CriticsDVDMovie assessment

Manny Farber's best films of 1951, #1: "Little Big Horn," directed by Charles Marquis Warren

By October 18, 2009No Comments

Little Big Horn #1 

Nobody refers to 1951 as an annus mirabil­is for Hollywood film, world cinema, or any­thing else for that mat­ter. Which isn’t to say that the year did­n’t see the release of some note­worthy, ground­break­ing, or even clas­sic films: ’51 was the year of An American In Paris, A Place In The Sun, Strangers On A Train, and A Streetcar Named Desire, to name but a few American movies. (Quo Vadis was the year’s box-office champ.) Our friends over­seas gave us the likes of Tales of Hoffman and Rashomon.

And none of those pic­tures are even men­tioned in Manny Farber’s art­icle ” ‘Best Films’ of 1951,” pub­lished in the January 5, 1952 num­ber of The Nation. “Let Stevens and Kazan win their Oscars,” Farber announces right off the bat; “The Nation’s Emanuel—a life-size drip cel­lu­loid statue of Kirk Douglas, rant­ing and dis­in­teg­rat­ing in the venge­ful throes of death—goes to the man or men respons­ible for each of the fol­low­ing unher­al­ded pro­duc­tions of 1951.” After this tongue-in-cheek (or was it? so hard to tell nowadays…) intro, Farber more-or-less soberly extols the vir­tues of a very inter­est­ing crop of genre pieces.

In cel­eb­ra­tion of Farber, and of the recent Library of America pub­lic­a­tion of Farber on Film, in which the above-cited piece is reprin­ted, I figured it would be fun, and per­haps even illu­min­at­ing, to have a look at the pic­tures Farber praises therein. One a week, in order of cita­tion, until we get to the end. And so we start with the Robert-Lippert-produced B Western Little Big Horn.



Here’s Farber’s mini-assessment: “This tough-minded, uncon­ven­tion­al, per­suas­ive look-in on a Seventh Cavalry patrol rid­ing inex­or­ably through hos­tile ter­rit­ory to ward Custer about the trap Sitting Bull had set for him, was almost as good in its unpol­ished hand­ling of the reg­u­lar army sol­dier as James Jones’ big nov­el. For once, the men appear as indi­vidu­als, rather than types—grousing, ornery, uprooted, com­plic­ated indi­vidu­als, rid­ing off to glory against their will and bet­ter judg­ment; work­ing togeth­er as a team (for all their indi­vidu­al­ism) in a genu­inely loose, effi­cient, unfriendly American style. The only nat­ur­al­ist­ic pho­to­graphy of the year; per­haps the best act­ing of the year in [John] Ireland’s grace­ful, somber por­trait of a warm-hearted but com­pletely dis­il­lu­sioned lieu­ten­ant, who may or may not have phil­andered with his cap­tain’s wife.”

I do love that tossed-off “unfriendly,” don’t you?

The cap­tain men­tioned is played by Lloyd Bridges, in a stol­id, stiff by-the-book fash­ion that at the time prob­ably recalled Fort Apache’s mar­tin­et Colonel Thursday but will likely remind con­tem­por­ary view­ers of Bridges’ self-spoofing in the Airplane! pic­tures and such. No mat­ter. The wife is played by Marie Windsor, always a pleas­ure to see, but the love tri­angle here is really a red her­ring of sorts. 

Little Big #2 

Only nat­ur­al­ist­ic pho­to­graphy of the year:” I can­’t judge that state­ment entire, obvi­ously. There are a few shots—the mag­ni­fi­cent sil­hou­ette of the patrol lined up against the sunrise—that appear to be spliced in from oth­er films, but oth­er­wise, Warren’s shot selec­tion and cine­ma­to­graph­er Ernest Miller’s views are nat­ur­al­ist­ic indeed, and effect­ively so. They cap­ture, almost to a fault, the tedi­um of riding/leading horses through rough ter­rain and try­ing not to advert­ise your pres­ence to hos­tile forces. “Generations have trod, have trod, have trod,” I thought at one point. I also recalled the con­cen­trated shots of horses’ hooves and knights’ boots in Bresson’s Lancelot du Lac. But this is a B Western after all, and Marquis is savvy and eco­nom­ic­al enough to know when and how to break up the sim­ul­tan­eous monotony/tension with an action jolt. I like how he stages a bit of hand-to-hand com­bat between Indian and army man near an open fire, for instance, for an extra fris­son of sad­ist­ic potential. 

What’s uncon­ven­tion­al about the pic­ture is dir­ectly tied in to what Farber finds admir­able about its depic­tion of army reg­u­lars. There are really only two through-lines in the film’s story (the screen­play is also by Marquis, from a story by Harold Shumate): the res­ol­u­tion of the con­flict between Bridges’ and Irelands’ char­ac­ters, and the story of one of the reg­u­lars who’s look­ing for­ward to meet­ing a mail-order bride, of sorts. The rest of the film has a more overtly mod­u­lar feel than most, in that it con­tains what could be taken as dis­crete mini-narratives, each focus­ing on one aspect of the patrol and then anoth­er. There’s a story of two-would be desert­ers and their fate; a story of how a deck of cards determ­ines the choice of a “point rider” —or does it?; a story of a sol­dier who does­n’t trust his Indian guide, and then has his life saved by him. All these present indi­vidu­al por­traits of inter­est­ing char­ac­ters, sharply drawn. While at the same time build­ing up a feel­ing of dread for the fate this patrol has in store.

