Asides

Notes on ressentiment

By June 28, 2010No Comments

So it looks as if John Nolte went out and spent ten bucks, or maybe just eight or so (one wants to give him cred­it for hav­ing the brains to take advant­age of mat­inée bar­gains), just to spite James Rocchi, who gave a bad review to Grown Ups. Not just a bad review, a bad anti-American review, that bespoke-suit wear­ing trait­or­ous he-bitch. Thus duty-bound, Nolte sat back and loved it, just as Armond White did. (“Grown Ups bor­rows a Mike Leigh title but does­n’t dis­grace it.” There, in few­er than a dozen words, is the reas­on why The New York Press pays White the big bucks. [Also, in cit­ing the White review, Nolte demurs that White’s “need to be a con­trari­an” bores Nolte “to death.” I do love when Nolte affects a Wildean indol­ence, don’t you?]) “The audi­ence was amused, the crit­ic was not,” noted bearded fury Nolte. “That’s all I need to know.” Doesn’t take much with this guy, does it? Clearly, it might be worth the time to research some ways by which this tend­ency could be exploited so as to milk some real money out of Elmer here. 

Nolte’s notice, such as it is, did hip me to some inter­est­ing inform­a­tion, which is that Joyce Van Patten has a role in the pic­ture. I’ve had a little, ahem, thing for Ms. Van Patten ever since her stel­lar work in Larry Cohen’s 1972 Bone, with Yaphet Kotto.

Joyce 

And no, I am not being funny or even try­ing to be funny; her work in the film is superb and very ballsy, and it led me to think­ing of her as The Really Talented, And Kind Of Strangely Hot, Van Patten. I admit I haven’t really been fol­low­ing her career of late, but I’m glad to learn she’s still work­ing. Which does­n’t mean I’ll fork over any cash to see Grown Ups, not even at mat­inée prices. I may give it a look when it turns up on cable or some­thing. I mean, I’m not stu­pid

UPDATE: Once again prov­ing him­self a mod­el of civil dis­course, James Rocchi responds, with civil­ity, to John Nolte, and receives a civil, if not par­tic­u­larly bright, response from Mr. Big Hollywood him­self. “I’m just anoth­er guy with an opin­ion no more import­ant or val­id than your’s or the guy who reads my gas meter,” aw, shucks, John. If only we were all so mod­est. I also notice that Karina Longworth’s Village Voice pan of Oliver Stone’s South of the Border (anoth­er film I’m not gonna see if I can help it) got a place on Big Hollywood’s marquee,and that Ron “there’s a com­mun­ist com­ing out of my wife’s blouse” Radosh has enthused “Right on, Karina!” with respect to said review. So much cross-political love, it really makes a guy snurfly.

No Comments

  • KEL says:

    I saw Grown Ups this week­end and can assure you it was an exer­cise in how to endure pain. Glenn, once you wit­ness Van Patten toun­ging Rob Schneider, I have a feel­ing your, ahem, thing for her may evap­or­ate, so you may want to avoid it – even on cable. That said, Van Patten and Schneider’s inter­ac­tions were amongst the “fun­ni­est” of the film, but, over­all, Grown Ups was about as funny as the BP oil spill.

  • Van Patten was once mar­ried to Grown Ups auteur Dennis Dugan. Imagine being mar­ried to this hack and Marty Balsam, being the mother-in-law of George Clooney and John Slattery (not at same time), co-starring in a Peter Sellers film, and being in the ori­gin­al As the World Turns cast. That’s some life.

  • gydm says:

    @Michael Adams, that’s awe­some! I did­n’t know all that. And, she was in the ori­gin­al Bad News Bears, and is the young­er sis­ter of a Dick. Phew. How come the Kardashians have an E! True Hollywood Story, but Joyce Van Patten does­n’t?! I think someone should start a cam­paign like the one that landed Betty White on SNL.

  • Don Fabrizio says:

    That’s Prince Yaphet Kotto!

