sion it causes.”

  • Dan says:

    On the set of Joe Swanberg’s remake of “The Maltese Falcon”, with Shawn repris­ing Sidney Greenstreet’s clas­sic role and Noah Baumbach as Sam Spade.

  • Josh says:

    If we move the table in front of that door­way over there, I’ll be able to shoot his dick.”

  • bemo says:

    Play Him Off, Keyboard Cat.”

  • Graig says:

    Let’s see some tit­ties. I’m Joe Swanberg, bitch.”

  • Tess says:

    The Squid, the Whale, and the Douchebag.

  • bill says:

    It’s just skin, Wallace. Why are you being so frigid?”
    Sorry, but all the best dick jokes have been taken.

  • Mike says:

    Oh, Joe? We met at a Chris Eigeman mixer.”

  • Jim Gerow says:

    GUY IN THE SWEATER: Hey, was­n’t I sup­posed to be cast in a late Bresson film, not this mumble­core thing?
    Although I have to admit, “This is the girl” is funnier.

  • Glenn, please post a photo of your­self, I’d love to have a stab at this cap­tion thing.

  • Gerry Almstadt says:

    Hey baum baby, could­n’t we put some skimpy shorts on this chick and get a move on. I like to hear people stam­mer as much as the next guy but you’re cut­ting into the fifeteen minutes I’d des­ig­nated for the pre, pro, and post pro­duc­tion of my next twelve films.”

  • John M says:

    So, Wally, you’re cool for the beads and the cream pie. That’s great. Can you stand up, let us take a look at that lovely combination?”

  • MovieMan0283 says:

    Because it’s both con­cise and hil­ari­ous, and works on two levels, Josh’s ““If we move the table in front of that door­way over there, I’ll be able to shoot his dick” gets my vote.

  • JC says:

    BAUMBACH: “Swanberg is fine but he’s not a ser­i­ous guy, he’s a philistine.”

  • gary says:

    After the ses­sion Joe, a man on a mis­sion, pro­posed a remake of Ice Cube’s sem­in­al clas­sic ” Boyz in tha Hood” star­ring Shawn as a grizzled street denizon named Snoopy.” Joe’s a won­der­ful fella“beamed Shawn” cer­tainly His fin­ger is on the pulse of the myopia of today’s youth. but can he do street?” . Baumbech how­ever seemed intrigued.…

  • bill says:

    I want to win so very badly, but Josh’s IS pretty good.

  • Zach says:

    Shawn: What’s with the per­man­ent grin? It’s like he’s leer­ing at me. Noah, why is this guy here? Is he even housetrained?
    Baumbach: (sighs) He’s harm­less. It’s…it’s a long story.
    Swanberg: (think­ing to him­self) Man, do these guys ever shut up?

  • Nathan Duke says:

    How about these:
    Get Thee Behind Me Satan
    Noah’s Lark
    Swan Schlong

  • Max says:

    Swanberg pre­tends to listen as he pon­ders a way to get his penis into the shot.

  • Jimmy says:

    Spell, hom­un­cu­lus”

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Not to influ­ence the com­pet­i­tion or any­thing, but I’d sug­gest to fur­ther posters that, as much as I enjoy a good cheap schlong joke, at this point I’d say we’re above quota. Almost feel bad for the guy. Did Vincent Gallo have to put up with this kind of thing?

  • B.r.i.a.n. says:

    I don’t know if Scott Collette’s little one-act play qual­i­fies as a cap­tion, but it’s the fun­ni­est thing that’s been writ­ten here so far, by a pretty wide margin.

  • Dr. Lappe says:

    Face it kid, this is the only work you’ll ever have in the Criterion Collection.

  • gary says:

    Okay you guys nailed the talk­ing. Let’s reshoot the sex scene”

  • Gerry Almstadt says:

    Joe and I were…ahhhh…wondering.…ahhh…if we could pos­sibly… like.…you know shoot you and your wife in your underpants????”

  • Owain Wilson says:

    Even though I joined in the fun, I’m start­ing to feel really sorry for this Swanberg kid.

  • Erin Donovan says:

    Oh snap, com­menter #1 had the same thought as me. This post rules anyway.

  • Max says:

    I came up with my schlong joke and was dis­heartened to find all the oth­er ones before it. I think it deserves its own con­sid­er­a­tion non­ethe­less! (as I pon­der the cri­terion My Dinner With Andre and drool…)

  • Dr. Mystery says:

    Wallace Shawn stares incred­u­lously at Noah Baumbach seconds after Andre Gregory stormed out of the room. Ostensibly there to dis­cuss My Dinner with Andre, Baumbach instead offered to pro­duce a web-only series to be dir­ec­ted by Joe Swanberg, in which Shawn revis­its his Cosby Show char­ac­ter, Jeffrey Engels. Entitled “90 Degree Engels,” the Swanberg-helmed series would also star Philippe Garrel as Heathcliff Huxtable, Andrew Bujalski as Theo, and Greta Gerwig as Rudy. Gregory left angrily after it was sug­ges­ted he play Claire Huxtable in drag.

  • Tess says:

    My above quota, good(maybe?) cheap(definitely!) schlong joke offer­ings include:
    “The tab­letop was­n’t the only thing hard.”
    “Joe Swanberg pon­ders jerking off on Noah Baumbach’s head.”
    “Joe Swanberg wants resid­uals for his penis. Just because it did­n’t have a “speak­ing part” did­n’t mean it was­n’t in the scene.”
    “Joe, is that your video cam­era? Or, are you just happy to see me?”
    “Let’s hope this is all Joe shoots today!”

