DVD

Best DVDs of 2009, Part One: Blu-ray discs

By January 5, 2010No Comments

2009 was a pretty lousy year in many respects, I found. One respect in which it was dis­tinctly not lousy was DVDs. A lot of great stuff, to the extent that I’m gonna need two posts to cite them all. And you may find I’ve missed a favor­ite or two of yours. First, the still-contention-fomenting Blu-ray Disc format. A lot of the below titles were released on standard-def DVD con­cur­rently, but not all of them; in any case, the Blu-rays of the films that got dual-format releases are my pre­ferred ver­sions. So. In alpha­bet­ic­al order…

DOMESTIC ISSUES

An American Werewolf In London (Universal) Sadly, I’ve nev­er quite been able to fig­ure out wheth­er I dig this grisly/funny John Landis con­coc­tion in spite of its mere­tri­cious­ness or pre­cisely because of it. In any event, this ren­der­ing of it pre­serves its excesses very nicely.

Bird With The Crystal Plumage (Blue Underground) Not my fave Argento by a longshot…but because the Blue Underground folks are not behold­en to cine­ma­to­graph­er Vittorio Storaro and his Esperanto-for-TV-displays 2.0 aspect ratio scheme, we now get a Storaro-shot widescreen Blu-ray in its ori­gin­al 2.35 ratio. 

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (Criterion) Yes, I know I was­n’t too crazy about this film, and remain so. Still, this disc is a keep­er because of its spec­tac­u­lar pic­ture qual­ity and exhaust­ive extras, which may someday per­suade me to upgrade my assess­ment of it. Criterion’s decision to handle this film is one of sev­er­al silly com­plaints voiced in a recent Newsweek art­icle by Daniel D’Addario, who sniffs, “turns out the art of the deal plays a big­ger role in the Criterion pro­cess than you’d think,” after quot­ing Criterion pres­id­ent Peter Becker say­ing that the Button disc was a kind of favor to David Fincher. Oh, some­body guide me to the faint­ing couch—Criterion admits it wants to work with David Fincher. Well, gee, who does­n’t want to work with David Fincher at some level. Hell, I’d like to work with David Fincher. But to D’Addario, this con­sti­tutes some kind of sin, as does Criterion’s recent deal with IFC, which has thus far yiel­ded spec­tac­u­lar Blu-ray edi­tions of Gomorrah, Che, and A Christmas Tale. These pic­tures are “decent enough,” allows D’Addario, “[b]ut clas­sics?” Maybe, maybe not, but hey, let’s look at the mis­sion state­ment that’s on every Criterion Collection case: “The Criterion Collection, a con­tinu­ing series of import­ant clas­sic and con­tem­por­ary films…” Aha! There goes D’Addario’s whole thes­is, I guess. Maybe the ques­tion should have been “But import­ant?” Of course that’s a more…mercurial qual­ity, I sup­pose. I for one wel­come the Criterion/IFC deal. IFC’s acquis­i­tion guy has great taste and he snatches up a lot of fant­ast­ic stuff very fast. (Last time I was at Cannes, whenev­er I’d see a pic­ture I thought was par­tic­u­larly fant­ast­ic, I’d call a friend who runs a DVD label and say, “Go after this,” and he’d say, “IFC just bought it.) But IFC’s cur­rent dis­tri­bu­tion mod­el, which ought to gain trac­tion in the com­ing months/years, often means that what the com­pany acquires gets a lim­ited the­at­ric­al expos­ure. The Criterion deal gets this stuff out there more prom­in­ently, which I con­sider a good thing. And in any event, as I’ve said before, Criterion isn’t a non-profit. And D’Addario’s argu­ments would have a little (a very little) more cred­ib­il­ity if he him­self did­n’t come off like he could­n’t tell Two Or Three Things I Know About Her from Ten Things I Hate About You without a Google search.

Dead and Buried (Blue Underground) Gary Sherman’s near-classic ’81 liv­ing dead film, one-stop shop­ping for exploit­a­tion kicks (gra­tu­it­ous nud­ity, nasty shocks), but also genu­inely spooky in an old-school vein. 

Dr. Strangelove (Sony, pic­tured) I saw a new 35mm print of this a week or so before I got the Blu-ray, so I felt par­tic­u­larly secure in siz­ing this one up. Just fab­ulous. A lot of grain? Yes, in all the right places. I took issue with grain-allergic Jeffrey Wells here

6a00e5523026f58834011570c241d7970b
Drag Me To Hell (Universal) Vivid hor­ror car­toon fun!

