Housekeeping

Declaration of principles

By December 19, 2009No Comments

456131358_7403c9ffb3Just so we’re all on the same page here, people.

The ever-entertaining Jeff Wells of Hollywood Elsewhere spent a large part of last sum­mer and autumn sneer­ing about how bad Avatar was going to be; the actu­al exper­i­ence of the film turned him around, and he now regards it with the same sort of soul­ful eyes that Charlie Dog puts on when he wants to impress a poten­tial mas­ter. So these days he feels com­pelled to call out the infi­dels, as it were, and today he issued a “take that” to AICN’s Mr. Beaks and CHUD’s Devin Faraci (or, as I like to call them, “the guys with the beards”) and “all the rest of the anti-Avatar fan­boys” who com­pound their error by lik­ing the Lord of the Rings tri­logy. Said “take that” was in the form of a pre­vi­ously pos­ted com­ment from someone with the handle “Plastique Elephant” who begins thusly: “Like people who can­’t dig Arcade Fire’s Funeral, I’d find it hard to respect any­body who can­’t enjoy this bloody mas­ter­piece.” Reading that, I spit out my cof­fee. I thought about mak­ing the thing a “com­ment we nev­er fin­ished read­ing” item, but I read the rest in any case, and I left a com­ment on Jeff’s thread. I said it there, and I’m gonna say it here. Just so every­one knows where I’m com­ing from, man:

That Arcade Fire album is a lotta over­wrought, off-key, charm­less, arty Canadian crap. Seriously: rock and roll is dead, altern­at­ive rock is dead, all forms of rock are dead. Free jazz lives. Peter Brotzmann rules. Get with the mother­fuck­ing pro­gram, people.”

You dig?

No Comments

  • Jonathan W. says:

    I cer­tainly dig Peter Brotzmann. Less so what I take as the declar­a­tion itself, that all forms of rock are dead. What irks me is the claim’s read­i­ness to dis­en­gage with a vast swath of art because of the pre­val­ence of things you find over­wrought, charm­less, arty(?) – and prob­ably a great deal many oth­er unpleas­ant sounds that dom­in­ate your aver­age radio sta­tion. Do the over­wrought qual­it­ies that some are see­ing in, say, Avatar have more weight some­how? Is it a tech­nic­al thing? Is it a film crit­ic thing, that this is what you have chosen to focus on, and out­side of it there’s a great­er capa­city for dis­crim­in­at­ing taste? Or is it simply and utterly, you know, a per­son­al thing?

  • Jonathan W. says:

    And do note that I believe the com­ment to have been made largely in jest, as know­ing hyper­bole. And that the anti­pathy toward Arcade Fire is real.

  • JF says:

    Not sure I dig. Funeral isn’t an unim­peach­able mas­ter­piece, but the second half is pretty strong. I have a soft spot for cer­tain types of bom­bast, and stuff like “Wake Up” and “In the Backseat” hits said soft spot. Neon Bible is a more con­sist­ently good album des­pite some abso­lutely godaw­ful lyr­ics, like “I’m stand­ing on the stage of fear and self-doubt.” Win Butler should change his name to Emo Metaphor Fail Butler.

  • Davin says:

    Glenn: I’m turn­ing 30 tomor­row. Any advice for what to do when those kids just won’t get off your lawn?

  • pdf says:

    I have nev­er heard an Arcade Fire song from begin­ning to end, but the snip­pets I have heard keep me from ever want­ing to. I’ve seen Peter Brötzmann live more than once (at now-defunct NY ven­ues like Tonic and the Cooler), and the entire Last Exit dis­co­graphy (for those who don’t know, Last Exit was an amaz­ing jazz/metal group Brötzmann co-led in the ’80s and early ’90s, with Bill Laswell on bass, Sonny Sharrock on gui­tar, and Ronald Shannon Jackson on drums) is per­man­ently installed in my iPod. I listen to way too much met­al to ever say rock music is dead, though lately a lot of extreme metal’s been get­ting so weird and abstruse it’s almost fairer to com­pare it to Elliott Carter than Black Sabbath. And I’m still passing on Avatar for all the reas­ons I cited in the earli­er thread: the dia­logue in the com­mer­cials makes my head hurt, it’s too damn long, and I don’t like the look of the blue Thundercats.