Big Horn #3 

The tor­tured, half-crucified sol­dier propped up there like a scare­crow later asks his buddy, “Please shoot me,” mak­ing me won­der if this film provided at least a soupçon of inspir­a­tion for a sim­il­ar scene in Alien

The way Marquis tips his nar­rat­ive hand some­times is kind of charm­ing. This is a pic­ture with prac­tic­ally no clos­eups; so, when this shot of King Donovan’s Private Corbo occurs, you know some­thing really bad has gone down.

Big Horn #4 

And so it has. If you’ve been pay­ing atten­tion, you know exactly what. Still, the shot startles. 

The sig­nal vir­tues of this small pic­ture are still almost entirely intact, and the pic­ture is one of two on a DVD called “Western Film Noir” from VCI/Kit Parker Double Features. (The oth­er film is Rimfire.) Well worth see­ing, and the print/transfer isn’t bad. Tell ’em Manny sent you. 

No Comments

  • Tom Russell says:

    This all sounds rather fant­ast­ic, actu­ally, and so I’m going to be seek­ing it out this week. The “mini-narrative” struc­ture is some­thing that espe­cially appeals to me.

  • The Siren says:

    What a GREAT idea for a post series. I saw this one as a girl and whatever was spe­cial about it passed me right on by, although I remem­ber lik­ing it, as I ten­ded to like Westerns.

  • Sean says:

    Great just what I needed two more movies to add to my list. The Siren is cor­rect. This is a great idea for a series, and I can­’t wait to read Farber on Film.

  • Jake B. says:

    I’ve been cham­pi­on­ing this film since I first saw it last Winter. I had no idea Manny was a fan as well. Thank you so much for writ­ing about it! If you haven’t already, check out anoth­er Western double fea­ture from VCI that con­tains The Silver Star and The Lonesome Trail. Two under appre­ci­ated classics…

  • ARP says:

    I found Farber’s com­plete list pf his favor­ite 1951 films, in his own words, here:http://notesoncinematograph.blogspot.com/2009/08/manny-farber-picks-top-1951-films.html

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Yes, the Iranian film enthu­si­ast Ehsan Khoshbakht has been tran­scrib­ing vari­ous Farber art­icles on his own blog since last August. In his most recent offer­ing, he says of “Farber onf Film,” “Now that the book has been appeared it doesn’t seem neces­sary to con­tin­ue post­ing his writings.”
    My pro­ject here is slightly dif­fer­ent, ARP. In any event, I will be cit­ing Farber’s thoughts before includ­ing my own.

  • Michael Adams says:

    Warren went on to be pro­du­cer of Gunsmoke and Rawhide. As such he can be seen as indir­ectly respons­ible for the auteur that is Eastwood.

  • jbryant says:

    Been mean­ing to track this down, along with the oth­er 1951 titles Farber cited, since com­ing across his list some­where a few years ago. Little Big Horn was Warren’s dir­ect­ori­al debut; his second film, Hellgate, is well worth seek­ing out. It stars Sterling Hayden as a veter­in­ari­an unfairly sen­tenced to a desert pris­on run by Ward Bond. Warren’s style may be more effi­cient than art­ful, but Hellgate is one of the more effect­ively edgy and dark Westerns of its time, with ele­ments that anti­cip­ate Le Trou and Cool Hand Luke. I’d nev­er heard of it until I stumbled upon an air­ing on Encore’s Western Channel, which fre­quently shows oth­er Warren titles such as Trooper Hook and The Black Whip (neither of which I’ve seen).

  • D Cairns says:

    Good luck when you get to Background to Danger. This is a Raoul Walsh spy yarn set in Turkey and star­ring George Raft, but Manny goes on to talk about postal detect­ives in Gary Indiana star­ring Jan Sterling. I guess the film he saw must be Appointment with Danger which fea­tures Sterling and was made the same year. But maybe you ought to watch both, to be safe?

  • jbryant says:

    Farber also lists a few also-rans, includ­ing some­thing called Against the Gun. If that’s the actu­al title, it’s thwart­ing both imdb and Google at the moment.

  • jbryant says:

    A little more care­ful Googling reveals that Farber prob­ably meant Ted Tetzlaff’s UNDER THE GUN, not Against the Gun. It’s a noir set on a pris­on farm, and it stars Richard Conte, Audrey Totter, Sam Jaffe and John McIntire. Sounds awe­some. I loved Tetzlaff’s Riffraff and quite enjoyed The Window, The White Tower and Terror on a Train (aka Time Bomb), but this one does­n’t seem to be available.