MasterpiecesMiscellany

Department of "What you say?"

By October 13, 2009No Comments

DKU

Another bomb­shell I missed over the week­end: the rev­el­a­tion of an unusu­al affin­ity I have with, yup, Nikki FInke. On Saturday she averred that David Cronenberg’s “enig­mat­ic adapt­a­tion of J.G. Ballard’s Crash” is one of her “favor­ite motion pictures.” 

Wow. I would say that makes two of us, but every now and then I’m happy to learn that there’s anoth­er soul out there, and anoth­er, and anoth­er, who refers to the Cronenberg film as “the real Crash.” I remem­ber when it first came out, I did an inter­view with Cronenberg for Première that largely focused on how thor­oughly hated/misunderstood the pic­ture was, turn­ing off even some of the dir­ect­or’s most loy­al followers. 

The rev­el­a­tion is inter­est­ing for a num­ber of reas­ons, not least of which is that giv­en how FInke gives the impres­sion that she pretty much hates everything, it’s always bra­cing to find out what she likes. The fact that this admis­sion is placed at the head of what’s essen­tially an advert­ise­ment for her­self makes it even more deli­cious. BTW, the woman above is Deborah Kara Unger, in the film’s very dis­arm­ing open­ing scene. Just so you know.

No Comments

  • Tom Russell says:

    I’ve nev­er been a fan of this par­tic­u­lar Cronenberg film, but I will say right out that, yes, it is “the real CRASH”, light-years bey­ond the Oscar win­ner in terms of act­ing, of dir­ect­ing, depth of feel­ing and of intel­lect, and of over­all effect. It’s not an exper­i­ence I’d par­tic­u­larly rel­ish going through again, but I’d cer­tainly rather watch it than suf­fer through the Haggis a second time.

  • Zach says:

    Actually, I’m in the habit of refer­ring to Cronenberg’s film as the ONLY “Crash.”

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    You mean there’s anoth­er CRASH? I’ve heard Cronenberg nev­er for­gave Haggis for steal­ing that title for his film… urb­an legend?

  • Phil Freeman says:

    I’ve nev­er seen Haggis’s “Crash,” and I walked out of Cronenberg’s (right at the car-wash scene, as I recall) and have nev­er seen the end­ing. The prob­lem for me was that because it was a stu­dio film, or because the cast would­n’t do it, or because Cronenberg him­self was­n’t will­ing to go all the way, the movie was a half-measure. Anybody will­ing to dir­ect an adapt­a­tion of Crash must be will­ing to make a porn movie with car crashes, and Cronenberg was either unwill­ing or unable to go full-on. I have thought for years that it should be re-attempted – my choice for dir­ect­or would be Michael Ninn.

  • Dan says:

    I actu­ally love “Crash”, which has the dis­tinc­tion of also being the best Ballard adapt­a­tion. Not that that’s a thick field of com­pet­i­tion in the first place, alas. What I would­n’t give to see a Gaspar Noe “High Rise” or “Super-Cannes”, or an Aronofsky “Crystal World”.
    @Tony
    From what I under­stand, he was upset about the title grab, but inor­din­ately amused by the sud­den bump in home video sales and rent­als of said film.

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    This is one of my abso­lute favor­ite Cronenberg films too!
    Phil Freeman, your com­ment reminds me of what Cronenberg said about a faith­ful adapt­a­tion of Naked Lunch: that to do it prop­erly would require a budget of $200 mil­lion, and it would then be banned by every coun­try on Earth.

  • The Siren says:

    I liked the movie a lot, although as I was walk­ing out I said I did­n’t want to see it again and I haven’t.
    More import­ant: where’s my James Spader screen grab, huh? He was more beau­ti­ful than Unger at that point in his career. What happened to Unger anyway?

  • MattL says:

    I loved the book but was nev­er a fan of the film. It’s hard to get past the images and the gen­er­al mood I got from the book. The movie seemed so much slooooweeeeerrrrr too. But, yeah, I real­ize no one should really try to make a faith­ful adapt­a­tion. And even then it’s all about inter­pret­a­tion anyway.