  • Chris O. says:

    The middle class determ­ines what will sur­vive and the avant garde will die right behind polem­ic­al crap. As much as I like some of it… good luck, free jazz.

  • nomorewells says:

    We under­stand that you gen­er­ally won’t ser­i­ously cri­ti­cize anoth­er mem­ber of the frat, so “ever-entertaining” is as close as you can get to acknow­ledging that Wells is an off-the-wall nut, and that his fas­cin­a­tion with gen­er­ic­ally denoun­cing the so-called “Eloi” (a grand mis­nomer) dis­tracts from his own low-to-middlebrow life and ques­tion­able judge­ment, and that one can­’t adequately call him on his own blog for danger of being ban­ished, so I say these things here. I much more respect Mr. Kenny and his ana­lys­is of film all the way back to the inven­tion of shad­ows, as it were.

  • justin says:

    i love free jazz, but am cer­tainly prone to enjoy over­wrought charm­less arty crap as well. how­ever, i don’t under­stand the fas­cin­a­tion with arcade fire. at all.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Wow! I showed this post to My Lovely Wife, and she said, “Boy, are you angry,” and I was like, “What? The obvi­ous­ness of the hyper­bole surely ameli­or­ates that,” and she said, “Not so much.” Just goes to prove I should always listen to her.
    Look: Jonathan W. is cor­rect when acknow­ledging the com­ment was made at least in part in jest…and that my anti­pathy for Arcade Fire is real. I recently did some fall/winter clean­ing of the spaces where I keep DVDs and CDs, and actu­ally sur­prised myself with how many contemporary/alternative/what-have-you rock titles I found expend­able. Arcade Fire, Clap Your Hands Say Duh, Expander, Exploder, whatever; stuff seemed inter­est­ing at the time but like Elvis said, just don’t move me. And it’s true; I do have less curi­os­ity about/engagement with cur­rent “rock” and its off­shoots than I have had for many years. I still read MOJO, but half-heartedly; more often I find keys to my heart’s desire in Wire, or the Downtown Music Gallery’s newsletter.
    My most recent vis­it to Manhattan’s Other Music (where one of my most favor­ite people in the world, Mikey IQ Jones, is employed) yiel­ded very few “rock” pur­chases: two Kraftwerk remas­ters, the Broadcast/Focus Group col­lab, and Roj’s Ghost Box debut.
    Is it a “get off my lawn” thing? I dunno; I still love noise, wheth­er it comes from the latest Sunn O))) explor­a­tion or Fripp’s man­ic solo­ing on the “Zoom Club” Crimson CD, which I just tracked down. Maybe I now love noise, and blow­ing, more than songs, or rather, songs that aren’t played/sung by Ellington, Armstrong, or Fitzgerald. I still love, as most of you know, the Feelies. And Ubu. But the vocal rock that’s rep­res­en­ted in its way by Arcade Fire DOES seem very very tired to these ears. Seriously.
    And again—kind of half kid­ding. Except for the love of Brotzmann, who really DOES rule. And every­body should check out the CD by Brown WIng Overdrive, a trio fea­tur­ing Mikey and DMG’s Chuck Bettis, that sounds like some­thing you’d hear on Harry Smith’s “Anthology of American Folk” music if elec­tron­ic instru­ments had been around then.

  • greg mottola says:

    I think its fair enough to declare ‘rock is dead’, even if i do keep buy­ing up indie rock albums. I’m not sure I agree with the com­menter above who asserts that “the middle class determ­ines what will sur­vive”. I ven­ture that there are a lot more people today who listen to Ornette Coleman than Ray Conniff. The middle class determ­ine what gets pro­duced in the most units (or down­loads … dis­pos­able, either way). The true believ­ers keep the flame alive. I think I’ll put on some Grachan Moncur…

  • Chris O. says:

    I don’t know about Coleman v. Conniff. In cer­tain trendy city spots per­haps. Look, the simplest melod­ies are the ones that last. If it has too many notes, then enjoy it while you can. Maybe it’s all rel­at­ive, though… and the middle class of 2250 will be able to whistle along with Sun Ra.
    This is all com­ing from a sax­o­phone play­er, by the way, and one who loves to play Monk.

