Housekeeping

Happy Monday!

By August 24, 2009No Comments

GasMarcello Mastroianni, 8 1/2, Federico Fellini, 1961

Salo
Sonia Saviange, Salo or The 120 Days Of Sodom, Pier Paolo Pasolini, 1976

I am a trifle out of sorts today. Heat rash, and the prom­ise of near-90-degree-highs through Thursday can do that to a guy. But look on the bright side. I kept my prom­ise of a snark-free blog for a week. That’s some­thing. I won­der if I ought to con­tin­ue this exper­i­ment.  Save all my snark for the Auteurs’ column. What say ye? 

By the way, in the wake of reg­u­lar people now being able to actu­ally see Inglourious Basterds (and quite a few of them are going, which makes me happy), the con­ver­sa­tion at my ini­tial post about the film is re-heating, and grow­ing ever more inter­est­ing, if I may say so myself. See here. 

No Comments

  • Tom Russell says:

    I’m in favor of snark being reserved for your Friday Auteur’s column. I’ve had people who have actu­ally ques­tioned me hav­ing you on my blog roll because all they asso­ci­ate with you is snark. And if snark dis­tracts from/prevents people from appre­ci­at­ing your genu­ine insights into the sev­enth art– the reas­on, I think, most of us hang around this site in the first place– I’d say that snark-free is the way to be.
    And that also makes Friday that much more spe­cial, does­n’t it?

  • I think you should save the snark for the HE threads. Those are entertaining.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Tom: Ha! Bet I could guess who some of the ques­tion­ers are!
    My personality—or call it “subjectivity”—and my sense of humor being what they are, I’m not sure I could run an entirely sarcasm/irony-free blog. If one defines snark as gra­tu­it­ous sarcasm/irony, well, that’s anoth­er thing. I think it’d be a good thing to mon­it­or the cheap shots closely, but if some­thing is shite, I don’t intend to hold back on it. So there you have it.

  • Tom Russell says:

    Glenn: Oh, I love the sar­casm and irony, or, as it’s more prop­erly known, “wit”. I agree with where you put the divid­ing line between wit and snark, and this read­er is all for the former.

  • Christian says:

    Snark is the last line of defense for those who have run out of argu­ments. Onward Glenn.

  • D Cairns says:

    Snarkwise: how is it feel­ing? If your blood pres­sure’s down and you’re enjoy­ing life more, the snark-free approach is the way to go. If you’re itch­ing to off­load a lot of pent-up out­rage, then do so. Who was it who said, “And always let your con­science be your guide?”

  • Nick Ramsey says:

    I enjoy your brand of snark from time to time, and this is com­ing from someone who is gen­er­ally not a fan of it. I remem­ber chuck­ling while read­ing one of your “Ask Glenn” columns where you snarkily ref­er­enced, I think, Pere Ubu in your reply to a snotty ques­tion about Hilary Duff or someone like her.