Easy Rider (Warner) I’ve always con­sidered the film some­thing of a meander, but see­ing it like this—Lazslo Kovacs’ ground­break­ing, impres­sion­ist­ic, semi-doc-style cine­ma­to­graphy repro­duced with exquis­ite sensitivity—actually improved its dra­mat­ic com­pon­ent for me. Said com­pon­ent is, as Paul Schrader noted, quite con­ven­tion­al and sen­ti­ment­al. Still, it’s more than just a time-capsule piece.

Fight Club (Fox) The very dark com­edy’s darks are very rich here.

The 400 Blows (Criterion) Every frame an hon­est beauty.

The General (Kino) Remastered from a fine-grain print taken from the ori­gin­al neg­at­ive, this is a smooth-as-silk sepia exper­i­ence of an immor­tal mas­ter­piece. The great Dave Kehr uses the disc as a spring­board for his per­tin­ent mus­ings on Blu-ray and clas­sic cinema here

Gimme Shelter (Criterion): I wish I still had that old issue of Video Review wherein D.A. Pennebaker raves about the image qual­ity of 8mm film pro­jec­ted onto a white sheet, so I could get the exact quote. In any event, if you’re at all in sync with Pennebaker’s sentiment—that the format had a unique vivid beauty—you’ll under­stand the logic, no, the geni­us, of giv­ing this rough-and-ready 16mm-shot doc the Blu-ray treat­ment. There’s blur, there’s grain, there’s flar­ing; and it’s all beau­ti­ful. The movie, of course, is one half great con­cert film and oher half coun­ter­cul­ture nightmare.

Gone With The Wind (Warner) Speaking of sepia; the beau­ti­ful tinge of it injec­ted into the film’s Technicolor in its first half is giv­en its prop­ers in this dazzling rendi­tion of a mag­ni­fi­cent and prob­lem­at­ic picture.

Hot Fuzz (Universal): Very slick and sleek, befit­ting its brand of smart and tech­no­lo­gic­ally advanced comedy.

Howards End (Criterion) The Merchant/Ivory tra­di­tion of qual­ity, here rep­res­en­ted in its argu­ably most suc­cess­ful mani­fest­a­tion, and giv­en a metic­u­lous presentation.

Inglourious Basterds (Universal) That it should yield a great Blu-ray isn’t neces­sar­ily news. 

Kagemusha (Criterion) Jaw-dropping col­or. No, really, your jaw will drop.

Labyrinth (Sony) Scary mup­pets and…super creep? Oh, Bowie’s char­ac­ter isn’t that bad.

Last Year At Marienbad (Criterion) Not a puzzle film, but rather a work of sci­ence fic­tion. Images smooth as sat­in. And still cap­able of gen­er­at­ing con­tro­versy after fifty some odd years. 

The Last Metro (Criterion) A par­tic­u­larly gor­geous Truffaut/Almendros col­lab. Some notes here

Monsters Inc. (Disney) Already-classic Pixar.

Monterey Pop (Criterion) Pennebaker him­self. See entry for Gimme Shelter.

The New World (New Line) The exten­ded cut, 175 often breath­tak­ingly beau­ti­ful minutes. One wishes someone would give the film a treat­ment akin to the multi-version present­a­tion of Mr. Arkadin that Criterion did some years back. 

North By Northwest (Warner) Part of a Warner Blu-ray tri­fecta along with GWTW and Oz. Probably my favor­ite film of the three. 

Pierrot Le Fou (Criterion) Godard at his most color-drunk since Contempt.

Pinocchio (Disney) One of those “holy moley” home theat­er exper­i­ences. Pictured, and reviewed here.

6a00e5523026f5883401127912957d28a4-800wi
 

Playtime (Criterion) If it’s gonna be watched at home, it’s gotta be watched in this ver­sion. Period. Here’s why.

Repulsion (Criterion) Polanski’s great all-men-are-creeps goose­bump fest. Look at the detail on that rabbit!

The Seventh Seal (Criterion) Something I really nev­er thought I’d see when the format deb­uted. Hence, the stuff that dreams are made of, in cer­tain respects.

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (Disney) The multi-plane cam­era 3‑D effect on this is actu­ally bet­ter than sev­er­al “real” 3‑D films I saw over the past few years. And the rest of it’s great too. 

