AuteursDVDGreat Art

Damned Damned Damned

By March 18, 2010No Comments

Damned #1

One of the most sig­ni­fic­ant DVD releases of the year will be hid­ing in plain sight, as it were, on April 6, when Sony puts out its three-disc, six-film “Hammer Icons of Suspense” col­lec­tion. For one of the six films in the col­lec­tion is Joseph Losey’s “These Are The Damned”, a land­mark of eschat­o­lo­gic­al film­mak­ing and an essen­tial, if not quint­es­sen­tial, Losey work. The pic­ture is still as stag­ger­ing, and as odd, as it must have been when it was first released in a much-truncated form almost fifty years ago. 

It’s often termed a science-fiction film—indeed, the entry on it in Carlos Clarens’ great An Illustrated History of Horror and Science Fiction Films is one of the most cru­cial pas­sages in that essen­tial book—but one of the most dis­arm­ing things about it is how cas­u­ally the science-fiction ele­ment is intro­duced into it. The pic­ture begins with a shot of a sea­side town taken from the water (it ends with the same shot) and cuts imme­di­ately to civil­iz­a­tion out of joint—a tableau of itchy “teddy boys” dis­play­ing their tics to the hor­rid strains of a ditty called “Black Leather Rock.”

Damned #2 

Their ringlead­er is King, played by the always-suitably-intense Oliver Reed, who soon dis­patches the comely Joan (Shirley Ann Field) to ensnare aging Yank tour­ist Simon (MacDonald Carey) into a mug­ging. After a bru­tal beat­ing, Simon is looked after a bit by a civil ser­vant Bernard (Alexander Knox) and sculptor Freya, who’s rent­ing an isol­ated house from Bernard, where she claims to be doing her best work. Once these char­ac­ters are intro­duced, their lives con­tin­ue to knit togeth­er in ways we might expect of a real­ist­ic but unusu­ally intense drama; the sub­sequent intro­duc­tion of the isol­ated chil­dren who trans­form all their lives forever is handled as merely anoth­er thread. The hor­ror these chil­dren rep­res­ent, Losey insists, is merely part of the world as it is today.

When he next encoun­ters Joan, Simon, rather than run­ning from her like the plague, prac­tic­ally forces him­self upon her and throws her on his boat, all but kid­nap­ping her. This lust-fueled impuls­ive­ness, a cor­rel­at­ive to wan­ton self-destructiveness, of course brings to mind Stanley Baker’s Tyvian Jones in Losey’s sub­sequent Eve (which was scrip­ted in part by Evan Jones, who also wrote the screen­play here, adapt­ing H.L. Lawrence’s nov­el The Children Of Light), who’s in a sense the archetyp­al Losey male. King’s boys fol­low in hot pur­suit, trail­ing Simon’s boat from over the high cliffs that make up much of the coast­line. We dis­cov­er that Joan, who King is so insanely pos­sess­ive of, is in fact King’s sis­ter. Simon, Joan, and King even­tu­ally infect, as it were, the space where Freya once felt so free to cre­ate. Looking over her art­works, King believes he’s got Freya pegged: “I know your kind. Smart talk­ing. Bad liv­ing. People with no mor­als.” (Wow, he sounds like Armond White!) Morals, eth­ics, all that sort of thing, are put through some fairly grue­some muta­tions as the pic­ture con­tin­ues, and as, soon, one by one, the prin­cipals all fall into the cave, the cave where the cold chil­dren have made their “hide­away.”