  • Davin says:

    I think there’s still plenty of viable-but-contemporary rock and roll being made. For an example from this year, I would point to and endorse Future of the Left. Their name may make them sound like soggy neo-U2 “polit­ic­al” rock, but hoo boy, are they any­thing but.

  • Chris O. says:

    And speak­ing of last­ing simple melod­ies… I thought it was an inter­est­ing coin­cid­ence that Wang Chung’s “Dance Hall Days” appeared earli­er this year sim­ul­tan­eously in DUPLICITY, ADVENTURELAND and the com­mer­cial for Major League Baseball 2K9
    I say this, as Glenn might say, free of snark.

  • The Chevalier says:

    How many people actu­ally believe Jeff has ever listened to Arcade Fire before?…

  • Chris O. says:

    I always pegged Wells’ CD col­lec­tion to be anchored by Sinatra’s DUETS, Clapton’s UNPLUGGED and, of course, to “keep it real”… Carole King’s TAPESTRY.
    There may be an unopened Dylan soundtrack to Scorsese’s NO DIRECTION HOME in there somewhere.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Greg Mottola: Grachan Moncur, oh yes; fant­ast­ic. This week­end I’ve been edu­cat­ing myself on Prince Lasha, whose recently reis­sued “Insight” is knock­ing a few books off my shelf. Great stuff, and the only oth­er thing with him in my cur­rent lib­rary is, of course, Dolphy’s “Iron Man.”

  • I feel dumber than usu­al, because I don’t recog­nize any of the bands named in this post or com­ments thread. But, that’s the great thing about all art forms: there’s always new stuff to dis­cov­er, explore, and engage with, and I have a few names to get me started…

  • don r. lewis says:

    What’s it like being a self-loathing hip­ster, Glenn? 😉

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Jeez, Don, I dunno. I did­n’t think that an enthu­si­asm for “out” jazz and being a hip­ster had been ser­i­ously asso­ci­ated with each oth­er much since shortly after Thomas Pynchon’s “V” was pub­lished. These days the term seems to mean any­thing vaguely slack and irrit­at­ing: guys in truck­er hats drink­ing PBR, latter-day refugees from Jackie 60, white fel­lows who affect hip-hop patois, what have you. And any­one who ticks off Armond White, of course. It’s all so confusing!

  • Tom Carson says:

    Re: “The middle class determ­ines what will sur­vive.” I’m guess­ing she’s not on your fave list, Chris O., which is fine with me. But you know, ask Patti Smith. From bebop to the Velvets – not to men­tion Georg Grosz or, knock wood, Guy Maddin – it seems to me the oppos­ite is true. Sales at the time are one thing, sur­viv­al (in the Artistic Immortality sense) another.

  • Chris O. says:

    I was­n’t talk­ing about sales at all. Jury’s out on all of it, of course – and really out on Maddin – but what will sur­vive out of those folks? Patti Smith’s cov­er songs; “Candy Says” & “Sweet Jane”; “Oleo”, “Salt Peanuts” & “Take Five” (prob­ably “So What”); and… I think Magritte will out­live Grosz.
    As for being “on my fave list,” don’t get me wrong… I agree with Tom Russell about the excite­ment of dis­cov­er­ing new stuff. I enjoy Mysteries Of The Organism as much as The Beatles’ Revolver. I don’t quite get the Arcade Fire/Avatar sen­tim­ment on HE, but at the same time I would­n’t dis­count the Candadian band just because their melod­ies are digest­ible and they’re enjoy­ing some main­stream success.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa there, Chris O.; my dis­like of Arcade Fire has zip to do with rel­at­ively large num­bers of people buy­ing their records. I dislike/discount them because they suck. To my ears, that is. That’s all. But when you get down to it, say­ing that “I’d find it hard to respect any­body” who did­n’t like an Arcade Fire album is chau­vin­ism of a par­tic­u­larly obnox­ious sort. I mean, what if Stephen Hawking can­’t quite get into “Funeral,” you know? Or Nelson Mandela? “Oh, okay, for you I make an exception…”

