AuteursHousekeeping

Coen heads

By October 16, 2009No Comments

Sirens
A nice fel­low at Salon was kind enough to include me in a loose sur­vey of film­makers and film writers who were asked to name their favor­ite Coen broth­ers film. My name is mis­pelled in the piece that res­ul­ted, but I am mostly in good company—Molly Haskell, James Toback, and Scott Burns are among those weigh­ing in, and the answers make a fairly divert­ing read over­all, should you be interested.

No Comments

  • bill says:

    Why does no one pick MILLER’S CROSSING? I guess because it was­n’t their favor­ite. Well, it’s mine.

  • like some stoned reima­gin­ing of the Powell/Pressburger ethos.”
    Beautiful. The Coens cer­tainly have a well-tempered social-philosophical per­spect­ive on the Dude sim­il­ar to that of P&P towards Clive Candy, though I nev­er thought to jux­ta­pose the two before.

  • Mine, too, Bill. Evidently it’s an acquired taste.
    I haven’t read the art­icle yet, but I ima­gine LEBOWSKI wins the major­ity. In which event: yawn with a side of snore.

  • bill says:

    First Bill C – THE BIG LEBOWSKI does win (Glenn picked it! Sshhhh!), but out­side of MILLER’S CROSSING I think all the main ones get a men­tion. I was glad some­body picked BARTON FINK, which is my second favorite.
    Just real­ized there’s no O BROTHER WHERE ART THOU? on the list, either. Oh well. Or BURN AFTER READIN, which does­n’t sur­prise me, although I do love it so.

  • Ha, oops. Should’ve worn my mint-flavoured shoes, as Rob Lowe once said. BARTON is my second-fave as well, mostly because it and MILLER’S at some point became an inex­tric­able double-bill in my view­ing habits.

  • lazarus says:

    I’m glad someone gave The Man Who Wasn’t There some much-needed love. Probably my second favor­ite after Barton.
    First Bill C: Don’t you think Fargo would have been the more bor­ing con­sensus pick? Glenn’s point about the snobby crit­ic­al back­lash at the Bros. hav­ing some fun was well-put. Fargo is near the bot­tom of the Coens list for me in terms of what I enjoy in mul­tiple viewings.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    Miller’s Crossing is a ter­rif­ic film. It’s sort of shared the favor­ite spot with, of all things, Raising Arizona for me. Raiaing Arizona, when I first saw it on HBO in, I guess 1989, was like noth­ing I’d ever seen before, gran­ted I was 11. But it taught me it was pos­sible to have con­tempt for your char­ac­ters and still love them in a twis­ted way. It’s still funny as hell, to boot.

  • I dunno, Lazarus: FARGO does­n’t have its own annu­al fest­iv­al, or inspire the kind of com­puls­ive quot­ing that Monty Python used to. FARGO was­n’t repeatedly namechecked, then repur­posed, by “How I Met Your Mother”. FARGO did­n’t inspire an online reli­gion! LEBOWSKI is the Coens’ STAR WARS at this point, the movie that every­body who likes it thinks makes them unique.
    I don’t hate it, mind, I’m just dis­ap­poin­ted that this list is so lock­step with status quo.

  • bill says:

    As a con­sensus pick, I sup­pose BIG LEBOWSKI is a little bor­ing. I would have thought it even more bor­ing had I not watched it again a couple of months ago. It is a REALLY good movie. What really floored me after watch­ing it again after a long gap was how Donny’s death actu­ally man­ages to be mov­ing. After 100 some minutes of total absurdity, they go and kill poor Donny, com­pletely out of the blue, and it should­n’t work AT ALL. But it does. Walter’s hil­ari­ous eulogy, com­bined with his line “I’m sorry, Dude”, to that won­der­ful last scene with Sam Elliot, AND “Dead Flowers” over the credits…it’s just amaz­ing how they man­age to pull that off.

  • joel_gordon says:

    This list just reminds me of some­thing that the Coens do bet­ter than nearly all cur­rent film­makers: end­ings. The bird plum­met­ing into the ocean in Barton Fink, Tom tilt­ing the fedora onto his head in Miller’s Cross, Raising Arizona’s “I don’t know; maybe it was Utah,” Burn’s hil­ari­ous anti-climax, and of course A Serious Man’s per­fect punch­line of a final shot that I won’t spoil. I’d hate to pick a best Coen Brothers movie. Thank God Salon lost my number.

  • More and more I’m pledging alle­gi­ance to THE MAN WHO WASNT THERE. In a way it, not LEBWOSKI, seems to per­fect their blend of ser­i­ous and non-serious. Though it clearly errs on the side of the ser­i­ous, it’s got UFOs and a dream sequence and that walk­ing Avery dervish Michael Balducci, tho he’s more por­cine than fox­ish, plus some of their driest wit. And, just like LEBOWSKI, it’s all about inter­pret­a­tion – and under­stand­ing, or how we form our under­stand­ings – in really cool lin­guist­ic, nov­el­ist­ic (tho always cine­mat­ic) ways. I mean, it looks great, duh, with all that smoke and those clothes. In any case, I like to think I got LEBOWSKI early on; at the very least I thought it hil­ari­ous, a really per­fect fol­low up to FARGO in that it was vibrant as all get-out, and I dug the soundtrack. I’d not seen any P&P yet. I was in high school. My sen­ti­ment­al pick would have to be HUDSUCKER, which was always a sick-from-school favor­ite. Until I found out about HIS GIRL FRIDAY.