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    One won­ders why Nolte even needs to have a job at all, if some kind of mat­rix of box-office res­ults and IMDB user rat­ings would­n’t provide the same inform­a­tion as ‘the audi­ence was amused’.
    Oh yeah, because he and Breitbart are dishonest.

  • Vanessa says:

    Royally hot screen­shot! I saw Grown Ups this week­end (my boy­friend dragged me which leaves me ques­tion­ing if it war­rants a break up); Adam Sandler & co. are sup­posedly ‘kings’ of com­edy, but I’ll take Prince Yaphet any day!

  • DeGuire says:

    Granted, I saw a free academy screen­ing of “Grown Ups” [sic] so there was­n’t much laughter in the theat­er, mainly weary sighs. One thing I haven’t read any reviews men­tion is how truly spe­cial the product place­ment is. For example, all the guys go to scat­ter the remains of their beloved coach and Kevin James brings along…a buck­et of KFC! Cause he’s over­weight, see? So it’s organ­ic to the char­ac­ter. Then, when Rob Schneider hil­ari­ously gets some of the ashes onto the chick­en, James eats it any­way. Here’s what the product place­ment meet­ing was prob­ably like:
    KFC EXEC: “So…he still eats the chicken?”
    SONY EXEC: “Absolutely. Cause that chick­en is so good it could be gar­nished with the cre­mains of your loved ones and you’d still scarf it down. The Colonel’s secret recipe could be twelve herbs and people…PEOPLE! And you know what? You’d lick your fin­gers and beg for more. That is the mes­sage of Grown Ups.”
    KFC EXEC: “Here’s a giant buck­et of money.”

  • otherbill says:

    A trip to Milan is “pseudo-intellectual bull­shit”? My head hurts.

  • skelly says:

    Don’t tell Big Hollywood that Rocchi is Canadian or they’ll send the tanks north..

  • Grant L says:

    Haven’t seen Grown Ups, have zero plans to, espe­cially after read­ing the linked review below. On one level it could be argued that she’s let­ting one aspect of the movie ruin things for her, on anoth­er that that one aspect is so unre­lent­ing and infused in the movie’s lifeblood that it makes it truly unbear­able. I’ll admit that this par­tic­u­lar aspect that has always been a huge red flag for me, so I’m hardly unbiased.
    http://www.flickfilosopher.com/blog/2010/06/062410grown_ups_review.html

  • gydm says:

    @DeGuire, too funny! By that part of the movie, I was too comatose to even pro­cess the absurdity. Just when I thought noth­ing could be more awe­some than KFC’s Double Down (ya know, the mas­ter­piece that’s just the chick­en, bacon, cheese, & sauce in your hands sans a roll), you point out the awe­some­ness of this oh-so-special ingredi­ent. This gives whole new mean­ing to “kick­ing the bucket”!

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Otherbill: Yeah, that’s pretty fucked, but even worse is “using the word maze [sic] instead of corn.” I mean, first off, it’s “maize,” any­way. And secondly, nobody’s ever actu­ally DONE that since, what, that Mazola com­mer­cial from the ’80s, which is to say, well, that nobody’s ever actu­ally done that. it’s like Nolte’s on some dis­or­i­ent­ing drug that dredges up every media trope he’s ever resen­ted in his life and com­pels him to blame them all on the entity that made him the failed screen­writer that he is today. What a whack job.
    @ DeGuire: It’s funny, my very FAVORITE bit of product place­ment in a film also involves KFC. It is, of course, from the immor­tal “Strange Brew,” and it’s when Paul Dooley, play­ing the Claudius role in the film’s bizarre muta­tion of the plot of “Hamlet,” tells Pam Elsinore to buck up and stop being such a wuss over her father­’s death. Indicating a KFC buck­et at the din­ner table, he says, “The Colonel’s dead, and we’re still enjoy­ing his chick­en.” Awesome.