  • Chris O. says:

    Thanks for the cla­ri­fic­a­tion and I com­pletely agree re: chau­vin­ism – the nar­row minded ball rolls both ways. But wer­en’t you say­ing that all rock, art rock and indie rock is dead? And isn’t that chau­vin­ism of its own sort? Okay, okay, tongue in cheek, I get it and I’ll stop. But what if Stephen Hawking thought that Roland Rashaan Kirk play­ing more than one horn was show­boat­ing and egre­giously excess­ive? I’d bet­ter see a post on his blog.
    Oh and be warned… Brian Eno appar­ently told Coldplay that glam rock will be huge again. These little whip­per­snap­per fan­boys will be wear­ing the rouge and glitter.
    Now, what do you think about this Jack White guy…

  • John M says:

    Like people who can­’t dig Arcade Fire’s Funeral, I’d find it hard to respect any­body who can­’t enjoy this bloody masterpiece.”
    Misplaced modifier?
    Glenn, how much would it take to con­vince you to draw up a short list of good places to start in music? That sounds very broad–like, your own short guide to listen­ing? Okay, like, ten bands/artists (or albums) you love, artists of whom we prob­ably haven’t heard. Like, “Tell ya what, kid, why don’t you start here?”
    Because I’m drown­ing in this thread a little.

  • Tom Carson says:

    @Chris O.: So far as I know, we wer­en’t arguing taste – just your notion that ‘the middle class’ is the arbit­er of artist­ic longev­ity. I agree with you that Magritte will out­last Grosz, but are you imply­ing that it’s because Magritte is more accept­able to the bour­geois­ie? If so, a fas­cin­at­ing argu­ment I’d love to hear amp­li­fied, and I’m not being sar­cast­ic at all. And for the record, I’m also no unthink­ing bash­er of ‘the middle class,’ which these days I kind of miss. I just don’t think their track record in guess­ing what will last artist­ic­ally is stellar.

  • bill says:

    Hey guys, is this where the hip­sters are hanging out tonight??

  • bill says:

    Before any­thing starts, that was just a joke. But good Lord…free jazz? Random and dis­con­nec­ted knocks on the middle class? This thread is my own per­son­al nightmare.
    Good even­ing to you all!

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Oh, Bill, you scalawag, you.
    John M: Oh good lord, whit­tling stuff down to a mere ten is a real mind-boggling idea. Even with respect to Bill’s obvi­ous favor­ite genre, free jazz, ten ain’t enough. But it I were to give you a primer on it, I’d tell you to start with some non-free records, because the genre, like abstract expres­sion­ism, is best appre­ci­ated with­in a cer­tain con­text. In that respect, Thelonious Monk’s “Monk’s Music,” fea­tur­ing both John Coltrane AND Coleman Hawkins, is an exem­plary bridge between old and new. Then check out some mod­ern jazz records with heavy emphas­is on impro­visa­tion: Coltrane’s “Giant Steps” and “My Favorite Things,” Ornette Coleman’s “Tomorrow is the Question” and the classically-titled “This Is Our Music.” And whatever album “Lonely Woman” is on. THEN check out Coltrane’s “Ascension,” Coleman’s “Free Jazz,” Albert Ayler’s “Spiritual Unity,” Cecil Taylor’s “Nefertiti The Beautiful One Has Come,” Archie Shepp’s “Fire Music,” Jackie McLean’s “Old and New Gospel” with Ornette. THEN check out Peter Brotzmann’s massive “Machine Gun, ” the European answer to most of the above. And if you like that, I’ll give you anoth­er list!

  • Tom Carson says:

    @bill, you know my polit­ics, but the snob-leftist take on ‘the middle class’ has been driv­ing me nuts since Nathanael West. Here’s hop­ing we get to dis­cuss same in some oth­er context.

