Housekeeping

On appearing to have struck a nerve

By August 17, 2010No Comments

Boy. A guy goes to bed early, and all sorts of hell can break loose. I am not going to clean up the mess left by Lex G in vari­ous below posts. Because, as Jed Leland said of Charles Foster Kane’s Declaration of Principles, I have a hunch it might turn out to be pretty import­ant. No, not really. It’s actu­ally because I want to sad­ist­ic­ally throw it back in his face someday if and when he finally changes his beha­vi­or. No, not that either. But finally, and for real, it’s because, well, voila: behold the inter­net, and isn’t it just too sad? Or some­thing. I blame Jeff Jarvis, really. (n.b., that’s a joke. Honest. Jeff Jarvis, I blame noth­ing on you.)

But yes, from here­on in, the fel­low is no longer wel­come here, and I’d appre­ci­ate it if the oth­er fine people who com­ment here would just do me the favor of ignor­ing him if he turns up. That is, don’t treat his com­ments as if they’re part of any thread, because they will be gone as soon as I’m able to delete them. Thank you.

And yes, it’s true; I AM bald. But hey, at least I’ve got my men­tal health. 

No Comments

  • Amusing to see the (over)reaction. I pic­ture Lex as a minor char­ac­ter drawn with steam com­ing out of his ears and swirl­ing cyc­lon­ic voids for eyes from Robert Crumb’s HUP, chas­ing after Devil Girl yet doused with a deus ex mach­ina buck­et of unsa­vory gloop in the final panel.
    Glenn – your blog, your house, your hos­pit­al­ity. Kudos to you – you’ve been way more tol­er­ant than I would have been.
    Criterion just announced a NIGHT OF THE HUNTER Blu-Ray too.

  • Oliver_C says:

    – When you’re right,you’re right. But you nev­er say, “I told you so.”
    – So what am I right about?
    – Well, I’ll tell you. But first you gotta prom­ise not to say I told you so.
    – I nev­er say that, and I don’t like people who do.
    – Personally, I think you was right. I think that Mink and Bernie
    was in it together.
    – I told you so.

  • Stephen Bowie says:

    Adiós, LexG. Guess you just could­n’t get the QC down.

  • Jaime says:

    Not to ques­tion your wis­dom – glad you’re ban­ning him and all – but let me run this by you:
    1) He makes a dumb remark on an espe­cially inap­pro­pri­ate thread. No longer than a few lines. (Yes, this is after – how long, months? – tons of child­ish behavior.)
    2) You devote an entire, care­fully writ­ten blog post in dir­ect response to him. With pic­tures. Exactly what he was look­ing for.
    3) You retire for the evening.
    4)
    5) You write http://somecamerunning.typepad.com/some_came_running/2010/08/on-appearing-to-have-struck-a-nerve.html
    I can­’t quite seem to fig­ure out #4. Anyone?
    I’m just sayin’.

  • Matthias Galvin says:

    Well, des­pite all that…
    It’s good to know that Manohla will be com­ing back.
    And also Glenn, I’m glad you–as Bloom would say–overcame your anxi­ety. Even if not object­ing your inclu­sion on this poll is all that con­sti­tutes is NOT bitch­ing about being on the list.
    Anyway, I voted for you, and hope that oth­ers do the same.
    And maybe someone could tell me:
    What was LexG ask­ing for an apo­logy from you for?

  • markj says:

    @Jaime: Re #4 – I think you may have missed LexG’s reappear­ance on a couple of threads below. I think his com­ments there MAY have offen­ded Glenn somewhat…

  • It’s all my fault.

  • christian says:

    LexG is a clas­sic bully – he stirs shit up then acts offen­ded when he’s called out (while his fans ignore his vile taunts). It’s fairly bipolar, hence Well’s unsur­pris­ing adop­tion of Lex as his id.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ James Wolcott: Don’t be too hard on your­self, friend. We’ve all been ena­blers before.
    @ Jaime: I, too, am not quite sure I fol­low you. If you’re say­ing that I delib­er­ately goaded Lex into cross­ing a line so I could have an excuse to ban him, you’re really giv­ing me cred­it for being cleverer than I actu­ally am, for which I thank you. No, hon­estly, I did not fore­see Lex going as bal­list­ic­ally ad hom­inem as he did; I mean, my old­est friends and I called each oth­er “dicks” all the time (in col­lege, gran­ted), and there was no real harm done. But he used it as a cue to be even more of a dick—and a far, far creepi­er one—than usu­al. Which is weird in many respects, but par­tic­u­larly in the respect that when things get hairy—for him, that is—he imme­di­ately retreats into this “it’s my com­ic per­sona! In real life I’m an ami­able cinephile mil­quetoast” stance. Which does­n’t quite jibe with the rage exhib­ited in his comeback posts, or the vari­ous posts signed “I Love Cum” that I’ve been delet­ing much of the morn­ing. Any way, I’m just hop­ing he sobers up, shuts up, goes away and stays away, and takes his vag with him.