South Pacific (Fox) More Todd-AO on Blu-ray, please? 

Synecdoche NY (Sony) Not just because I’m one of its volu­min­ous DVD extras. Really. 

Raging Bull (MGM) A superbly sat­is­fy­ing rendition.

Up (Disney) Again, not news.

Vanishing Point (Fox) Existentialism and fast cars, a minor cult clas­sic with some sub­stan­tial visu­al pleasures.

The Wages of Fear (Criterion) Desperate char­ac­ters and nerve-wracking sus­pense in piti­less black and white…

Wings of Desire (Criterion) Considered here. 

The Wizard of Oz (Warner) Definitively dazzling.

UPDATE: A read­er reminds me that the Zodiac dir­ect­or’s cut Blu-ray was a January ’09 release. Fits in nicely here; good thing its title begins with a Z…

FURTHER UPDATE: Having got­ten a Japanese issue of the amaz­ing Warner disc of An American In Paris pre­vi­ously, I stu­pidly for­got its domest­ic release in ’09. Of course it’s a must, as is the Blu-ray of Gigi. I also neg­lected to men­tion the icons of reli­gious and Technicolor kitsch Quo Vadis and The Robe. And the icon of just plain kitsch The Towering Inferno. All dazzling Blus!

 

FOREIGN ISSUES

Belle De Jour (Studio Canal Collection, Region B locked) This Studio Canal col­lec­tion is put­ting some pretty excit­ing stuff on Blu-ray, and doing it well. It’s likely that this title, and the Godard cited below, will see domest­ic release via Liongsate, and if they don’t screw them up, that’ll be great. Me, I could­n’t wait…

BFI Flipside label (Region B locked): Hard to pick just one title from this intriguing off­shoot of this splen­did label, which has been respons­ible for mag­ni­fi­cent Blu-rays of Antonioni’s The Red Desert and Pasolini’s “Trilogy of Life.” I’ve reviewed Primitive London and Herostratus here and here. And then there’s Lester’s The Bed-Sitting Room. And the three Jane Arden/Jack Bond films, which are impress­ive and haunt­ing and have been, for me, impossible to write about. An eccent­ric treas­ure trove.

Contempt (Studio Canal Collection, Region-free) Ooh, look how heav­enly white Michel Piccoli’s cigar­ette is…

The Dam Busters (Optimum, Region B locked) This favor­ite of WWII-movie con­nois­seurs really shines in this Blu-ray. A nice surprise.

Hamlet (ITV, Region B locked) A Facebook friend, cit­ing this and Welles’ Macbeth, called 1948 “the year Shakespeare went noir.” This disc is an immer­sion in fog-choked mel­an­chol­ic atmosphere.

Red Cliff I and II (Mei Ah Entertainment, Region A) If you can­’t see the full five-hour-plus ver­sion of this mag­ni­fi­cent Woo epic on a very big screen, these two excel­lent discs are the next best thing.

Sunrise (Eureka!/Masters of Cinema, Region-free) An inspired and inspir­ing disc. Reviewed here.

Tokyo Sonata (Eureka!/Masters of Cinema, Region-free) The Mad Detective Blu-ray isn’t any­thing to sneeze at, either. The label’s going to be even more aggress­ive with Blu-ray this year, which we should all be look­ing for­ward to. 

 

No Comments

  • bill says:

    That PINNOCHIO still is amaz­ing. I don’t have a Blu-Ray play­er yet myself, so I’m very much look­ing for­ward to part 2 of this, to see if there are any big DVDs I missed. More than likely there are. I loved when you did this fea­ture at PREMIERE, and I do believe that’s how I found out about the Val Lewton set, for which I’m etern­ally grateful.

  • Michael Adams says:

    Glad to see Hot Fuzz on your list. So much is going on that won­der­ful new jokes jump out every time I see it. It does­n’t seem to be the kind of film, com­pared to New World, say, that cries out to be Blu, but it does look much bet­ter than it did in theaters.
    The Blu rev­el­a­tion of 2009 for me is North by Northwest. I’d seen it at least twenty times but nev­er noticed ROT’s yel­low undies until this time, and EMS is much more attract­ive than before. Blu makes a great film even greater.

