Housekeeping

The Current Cinema, treating here the Potter perplex

By November 18, 2010No Comments

17

Harry Potter and the Onset of Puberty? Harry Potter and the Hormonal Surge? No, and, no, it’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, and as I point out in my review for MSN Movies, by now you’re either in or you’re out, and that’s one reas­on cer­tain crit­ics find the series gets more frus­trat­ing as it draws near­er to its close; there’s really not a whole lot to say, unless the film­makers just out and out blow it at some point, which is not likely to hap­pen. (My favor­ite bit of resent­ment in this depart­ment was Jeffrey Wells’ pro­nounce­ment that “no per­son of con­sequence” cares about the Potter films. Sure, you betcha, whatever you say, Mrs. Wallis Simpson.) Still, one must give crit­ic­al review the old col­lege try. I have to admit in an early draft of my notice I amused myself by rumin­at­ing on what Bill Condon might do with the final install­ment of the fran­chise, until it was recalled that Mr. Condon is in fact tak­ing in the next film in the Twilight, um, saga. These teen super­nat­ur­al fran­chises are hard to keep up with, man. And I barely even think of them as genre films until one of ’em turns up on a Video Watchdog cov­er, or something.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ll get back to listen­ing to this brand new 5.1 DTS Surround mix of In The Wake of Poseidon, on DVD, even. Boy, now when Greg Lake taunts “Cat food!” over and over he actu­ally goes all the way around the room. Fuckin’ ‘del­ic.

No Comments

  • Nort says:

    Glenn, I saw you in the crowd at Limite last night. Were you plan­ning on post­ing about it? I’d be inter­ested in your thoughts.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Hello Nort. I found the experience—that is, of see­ing the res­tor­a­tion of the legendary 1931 Brazilian film “Limite” at BAM last night—rather over­whelm­ing, and it put me a little at a loss. In a “good” way, I mean. It was a present­a­tion from the World Cinema Foundation, and intro­duced by our friend Kent Jones, and drew a grat­i­fy­ingly big crowd. It’s a FRANKLY AMAZING FILM, and I’m hold­ing off on dis­cuss­ing it more until I can see it again and actu­ally make some mean­ing­ful notes on it. I’d also like to write about it in a con­text in which more of the read­er­ship here can actu­ally have the oppor­tun­ity to see it them­selves, so there can be a wider dis­cus­sion. I hope this cir­cum­stance occurs soon.

  • Lord Henry says:

    Um. I agree with Jeffrey Wells. Sorry.
    I can­’t remem­ber what you said about SOMEWHERE. Did you say it was one of the worst, and most offens­ive, films of the year? Because if you did, you were right. I still can­’t get over it. Jaw-dropping shit. Cut to Gandhi on the TV???? Yeah, I used four question-marks.
    But I guess that’s off-topic. Still, bet­ter than talk­ing about HARRY POTTER, hey?

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Um, I ain’t even SEEN “Somewhere” yet, so no, that wer­en’t me.
    As for agree­ing with Wells—really? “Person of con­sequence?” What the hell’s a “per­son of consequence?”

  • lipranzer says:

    There’s a book called “Will the Vampire People Please Leave the Lobby? True Adventures in Cult Fandom”, by Alyson Beatrice, and while it’s spe­cific­ally about being a fan, and being part of the com­munity of fans, of the TV show “Buffy the Vampire Slayer”, I think it applies to cult fans of all stripes, includ­ing Harry Potter, and people’s atti­tudes towards them. Early in the book, Beatrice describes a reunion of Buffy fans in the lobby of the hotel they were all stay­ing at, and des­pite the fact they were act­ing like a group of friends who had­n’t seen each oth­er in a long time would act (loud greet­ings, shared laughter, etc.), the recep­tion­ists at the lobby yelled out the line that gives the book its title. Beatrice goes on to write:
    “Vampire People? We knew this was code for: ‘You are all fuck­ing dorks. If I wer­en’t miser­able here at work, I’d be in a bar, kick­ing your asses, or stick­ing maxi pads on your backs so me and my cool friends can laugh at you.’ ”
    Okay, so maybe not all the Harry Potter movies worked (I par­tic­u­larly did­n’t like the second one, and the fourth one was set pieces in search of a movie, even if they were pretty good set pieces). Most of them were still made with at least more care, craft, and hon­est emo­tion than most of the block­busters that come down the pike these days. We need atten­tion paid to the people who work to make film art, but should­n’t we praise the people who, you know, try to make “enter­tain­ment” films that are actu­ally entertaining?

  • Oliver_C says:

    What if J K Rowling’s ori­gin­al desire had been honored, and Terry Gilliam giv­en the first film to direct?

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Oliver C: You prob­ably would have had a more inter­est­ing movie, and Warners would have had a much harder time craft­ing a con­sist­ent series of them!
    @ Lipranzer: I think that, all things con­sidered, cinephiles ought to be a little more tolerant/understanding of “vam­pire people.” After all, as the pri­or thread indic­ates, we who love black-and-whate movies can cer­tainly be con­sidered cult­ists ourselves, at least by a cer­tain yardstick…

  • James Keepnews says:

    Couldn’t say I’m a “hater” where Mr. Potter and his school­chums are con­cerned, but I am unques­tion­ably an extreme disinterest-er.
    Poseidon is, as we used to say in fin­ish­ing school, mad under­rated, even if it, um, hon­ors the tem­plate of In the Court and expands it out­ward in a couple few dir­ec­tions – not­ably, in the dir­ec­tion of one Keith Tippett, who is the inev­it­able touch­hold on KC the Sunshine Band for most of the free cats with whom I bring up the band: “Oh, King Crimson, Keith Tippett played with them.” Sure, almost 30 years ago now…
    Apparently, at some Epitaph live ’69/&c. box-set sign­ing, someone inquired of Mr. Fripp some­thing to the effect of had he ever con­sidered how many minds were blown by The Devil’s Triangle off Poseidon. Mr. Fripp’s response was some­thing to the effect of: “Well, I sup­pose there’s only one thing to say and that’s…” whereupon he began oscil­lat­ing his index fin­ger rap­idly between his lips, mak­ing with the ee-bee-bee-buh-bee-&c.s. Do you sup­pose Mr. Fripp did not con­sider this fan a “per­son of consequence”?

  • bill says:

    My wife is a fan of the books, as are a couple of our friends, so as a team we go see all these movies. And I’ve enjoyed them, par­tic­u­larly the last one, which I thought had some won­der­ful moments. But when my wife reminded me that the new one was com­ing out today, I have to admit, my heart sank a little bit. I simply don’t feel like it…

  • The Siren says:

    All I ask is that Mr. Wells be here­in­after referred to as “Mrs Wallis Simpson” in each SCR post in which he makes an appearance.
    Because you can nev­er be too Wi-Fi con­nec­ted or too thin.