  • bill says:

    No dis­respect to free jazz. Honestly. I tried to like it, and out­side of a few indi­vidu­al pieces, I just nev­er con­nec­ted to it. I have some CDs in my col­lec­tion, and I feel like a poser because of it.

  • bill says:

    @Tom – “the snob-leftist take on ‘the middle class’ has been driv­ing me nuts since Nathanael West.”
    Man, you’re old! Ha ha, no, but really. Yes, me too, but yes, also, I’m not going to try and stir any­thing up. Have a good night, everybody.

  • Chris O. says:

    Practically, it starts with schools, for one. There’s no time to work in Ornette Coleman or Grosz when you have to cov­er Miles Davis and Picasso. How much play does Dvorak or Penderecki get in music classes? Minimal. Baroque (the simple melod­ies) and Romantic (simple melod­ies with flair) reign. Pretty soon those guys left behind, unless you’re a for­tu­nate soul with an interest in con­tinu­ing edu­ca­tion and self-directed learn­ing (who can/will also pass that eth­ic on to your kids). Sadly, the lat­ter ain’t the masses.
    Idealistically, I guess it also goes back to the idea that the new­ness of the avant garde alone isn’t enough to save it. There’s got to be some­thing else there, some­thing per­son­al that’ll res­on­ate with the wor­kin’ man in time. (Now my mind is won­der­ing back to Kim Morgan attach­ing Dolly Parton & Porter Wagoner to Von Trier’s “Anti-Christ” earli­er today.) Again, or else it’s like the polem­ic­al and those things die every day.
    As a small obser­va­tion­al sample, I was at the Surrealism & Dada exhib­i­tion in Cincinnati in the spring and you could just see the reac­tions of people going from Duchamp, Breton, Ernst, Miro, Desnos to early Pollack, Dali and they would just stop in their tracks and take in Magritte’s Castle of the Pyranees. I guess the aes­thet­ic was a spoon­ful of sug­ar to make the “weird” medi­cine go down. However, Magritte for the time being can dir­ect people to the oth­er guys, but that’ll fade out.
    And while I’m think­ing of it (sorry for the long post, guys) and going back to folks ask­ing Glenn about what music to get and Tom Russell talk­ing about enjoy­ing new things… artists today don’t get asked the right ques­tions. The dis­sem­in­a­tion and cross-pollination of the under­sung can come out of these pieces. Like Bill Flanagan’s inter­view with Dylan earli­er this year where they debate Sam Houston. What? I want to hear Dylan talk about the things he’s an expert on. (They do get around to Ovid and, I don’t know, Gordon Lightfoot.) I mean, I have “Dirty Little Billy” on my DVR because Tom Waits said it was one of his favor­ites. People will check out Bowie and Joy Divison because they’re Arcade Fire fans. I’m tired of inter­view ques­tions like “Why did you need/want to make ____?” (I’m look­ing at you, Charlie Rose.) I want to know what Cameron has enjoyed been inspired by in these last 12 years. No one asks.
    Anyway, sorry to cause a tizzy. A TIZZY!

  • William Goss says:

    I blame James Cameron.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    It’s a fun tizzy, Chris; a nice way to spend a snow­bound even­ing, at least in part. It’s funny you men­tion school. My music­al tastes formed haphaz­ardly, and were pre­co­cious; as the world’s young­est Beatlemaniac, I was all of five when I asked my folks to buy me a Beatles album, and as such got “Beatles ‘65” for Christmas ’64. When I got to school I was a genu­ine mis­fit, and I don’t use the term lightly; for much of second grade I had to go through a bat­tery of med­ic­al tests to determ­ine wheth­er or not I was “spas­tic.” I was­n’t, just goofy, but I guess a part of me thought “if the show fits, wear it,” and there I went, tak­ing out LPs of Schoenberg string quar­tets from the lib­rary as I con­tin­ued to fol­low the Fab Four into psy­che­delia. By the time I met the high school teach­er who would lend me “Ascension,” I was pretty primed for it. And all of the stuff stuck, but I still did­n’t KNOW shit about it, and I could­n’t argue why it was any good; all that came later. A lot of it is still com­ing, as it were. Never ends, really.