Damned #4 

I won’t give away too much of the plot, for the sake of those who have yet to see this utterly bril­liant pic­ture. I will instead say that, among oth­er things, the pic­ture con­firms to some extent Andrew Sarris’ asser­tion that Losey’s often at his best in a genre set­ting: “Genre movies give him the dis­tan­cing he needs to writhe express­ively on screen.” (As it hap­pens, Losey held the science-fiction/horror genres in particular…not quite con­tempt, but mis­trust, and he described Hammer as an out­fit “dis­tin­guished for mak­ing pretty hor­rid hor­ror films.”) This movie writhes through­out, with a thor­oughly uncom­fort­able vibe estab­lished at the very out­set; there’s one cut, in a trans­ition from exter­i­or to interi­or fol­low­ing the thugs, that’s a mar­vel of neck-snapping dis­or­i­ent­a­tion. “The film is slightly dis­join­ted,” Losey explained to Tom Milne in the inter­view book Losey on Losey. But its dis­join­ted­ness con­trib­utes to its power, makes the pic­ture’s ulti­mate, unfor­giv­ing des­ol­a­tion all the more forceful. 

I haven’t even begun to think about look­ing at the oth­er five films in the new Hammer set. They are: Stop Me Before I Kill, Cash on Demand, The Snorkel, Maniac, and Never Take Candy From A Stranger. All are rel­at­ively obscure (Stop and Stranger aren’t even lis­ted in the Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film) and of them I’ve only seen Maniac; I’m sure I’ll get to them all even­tu­ally. But I can assure you without even look­ing at the oth­er films that “These Are The Damned” , which appears here in Losey’s 97-minute cut (Tim Lucas wrote a won­der­ful piece on the dif­fer­ent mani­fest­a­tions of the film in Video Watchdog issue #133) and a beau­ti­ful trans­fer, is worth the price of the whole set.

No Comments

  • bill says:

    I’ve wanted to see this Losey film for a long time. This is great news.
    “It’s often termed a science-fiction film—indeed, the entry on it in Carlos Clarens’ great An Illustrated History of Horror and Science Fiction Films is one of the most cru­cial pas­sages in that essen­tial book—but one of the most dis­arm­ing things about it is how cas­u­ally the science-fiction ele­ment is intro­duced into it.”
    That’s what I found so inter­est­ing about Ishiguro’s NEVER LET ME GO. It can only be termed an SF nov­el because the idea around which everything else in the book revolves is an SF concept, but it reads like a con­tem­por­ary drama. There are no SF trap­pings out­side of that one idea (without which the book would­n’t exist).
    Also, and for­give me if this sounds ped­es­tri­an, and your answer won’t effect my desire for this DVD set one way or the oth­er, but are there any com­ment­ar­ies? Old genre films with good com­ment­ary tracks are my favor­ite thing.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Bill: No com­ment­ary; this is about as bare as bare-bones gets. The pic­ture qual­ity is ace, though.

  • bill says:

    Nertz. Well, I’ll buy it anyway.

  • Ray says:

    @bill: Excellent way of describ­ing the Ishiguro nov­el. He does the same kind of sleight-of-hand genre trick with detect­ive fic­tion in “We Were Orphans,” to equally power­ful effect. And did you see there’s a film of “Never Let Me Go” in the works? I sus­pect the film ver­sion will tilt over into a fully sci-fi genre approach–just as “Remains of the Day” tilted over into full-mahogany peri­od piece.

  • steve simels says:

    Fricking about time. I’ve wanted to get my mitts on this one for ages.…

  • bill says:

    Ray – I think that movie’s done, actu­ally, and set for release in the not-too-distant future. For whatever reas­on, I’m cau­tiously optim­ist­ic about it. If they go the route you pre­dict, then it’ll prob­ably be a dis­aster, but I’d frankly be sur­prised if they went to the trouble of adapt­ing that nov­el, if they mis­un­der­stood it so badly. But I’ve been wrong about these things before.
    I’ve read WHEN WE WERE ORPHANS. Strange book…

  • Shawn Stone says:

    Because I can­’t help myself I went to the NYP Web site. And the head­line on the essay made me cry out “OH. Oh God, no.”
    Good thing it’s Sunday and I’m alone in the office and don’t have to explain what just punched me in the stomach.

  • Tim Lucas says:

    I offered to provide a com­ment­ary for this one, but my offer either did­n’t reach the right ear or was rejected. : (