Housekeeping

Motive

By March 19, 2010No Comments

Motive

My motive is that I thought we could use a break from all the mad­ness. My motive for what, you ask. My motive for not writ­ing about what you might expect me to be writ­ing about in this week’s Topics/Questions/Exercises at The Auteurs’. What did I write about instead? The screen cap above is a clue. Not that it’s a dif­fi­cult mys­tery to solve; just go to one of the links. 

No Comments

  • lazarus says:

    Glenn, I love your men­tion of Tayback as a “Raoul Ruiz col­lab­or­at­or”. I just recently watched Treasure Island, a film that took me some­thing like six months to com­pletely down­load through peer-to-peer, and I had nearly giv­en up hope I would ever see it hit 100%. The fact that Tayback is in a film with Anna Karina and Jean-Pierre Leaud makes it even more of a curiosity.
    Anyone who loves City of Pirates and/or Three Crowns of the Sailor will find them­selves in famil­i­ar ter­rit­ory, even if every­one being dubbed makes it a harder thing to sit through. It’s a real trip of a film, and I had to re-read Stevenson’s story to make more sense of it. Also pur­chased Ruiz’s recently-published book In Pursuit Of Treasure Island, which is just as strange as the film.
    Now if I could only get my hands on that three-part “Manoel on the Island of Marvels” from the same Ruiz period…

  • Lou Lumenick says:

    For me Glenn, the most aweo­me epis­ode of “Murder She Wrote” is the one from sea­son three where Jeffrey Lynn, Martha Scott and Harry Morgan recre­ate their roles from the obscure and noir­ish 1948 flick “Strange Bargain” (also seen in clips), joined by Gloria Stuart and Susan Strasberg! Those were the days!

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    Do you or your wife find that the qual­ity of the show is con­sist­ent through­out, or are some sea­sons bet­ter than oth­ers? I’m famil­i­ar with a lot of Stracynzski’s work, for example, and I’m a cas­u­al fan.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Objectively speak­ing, Tony, I can­’t say that any “Murder” epis­odes or sea­sons reach the heights of a really good “Columbo.” As Lou implies, it’s around sea­sons three and four that the series reaches the clev­er apex of its nostalgia-appeal factor. The Straczcinski sea­sons mix things up more, hav­ing Fletcher travel, and try to cut down on the quaint factor, and are only inter­mit­tently suc­cess­ful at doing so. As a whole, it’s very old-school tele­vi­sion of a sort that’s really gone by the way­side in recent years.

  • g. says:

    Lazarus – per­haps this is not the best place for this, but des­pite that.…as a huge ruiz fan who of course struggles to catch up many of the dif­fi­cult to see films (film com­ment selects has been quite good the last few years, show­ing two or three last year, one the year before, etc., and one this year, thank­fully), any chance you could steer a fel­low ruiz fan in the dir­ec­tion of where you tracked down “treas­ure island”?
    not many dir­ect­ors of who you could say they are one of your all time favor­ites, you have seen maybe 40 films, or some num­ber, and have still not even seen half their work.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    A couple years back, when MGM home video began to trickle out one or two releases from their Cannon hold­ings (“Tough Guys Don’t Dance,” “The Apple”) a friend who has a DVD label and I con­sidered con­tact­ing the label and inquir­ing about sub-licensing some of that stuff—Godard’s “King Lear,” Ruiz’s “Treasure Island,” etc., and manufacturing/marketing them as a kind of “Critic’s Choice” series, with intel­li­gent but mod­est sup­ple­ments and some kind of intro/commentary from a reput­able cham­pi­on of the film. As I recall, we wer­en’t even able to get MGM’s licens­ing per­son to return our calls. Then the eco­nomy tanked, and cer­tain ambi­tions shriveled. Sigh. Requiem for a dream, indeed. And MGM’s cur­rent situ­ation makes its own con­sid­er­a­tion of releas­ing such stuff less and less likely.

  • lazarus says:

    That’s a real shame, Glenn. But thanks for try­ing. Wasn’t the Godard released on VHS? I seem to remem­ber see­ing it at a video store I once worked at.
    g: if you have aMule, eMule, Kadmilla any of that stuff, you can just search for it under “Treasure Island Ruiz”, but it is one long time invest­ment, and hard to say if you’d even man­age to get all of it.
    I would cer­tainly be open to mail­ing out copies.

  • Joseph Neff says:

    Lazurus: Wasn’t the Godard released on VHS?
    It was, as part of The Cinematheque Collection, which included oth­er titles like Rohmer’s PAULINE AT THE BEACH, Ruy Guerra’s ERENDIRA and I think Bunuel’s NAZARIN and DIARY OF A CHAMBERMAID. Titles from this col­lec­tion were staples in Blockbuster Video Stores’ Foreign sec­tions back in the late ’80s-early ’90s. I own a used copy of LEAR due to a loc­al Mom and Pop out­let which would sell off stock that had­n’t ren­ted in some des­ig­nated length of time, a prac­tice which also helped me pick up LITTLE MURDERS and an obvi­ously booted EL TOPO with burned in Japanese subs. And THE REFLECTING SKIN. And MIKEY AND NICKY. And HIGHWAY PATROLMAN. I kind of miss those days.…

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    Thanks for your response, Glenn.
    “…it’s very old-school tele­vi­sion of a sort that’s really gone by the way­side in recent years.”
    If by this you mean non-serialized, I nev­er thought I’d be in agree­ment on this. But in recent years, it seems like even the sit­coms require you be up on their “myth­o­logy” to under­stand a giv­en epis­ode. I do miss the sim­pli­city of just being to tune in to a ran­dom show and being able to get into their self-contained story rather quickly and eas­ily. The appeal of LAW AND ORDER and CSI, no doubt.

  • The Siren says:

    If you haven’t seen Angela in the The Private Affairs of Bel-Ami, you MUST. She’s so lovely and heart­break­ing, def­in­itely the only woman a cad like George Sanders could truly fall for. And she is crisply sexy in Red Danube, too, alto­geth­er too good for Walter Pidgeon.

  • Brian says:

    Despite my abid­ing love for Judy Garland, I always thought it was dis­ap­point­ing that Lansbury was­n’t the romantic lead in THE HARVEY GIRLS– she’s so funny and sexy, and much more inter­est­ing than Garland’s char­ac­ter. I was root­ing for her through­out the film.

  • My favor­ite Lansbury per­form­ance is in the com­pletely won­der­ful The Private Affairs of Bel-Ami. I sold my VHS long ago under the false assump­tion that it would soon appear on DVD. Wish I still had it.
    Bel-Ami is being remade with this Pattinson kid. Bobby, I know George Sanders, and you’re no George Sanders.

  • The Siren says:

    Michael, you are a man after my own heart…

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Michael & The Siren: The hate­ful Pattinson is not only no George Sanders, he’s no Harry Reems, who starred in a sur­pris­ingly charm­ing European-produced “adult” rethink of the de Maupassant tale back in 1976, a very good year for aspiring-to-respectability porn.

  • aspiring-to-respectability porn”: Sounds like an intriguing top­ic for FSLC or Film Forum.

  • The Siren says:

    ^^Or for the Erotic Connoisseur…

  • Pinko Punko says:

    She was fab look­ing in the Tracy/Hepburn polit­ics movie. While very good in Gaslight, I thought the act­ress in the English ori­gin­al was even better.