Okay, so right now I’m obligated to put my money, such as it is, where my ethical mouth is, as I’m gonna write some very complimentary things about a movie made by a couple of friends of mine. I don’t think it’s a secret to anyone who’s followed my work over the years that I’ve been buddies with Brian Koppelman and David Levien since I met them on the set of their first produced film as screenwriters, Rounders, back in 1998. And I hope I’m not being too…is “obsequious” the word?…when I further point out that Brian and David have been/are not just film-world friends but, you know, very real, very constant, almost-get-you-out-of-jail friends. Literally, even. (It’s a long story. Short Bart Simpson version: “I didn’t do it!” No, really.) Furthermore, I’ve got an intimacy with their new film, Solitary Man, that few critics have the privilege of enjoying; I’ve read the script (something I actually make a practice of not doing most of the time, I believe I turned against it after a traumatic experience with an Ehren Kruger work about ten years ago) and seen three different cuts of the film, including the final. Which I think is splendid. Putting aside my personal conflicts as much as it is possible, I hereby proclaim that Solitary Man, which opens Friday in Los Angeles and New York, is a terrific character-driven drama (with comedy) of the ilk that many complain is not made anymore, and that if you are one of said complainers, you ought to take my advice and check this picture out, because you will be very taken with it.
Michael Douglas scores what I consider a latter-day career high with his performance as Ben Kalmen, a one-time monster car dealer who’s fallen into both disrepute and fiscal mayhem in the wake of a post-midlife decision to pretty much say “fuck it” to whatever once meant anything to him. He now spends his days, as his daughter Susan (Jenna Fisher, in as sly and seemingly self-effacing a turn as her Pam in the TV series The Office) so memorably puts it, “slutting up Lexington Avenue,” preying on the local cougars, as it were, and trying to get a new business concern going. Central to that concern’s startup is the influence of his woozy, stinking rich girlfriend Jordan (Mary Louise Parker), whose you-can’t-tell-me precocious daughter Allyson (Imogene Poots) is applying to Ben’s alma mater, whose library he endowed. Ben’s palaver to Allyson about relationships-as-transactions, laid out over drinks during a weekend jaunt to that college (where Ben also reconnects with an old buddy played by Danny DeVito, and proffers crass but useful social life advice to a green student played by Jesse Eisenberg) results in what you’d call a grievously ill-advised liaison for the two, and if you thought Ben’s life was a bit of a mess before the fallout from this, um, transaction, well, he’s got farther to fall. And maybe someplace to rise up to.
Kalmen’s really a movie character for the ages, an unctuously charming slimeball who may have a heart of…well, not necessarily gold, but at least something not manifestly toxic, under his slick exterior. If you wanna talk about him in terms of ’70s movies, pitch him somewhere between Jack Lemmon’s Harry Stoner in Avildsen’s Save the Tiger (1973) and Roy Scheider’s Joe Gideon in Fosse’s All That Jazz (1979). He’s also got a coarse swagger that one associates with some of the anti-heroes of David Mamet, one of Brian’s favorite writers. (While Koppelman and Levien co-directed the film, Solitary Man differs from their prior projects in that it’s from a solo script by Brian.) But finally he is his own man, a thoroughly recognizable type even if you don’t know the Manhattan milieus through which he imagines he’s still cutting a formidable swath (and the moods and mores of which the filmmakers capture with beautiful, accurate, efficient shorthand). Even if you feel disgusted by the very ground he’s walking on, Koppelman and Levien make you feel somehow invested in his fate.
The film’s look has a lot of clean lines and a good, intimate feel to it; the cinematographer was Alwin Kuchlar, who also shot, among other pictures, a stone favorite of mine, Lynne Ramsay’s Morvern Callar. The picture is brilliantly cast down to the tiniest parts—Susan Sarandon is warmly Sarandonesque as Ben’s exasperated but still affectionate ex-wife; Ben Shenkman’s beautiful as a would-be Kalmen backer who has to tell the dealer no; Richard Schiff has a devastating bit as a private banker who delivers some unwelcome news to Ben; an uncredited Olivia Thirlby is enchanting as the bright girlfriend of Eisenberg’s character, and so it goes on.
The fellows’ directorial debut, 2001’s Knockaround Guys, had a nifty premise and an appealing cast, but its was frequently indistinct and less than sure-footed. Here the directing team has created not only a fully-realized movie, but a fully realized Koppelman/Levien movie—the kind of picture they were meant to make, the kind of picture that they got into the game to make in the first place. And I know it wasn’t all that easy—some day, if I ever get to teach a class in editing, I’ll bring them in to explain how they were able to improve the movie by a very large percent by merely excising a bit of data at the very end, and how fraught their decision to do so seemed to one of them until it was actually executed—but they really pulled it off. Good for them, and good for you, I think.
Looking forward to this one; I’m a big Douglas fan.
I liked THE GIRLFRIEND EXPERIENCE and ROUNDERS, so my two experiences with Koppelman/Levien have been positive, but is it wrong that the main draw for me to see SOLITARY MAN is Jenna Fischer?
If Douglas is anywhere near as good as he was in Wonder Boys, this is going to be a treat.
Wonder Boys was my first thought as well.…his last good movie really – and, i’d argue, his best since Wall Street.
I actually thought KNOCKAROUND GUYS was decent, so I’ll be checking this one out.
you had me at ‘morvern callar’
Am I the only one who always wants to punch Jesse Eisenberg in the face?
Glenn,
Next time we are in front of a group together, a screening series, whatever, we should absolutely talk about that moment, editing decision and etc… I agree, the whole thing plays differently as a result. Don’t want to get further into it, though, until many more people have seen it, to not even shade what we’re talking about.
So glad you dig the film.
@EOTW
I would also like to punch Jesse Eisenberg in the face.
Although I liked him in THE SQUID AND THE WHALE.
Actually there are a lot of people I would put ahead of Jesse Eisenberg re: punching in the face, now that I come to think about it.
Margaret Thatcher, Britney Spears, G. Gordon Liddy, Mike Leigh…That guy who does that top 10 countdown on E News or whatever the fuck that show is…Uhhhh…I was gonna say Pinochet but I just remembered he’s dead.
Had the pleasure of introducing this at a screening tonight, Glenn, and you’re right, it’s a nice, unexpected pleasure. And among the greatest pleasures onscreen was Douglas.
He’s done some crud over the last ten years (although I was kind of fond of him in “King of California”) but taking off on something you wrote, I’d almost say this movie is kind of him saying “fuckit” too – but in a good way.
I mean, you don’t have to be a regular People reader to know a lot of things about this character (the issues he has with aging, with fidelity, with family) cut pretty close to Douglas’ real life. Add to that the pretty reprehensible things the character does onscreen (and those morning-after shots of him in bed, like a beached manatee)and you could imagine some actors being hesitant. But Douglas dives right in.
Definitely his best since “Wonder Boys.” Worth seeing, and full of nice touches (I loved that shot in the hotel bar, which uses a mirror and a staircase to divide the frame into a series of levels – and hint that there may be a few different levels in what we’re about to see happen.) Just hope people find out about this one – it doesn’t help that the title sounds like at least two other films that already came out last year.