  • jim emerson says:

    I dig. And “Avatar” is dead (to me), too.

  • Mike D says:

    Glenn, Nelson Mandella got into Winnie Mandella, so any­thing is pos­sible. Until that day, I’ll con­tin­ue to sing “If the chil­dren don’t grow up/our bod­ies get big­ger but our hearts get torn up”. But, what the hell. Second the Future of the Left love, as they are the off­shoot of Mclusky. But I have a soft spot for both Ligeti and Lady Gaga, so what do I know? I also hap­pen to think The Divine Comedy is amaz­ing, and Pulp’s “This is Hardcore” to be one of the all time great albums. Of the more recent crop, Lily Allen and Florence and the Machine are quite a delight. And yeah, Schoenberg can freak me, and “Baby’s In Black” is one of the Beatles all-time jams. This thread is great. Thanks, Glenn.

  • jim emerson says:

    Holy shit! I just dis­covered that Peter Peter Brötzmann put out a record called… “Shadows: Live in Wels.” As in Jeffrey, but with one less “l.” What does it mean?

  • Chris O. says:

    That’s great, Glenn. Whereas my son, at 5, asks me if Nancy Sinatra on the cov­er of “Boots” is a super­hero because she’s wear­ing red boots and appear­ing as if float­ing in mid-air. Dylan’s “Subterranean Homesick Blues” split my sky open-wide, at 13. An example of how the avant garde and middle class can come togeth­er, I sup­pose. Absurdism you can dance to.

  • jim emerson says:

    Chris O.: Cameron has abso­lutely been inspired 1) his own bet­ter past work; and 2) Roger Dean Yes album cov­ers from the 1970s. I don’t know if he’s acknow­ledged it, but that’s where the look of “Avatar” comes from. Examples here: http://j.mp/5B7veB

  • Chris O. says:

    But does­n’t that make it inter­texutal rather than unima­gin­it­ive, Jim? I kid. I actu­ally deleted the sen­tence from that post “Or does Cameron not feel that any­thing released in the last dec­ade is on par with where he believes he can take cinema”. I had fun with “Avatar”, but there were moments where a part of me wanted to instead see a Nova/Nature epis­ode guid­ing us through Pandora.
    And your post and pics can also bring us back to the afore­men­tioned Castle of the Pyrenees. Weird: http://tinyurl.com/4x284

  • Chris O. says:

    And to cla­ri­fy, Jim, the Chris O com­ment­ing on your blog (“Why does a 10-year-old have a cell phone?”) is not me. Though it’s a val­id question.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    This IS a fun thread—and Jim, your com­par­is­ons between “Avatar“ ‘s land­scapes and Roger Dean Yes cov­ers are great; in fact the phrase “moun­tains come out of the sky and they stand there” actu­ally popped into my mind dur­ing the movie—but I gotta call it a night. Compiling playl­ist for Christmas brunch party tomor­row (not ter­ribly idio­syn­crat­ic; Charlie Parker’s “White Christmas,” yes, James White and the Blacks’ “Christmas With Satan,” no) and then help­ing the Lovely Wife with final straight­en­ing out. Then bed. A demain!

  • Zach says:

    As someone who spent a long time being per­plexed by the music­al taste of my col­lege friends, I can relate to a gen­er­al sense of dis­dain for most of con­tem­por­ary pop/rock music. I was really res­ist­ant for a while, but I’ve come to enjoy a sig­ni­fic­ant enough por­tion of the “indie” scene to not write it off.
    But, it DOES feel like there is this gen­er­al aim­less­ness to a lot of the con­tem­por­ary scene. It’s frus­trat­ing, but so are a lot of oth­er things…
    But not Avatar! I’m cur­rently in the slightly awk­ward pos­i­tion of basic­ally appre­ci­at­ing every cri­tique I’ve read, but yet some­how con­vinced that they are irrel­ev­ant. I’ll go on record now for say­ing that it’s actu­ally the anti-FX porn film. And the fact that its com­ing from Cameron makes it all the more essential.

