Misc. inanity

We have a weiner: Results of the first—and now absolutely definitely for sure LAST—"Some Came Running" contest, with bonus photos for (non-rewarded) captioning!

By June 8, 2009No Comments

As no less a per­son­age as Mr. Kevin Smith recently poin­ted out to me in an inter­view, humor is really fuck­ing sub­ject­ive. So when judging the entries for the first, and last, “Some Came Running” con­test, the sole cri­ter­ia was, did it make me laugh? Okay, how much it made me laugh was also taken into consideration.

For those of you com­ing in late, the inspir­a­tion for the con­test came as I was watch­ing one of the sup­ple­ments on Criterion’s largely ter­rif­ic double-disc set of My Dinner With André. One of said sup­ple­ments is an hour-long video in which film­maker Noah Baumbach inter­views the ori­gin­al film’s stars and screen­writers, Wallace Shawn and André Gregory. The piece is inform­at­ive, inter­est­ing, and all that, enough so that the fre­quent close-ups of Mr. Baumbach seemed rel­at­ively tol­er­able rather than some upstart attempt to some­how co-opt the Louis Malle pic­ture. Then occurred some shots of Mr. Baumbach’s cam­era crew, which I sup­pose was someone’s idea of being suit­ably meta, and then I saw Mr. Baumbach’s pro­tegé, the film­maker Joe Swanberg, in one of said shots.

Now. I am not a fan of Swanberg’s films, and I’m not a fan of Swanberg, to the extent (as I’ve stated before) that it is my sin­cere belief that his image belongs in any­thing hav­ing to do with My Dinner With André about as much as I myself belong in the Merce Cunningham Dance Company. Hence, a rash request of my read­er­ship, that they con­coct funny cap­tions for the below-reproduced screen grab from the supplement. 

Swanberg reduction  

The author of the entry I, and per­haps one or two anonym­ous co-judges, found the most amus­ing would be gif­ted with a spanking-new copy of the André disc. 

This soli­cit­a­tion was met with some dis­ap­prob­a­tion. Commenter Rebecca believed I was poten­tially adding to “the worst part of the inter­net.” Someone call­ing him­self “kennylust­s­joe” spec­u­lated that I had a “hard-on” for Swanberg that I was intent on “re-chubbing,” which spec­u­la­tion met with some dis­ap­prob­a­tion from My Lovely Wife. Don Lewis, who is mostly a friend of this blog but who defends Swanberg with a fero­city sim­il­ar to that with which Pauline Kael stood up for Brian DePalma, pro­tested that Swanberg’s appear­ance is just hap­pen­stance, say­ing that he doubted that Baumbach had much to do with the edit­ing of the piece. It’s true that Baumbach does­n’t get any kind of cred­it at the end of the piece. Still, this struck me as grasp­ing at an ima­gin­ary straw. But a noble effort. And “Glen [sic] is irrel­ev­ant” said…well, we’ll get to that later. 

As for the entries, well, very few of them were as vin­dict­ive or vit­ri­ol­ic as Rebecca had feared. Penis jokes did, as it hap­pens, abound, but that’s no sur­prise. As such emin­ences as Harvey Keitel and Ewan McGregor can tell you, if you don’t want people mak­ing wise­cracks about it, keep it in your pants. The best penis joke of the bunch came from Josh: “If we move the table in front of the door­way over there, I’ll be able to shoot his dick,” which com­bines cheap penis humor with a trenchant obser­va­tion con­cern­ing Mr. Swanberg’s sense of pro­duc­tion design. 

The best deep inside-baseball cap­tion was Mike’s “Oh, Joe? We met at a Chris Eigeman mix­er.” Obeying the dir­ect­ive “brev­ity is the soul of wit,” there were a whole bunch of zingy one-liners, the sneak­i­est of which was Bill’s “He’s still behind me, isn’t he?” On the oppos­ite end of the length spec­trum, Scott Collette’s one-act was pretty special. 

And for all that, the one that made me almost spit up my cof­fee, and thus the win­ner of the con­test, was Daniel A.‘s “Hmm, how ’bout a series called Old American Bodies?”

Congratulations, Daniel. And that is that. Almost. 

Now, back to the com­menter call­ing him or her­self “Glen is irrel­ev­ant,” of the email “bully@glennkenny.com” and the url “http://www.wasteoftimebully.com,” wrote, “Glenn, please post a photo of your­self, I’d love to have a stab at this cap­tion thing.”