  • Jimmy says:

    Are you now or have you ever been a homunculus?”

  • Matt says:

    For the first and last time, Swanberg’s film­mak­ing meets a basic Criterion.”

  • Dan says:

    @Glenn
    Yeah, he did. Hell, he still does. He tried to sell his sperm on eBay. What amazes me is Chloe Sevigny has man­aged to finally live it down, one of many things “Big Love” did for her. Although admit­tedly now instead of blow­ing Vincent Gallo, every­one looks at her and thinks “I saw you fuck­ing Bill Paxton.” I’m torn as to wheth­er this is an improvement.

  • Tess says:

    Joe makes love to the cam­era from behind.”

  • Sam says:

    Most dir­ect­ors keep a port­able lib­rary of film-theory texts on set for reference.

  • Mr. Swanberg mut­ters to him­self. “Mise-en-scene, mise-en-scene, come on Joe! Get it togeth­er. Mise-en-scene.”

  • don r. lewis says:

    I got one!
    “Glenn Kenny, unable to find a pay­ing writ­ing gig par­ti­cip­ates in a glos­si­er ver­sion of a Joe Swanberg movie called ‘The Girlfriend Experience.’ After that fizzled, and unable to pick a fight with David Poland over ostens­ibly a “yo momma” joke that Kenny took to heart, he retreats to his own blog to yet again, bizar­rely attack a young film­maker who has made a crappy web­show called ‘Butterknife’ that Kenny was appar­ently forced to watch ala Alex in ‘A Clockwork Orange.’ Shortly after said blog entry, C. Mason Wells moved into Glenn’s extra room to help pay the rent and sit around stew­ing about Joe Swanberg hhich is what people with no jobs and way, WAY too much time on their hands do in Park Slope.”
    Do I win?!?!

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    No, Don, you do not. But thanks for play­ing! I must say I’m con­sist­ently moved by your loy­alty to old Joe, which extends so far that it com­pels you to slag people who aren’t even ger­mane to to the lar­ger argu­ment presen­ted by this post, which is that Joe Swanberg has about as much of a legit­im­ate reas­on to show his face in a “My Dinner With André” sup­ple­ment as I have to per­form with the Merce Cunningham Dance Company. Which I ima­gine could be some­thing even you might be com­pelled to admit, were it not for your reflex­ive defensiveness.
    Boy, I am SO not buy­ing your DVD now, dude.

  • don r. lewis says:

    Duuude.….you pwned me! I’ll get you a DVD screen­er though…you’re gonna need that $13.
    As for my loy­alty, Joe is a friend and he’s secretly a nice guy, work­ahol­ic who deserves none of your vit­ri­ol. But whatever. I will add that I highly doubt Joe edited the piece and stuck his face in it. Nor do I think Baumbach had a heck­uvalot to do with edit­ing it. If they did in fact edit it and made it their own little “face time” assign­ment, that is lame much like Ratner throw­ing him­self in the mix in that John Cazale doc. Ugh. But just because Joe showed up in that DVD extra does­n’t mean “he” did it and all this looks like is fur­ther proof of your crazy Swanberg hate obses­sion. Whatever gets you through the day man, seriously.
    But what point is logic when there’s hate to spread! Joe should have nev­er, ever agreed to film that DVD extra or let Baumbach take him under his wing or film that SNL digit­al short. Dude, should do noth­ing. Ever. Make his crappy DV shorts for free and stab any­one who sup­ports him in the eye.
    Now, as for Soderbergh’s for­ay into Mumblecore.…..

  • Tom Russell says:

    Now, as for Soderbergh’s for­ay into Mumblecore.…..”
    I can­’t say how “mumblecore‑y” that film is, as I haven’t seen it yet, but I seem to recall that there’s quite a few films and film­makers Glenn likes who have been saddled with the dreaded “M” word. It’s just that Joe isn’t one of them.
    Now, while you and I might dis­agree with Glenn’s assess­ment of Joe as both a film­maker (recall my response to Glenn’s post over at sonofaseahorse.blogspot.com) and a per­son (to para­phrase the immor­tal Ben Affleck, Joe Swanberg is a gen­tle­man and a prince; and I’ll nev­er have any­thing bad to say about the man who got me back into mak­ing films and was kind enough to take time out of his busy sched­ule to appear in one), I don’t think the Soderbergh-Mumblecore angle and the impli­cit notion that our host is some­how being hypo­crit­ic­al– a notion which, IIRC, you’ve actu­ally brought up at least once before in these parts– is really a good place to be arguing from, even in jest, giv­en his praise of– again, IIRC– Katz, Audley, and Mutual Appreciation.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @Don: I kid, sir, I kid. I will hap­pily buy your DVD. I can still afford it.

  • John S says:

    I’m so used to uniden­ti­fi­able people scrap­ping tooth and claw in com­ments sec­tions that I’m not sure what to do with this inver­ted inter­net where people with iden­ti­fi­able names and real careers make the troll-esque posts (don r lewis, 6/4/09 11:44 pm). Unless I’m much con­fused, this breaks one of the basic laws of trolling.

  • Brandon says:

    Shawn: “I think I’ve got some­thing in my eye­line. No, wait a minute, nevermind.”

  • Nick says:

    Retarded nym­pho­ma­ni­ac wanders in on smart people talk­ing and slaps at a cam­era like a baboon before being shot in the heart with a pois­on dart. Shawn and Baumbach wait hours before check­ing the Swanberg heart, finally going over, rip­ping it out and drink­ing the blood in wine glasses while dis­cuss­ing a silent ritu­al in the plains of Maine for an hour and a half.