  • markj says:

    @ TheSiren: She is still work­ing, White Noise, Silent Hill, 88 Minutes. Perhaps she needs a new agent though…

  • John says:

    Crash was a film that will always have a spe­cial place in my heart. I believe we all have spe­cial movie exper­i­ences that stand out from the rest, if not due to the film’s qual­ity so much as the cir­cum­stances. I watched Crash when I was about 12 years old, at mid­night, hav­ing very sneak­ily snuck down­stairs while my par­ents were asleep. I had ren­ted it incog­nito, as I was forced to by my won­der­ful par­ents who were work­ing in the they understood-I-loved-film-but-wouldn’t-feel-comfortable-knowing-they-allowed-
    me-to-watch-such-filth mode. It was mid­night exactly, a dark still night, around Christmas time. The film starts and I imme­di­ately feel on edge, wor­ried at every sound, ‘Was that the house set­tling or a con­cerned par­ent won­der­ing what’s going on down­stairs?’ But soon I was into the slick cool wound of the film. I still always think of Elias Koteas’ mono­logue before the James Dean re-enactment, how he draped and pulled him­self over the car. And of course the leg wound, which would be the first top­ic of con­ver­sa­tion at school the next day in the you’ll-never-believe-what-I-fucking-saw mode. I remem­ber think­ing at the time that this was a mature Cronenberg film. I have no idea where the hell I picked that up, being I was only 12 and could­n’t really throw my cinema-weight around in the slight­est. I think it was because I was a fan of The Fly and that film, as remembered by a young boy, is all goopy, for lack of a bet­ter word. Gorey and weird but still you could fol­low it. Crash was its own world, its own deal, and weird and shock­ing as it may be it had some­thing at the cen­ter of it that felt true. I still don’t know what it was.

  • Paul says:

    When Crash comes out on (region-free) blu-ray, that’s the day I’ll know I was right to invest in a player.
    Just fin­ished read­ing Ballard’s won­der­ful auto­bi­o­graphy, Miracles of Life. Interesting to learn that Vaughn (the ‘hood­lum sci­ent­ist’ from Crash) was based on this guy:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Evans_%28computer_scientist%29
    Evans was a good friend of Ballard’s, so it was pretty gutsy for the (as far as I know) uncom­plic­atedly het­ero­sexu­al writer to put his alter ego into an expli­citly gay sex scene with Vaughn…

  • LondonLee says:

    There is anoth­er film ver­sion of Crash (sort of), made in 1971 and star­ring Ballard himself
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5tpVcnfJrY

  • trooper york says:

    I just love when Roseanna Arquette star­ted tak­ing her­self apart. What a hot piece of tuna.

  • trooper york says:

    Oh sorry. Can you talk like that here?

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Trooper: You CAN (I’m a free-expression abso­lut­ist up to a point) but it might not earn you a whole lot of pals right off the bat.

  • trooper york says:

    That’s ok. I have enough friends.
    Glad to hear you are an abso­lut­ist just like me.
    Great blog you have here.

  • trooper york says:

    Plus every vil­lage needs an idiot.
    Is the pos­i­tion filled?

  • Bob Westal says:

    She actu­ally men­tioned her affec­tion for the Cronenberg film pri­or to that in the com­ments of one of my one one of my blog posts that got just a little contentious.
    http://www.premiumhollywood.com/2009/10/07/think-finke/#comment-510864

  • Joe Bowman says:

    I feel ter­rible for laugh­ing at that Rosanna Arquette comment.
    The scene where she and James Spader go “car shop­ping” is one of my all-time favor­ites from Cronenberg.

  • I still remem­ber when the posters for “the oth­er one” went up in the sub­way. My first thought—really, not kid­ding at all here, was “Hunh, they’re doing a remake of Crash? That seems a little soon, but maybe someone thought it could be more com­mer­cial with Matt Dillon and Thadie Newton in the Spader/Hunter parts. Weird.”

  • bill says:

    Someone should go through the nov­el and count how many times Ballard uses the word “junc­tion”. A lot, I think would be the total.

  • bill says:

    Also, I find it pretty hil­ari­ous that the DVD of CRASH includes both the NC-17 and R‑Rated cuts. Who is the R‑Rated cut for, exactly? For people who find a film about people who are sexu­ally aroused by car crashes com­pletely fas­cin­at­ing, but can­’t handle all the sex?

  • Paul says:

    Bill> Ask and you shall receive. Here’s a link to a con­cord­ance cross-referencing every word in Ballard’s oeuvre.
    http://www.mikebonsall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/concordance/framconc.htm
    Junction: 22. Junctions: 10.
    Ain’t the inter­net great?

  • Bruce Reid says:

    bill: “Who is the R‑Rated cut for, exactly? For people who find a film about people who are sexu­ally aroused by car crashes com­pletely fas­cin­at­ing, but can­’t handle all the sex?”
    As I recall, it was a con­trac­tu­al oblig­a­tion for video release, and Cronenberg accep­ted the chal­lenge just to see if he could come up with a redac­ted ver­sion that made any sense. And was rather pleased that he couldn’t.

  • bill says:

    Well. Both my ques­tions have been answered. Thanks, fellahs!

  • Dan Coyle says:

    You know, I read the book hav­ing nev­er read Ballard before to pre­pare for the movie, and loved it, but nev­er got around to see­ing the film.
    Deborah Unger is one of those spe­cial weird kind of act­resses who can make their death scene look sorta kinda hot.