  • James Rocchi says:

    For the record: 1) I became a U.S. Citizen last year and b) I buy off-the-rack (The Nordstrom’s Rack, to be more spe­cif­ic); bespoke is bey­ond my means, with great regret.

  • Grant L says:

    Sadly, Glenn, I’m sure he sees every last one of those media tropes as symptomatic…file that par­tic­u­lar one under “non-whites insi­di­ously try­ing to force us speak their language.”

  • Dan Coyle says:

    I really des­pised Funny People, and one more thing to des­pise it for is that Sandler made anoth­er movie with Dugan in response to its fail­ure. Please, for the love of God, Adam, STOP IT.

  • LexG says:

    Not to break up the Nolte-bash with facts or any­thing, but…
    He’s been tout­ing this movie all sum­mer sea­son, and his­tor­ic­ally digs Schneider and Sandler vehicles. Whatever your ideo­lo­gic­al issues with Nolte or Big Hollywood or his tact with regards to Rocchi or Kenny, it’s pretty obvi­ous the guy’s a genu­ine Sandler fan who was primed for this movie from the jump, and not just to spite the allegedly lefty crit­ics who’ve panned it.
    But mostly I just want to say you need to see this movie to see MADISON RILEY as Schneider’s lanky, leggy, golden-blonde SMOKING HOT daugh­ter. Best intro­duc­tion to a new HOT CHICK since Megan Fox in Transformers. I was almost out of my seat, or at least my boner was, when she showed up and bent over while wear­ing high heels. Then as icing on the cake, the DREAMY Jamie Chung showed up as her Asian half-sister, so it was like an ebony/ivory VISION FROM HEAVEN.
    Their com­bined STUNNING HOTNESS makes the movie worth see­ing, even though almost the entirety of con­sists of these five guys sit­ting around doing bad puns (most of which don’t even make sense) and mak­ing fun of each oth­er, with “set­pieces” that con­sist of merely chan­ging the ven­ue for five minutes from lake­front to water slide to bas­ket­ball court and still let­ting them riff.
    Also inter­est­ing to note the peck­ing order, with Sandler obvi­ously the lead, MALL COP get­ting second most screen time, Spade and Schneider each doing their thing (snide lech­ery, absurd­ist gross-out) off to the side… then Rock bring­ing up the rear, seem­ingly dis­ap­pear­ing some­times, stuck mak­ing bad jokes about his mother-in-law’s bunions (sample hil­ar­ity “Shut up, TOE-BOCOP!” Cut to shot of Sandler laugh­ing heartily.)
    But, if you ever liked Rat Pack movies, or more fiit­ingly, the era where Burt, Jerry Reed, Mel Tillis, Jim Nabors and the boys filmed them­selves hoot­ing at Loni in a Coors-induced stupor and called it a “movie,” then have at it.

  • Mr. Peel says:

    Haven’t seen GROWN UPS but when Sandler was on Letterman plug­ging it last week Dave took a moment dur­ing the inter­view to men­tion Joyce Van Patten and how much he liked see­ing her in the movie. It struck me as kind of odd, but maybe he worked with her on some TV pro­ject long ago. Maybe Dave always liked I LOVE YOU, ALICE B. TOKLAS.
    Hang on…the same woman was mar­ried to both Dennis Dugan and Martin Balsam??

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Lex G writes: “[Nolte]‘s been tout­ing this movie all sum­mer sea­son, and his­tor­ic­ally digs Schneider and Sandler vehicles. Whatever your ideo­lo­gic­al issues with Nolte or Big Hollywood or his tact with regards to Rocchi or Kenny, it’s pretty obvi­ous the guy’s a genu­ine Sandler fan who was primed for this movie from the jump, and not just to spite the allegedly lefty crit­ics who’ve panned it.”
    B‑b-b-b-but Lex, Nolte him­self writes: “Until I came across James Rocchi’s review at MSN, how­ever, my inten­tions were to rent this…”
    Maybe that’s just a fakeout from JN, to set us up for the killer Right Wing Sucker Punch! Ooof!
    This Madison Riley of whom you speak sounds…interesting.