  • Jaime says:

    @ markj – I know. Hence the “Just say­in’.” Point being, it seems strange to have expec­ted any­thing OTHER than what happened, giv­en the cir­cum­stances (I’m temp­ted to call it “the pitch”), giv­en LexG’s past beha­vi­or, giv­en the long-established and unchanged pat­tern of trolls since the dawn of the internet…
    Trolls want noth­ing more than to be fed. For optim­al res­ults, feed him a big, late meal and leave him to roam free overnight.

  • Jaime says:

    If you’re say­ing that I delib­er­ately goaded Lex into cross­ing a line so I could have an excuse to ban him, you’re really giv­ing me cred­it for being cleverer than I actu­ally am, for which I thank you.”
    I would­n’t take it to that con­clu­sion – simply that I’m hav­ing trouble with any­one act­ing sur­prised at the res­ult. Not the mag­nitude of the res­ult, just the choice LexG made not to sit quiet after hav­ing a whole post designed to call him a dick.
    “No, hon­estly, I did not fore­see Lex going as bal­list­ic­ally ad hom­inem as he did; I mean, my old­est friends and I called each oth­er “dicks” all the time (in col­lege, gran­ted), and there was no real harm done.”
    LexG is like a col­lege chum with whom you share play­ful, punchy banter?
    I’m not say­ing that you put the 2‑liter of Jim Bean in his hand and wheeled him up to his inter­net ter­min­al. But… you wrote a long post that con­cluded (cor­rectly) that he’s a dick with beha­vi­or­al issues (one of them being a lack of self-control), and I pic­ture you then turn­ing in for the night, say­ing “Okay inter­net, be good while I’m away.” It’s like, if you’re at a remote, English coun­try man­or and you’re in a room with a bunch of murder sus­pects, and the power sud­denly goes out, you should maybe duck.
    Anyway, I feel I’ve gone from under­stat­ing my point to over­stat­ing, so maybe I should just leave it alone…

  • Jaime says:

    AAAAnyway, loved the piece on PSYCHO.

  • Yes, how dare you ‘retire for the night’ like some coun­try squire, when you should have stayed up to mon­it­or the situ­ation, in a state of read­i­ness, like Dustin Hoffman in Straw Dogs, maybe not the best example.
    Still, I blame myself.

  • bill says:

    I’m try­ing to think which char­ac­ter from STRAW DOGS Lex might be. I’m think­ing an amalgamation.

  • Jaime says:

    As a coun­try squire, I resemble that remark.

  • Now we’ll nev­er learn how to pick up babes.

  • jbryant says:

    I like Lex … and I do believe that much of his “work” is shtick. But this felt dif­fer­ent. At MCN at least, he usu­ally altern­ates between “bad Lex,” with rants about vag and young act­resses feet and the like, and “good Lex,” with astute com­ments about the con­tent and visu­al style of films. Then there’s “drunk Lex,” or per­haps “man­ic Lex.” His, uh, ten­ure here at Some Came Running seemed to pro­gress from “bad” to “man­ic,” with no stops in between. I’m guess­ing he thought Glenn “got” his shtick, and would tol­er­ate and per­haps even wel­come his pres­ence here, know­ing that “good Lex” would even­tu­ally appear. Then he got spurned (while in his cups, I sus­pect) and over­re­acted, to say the least. The ten­or of his rants against Glenn are harsh­er than any­thing I’ve seen from him at MCN (oth­ers may dis­agree), and were no doubt inten­ded to res­ult in his ban­ish­ment from this site, which I’m sure he came to real­ize would afford him little to no oppor­tun­ity for mak­ing new fans.

  • christian says:

    The thing is, lex knows exactly at what site he can push his shtick. He does­n’t post the EAT CUM BITCH crap he leaves at Poland’s site (or my blog) over at HE. He does­n’t pull out his PALIN 2012 there either.
    When lex wants to write about film he can be a per­cept­ive writer – as long as it’s not any­thing for­eign or anim­a­tion or black&white – which dulls his per­cep­tion. But like Wells, he’s a sociopath, determ­ined to make enemies of those he deigns to spend his time with.
    And of course, lex for­gets that Wells asked his read­ers to chip in to help him a couple years back. This was before Wells went full-on mis­an­throp­ic of course.

