FestivalsMovies

Three Toronto films I have seen without being in Toronto

By September 12, 2009No Comments

No, I did­n’t go this year, again. But I figured you inferred that. But I have seen at least three of the 300-plus pic­tures screen­ing in the Great White North, and why should the trav­el­ing press have all the fun?

Karyn Kusama’s Jennifer’s Body, from a script by Oscar™-winning screen­writer Diablo Cody, is a mal­ad­roit Heathers retread that’s too inept to qual­i­fy as odi­ous, although it sure does try its best.Body small  As you may already know, Megan Fox plays a cheer­lead­er pos­sessed by demons who feasts on the flesh of teen­age boys. While Cody’s script bor­rows huge swaths of Heather’s storyline while half-heartedly graft­ing on a super­nat­ur­al thread, this pic­ture does­n’t really both­er to exam­ine or cri­tique high-school hier­arch­ies and social cruel­ties. And while the vic­tims in Heathers actu­ally had sins to answer for, Jennifer’s vic­tims die merely because they’re…guys. The jock who gets it isn’t par­tic­u­larly cruel or nasty—a bit crude, but not enough to really register—and the emo guy is just, well, an emo guy. While I have little use for emo and its trap­pings myself, I don’t believe that being into it ought to be pun­ish­able by death. I mean, it’s a phase, you know?  But as Jennifer her­self might say, what the fuck ever. Cody’s too busy with her cutesy inter­net ref­er­ences (a dozen or so easy lays at the press screen­ing I atten­ded broke out in self-conscious guf­faws when one char­ac­ter mentioned—get this!—Wikipedia) and gra­tu­it­ous Christian-bashing jokes (which would have been more than excus­able, had they been funny) to both­er con­struct­ing a cogent nar­rat­ive or a coher­ent theme.

 

And yes, Megan Fox is bad. A creature cre­ation of pout, gloss, and sway. I ima­gine the poor woman must think that Cody’s dia­logue for her char­ac­ter is a fair approx­im­a­tion of how she, Fox, really talks, because that’s what she aspires to.
 
It’s also worth not­ing that the film takes place in a world in which Hispanics and African-Americans exist solely to be mocked (“Grass-E-ass, Ramundo,” drawls the most putat­ively sym­path­et­ic char­ac­ter in the film at one point) and phys­ic­ally bru­tal­ized, and that the film’s hand­ful of racist jokes don’t even have per­func­tory quote marks around them. Cuz grrrls don’t have to be PC, I guess. 

 

Steven Soderbergh’s The Informant! is (and this has kind of been said before) the anti-Erin Brockovich, a very irony-rich tale of cor­por­ate mal­feas­ance and whistle-blowing. It is sad that, times being what they are, I am com­pelled to note that when I say “irony-rich” I mean real irony, lit­er­ary irony even, not mre nose-thumbing snark. This is a ter­rific­ally layered film. Informant small Never one to shrink from a form­al chal­lenge, here Soderbergh, work­ing from what must be a very adroit script from Scott Z. Burns, lays out a doozy for him­self. He’s got to juggle three balls, as it were: the actu­al on-screen nar­rat­ive of Archer Daniels Midland exec Mark Whitacre and his attempt to expose the com­pany’s price-fixing prac­ti­cies; the ram­bling, dis­curs­ive voice-over nar­ra­tion that con­sti­tutes not just Whitacre’s ongo­ing apo­lo­gia but also exposes—or does it in fact camouflage?—the work­ings of his eccent­ric mind; and the nar­rat­ive that remains hid­den until the last fifth of the film but which the audi­ence ought to feel, as a steady tremor, through­out.  Upping the ante fur­ther in terms of tone-bending, Soderbergh also lured Marvin Hamlisch out of movie-scoring retire­ment (at least that’s how it seems; this is the first the­at­ric­al fea­ture Hamlisch ha’s done since ‘96’s The Mirror Has Two Faces) and, it seems, instruc­ted him to resur­rect many of the tunes and most of the instru­ment­a­tion from his work for Woody Allens’ Bananas. I think the pic­ture works. Granted, it’s no The Girlfriend Experience (for what else could be, really?), but it’s incred­ibly absorb­ing, deeply smart, and yes, very funny, albeit in a chort­ling rather than belly-laughing way. Matt Damon is impec­cable as Whitacre, a very cock­eyed optim­ist who may also be a sociopath. The rest of the cast is packed with both top-notch pros and wild cards (Melanie Lynskey, Scott Bakula, the ever-great Eddie Jemison, The Soup host Joel McHale, and so on) who all make an impres­sion. (I have to take excep­tion to my friend Anne Thompson’s objec­tion: “The Informant! is a smart, witty com­edy that makes fun of dim-witted bipolar mid­west­ern­ers.” First off, “dim-witted bipolar mid­west­ern­ers,” are you try­ing to say that that’s an actu­al demo­graph­ic that could be poten­tially offen­ded by this film? Also, there’s only one such spe­ci­men in the movie, and the whole point of the movie is he’s not as dim-witted as all that. Anyway…)