  • otherbill says:

    I’ll take advant­age of the tiny open­ing provided by Glenn and DeGuire. The best use of product place­ment in film his­tory occurs in Tsui Hark’s DOUBLE TEAM. Jean Claude Van Damme and Dennis Rodman fight Wilderness Period Mickey Rourke and a tiger in a bomb encrus­ted Roman Coliseum (ya know, I enjoy my copy of THE RULES OF THE GAME as much as the next guy, but sen­tences like that are half the reas­on I love movies). Apres le com­bat, Van Damme, Rodman, Some Guy, and a baby run from a giant explo­sion. They pass a row of Coke machines. Recognizing that the explo­sion will catch them, Rodman, as adept at being in pos­i­tion here as he ever was in the low post, grabs a Coke machine to shield the party and every­one is saved from incin­er­a­tion by the power of the Coca-Cola Corporation. 2:40 in the clip below:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo9FpxpvxsM
    I can only assume they killed Rourke because he forced them into the pseudo-intellectual bull­shit of a vis­it to Rome. Though Van Damme’s a dirty Belgian and Rodman once wore a dress so it’s prob­ably just a total wash.

  • haice says:

    Glenn, would­n’t it be a good time to bring back the screen­shot of the drip­ping wound from Parsifal to sort of clean the palate?

  • Tom Russell says:

    I always thought the com­plete and utter crassness of the product place­ment in MAC AND ME was kind of breath-taking.
    And HAROLD AND KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE is argu­ably exempt from being con­sidered “product place­ment”, as it’s more a soci­olo­gic­al study of a product-oriented subculture.

  • The Siren says:

    @James Rocchi: Aha, Nordstrom! All becomes clear. I assume you take advant­age of Nordstrom’s very fine on-site alter­a­tion ser­vices? Not Savile Row, but it makes all the dif­fer­ence. Whatever else one can say about Mr. Nolte’s review, evid­ently he can spot tail­or­ing. I am temp­ted to make a copy of my “Tales of Manhattan” DVD‑R for him.
    There can­’t be all THAT many of these “gath­er­ing at a funer­al” movies, but giv­en William Faulkner’s frus­trat­ing time in Hollywood, it amuses me whenev­er a screen­writer cribs As I Lay Dying. Great nov­el. Maybe next we’ll see Sandler in a com­ic vari­ation on “Barn Burning.”

  • The Siren says:

    Oopsy, now I see that it was Glenn, not John, who has the eye for tail­or­ing. Well, now that isn’t sur­pris­ing at all. Carry on. And Glenn, if you wanna come over and see the Duvivier, say the word.

  • I.B. says:

    Madison Riley could be a porn name.
    @ oth­er­b­ill: now that you talk abou DOUBLE TEAM, I won­der if the ‘Pummas’ in KNOCK OFF also fit as product place­ment… maybe paid by a rival cor­por­a­tion. Always loved the shot of the Nikon cam­era in DEATH WISH III before the Giggler snatches it and Bronson sub­suquently pro­ceeds to blast him with his massive hand­gun loaded with rifle cart­ridges, eli­cit­ing the applause of the neigh­bours and a ridicu­lously sappy Jimmy Page tune in the soundtrack.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    You know, Lex, your com­plete switchar­ound on Nolte is get­ting really fuck­ing weird. What, your taxes go up and Nolte goes from being “The worst American ever” to a guy who loves movies first and aw shucks ain’t that bad after all?
    Best part of that Nolte post is that he “regrets” that his high­light­ing was seen as an attack on Rocchi. Yeah, I’m sure he does. His seem­ingly infin­ite need to be viewed as a per­se­cuted mem­ber of the “real” America in the inter­ment camp that is Hollywood in his head had noth­ing to do with it.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    Death Wish 3 is one of the most mem­or­ably, mind-blowingly awful films ever made. I like how they jus­ti­fy Kersey’s blatant exe­cu­tion of the Giggler- for purse snatch­ing! with this exchange earlier:
    Martian Balsam: “He killed a teen­age girl last week. Put a knife in her skull.”
    Kersey: “How do you know he did it?”
    Balsam: “He did it.”
    Well that clears things up then!
    The Giggler was played by, of all people, Alex Winter of Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure fame.