  • John M says:

    Thanks for the recom­mend­a­tions, Glenn! I shall begin my own per­son­al Free Jazz Odyssey asap.
    I hope you all enjoy my new direction.

  • Dylan P. says:

    Glenn, on a totally unre­lated note: is it strangely poet­ic that yours and Swanberg’s pieces on your respect­ive favor­ite films of the dec­ade at Salon are right next to each oth­er? And that you chose Rivette and he chose “Jackass”?
    These are things that leave me feel­ing good before going to bed.

  • Brotzmann rules OK. >WHEW! Thank G‑d I was able to take on stand on the con­tro­versy… :} It’s true, the 21st c. does­n’t seem too feli­cit­ous for the avant­jazz con­tinuüm, esp. (as clearly evid­enced in this thread) as increas­ingly the con­sensus insists that one must des­pise it sound-unheard, but Good Lord if this was­n’t a stun­ning dec­ade for this music, as well, & this past Friday’s not-overwhelmingly-attended Sabir Mateen/Ras Moshe gig at the Douglass St. Collective space shows the dec­ade ain’t done yet. For people may be look­ing for a way in to this some­what her­met­ic music scene even sym­path­et­ic ears may be scared off from, I’d recom­mend approach­ing artists play­ing this music label-centrically, some­thing that helped me enorm­ously when I star­ted listen­ing to trad jazz in col­lege and began to real­ize all the albums on Blue Note were invari­ably many mani­fest­a­tions of the shit. So, check out Thirty Ear (not­ably the Matt Shipp-curated Blue series, e.g. his Nu Bop, which is kinda hard to call “ran­dom” in the vig­or­ous pres­ence of such phat beats…), Aum Fidelity, Eremite, Clean Feed, Pi, Tzadik, &c. That cov­ers Peter B., and some sev­er­al hun­dred oth­er greats of the form(s)… P.S. Yeah. Arcade Fire. Who cares? 

  • Joseph Neff says:

    Free jazz has been around nearly as long as rock ’n’ roll, so I feel safe in pre­dict­ing that free music’s future is secure, maybe more sol­id than rock, which keeps hyphen­at­ing itself in attempts to be ‘con­tem­por­ary’ or ‘hip’, and becomes less and less inter­est­ing to me as a res­ult. I rank the greatest live show I ever atten­ded as the Brotzmann Chicago Tentet in Washington DC. The per­form­ance was fero­cious and sub­lime. That said, I also saw Arcade Fire open for Lou Barlow before FUNERAL came out, and I like that record a lot. But I NEED Brotzmann/Drake/Kessler LIVE @ THE EMPTY BOTTLE on Okkadisk. That dis­c’s a total monster.

  • don r. lewis says:

    Obviously, I was jok­ing earli­er buuuut.…you *do* fit the hip­ster descrip­tion in terms of lov­ing obscure bands, movies that are impossible to see etc. Plus, don’t you live in Brooklyn?! Free jazz…puhleeze 😉
    Admittedly, I can­’t stand these skinny jeaned, greezy haired, PBR drink­ing, Parliament smoking Brooklyn-ites so I’m actu­ally on your side there.
    Carry on…

  • christian says:

    Yes, Jeff Wells needs to stop being enabled. He’s a big­ot and a mor­on. Does he have any insight that has­n’t flipped with the wind? I just feel sorry for a man so blinded by self-loathing and misanthropy.
    As for “rock is dead” – in some ways yeah, in some ways, nah. Jack White rules.
    As far as hip­sters go, when I moved to LA I was handed a pork­pie hat, a copy of “Neutral Milk Hotel” and poin­ted to Silverlake. I rejec­ted all three and life has been just fine.
    I’ve noted in my music-lovin’ life that there are rock/indie fans who often asso­ci­ate depth with noise, where­as I’m more European in my tastes. Over there, Morrissey and Leonard Cohen can praise a‑ha’s “Scoundrel Days,” one of the greatest synth-pop records of the 80’s that you’ve nev­er heard. In America, there’s too much “three chords and a truth” blue-collar fantas­i­as from music critics.