  • Brian Barnes says:

    Banned. Not banned. It does­n’t mat­ter. The fact that Glenn has to spend his morn­ing (and fore­see­able morn­ings to come) mon­it­or­ing threads for Lex in oth­er forms in an effort to quickly delete, is just an indic­a­tion that Lex still has the upper hand. More than any­thing, he wants atten­tion. It does­n’t mat­ter how he gets it or what form it holds, he just wants atten­tion. Glenn, stop giv­ing it to him. Not just with your words, but with all the time of mon­it­or­ing. He’s sit­ting in his mother­’s base­ment with a big, shit eat­ing grin because he knows he still has you by the balls. Stop giv­ing him that priv­ilege. Follow your earli­er advice. Let him con­tin­ue to post and make a STRONG recom­mend­a­tion to every­one to just ignore him. The less atten­tion he gets, the less rel­ev­ant he is (and the less verbal ammuni­tion he’ll have on oth­er sites). Let him back in the room to yell, whine and com­plain while no one pays him the slight­est bit of atten­tion. Don’t give him any more of your time and men­tal energy.
    Lex, by the way, you’re a cow­ard. In every sense of the word, you are a coward.

  • Jaime says:

    Hmmm, I under­es­tim­ated this guy’s back­story – it’s more con­vo­luted than a pro wrest­ling narrative.

  • Oliver C says:

    The cunt even man­aged (deservedly) to lose a lot of sup­port­ers over at Wells by insist­ing, in char­ac­ter­ist­ic­ally unin­gra­ti­at­ing style, that ‘Alien Resurrection’ was super­i­or to ‘Aliens’.

  • Robert Merk says:

    There’s just no need to sup­ply a plat­form for that type of behavior.
    Thank you, Glenn.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    I don’t intend to weigh in more than this, but I do have to say it’s pecu­li­ar, and a little dis­pir­it­ing, to see oth­er­wise reas­on­able people imply that I should cut some kind of slack for a guy who wrote, and I quote, “And tell me you wer­en’t think­ing of co-star Sasha when you fucked your wife those weeks you were film­ing, old fuck.”
    Really? Really?
    Those used to be known as…what’s the phrase?…oh yes, “fight­ing words.” But hey, it’s the inter­net, he’s a troll, and I need to take it on the chin. Sure. Gotcha.
    Sometimes I won­der wheth­er or not Lee Siegel had a point, after all. And just so every­body knows, I haven’t heard a peep from any trolls since work­ing hours began on the West Coast. Big man, Mr. G. TCB and all that.

  • Well yes, pre­cisely, Glenn. And I knew that was the line that he’d crossed the minute I read it.
    To mis­quote an enraged Michael Corleone: “On my BLOG. That my FAMILY reads. Where my WIFE posts.”
    No, you bring fam­il­ies into some­thing? You are done, son.

  • christian says:

    The silence from Wells on this will be deaf­en­ing. I guess it’s tough to hear when you’re hid­ing in the same gar­age with lex.

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    Mr. Kenny, con­grat­u­la­tions on lack­ing the self-defeating mor­al pre­ten­tious­ness that has held Mr. Poland back from ban­ning him.

  • Tom Russell says:

    @ Glenn: Let this not-altogether unreas­on­able per­son do whatever small part he can to com­bat your dis-spiritedness; the line he crossed was unfor­give­able, vile, and com­pletely undeserving of slack. Spouses are off-limits.

  • Kiss Me, Son of God says:

    After read­ing some of those awful com­ments I now would like noth­ing more than to see Lex G’s gimmick-brother ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER lay down some own­age on that piece of shit. ZMF has his own troub­ling issues, but he’d nev­er stoop as low as Lex did.

  • lazarus says:

    Hitchcock post: 8 comments.
    LexG post: 28 comments.
    SIGH.

  • [Banned commenter posting under a not-particularly clever pseudonym says:

    [Comment deleted]

  • jbryant says:

    Glenn, I don’t see any sug­ges­tions here, from reas­on­able people or oth­er­wise, to cut Lex any slack. Jaime sug­ges­ted you should­n’t be sur­prised that the troll fed on the meal you left out, but I would­n’t say that equals slack-cutting. And my post may have begun “I like Lex,” but I cer­tainly did­n’t (and don’t) con­done any­thing he wrote or even dis­agree with the ban. Everyone else seems to be on board with the decision, too, at least in this thread. So don’t be dis­pir­ited! The only read­er you’ll lose over this is Lex (once we stop men­tion­ing him in posts, that is).

