AuteursDVDGreat Art

Absolutely three screen caps

By June 30, 2009No Comments

Filling the frame with mul­tiple sig­ni­fi­ers, then filling it with a single sig­ni­fi­er, then going back to the mul­tiples, leav­ing the view­er to con­nect cer­tain dots…this sort of thing is not uncom­mon in plenty of Godard films, but I think it reaches a par­tic­u­lar peak of fero­city in 1967’s Two Or Three Things I Know About Her, com­ing soon in a spec­tac­u­lar Criterion editon…

2:3 #1

The tape record­er and oth­er elec­tron­ic gee­gaws, the pack of Winston, the poster for Resnais’ Muriel, the copy of L’Express lead act­ress Marina Vlady per­uses; this is mise-en-scene as zeit­geist gar­age sale. 

2:3 #2

The giant red “Pax” as Godard’s voice-over lam­poons the “Pax Americana…”

2:3 #3

…is rather hil­ari­ously revealed as a dish­wash­ing deter­gent logo in the next shot. And note the Buster Keaton poster to the right. Is this a house­hold of cinephil­ic sub­urb­an­ites? Nothing in the film sug­gests so, but nowhere in the film are its act­ors play­ing tra­di­tion­al char­ac­ters, or rather, are being allowed to play tra­di­tion­al char­ac­ters; whenev­er Godard gets close to con­struct­ing a con­ven­tion­al dieges­is here he imme­di­ately dis­rupts it. One of The Man’s most fas­cin­at­ing pic­tures, and a most wel­come disc. I’ll surely have more about this and its com­pan­ion piece Made in U.S.A. in due time…

No Comments

  • Ed Howard says:

    I’m con­vinced that pretty much any ran­dom set of still frames from this film could be sub­jec­ted to the same kind of ana­lys­is. Seldom has there been a film so dense in visu­al ref­er­ences and sub­texts. This is what makes it so end­lessly reward­ing; it’s prob­ably my favor­ite of Godard’s 60s work.

  • walter trale says:

    I’m con­vinced that pretty much any ran­dom set of still frames from this film could be sub­jec­ted to the same kind of analysis.”
    hence…
    http://www.amazon.com/Two-Three-Things-Know-About/dp/0674915003/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1246393732&sr=8–5

  • Ryan Kelly says:

    I have a down­loaded copy of “Made in U.S.A.” that’s good enough, and I’ve nev­er seen “Two or Three Things I Know About Her”. Criterion obvi­ously loves me and is releas­ing both of them the day before my birth­day, so I’m going to be buy­ing myself a little Godard double fea­ture for my 21st.

  • Adam R. says:

    It’s def­in­itely a high-point in his work – the stun­ning café scene, the sat­ur­ated primary col­ours through­out, the per­fectly integ­rated foot­age of con­struc­tion work through­out. And that final scene! If the pun­ning pull­back from “Pax” (Americana) to mere deter­gent is good, the city of products fadeout is a genu­ine top­per. And there’s such loneli­ness it too, just like the deeply mel­an­chol­ic Masculin-Feminin. Rarely has a film as digress­ive and self-conscious and will­fully inter­rup­ted as 2 or 3… cast such an thorough-going sad­ness over me – sad­ness over mis­com­mu­nic­a­tion, ali­en­a­tion, etc. Which all sounds so dry, but Godard in these films is any­thing but…so fuck­ing alive, and so cereb­ral too. These films are miracles.
    Whoa, take a breath there me.
    I’ve always found Made In USA tough-going though…talk about self-sabotage. Plot explan­a­tions covered in noise, direct-to-camera double-talk. Sure, an effect­ive rep­res­ent­a­tion of polit­ic­al con­fu­sion, of no-gunman blues, but tough non­ethe­less. Still, the doc­tor’s office scene, seem­ingly cut arbit­rar­ily with scenes of Paris at night and Karina cross­ing the cam­er­a’s frame, is stun­ning, and the wist­ful use of “As Tears Go By” is per­fect. I need to see it again – hav­ing seen it once is to have almost not seen it all. Lifting from Nabokov, you don’t read Godard films, you only reread Godard films.
    Oh, and the recent NY rerelease (which I did­n’t see as I’m not American – I just read the blogs and envy the cine­mat­ic avail­ab­il­ity) did inspire the only decent piece Armond White has writ­ten in recent memory. Worth mentioning.