 

I ima­gine that you’ve been read­ing else­where about Lone Scherfing’s An Education and won­der­ing if it’s really all that. I would have to say almost, but not quite. What’s inter­est­ing about the pic­ture is that the qual­it­ies that make it worthwhile—a scru­pu­lous intel­li­gence accom­pan­ied by what some might term dis­cre­tion and oth­ers (that would be me) call over-cautious good taste—are also the qual­it­ies that under­cut it some­what.Education small  Adapted by nov­el­ist Nick Hornby from a short mem­oir by journ­al­ist Lynn Barber, the pic­ture tells the story of a bright, cheer­ful, Oxford-aspiring teen girl in 1961 London who’s pur­sued and even­tu­ally seduced by a mys­ter­i­ous charm­er twice her age. Her life goes com­pletely upside down as a res­ult, of course. The writ­ing is quite nicely craf­ted, with the dia­logue always smart and only very rarely too on-the-nose. The cast is won­der­ful. Carey Mulligan as heroine Jenny is just a per­fect incarn­a­tion of a unique char­ac­ter, a thor­oughly dis­arm­ing pres­ence. Peter Sarsgaard, as David, a charm­er who even man­ages to take in Jenny’s stern fath­er, eschews his usu­al bag of tricks. Instead of the fey unc­tu­ous­ness he fre­quently uses to make his char­ac­ter­iz­a­tions look enig­mat­ic, he here goes full out for British faux-gentility and bon­homie. It’s a quiet tri­umph. Olivia Williams is also quiet, and dev­ast­at­ing, as Jenny’s con­cerned teach­er. And on it goes. The pic­ture’s worth see­ing for the per­form­ances alone. Where it went slightly south for me was in the sec­tion where we learn how David makes his liv­ing, and the sub­sequent treat­ment of Jenny’s sexu­al­ity. Having exposed some nasty lies and dis­taste­ful facts, the film seems to carry on believ­ing, to a cer­tain extent, in the David-Jenny romance. The music con­tin­ues to swell, the cam­era to swoon­ingly crane. It seems evas­ive, if not down­right dis­hon­est. On the oth­er hand, the refus­al to fully con­front some of the dark­er corners of its scen­ario is part of what makes the film go down so well. ‘Tis a puzzlement.

No Comments

  • Craig says:

    Thanks for the warn­ing on Diablo’s latest tox­ic dump.
    For months I had been enter­tain­ing the delu­sion that “The Informant!” was serioso-Soderbegh pri­or to finally spot­ting the giveaway exclam­a­tion point in the title. The pre­views look iffy, but maybe I’ll give a shot.

  • bill says:

    Glenn, I’m sorry, but I have to ask: why do the racist jokes in JENNIFER’S BODY get called out for being what they are, but the Christian jokes WOULD get a pass if they’d been funny? Bigotry’s bigotry, you know. So either it would all be fine if it were funny, or none of it’s okay.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @Bill: The racist jokes in “Jennifer’s Body” aren’t funny, either. Should have made that clear. But it’s true; I was think­ing too much about movie con­ven­tion, I’ll admit, and the way that Apatow movies can get away with racist jokes by cloak­ing them in the putat­ively cor­rect “con­texts.” The Christian-bashing jokes in “Body” are just bald-faced and stu­pid, and would­n’t have worked even had they had some ste­reo­typ­ic­ally ignor­ant char­ac­ter there to set them up. My point being that the jokes are largely just bad.

  • bill says:

    Fair enough. I’m wind­ing down from “Scold Mode” as we speak.

  • Jason says:

    I nev­er quite warmed up to Juno, but I was hop­ing Cody’s pen­chant for pop-culture dia­logue might work in a con­tem­por­ary hor­ror film, but, alas, ’twas not meant to be (the inclu­sion of Megan Fox was my first warn­ing). Soderbergh’s new film looks impress­ive, if only for the fact that the world has been wait­ing nearly a dec­ade for Scott Bakula to make anoth­er fea­ture film. Seriously, after a depress­ing Summer Blockbuster sea­son, I’m look­ing for­ward to so many potentially-intriguing Fall films!

  • Joel says:

    After see­ing how much of a boost David Rasche has got­ten from the espi­on­age satire genre (Burn After Reading and In the Loop), I think that Bakula might suc­ceed there, as well. All of my favor­ite 80s-TV stars will get the comebacks they deserve.

  • Earthworm Jim says:

    I heard that Thomas F. Wilson, aka Biff from Back to the Future, is in The Informant as well. Plus stand-up com­edy mas­ters like Patton Oswalt and Paul F. Tompkins. This might be the most quirkily cast Hollywood movie since…ever?

  • Dan Coyle says:

    I saw Biff in the trail­er, as well as Clancy Brown and Ann Cusack.

  • Jason M. says:

    Not to men­tion Tony Hale, in what appears to be full-on Buster Bluth mode; glad to see him get­ting more work after Arrested Development. Looks to be a wacky cast (in a good way).