  • lazarus says:

    Looks like we’re both part of the prob­lem now.

  • Jaime says:

    How bout them movies, huh? Happy birth­day, Maureen O’Hara! 90 years young and I’ll bet she’s still a stunner.

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    Kent-
    I know it’s a little late but in answer to your ques­tion in a pre­vi­ous thread as to why cul­ture is in the toi­let I’ll quote Oliver C in an earli­er post on this one.…:
    “The cunt even man­aged (deservedly) to lose a lot of sup­port­ers over at Wells by insist­ing, in char­ac­ter­ist­ic­ally unin­gra­ti­at­ing style, that ‘Alien Resurrection’ was super­i­or to ‘Aliens’.”
    it was said in regards to the man of the hour but it really does­n’t mat­ter. This whole cul­ture has been infant­il­ized and duped into buy­ing com­ic books and remeber­ing stars’ names.…and think­ing in terms of “sup­port­er­’s” or mar­kets. The dis­rupt­ive­ness, vit­ri­ol and lash­ing out makes sense with everything considered…the ref­er­ences to Taylor Lautner or whomever do not as far as I’m con­cerned. Hope that’s not too bor­ing for you

  • Oliver C says:

    Hey, aside from Gilbert Shelton (and the Criterion release of ‘Crumb’, if that counts), I haven’t bought any com­ic books for almost a decade.

  • Oh man … just read Lex’s rights-killing posts.
    And I thought *I* could be a dick?!?!!?

  • Kent Jones says:

    Urethra Franklin -
    I see your point, and thanks for a thought­ful, if mys­ter­i­ously bit­ter, reply.
    It seems to me that it’s not “cul­ture” that’s gone to hell in a hand­bas­ket – every­body has always thought that’s where it’s going – but that con­sumer­ism has been giv­en pride of place for, let’s say, the last 25 years. There is an option, of course: don’t pay atten­tion to Supporters and Detractors, Scores and Pure, AM and Metro, the people who keep appear­ing reg­u­larly on the cov­ers of People and the Enquirer and a thou­sand web­sites, the guys and girls who parade through Hot Chicks with Douchbags.
    But one thing I don’t get: why do dis­rupt­ive­ness and vit­ri­ol make sense, but ref­er­ences to Taylor Lautner or who­ever else don’t?

  • Mike Mazurki says:

    Wow. Having just caught up with LexG’s com­ments, I can only sup­port the move to ban him from the site. He’s clearly unhinged – des­per­ate for atten­tion, no mat­ter how unpleas­ant, requir­ing the reac­tion of oth­ers – pos­it­ive or oth­er­wise – to sat­is­fy his own sense of self-worth. What oth­er reas­on can there be for such inane, barbed insults – bald, has-been, career over, etc? LexG is clearly someone unhappy with their own life and feels the need to attack whenev­er pos­sible. the whole BITCH CUM SUCK etc non­sense is just defens­ive ammuni­tion. You simply can­’t take a troll like this seriously.

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    Ah yes, now I have seen the full story. I think it can be summed up by simply look­ing at the times his posts arrived:
    2:18 AM
    2:34 AM
    4:40 AM
    5:31 AM
    5:33 AM
    He’s a troubled per­son in need of ther­apy and/or med­ic­a­tion. Banning him brings him one step closer to hit­ting bot­tom, which is what he needs.

  • lipranzer says:

    Glenn, I sin­cerely thank you. Particularly since the monu­ment­al asshole went after someone I hap­pen to know over at HE.

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    Kent-
    in response to “But one thing I don’t get: why do dis­rupt­ive­ness and vit­ri­ol make sense, but ref­er­ences to Taylor Lautner or who­ever else don’t?”
    I don’t know. All I do know is every time someone men­tions… or I men­tion Taylor Lautner I seem to get a split­ting migraine head­ache and yet when people yell explet­ives at me I feel great…or at least juiced. I couldn;‘t tell you why.…maybe it’s a mat­ter of preference…or temperment…maybe you feel the same way
    let me know what your approach is to ignor­ing the commercialism…I’ve thought about what you said before regard­ing us always think­ing that cul­ture is in the bowl but I’ve come to the con­clu­sion that while pop cul­ture may have always been just as trivi­al or us old folks may have thought so the deple­tion of our per­son­al resources and the fero­city of it’s deploy­ment is at a peak…so is the propensity for some sort of escape…and the aggress­ive defence of it
    I will say in response to Jeff’s post- and I don’t want to defend anybody- that with the way things are going though if you don’t wake up at strange hours dur­ing the night you’re prob­ably quite a bit cra­zi­er than someone who in fact does.…
    give em’ meds!

