Housekeeping

"Wild" by default

By May 28, 2010No Comments

SH WIldBudding anarch­ist Sterling Holloway with Ulrike Meinhof pre­curs­ors Rochelle Hudson and Dorothy Coonan in WIld Boys of the Road.

Because I could not stop for death…no, actu­ally, because I could not com­pose a Topics, etc. post excor­i­at­ing the cov­er­age of this year’s Cannes Film Festival that did­n’t roy­ally irrit­ate my edit­or, I instead opted to con­coct an ana­lys­is of William Wellman’s 1933 Wild Boys of the Road. I know, because that’s the logic­al altern­at­ive, right? Well, such is my char­ac­ter, and my char­ac­ter has no logic. At The Daily Notebook, as it has always been.

No Comments

  • Brian says:

    Will you excor­i­ate here?

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Not likely Brian, as excor­i­ation is best applied in the heat of the moment, and the moment has passed. And in any event, it was just a bunch of uni­ver­sal truths, to wit: Walking out on a movie and then writ­ing about it is still a dick move, even if you’re “only” writ­ing about it on Twitter; com­plain­ing about how Cannes was so much more fun and inter­est­ing 40 years ago is not much more than a passive/aggressive vari­ation on “I fought the war for your sort;” the young fresh fel­lows who tout them­selves as the new van­guard of film cri­ti­cism, if only all these old farts would get out of the way, are by and large noth­ing but hip­ster hacks who can barely carve out com­pet­ent boil­er­plate; and mak­ing sport of Jeffrey Wells is still my best enter­tain­ment value. And there you have it.

  • bill says:

    Man, do I hate hipsters.

  • Chuck Stephens says:

    What? “MUBI” a mor­ass of thin-skinned, crony-protecting cruds incap­able of endur­ing or apply­ing the ton­ic of crit­ic­al reas­on? STOP THE PRESS! (Oh wait, then you’d have to explain to them what a press was, and what The Press was, and…)
    Nevermind, I love this Wellman: is the DVD copy you have/are review­ing from the one in the FORBIDDEN HOLLYWOOD set, or is there yet a new­er edition?

  • Ben Sachs says:

    Aw, Chuck, ain’t it a little early on a Saturday to be spread­ing bad vibes? And aren’t we sup­posed to be all memori­al­iz­ing and shit this weekend?
    But, man, ain’t that third FORBIDDEN HOLLYWOOD set great? My girl­friend and I have gone through most of it in the last year, both of us becom­ing huge Wellman fans in the pro­cess. (As a para­med­ic, she’s par­tic­u­larly fond of NIGHT NURSE, but that’s anoth­er box.) We’re always taken by how much he was able to cram into a single hour, not to men­tion the gen­er­al bad-ass attitude.

  • MovieMan0283 says:

    Yes, Wellman’s great. I enjoyed the Shickel doc/interview with him as well, which TCM included before screen­ing this one a few years back.
    Fortunately, I have missed out on most of the hip­ster hack Twitter fiendds who are appar­ently swarm­ing bug­like over the remains of estab­lish­ment cri­ti­cism. Though 26, I’m still too much of a Luddite to even know what Twitter is (is it a device & an app as well as a site?) I pic­ture a little Tomagochi-looking thing that tweets and warbles whenev­er you text some bon mot. Yes, I know it’s all done through the phone (right?) but I like my ima­gin­ary ver­sion better.

  • Chuck Stephens says:

    Ben, I eat, sleep and bowel-move bad vibra­tions. Why? Because, like the scor­pi­on, it’s in my nature.
    (And I’m memori­al­iz­ing the ver­it­ies of the Press, yo!)
    🙂

  • Ben Sachs says:

    Chuck, if I knew your bowel move­ments were a chron­ic source of bad vibra­tions, I would­n’t have been so quick to judge. That’s a sorry state of affairs, man.

  • Chuck Stephens says:

    On the con­trary: I look good in black.

  • Hopper obit coming?