  • Tom Russell says:

    I too found that “art­icle” about Criterion rather stu­pid, espe­cially giv­en the whole “con­tem­por­ary” part of the mis­sion state­ment, as you cited. And I’m the guy who picked a snit about ARMAGEDDON’s pres­ence in its cata­logue and, IIRC, inspired a recent “Criterion isn’t a non-profit” response.
    I kinda wish Criterion had access/DVD rights to the films that were in their laser­disc col­lec­tion, which was a bit more eclect­ic (Ghostbusters! Spinal Tap! Boogie Nights!), and helped in some ways to broaden the Strictly Arthouse image that D’Addario thinks they’re squandering.

  • Fabian W. says:

    What, no ZODIAC Director’s Cut Blu-Ray? That was in January, right?

  • Couple o’ things:
    * “the still-contention-fomenting Blu-ray Disc format” – for realz?? Some people would still prefer Betamax? Seriously, I thought this was the long-preferred DVD format for the cinephile, even as against HD-DVD. Who is doing the con­tend­ing, and why?
    * You are too kind by half to Mr. D’Addario, and deserve to give him the full Glenn on The Auteurs, else­where. I real­ize Newsweek is viewed across a broad swath of world his­tory as an unas­sail­able pin­nacle of indie/arthouse cred. And yet. To para­phrase a Bryon Coley review from many years ago, please fuck him.
    * You’ve been name-checking Dead and Buried more than once of late, and it inter­ested me since Mr. Sherman (whose mem­or­able, under­rated Vice Squad is the only thing I’ve seen by him) has pretty much writ­ten it off, even more than his hacked-up Death Line/Raw Meat – in his Shock Cinema inter­view he refused to dis­cuss it at all. Discuss…
    * Never, ever under­stood the Vanishing Point cult, except in prin­ciple (speed freak, long drive, chases, hip black DJ/Tiresias stand-in, etc.) In prac­tice, how­ever, I found it so goofy and unbe­liev­able – where to begin? Tiresias/Little declaim­ing on Newman’s “crazy luck”, about which he became informed.…how? I’ll sit through Jeanne Dielmann or Wavelength again, though I know how both will end, before I will for Vanishing Point. I’d soon­er die – is that what people mean when they call the film “exist­en­tial”?
    * And to close out by poten­tially fur­ther stok­ing cinephil­ic wrath: is now a good time to admit I prefer Sorcerer over Wages of Fear? No? too late…

  • Tom Russell says:

    But… but… WAGES OF FEAR is good. It’s moody, taut, incred­ibly vis­cer­al, not to men­tion delight­fully sor­did. It takes the time to set up its mileau and the stakes, which to my mind makes the action sequences all the more sat­is­fy­ing and thrilling.
    SORCERER, on the oth­er hand– all it really has going for it, I think, is the score by Tangerine Dream. Which is (in all ser­i­ous­ness) noth­ing to sniff at, I think it’s an abso­lutely lovely score, cer­tainly evoc­at­ive, but the film as a whole I find to be quite under­whelm­ing. (Though this might be my well-documented anti-Friedkin bias speaking.)
    You’re cer­tainly entitled to your opin­ion, James, and I’m cer­tainly not try­ing to unleash cinephil­ic wrath upon your per­son– I’m just curi­ous what qual­it­ies SORCERER has that puts it over WAGES OF FEAR in your book.
    As for Vanishing Point, I thought it was pretty neat but was­n’t as wowed by it as I thought I’d be, giv­en the hype. My wife intro­duced me to it and seemed to get a lot big­ger kick out of it than I did. She also had seen it when it came out in theat­ers, and was prob­ably bet­ter able to get back in touch with the film’s ori­gin­al “zeit­geist” than I; a lot that might seem silly or curi­ous in my child-of-the-eighties-and-nineties eyes are forgiven/understood by her eyes (just as my affec­tion for the Transformers or Thundercats car­toons seem rather ali­en to her).
    Granted, I have no idea how old you are, Mr. Keepnews, and this explan­a­tion could for you per­son­ally not hold very much water. But that was my exper­i­ence with it, at any rate.

  • bill says:

    I don’t agree with James Keepnews about many things, but SORCERER vs. WAGES OF FEAR is one of them. Granted, it’s been ages since I’ve seen either one, but the sweaty ten­sion every­one says they feel when watch­ing WAGES OF FEAR is how I felt watch SORCERER, and SORCERER does­n’t have its prot­ag­on­ist cel­eb­rate his sur­viv­al and new solvency by weav­ing across the road like a car­toon drunk, so that fate can kill him.