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    but yeah all bull­shit aside that Lex guy was pretty fuck­ing mean

  • bill says:

    Cadavra, I sym­path­ize with Blamire, but as a fan I’m just glad I’ll finally get to see these movies. I loved LOST SKELETON. Furthermore, I can­’t wait to read his book for short horror/Western stories!

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    lost skel­et­on is a pile of shit

  • Jeff McM says:

    Cadavra, earli­er tonight I went to Amoeba and pur­chased both DVDs. I will spread the word as much as I can!
    Urethra:
    Re: 10:48 – Ha!
    Re: 01:52 – NO!
    Oh, and I see now that all times lis­ted are Eastern, so He Who Shall Not Be Named was in fact only up until 2:33. Never mind.

  • christian says:

    but yeah all bull­shit aside that Lex guy was pretty fuck­ing mean”
    i guess you would know. SKELETON rules.

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    enjoy fat­ten­ing your­self up on whatever garbage you want. It’s going to be impossible for me to have a con­ver­sa­tion with a bunch of intel­lec­tu­als who learned everything they know about life from the revenge of the nerds series. You’ve got all the angles covered and you’re all über hip and up on it all. Stay well

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    Uh-huh.

  • bill says:

    Good Lord. All I can say to Urethra is that in many ways, it’s hard to be a sci­ent­ist’s wife – the wife of a sci­ent­ist. But in oth­er ways it’s good. Really good.

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    Uh- huh what?! uh huh yeah your diapers leak­ing? or uh huh yeah any­day now your testicles are gonna drop? which one?
    or do you work for fuck­ing big pharma?
    “he needs to be on med­ic­a­tion”. You corny ass mother­fuck­er. So what a guy drinks or posts at 2 am or 5 am. What do you do while the worlds fall­ing to pieces? Jerk off to images of the cat­wo­man in green lan­tern under­oes. I met twenty people this week who read the same art­icle that said “nerds” were cool. Fuck you!

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    that post was for Jeff McDonald…
    Bill I’m not sure what you’re talk­ing about. I must have missed that book. I’m sure this will set me up for some kind of ridicule by the smarty smart smar­typantses here but so be it. We can­’t all be super genuises…ha!

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    skel­et­ons still sucks!!!!

  • Cadavra says:

    Jeff: If memory serves, does­n’t Lex work at night? If so, that would explain the tim­ing of his posts.
    Urethra: Shockingly, you’re not the only per­son who does­n’t like LOST SKELETON. So what? Has there ever been a movie that did­n’t have some people who dis­liked it? Get a grip.

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    Never saw the movie it’s your flip­pancy I did­n’t like

  • I.B. says:

    Now you fancy your­self Norman Mailer?

  • Otis Breading says:

    That’s right, people, Urethra Franklin does­n’t care for YOUR flip­pancy. What was that line from “Annie Hall,” about being due back on the plan­et Earth?

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    you’ve got an encyc­lo­ped­ic know­ledge of film but can you do the twist?

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    i’ll tell you anoth­er thing…i really don’t think this inter­net thing is too good for communication

  • Otis Breading says:

    Well, since you ask: like our friend…wait for it…Sam “Can” Cook, I may shake it like a bowl of soup.

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    I’ll shaker like a quaker that’s way off the richter…pull your card, paint ‚a pic­ture just like Gerhardt Richter

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    watch now some assholes gonna tell me ger­hardt richter does­n’t paint

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Just a sug­ges­tion, Urethra: You might wanna cool it with the reflex­ive, and pos­sibly self-fulfilling, neg­at­iv­ity here. For what it’s worth, I’ve expressed my enthu­si­asm for Richter’s art­work and writ­ing, here and else­where, and nev­er got­ten slagged for it. That may have some­thing to do with my status as king of the back-scratching snobs, of course, but what can I do?

  • Urethra Franklin says:

    I love all of you (not in any kind of sexu­al way) and I’m happy to be alive. Good night to all of you…may you dream of kit­tens and lady­bugs and awake to a bright­er day
    Urethra

  • If I ever doubted the wis­dom of turn­ing off com­ments on my blog, this thread has made me stop doubting.