Now, dis­reg­ard­ing GII’s mis­ap­pre­hen­sion of my motives (I was inter­ested in mock­ery of Swanberg’s pre­sump­tion more than his appear­ance), and his or her sloth (it’s not as if there aren’t at least a few pic­tures, some no doubt quite unflat­ter­ing, of myself already on the inter­net), I fig­ure, why not be a good sport any­way. So, below the fold, you’ll find not one but three pho­tos of your humble cor­res­pond­ent, from dif­fer­ent peri­ods of his exist­ence, all of them at least goofy if not mor­ti­fy­ing. Have at them, if you’re so inclined. No prize this time (for some reas­on a sealed copy of Yeast struck me as poten­tially appro­pri­ate, but I don’t want to be overly ant­ag­on­ist­ic, and any­how, it’s not as if I’m made of money), merely the sat­is­fac­tion of get­ting back at an irrel­ev­ant waste of time bully. Enjoy!

PHOTO A:

N668415475_2732697_1572223
PHOTO B:

N1365529280_30305339_4273216
PHOTO C:

4566_85032119124_722009124_1846160_456081_n

No Comments

  • Dan says:

    On photo 3:
    Glenn Kenny, reen­act­ing the best scene from “Funny Farm”.

  • Max says:

    Photo A:
    “This photo was taken shortly after Kenny was found face-down in a moun­tain of cocaine. Asked why he was dressed as a King, Kenny respon­ded: ‘First joo get dee money, den joo get the power, DEN joo get the women.’ ”
    Photo B:
    “Now, while Kenny did not end up land­ing the part of Joey Jeremiah in the hit Canadian dra­mady Degrassi Junior High…”
    Photo C:
    “I swear to God, his balls were like grapefruits!”

  • Matthias Galvin says:

    Photo A:
    “WHO IZ SEXY BEEST IN PIC-TORE!? IZ NIIICE!”
    Photo B:
    “Who’s Henry Hill?”
    Photo C:
    “Yes, but what do we do, now that we HAVE the head of Alfredo Garcia?”
    Unrelated: Would you hap­pen to know any­thing about Yuliya Solntseva and her body of work bey­ond her capa­city as Alexander Dovzhenko’s wife?

  • Scott Collette says:

    Thanks for includ­ing me.
    Also, photo A: When Mel Brooks chose Richard Lewis over you for Robin Hood: Men in Tights. How did you feel?
    And photo B: Not a cap­tion… but was your fath­er Peter Coyote?

  • Cadavra says:

    Photo B:
    After his class­mates super-glued a pimp hat onto his head, Glenn tried to make the best of it.
    Photo C:
    “On the oth­er hand, Curly would hold the pie like this, giv­ing him a greatly increased trajectory.”

  • jbryant says:

    I’m con­fused. A & B are clearly high school year­book pho­tos of Tyne Daly and Patrick Dempsey, respectively.
    C might be Federico Fellini.

  • bill says:

    Photo A:
    Outside the court­house, Oscar Wilde faces the press.

  • Dr. Lappe says:

    A & B:
    Costume fit­tings for Swanberg’s remake of Salo.
    C:
    Mr. Kenny talks about the time on the GFE set when he had to demon­strate to both the dir­ect­or and his young cost­ar Ms. Gray, what tea-bagging meant.

  • Chad says:

    Count me amongst those who don’t get your ven­detta for Swanberg. Your cap­tion to get the ball rolling, “I think I’ve seen this guy on Gossip Girl” is worth not­ing since you seem to be chid­ing Swanberg for some­thing that 90% of your com­menters are guilty of. They simply don’t seem to know Wallace Shawn for any­thing out­side of The Princess Bride or Clueless.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Chad: Okay, smart guy, YOU try work­ing an “Aunt Dan and Lemon” ref­er­ence into a cap­tion for the picture.
    I must say that cock­ing a snoot at my read­ers’ sup­posed intel­lec­tu­al shal­low­ness is a rather round­about way of stand­ing up for Swanberg. But whatever works, I guess.

  • bill says:

    some­thing that 90% of your com­menters are guilty of. They simply don’t seem to know Wallace Shawn for any­thing out­side of The Princess Bride or Clueless.”
    How, exactly, would you know this? Do you run across a lot of ref­er­ences to either movie on this site?

  • Tom Russell says:

    To echo what Glenn said, I think the reas­on why there were so many Princess Bride and Clueless ref­er­ences in that thread has noth­ing to do with not being acquain­ted with a wider array of won­der­ments of Wallace Shawn, but because those were the films that lent them­selves best to captioning.
    That being said, I am sur­prised that, giv­en how often swipes at Joe revolve around the sexu­al con­tent of his pic­tures, as far as I could tell no one worked in a ref­er­ence to the sup­posed sexu­al prowress of Wallace Shawn’s char­ac­ter in Manhattan.