  • Matt Miller says:

    I main­tain that MILLER’S CROSSING is best from a nar­rat­ive stand­point, BARTON FINK for its quietly apo­ca­lyptic tone and O BROTHER for its word­play, but I’ll always hold RAISING ARIZONA as my favor­ite. Like Dan Coyle, as a kid, this was my intro­duc­tion to idio­syn­crat­ic filmmaking–it was the first movie that made me say “Somebody made this. Somebody weird.” Plus, it’s still more quot­able than LEBOWSKI.
    “Everything’s CHAAAAYYYNGED!”

  • bill says:

    Anybody found biped­al in five wears his ass for a hat.
    Dot says these here are get­tin’ too big to cuddle.
    Well, no, not unless round’s funny.

  • bill says:

    Also:
    Awful good cer­eal flakes, Miss McDunnough.

  • Yeah, I had the same PayTV exper­i­ence with RAISING ARIZONA. I was 13, and it hit me like a truck. I taped the next show­ing, then I think I watched the first 8 minutes about 6 times in a row. Just kept rewind­ing back to the begin­ning, try­ing to decode it, I guess.
    Okay then.

  • Matt Miller says:

    I dunno, they were jam­mies! They had Yodas and shit on ’em!”
    And one of my favor­ite exchanges:
    “And when they was no meat, we ate fowl. And when they was no fowl, we ate crawdad. And when they was no crawdad, we ate sand.”
    “Y’ate *what*?”
    “We ate sand.”
    “Y’ate *sand*?
    “Das’ right.”
    Okay, I’m done.

  • Zach says:

    All in all, Raising Arizona is prob­ably their deep­est, most bril­liantly idio­syn­crat­ic film. For per­son­al taste, I’ll have to go with the bor­ing old “status quo” and choose LEBOWSKI, since I also loved it early and have loved if often since – for pure repeat view­ing resi­li­ence, it can­’t be beat. MILLER’S, a mas­ter­piece in its own right, is second by only a micrometer.

  • Sometimes I get the men­stru­al cramps REAL HARD.”

  • Zach says:

    I’ll take these Huggies, and whatever you got in the drawer.”
    “No sir, that’s one bone-head name, but that ain’t me no more.”
    “They got two Koreans and a negra born with his heart on the out­side. Craaazy world.”

  • Dan Coyle says:

    Maybe he popped one Polack joke too many.”

  • Ryan Kelly says:

    My gut screams “Blood Simple” whenev­er I try to pick a favor­ite Coen, a task that I feel is almost impossible. That, and prob­ably “O Brother Where Art Thou?”, most unfor­tu­nately not rep­res­en­ted on the list.
    But the list of Coen films I don’t love is con­sid­er­ably short­er than the ones I love.

  • Scott Nye says:

    What am I talkin’ about? I’m talkin’ about sex, boy, what the hell you talkin’ about? I’m talkin’ about l’amour! I’m talkin’ that me and Dot are swing­ers, as in ‘to swing.’ ”
    It’s that last line that really sells it.
    BARTON FINK is my favor­ite. It’s everything I love about the Coens cranked up all the way. Of all their films, it feels like the one they really went for broke on, and made it work. And that ending…wow…

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    I’ll weigh in with Raising Arizona and Barton Fink a close second. Of course, I love all of their movies except for The Ladykillers (big sur­prise) which was so bad it almost made me reex­am­ine their whole output.
    A Serious Man is excel­lent BTW. Best thing they’ve done since Lebowski.

  • JF says:

    He’s a good man. And thorough.”
    I don’t quite know what my favor­ite Coen is, but I do know what my favor­ite Coen end­ing is, and that would be Blood Simple’s. One of the more indelible uses of pop music in film, and one that does­n’t come up often enough in dis­cus­sions of the subject.

  • Zach says:

    @JF – I’m not 100 % sure about this, but in the ori­gin­al ver­sion of Blood Simple, which I once owned on VHS, the clos­ing music cred­its was “I’m a Believer” by Neil Diamond (a reprise from the earli­er bar scene). When the ‘dir­ect­or’s cut’ came out sev­er­al years later, it was one of the few details that had changed – to “It’s the Same Old Song” I’ve since mis­placed my ori­gin­al copy, so I can­’t be abso­lutely cer­tain, but if there was indeed a change, and I’m not totally crazy, it was a choice that per­plexed me. Anyone out there able to confirm/disconfirm?

  • Zach says:

    Ok, so next time I’ll check IMDB first. They don’t sup­ply the whys and the where­fores, but it does con­firm that “I’m a believ­er” was on the ori­gin­al VHS. A much bet­ter choice, I think, but it could just be because that’s the way I first exper­i­enced it.

  • bill says:

    Zach, I was the same way about the song switch – I wanted it to stay the way I knew it – but I’m really come around on “It’s the Same Old Song”. It works really well, once you’re used to it.

  • Graig says:

    It’s the Same Old Song” was in the ori­gin­al the­at­ric­al release, but was replaced by “I’m a Believer” for the VHS due to rights issues. The Coens brought it back for the rerelease.

  • JF says:

    I haven’t seen the “I’m a Believer” ver­sion, but I think the irony of the “It’s the Same Old Song” ver­sion might be a little bit subtler. Though subtle irony isn’t exactly the Coens’ métier.

  • Zach says:

    Ach, a rights issue. As per Bill’s com­ment, I must say that “same old song” ver­sion has grown on me a bit, but some­thing about the pure poppy-ness of “i’m a believ­er” – so upbeat and assured, really works as the first thing you hear after look­ing at the crazed mug of M. Emmet Walsh.

  • I know this is ten days old, but I missed this some­how and still feel com­pelled to remind every­one… remem­ber when Owen Gleiberman called O BROTHER, WHERE ART THOU? the worst movie of 2000?
    Yeah.
    @Zach – It was “I’m A Believer,” but a cov­er version.

  • bill says:

    Elston, he said the same thing about BARTON FINK.