  • Tom Russell says:

    I’ll agree that the end­ing of WAGES, while in keep­ing with the film’s cyn­ic­al nature, is a little much.

  • Dan says:

    You know, I can­’t stand “Fight Club” as a movie, but I’m forced to agree it belongs on this list just for tech­nic­al reas­ons. Great transfer.

  • Chris O. says:

    Glenn, did you agree with Wells’ assessment/near-heart attack re: “The French Connection?” It’s not on your list and I’ve avoided pick­ing it up as well.

  • Brian says:

    Wow, how hor­rible that Criterion offers pre­sum­ably more com­mer­cial films like BUTTON as a way of fund­ing pre­sum­ably less com­mer­cial films like 2 OR 3 THINGS! Why, that would put them in the same cat­egory as all the oth­er stu­di­os and com­pan­ies that suc­cess­fully bal­anced art and com­merce! I have no real interest in BUTTON, but if it means I get to finally see MADE IN USA, or THAT HAMILTON WOMAN, or the won­der­ful Eclipse pack­ages of the last few years, what’s the real prob­lem here? Someone should get D’Addario off the com­mune and put a copy of Thomas Schatz’s THE GENIUS OF THE SYSTEM into his hands.

  • christian says:

    I think what’s neat about VANISHING POINT, silly as it is, is the net­work of counter-culture types who help Kowalski on his exist­en­tial road jour­ney. It gives it a def­in­ite cul­tur­al moment. And the cars are bad-ass.

  • david hare says:

    Glenn, no love for the ITV Red Shoes (region B locked)? Or are you hold­ing out for the inev­it­able Criterion second half of this year? It topped my list of Blus for the Beaver – inna hell of a strong field.
    Watching Marienbad again in the Criterion Blu (the Canal is vir­tu­ally identic­al in qual­ity) it finally dawned on me this is the first of Resnais’ Musical Comedies. Francis Seyrig’s (Delphine’s bro) humong­ous, Desormiere-esque organ score is the key, along with the name of the play and author they’re all watching.

  • James does not con­sider Wages bad, just that Sorcerer’s bet­ter. What puts it over? I saw Wages after Sorcerer and was sur­prised to believe the homage exceeded the ori­gin­al. I real­ize it was the 50’s but for so grimy and “exist­en­tial” a jour­ney in Wages, it felt con­trived and maybe not all that grimy com­pared to the jour­neys real­ized in Sorcerer (if only Sam Fuller had dir­ec­ted it!). Make no mis­take, Friedkin is way, way over the top with some of the mater­i­al – guilty Irish goons hit­ting a Catholic Church dur­ing a wed­ding where the bride has a fresh black eye, mmm, subtle, and that’s just Roy’s path in. The “remov­al” of the tree in the jungle path is per­haps the most riv­et­ing sequence in all of Friedkin’s films. And the bot­tom­less cyn­icism through­out plus the no exit coda, match­ing many no exits lead­ing up to it. For me, Wages pales by com­par­is­on, where Sorcerer is a key 70’s film for me, if for few else.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ David Hare: Yes, I was very high on the ITV “Shoes,” but as the Criterion ver­sion is a cer­tainty I held out; many read­ers accuse me of try­ing to bust their bank accounts so I thought I’d show some mercy. It is spec­tac­u­lar but I have no reas­on to think the Criterion won’t be just as good!
    That’s an inter­est­ing per­spect­ive on “Marienbad,” I’ll have to try look­ing at it that way soon!
    @ James, I’m not sure about “Sorcerer“ ‘s superi­or­ity, but I know damn well I’d like to see it again, soon­er than later.

  • Glenn – Me, too! If I’m not mis­taken, the primary reas­on there has­n’t been a major Sorcerer video release is because of how utterly pissed off the stu­dio is at Friedkin, still! Certainly, Easy Riders, Raging Bulls details Billy’s diva­dom in the jungle dur­ing the mak­ing of Sorcerer pretty thor­oughly, though 25 years is quite a long time to hold a grudge, no mat­ter how poorly it did at the box office nor the auteur’s man­ners and/or absence there­of. You’d think Mrs. Friedkin might be able to twist an arm or three, though that may be a related problem…

  • Chris O. says:

    Finally had time to find your com­ments re: “The French Connection.” Consensus is clear across the board. Will avoid.