CriticismLiterary interludesMusic

Literary/critical interlude

By November 3, 2010No Comments

Readers of John O’Hara’s Appointment in Samarra will remem­ber a curi­ous scene near the end where the hero, Julian English, drinks an enorm­ous high­ball from a flower-vase and plays his favour­ite jazz records. After a while he goes out to the gar­age and kills him­self. The inter­est­ing thing is that the records he plays are not by Armstrong, Ellington or even the Chicago Rhythm Kings, but Whiteman’s “Stairway to Paradise” and Goldkette’s “Sunny DIsposish.” Enough to make any­one seek obli­vi­on, you may say, and I thought at one time that O’Hara (who cer­tainly knew his jazz—witness Butterfield 8) was being satiric.

The lush pictori­al album accom­pa­ny­ing “The Original Sound of the Twenties” (CBS, three discs) has a yearn­ing essay by Roger Whitaker that makes me not so sure. The twen­ties, and par­tic­u­larly the music of the twenties—“loud, clear, jolly, sen­ti­ment­al, brash, bub­bly, life­giv­ing and alto­geth­er unforgettable”—are plainly full of emo­tion­al punch for their con­tem­por­ar­ies. Perhaps Julian English’s swan song was meant ser­i­ously. The three discs, which are avail­able sep­ar­ately, are divided into Whiteman/other bands, pianists/male vocal­ists, and female vocal­ists. From the jazz point of view the first is the best—Whiteman is pretty awful, but the reverse has Ellington’s “Diga Diga Do,” Armstrong’s splen­did “St. Louis”, and the Dorsey Brothers “My Kinda Love” not to men­tion Cass Hagen’s “Varsity Drag” which sounds straight out of “The Boy Friend”—but the appeal of the oth­er tracks will depend on the listen­er­’s age and taste. The girl singers—SOphe Tucker and Kate Smith in particular—are forth­right rather than seduct­ive, and the men—Cliff Edwards, Buddy Rogers, Rudy Vallee—are of the almost for­got­ten pre-crooning world and sound incred­ibly cheer­ful and decent in con­sequence. And there are so many sur­prises: who would expect Gershwin to rattle out such and insens­it­ive ver­sion of “Someone To Watch Over Me” , or for the whole thing to be roun­ded off by Bessie SMith pro­claim­ing “I’ve Got What It Takes (But It Breaks My Heart To Give It Away)”? One star: add anoth­er for every year of age after, well, 59.

But pop­u­lar music is odd. To com­pare this set with the Beatles’ “Help” (Parlophone) demon­strates how its appeal has shif­ted from the Edwardian bal­lad and comic-song tra­di­tion over­laid with syn­co­pa­tion to the genu­ine blues over­laid with the hybrid and plan­gent roman­ti­cism that is the Lennon-McCartney hall­mark. Will this Original Sound Of The Sixties be the stand­ard of the eighties? I hope so. 

—Philip Larkin, “The Idols of the Twenties,” The Daily Telegraph, 15 September 1965, col­lec­ted in All What Jazz: A Record Diary, 1970

No Comments

  • James Keepnews says:

    Larkin loved (cool J. Lennon?) the “hybrid and plan­gent roman­ti­cism” of Lennon/McCartney but des­pised that of Coltrane, even while admit­ting that we prob­ably would not go a long way out of our way to describe Coltrane’s roman­ti­cism that way – much of his cri­ti­cism up to and includ­ing his Beatlemania had the smell of both “fuddy” and “duddy”. Larkin’s never-published anti-Coltrane screed was excerp­ted in Ben Ratliff’s Coltrane bio, which itself nev­er goes a long way towards mount­ing much of a defense of Coltrane against oth­er crit­ics (Larkin, Crouch, etc.), imply­ing a tacit sup­port of their critiques.
    Certainly no small amount of 80’s pop music is awash in har­mon­ies that can be traced back to the lads, along with a cer­tain roman­ti­cism. That said, apart from post-punks like Mission of Burma, Saccharine Trust, &c., I won­der how much of the truly “pop­u­lar” pop was based in “genu­ine blues”.

  • Scott says:

    I feel like it’s cul­tur­ally blas­phem­ous to admit it, but I’m not a huge fan of poetry or jazz. That said, I make excep­tions, and Philip Larkin is one of them. He’s one of my favor­ite twen­ti­eth cen­tury writers, and I adore his poems. I knew he wrote music reviews for The Telegraph, but haven’t read much of his cri­ti­cism. This is an inter­est­ing pas­sage! I’ll have to keep an eye out for that book.
    This is only loosely related, but The Paris Review has recently made their fam­ous author inter­views avail­able online for free, and I’ve been gor­ging myself on them. There’s a fas­cin­at­ing inter­view with Larkin there, among many oth­er great writers. You all should check it out if you haven’t already!