  • Brian says:

    Also, Wallace Shawn is very win­ning, funny, and warm on GOSSIP GIRL. Just say­in’, at the risk of earn­ing the fur­ther ire of “Chad” for my intel­lec­tu­al shallowness.
    Glenn, please keep teas­ing Swanberg– I find it very funny.

  • bill says:

    And, in regards to what Brian said, I read an inter­view with Shawn where he said he loved the show and hoped to work on it a very long time – and he seemed sin­cere! Never seen the show, but still.
    http://www.avclub.com/articles/wallace-shawn,26010
    Also, a friend of mine saw Shawn at the cam­pus boost­ore at UVA. My friend approached him and said that he thought Shawn was bril­liant in “Vanya on 42nd Street”, which seemd to really please him. So okay, he’s maybe tired of being asked about “The Princess Bride”, too.

  • Claire K. says:

    I per­son­ally will only and always think of Wallace Shawn as the fath­er of Peter, Rudy’s pudgy young friend on “The Cosby Show.”

  • Ryan Kelly says:

    You… with your pic­tures and cap­tions… lower­ing the dis­course of the inter­net with your imma­tur­ity and lack of matur­ity and stu­pid­ity and lack of intelligence.
    You should be ashamed of yourself.

  • DVertino says:

    http://www.criterion.com/explore/top10
    Check out Swanberg’ Criterion Top 10 at the bottom.

  • Josh says:

    http://www.criterion.com/explore/66
    Seen this yet? Please comment…
    Oh, and best penis joke? Thanks. I feel, per­haps inap­pro­pri­ately, honored.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @Josh and DV: Gee, thanks. For any­one who does­n’t “get” my “ven­detta” against Swanberg, please explain to me how any sen­tient being can take in his cal­low, smug “pensées” on Brakhage and “Straw Dogs” and not wanna punch the guy in the face. Favorite phrase: “I finally had an out­let for all the good energy Kieslowski had giv­en me.” Yeah, great, see ya in yoga class, pal!
    Personal to Steve James: Thanks a pantload!

  • DVertino says:

    My favor­ite bits:
    re: Brakhage – “it seemed like any­one could just fuck around with a strip of film and some paint and point the cam­era at dif­fer­ent shiny things and make a movie. What was the point? And what could any­one pos­sibly see in the work? Those ques­tions are still worth asking…”
    And from his intro..
    “It’s worth not­ing that I have not seen the major­ity of the films in the collection…”

  • daniel a says:

    I hear that Faber & Faber is put­ting out “Swanberg on Swanberg” later this year. Should be good.

  • lazarus says:

    Daniel, I’m assum­ing that’s a photo book fea­tur­ing Swanberg repeatedly try­ing to blow himself?

  • Glen is irrelevant. says:

    At least you’re a good sport.

  • jbryant says:

    I just learned on the Criterion site that Swanberg stud­ied film at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, same as me (I was gone before he got there). Now I kind of feel oblig­ated to take a look at some of his work.

  • Tess says:

    A.) Oh
    B.) Dear
    C.) God
    (aka I’m bit­ter because I did­n’t win the contest. ;-)).

  • Tess says:

    PS ~ my favor­ites included:
    1.) Matt’s “For the first and last time, Swanberg’s film­mak­ing meets a basic Criterion.”
    2.) Bill’s “He’s still behind me, isn’t he?”
    3.) Josh’s “If we move the table in front of that door­way over there, I’ll be able to shoot his dick.”

  • Tess says:

    A.) “Looks like Glenn knows who Adam Lambert is afterall.”
    B.) “I will con­tin­ue to embar­rass myself in hats for years to come.” (See: Tucson Weekend).
    C.) “My wife may be lovely. Me? Not so much.”
    (…did I men­tion I’m bit­ter because I did­n’t win the con­test?! Lol).

  • Pic A: “Most likely to grow up to have a hard-on for Joe Swanberg.”
    Pic B: “Most likely to grow up to have a hard-on for Joe Swanberg.”
    Pic C: “Prophecy fulfilled.”

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @kennylustsjoe: Anonymous com­menters do seem to have the biggest balls, for some reas­on. Pussy.

  • Pussy?” Hmmm. You can jump out of “char­ac­ter” and call out for it all you want. But you don’t want pussy. You want what you saw brought to orgasm in Kissing on the Mouth.
    Too bad we don’t believe you.
    – Anonymous.