AppreciationCritics

Mazel tov...

By April 13, 2010No Comments

…to my pal Stephanie Zacherek, who’s just been announced as the lead crit­ic for Movieline, the bold web resus­cit­a­tion of the print organ. While we’ve had our sub­stant­ive dif­fer­ences of opinion/perspective (yeesh, some days I feel like I have to pre­face every oth­er sen­tence I write with that qual­i­fic­a­tion), I con­sider her a lively, pro­voc­at­ive writer with a clear, dis­tinct­ive voice, who don’t make too many gram­mar errors neither. She comes to Movieline from Salon, and it’ll be inter­est­ing to see if/how her work changes in the new con­text, if at all. And, con­versely, how her pres­ence will influ­ence Movieline over­all. The site is nev­er, ever bor­ing, but I’ve seen it as strug­gling with a slight iden­tity crisis since its 2009 re-make/re-model, as in, does it want to be Gawker-ishly snarky, fan­nishly enthu­si­ast­ic, or soberly ana­lyt­ic­al, or achieve some kind of syn­thes­is (or “syn­fe­shish,” as they say in some British regions) of the three? I think Stephanie’s pres­ence there will help cla­ri­fy mat­ters. And of course she’ll be a pleas­ure to read, as she is in any context.

No Comments

  • Ah, that’s lovely! Zacherek has long been my prime example of a crit­ic whose taste I con­sist­ently dis­agree with, but whose writ­ing I always enjoy, and it’ll be inter­est­ing to see what she does now that she’s the one set­ting the tone of a site.

  • Jeff says:

    Yeah, I could count on one hand the num­ber of times I’ve agreed with her, but she’s always a good read. A good choice, Movieline. Not Glenn-Kenny-good, but good non­ethe­less. I’m not sure how well she’ll jibe with (my per­cep­tion of) the Movieline readership.

  • S. Porath says:

    I’d missed the news of her depar­ture from Salon. I’d really got­ten to like Salon’s movie cov­er­age, greatly enjoy­ing the writ­ing of both Zacharek and O’Hehir. Oh well. Another link in my movie folder. She is one of the most depend­ably illu­min­at­ing crit­ics out there, and is a won­der­ful writer.
    What does this mean regard­ing Salon? Is O’Hehir tak­ing over? I’d be inter­ested in read­ing his thoughts about more main­stream films.