  • J says:

    Hey, I like my “over­wrought, off-key, charm­less, arty Canadian crap” thank you very much! If you Americans don’t like Arcade Fire, we’ve got Sloan, Weakerthans, New Pornographers, Metric, Broken Social Scene, and a host of oth­ers that may appease you. My feel­ings on jazz are best summed up by The Kids in the Hall’s Bruce McCulloch: http://www.kithfan.org/work/transcripts/two/jazz.html
    But please don’t blame Canada.

  • Marsh says:

    Come on Glenn, every­one knows Free Jazz is dead. Only min­im­al synth, harsh noise, and italo-disco reviv­al lives these days.

  • Right on, Marsh – oh, yeah, and Sloan! And, of course, with sim­il­ar chau­vin­ist pride and glance towards a pre­vi­s­ous cen­tury, Rush.
    It would be fun­ni­er if people who ref­er­ence someone else’s com­ic skit for their (one can only ima­gine) thor­oughly informed, know­ing dis­missal of “jazz” wer­en’t so sim­il­arly determ­ined to trawl through their own dust­bin of his­tory. Someday, Broken Social Scene will be as au cour­ant as Gene Krupa. And, you know, us Brotzmann fans just CAN’T stop talk­ing about Gene Krupa…

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    It WAS silly of me to for­get the Italo-disco revival!
    James, did you know Gene Krupa was the bon­afide, un-ironic idol of New York Dolls’ drum­mer Jerry Nolan? And let’s face it, as over­used in movies as “Sing, Sing, Sing” tends to be, it WAS some­thing of a breakthrough/turning point in the, ahem, devel­op­ment of a form.
    I’m still bummed out about the recent passing of Louie Bellson, who was kind enough to answer my ques­tions about him and the Goodman band in “The Gang’s All Here” a while back…the art­icle from The Auteurs’ is here:
    http://www.theauteurs.com/notebook/posts/195

  • Glenn – I did not know that. I’ll have to listen more closely to the hi-hat on “Personality Crisis”. Good look­ing on the Bellson quotes. Myself, I’m still get­ting over George Russell…
    And, since we have been dis­cuss­ing jazz of a more avant bent on this here film blog and all, were you aware of Muhal Richard Abrams’ “appear­ance” in Medium Cool? Me neither, but clearly ’68 in Chicago did­n’t belong to Abbie & Daley’s storm­troop­ers exclus­ively. I found this out in an inter­view with the peer­less George Lewis, author of the recent, well-received AACM his­tory A Power Stronger Than Itself, on All ABout Jazz’s web­site. A teas­er or three:
    “LP: Did the music of the AACM reflect the struggle of African or Black Americans dur­ing the time of the civil rights movement?
    GL: The simple answer is “of course,” and the prob­lem with that is that no one ever goes past the simple answer. I sug­gest that if someone really wants an answer to that ques­tion, they watch the DVD of the movie Medium Cool by Haskell Wexler.…The DVD included com­ment­ary by Wexler and his asso­ci­ates, and they’re talk­ing about a scene in which Studs Terkel had prom­ised them that they would be intro­duced to Real Black Militants…when I got to that part of the movie I found that the “Real Black Militants” turned out to be Muhal Richard Abrams, Jeff Donaldson, one of the founders of the Africobra art move­ment; John Jackson, who was a trum­peter with the AACM, and sev­er­al oth­er people who were asso­ci­ated with the more pro­gress­ive African-American art scenes of the mid-1960’s…It was inter­est­ing to me that Wexler and the oth­ers had no idea who these people were, even today. So for them, these were Real Black Militants from the com­munity who had these amaz­ing powers of per­form­ance. And the real­ity was that these were people who had been per­form­ing and act­ing in the visu­al and per­form­ance world longer than the film­makers themselves.”
    True story, one of many reglaed by the ever-insightful Mr. Lewis: http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=33855&pg=2