  • brad says:

    so a couple of chicks in bikinis is enough to get Lex to pay $10 to see a shitty movie? I’m assum­ing he’s aware of the inter­net since he posts here.…perhaps he should look into Google Image w/ safe search turned off. Could save him a lot of time and money if all he needs is wank material.
    I guess Rocchi is right: this is indeed why we can­’t have nice things.

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    You call Death Wish 3 ‘mind-blowingly awful’ as if that’s a bad thing! I just saw that movie a few months ago at LA’s New Beverly and it was delight­ful ’80s kitsch. I’m sure back in the day it just seemed like hate­ful pro­pa­ganda, but nowadays it’s aged into just the right kind of cheese (which is also what I expect to hap­pen to Zack Snyder’s 300).

  • brad says:

    Good christ.…shoot me for look­ing at the com­ments in the Nolte review. How can so many people see things so wrongly? “Liberals hate it so I’m gunno go see it today!” “Hollywood just can­’t stand to see us neander­thals in Middle America hav­ing a good time!”
    wat? I will nev­er under­stand how so many people can col­lect­ively delude them­selves regard­ing the opin­ions oth­ers have of them to such an incred­ible extent. And then they gladly flock to shitty movies just to prove them wrong? or some­thing? It’s so bizarre…and actu­ally does more to rein­force any neg­at­ive opin­ion any­one might have about the demo­graph­ic rather than chal­len­ging it. Dugan is like their prophet…churning out shitty unfunny movie after shitty unfunny movie for them to cham­pi­on as proof that they are reg­u­lar folks. it’s all so bizarre.

  • I.B. says:

    @ Dan Coyle: cor­rec­tion, Winter plays ‘Hermosa’, the rook­ie gang­banger. And yes, they make up that ‘jus­ti­fic­a­tion’ for Kersey killing the Giggler, but there’s still this woman loudly cel­eb­rat­ing Giggler’s death, and the next day har­ass­ing the cops in the crime scene and pro­clam­ing how glad she is because “he stole my purse last week!”. So yes, purse-snatching auto­mat­ic­ally war­rants exe­cu­tion, angry old people would be happy if only they could shoot with machine-guns at noisy young­sters, and bazookas can be safely fired in your liv­ing room. And the movie makes no attempt to elab­or­ate and reas­on these self-evident truths. Which is why DEATH WISH III rules and John Nolte sucks.
    No chicks in bikinis, though.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    Plus, Ed Lauter gets to say “Dude” mul­tiple times, which nev­er stops being funny.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    I know I should­n’t pick at this, but Nolte has a post today on the Tillman Story not­ing that none of the reviews he’s read of the film have any ques­tion­ing of its authen­ti­city. He him­self has not seen the film, but he presents this in an “Isn’t this inter­est­ing, HMMMMMM?” sort of way.
    You might expect him to bring up some issues and sources with the Tillman story for his read­ers to look at. But he does­n’t. He does­n’t ques­tion the film’s basic premise. Or any facts of the case the film presents.
    Isn’t this inter­est­ing, HMMMMM?

  • christian says:

    This was an all-star cast of act­ors who have enter­tained us for a couple of dec­ades now.”
    Nolte is a genu­ine buf­foon. Rocchi of course rules.

  • What, exactly, is wrong with say­ing “I don’t trust these rap­tur­ous reviews.” I *have* seen THE TILLMAN STORY and while I liked it in gen­er­al (weak “7” I’d say) and would be a very happy man if this were as strident as left-wing issue docs get, the fact is – it’s the oppos­ite of that.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    He was imply­ing that the film’s vera­city was in doubt, yet not provid­ing any evid­ence that was the case.