DVDTales From The Warner Archives

Tales from The Warner Archives #11: "-30-" (Jack Webb, 1959)

By January 4, 2011No Comments

30 #1

In my heed­less youth, with my slov­enly wannabe-hippie atti­tude and all, I was nev­er much of a Jack Webb fan, so I was­n’t even aware of his film ‑30- until I read this evoc­at­ive writeup of it in Michael Weldon’s Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film, pub­lished in 1983 (the year I turned 24): “Another Thursday night shift at the Los Angeles Banner. Jack Webb arrives late from his weekly vis­it to the graves of his wife and son to settle in with city edit­or William Conrad for eight hours of cigar­ettes and stale cof­fee. David Nelson and friends relax with ‘Copy Boy’ for voice and bon­gos, while assor­ted news­room types await pro­gress reports on a 5‑year-old girl lost in the city’s storm-drain sys­tem. Cannon and Friday’s backups include Richard Bakalayan, Joe Flynn of McHale’s Navy, and Hazel’s Whitney Blake.” (The writeup itself was not by Weldon but by his col­lab­or­at­or Charles Beesley, a very cool and tacit­urn customer—he looked a bit like DeNiro’s Johnny Boy, without the stu­pid hats—who was some­times seen in the com­pany of Hoboken’s most enig­mat­ic music­al luminar­ies, and who appears to have dis­ap­peared from the face of the earth. But that’s anoth­er story.)

The film soun­ded like a little slice of heav­en to a guy who still had­n’t much of a clue as to what life after the col­lege paper was going to hold for him. Cigarettes and stale cof­fee was my idea of some kind of break­fast of cham­pi­ons. Of course the film, like so many in Weldon’s book at the time, seemed almost impossible to see at the time, and even when I became friendly with Weldon shortly after the book appeared, I nev­er asked him if he had a copy I could bor­row (Psychotronic pic­tures were often passed around like VHS or Beta sam­izdat by like-minded cinephiles). Maybe I was afraid the real­ity of the pic­ture would dis­ap­point me. Having now finally seen the movie via a recent DVD from the Warner Archive, I can report the film does not dis­ap­point at all, although Beesley’s writeup makes it sound a little more impres­sion­ist­ic and aim­less than it actu­ally is. 

30 #2

For this IS a Jack Webb pic­ture, after all, and Jack Webb pictures—not to gen­er­al­ize over­much, but still—are about reg­u­lar Joes doing really import­ant things. And get­ting the morn­ing paper out is an import­ant thing, in spite of it all. The “it all” part does involve tedi­um and flim-flammers and edit­ors head­ing up nonex­ist­ent depart­ments, but ‑30- hardly takes as cyn­ic­al a view of the old-school news-gathering pro­cess as does, say, The Front Page, or Front Page co-author Ben Hecht’s account of his early days in news­pa­per­ing in his auto­bi­o­graphy A Child Of The Century, which it so hap­pens I’m read­ing now. (See here.) Hecht’s faux-pokerfaced recount­ings of his exploits as a “picture-chaser,” going to almost any lengths (includ­ing sim­u­lat­ing a house fire to make a fam­ily flee, the bet­ter for Hecht to break in and ran­sack the photo albums) to acquire per­tin­ent pho­to­graphs of vic­tims of crime and nat­ur­al dis­asters and such, are enough to make any con­tem­por­ary ombuds­man’s blood run cold. In -30-, with respect to the photo of the afore­men­tioned 5‑year-old-girl stuck in the city’s storm-drain sys­tem, well, at one con­fer­ence an anonym­ous edit­or allows that the pic­ture the Banner is going to run was “hustled off a next-door neigh­bor.” Well, all right then. 

While main­tain­ing an admir­able unity of space of the sort that some crit­ics like to cite in sup­port of a claim of “form­al rigor”—that is, the cam­era nev­er leaves the news­room dur­ing the entirety of its nearly 97-minute run­ning time—the pic­ture juggles mul­tiple storylines and what they now call char­ac­ter arcs. The will-the-5-year-old-girl-make-it? ques­tion is of course para­mount, but there’s also the dilemma of the lovely female obit writer who wants a crack at a real story, but is afraid of get­ting it because she’s the daugh­ter of the paper­’s own­er; the pride and anti­cip­a­tion of anoth­er female staffer, a long­time report­er, whose son grand­son the rest of the staff nev­er even knew she had is mak­ing a dar­ing cross-country flight; the frus­tra­tion of the copy run­ner stuck in a go-nowhere job, or so he thinks; and oth­er such stuff. All of which is both driv­en and punc­tu­ated by lots of  news­pa­per­ing nuts-and-bolts jar­gon, as wit­ness this exchange between Webb’s M.E. Sam Gatlin and Conrad’s Jim Bathgate:

Gatlin: Jim—this shot of the catch basin, let’s run it same size…across pages two and three.

Bathgate: Across both pages, 16 columns?

Gatlin: That’s right.

Bathgate: No can do. 

Gatlin: Oh, can do. We’ll run two eight column cuts with a gut­ter down the middle. Now run a type over­lay, white on black, across both pages. Use 72-point Bodoni caps…“Danger, Kids: Stay Out Of These.” Exclaimer. Then in lower case: “One little girl didn’t.”

Yeah, this Gatlin fel­la’s got it all—the sizzle, the steak, and a great big heart that’s been broken bad once and does­n’t wanna get broken again. Which leads to his mule-headed res­ist­ance to his new wife’s scheme to adopt a little tyke. You can likely see where all this is going, right? 

30 #4

Which hardly detracts from the pleas­ure of it all; in fact I dare say it adds to it. In any event, when Conrad’s had enough of the grip­ing from those damn copy run­ners and launches into his grand, “Why sure, it’s just a news­pa­per” speech, you may well be har­umph­ing right along with him. -30- is as affec­tion­ate as Fuller’s great Park Row, while being infin­itely more mushy, and mushy-headed. But if you’re one of the increas­ingly rare breed who still has a bit of print­er­’s ink in his or her blood, it may well be just your pre­ferred vari­ety of mush. Now where’s a DVD of Webb’s next col­lab­or­a­tion with screen­writer William Bowers, the inef­fable The Last Time I Saw Archie?

No Comments

  • Lou Lumenick says:

    Nice writeup, Glenn, on one of my favor­ites, which also offers Richard Deacon of “The Dick Van Dyke Show” as a sar­cast­ic staff artist and Howard McNear of “The Andy Griffith Show” as the fuss­budget wire edit­or. I espe­cially love the way Conrad makes his cof­fee. The doomed fly­er is the rewrite woman’s grand­son, though.

  • Yes, a fave of all ink-stained wretches (I’m look­ing up at a par­tic­u­larly gar­ish, pink-toned lobby­card as I type this). “Park Row” too. Although, for ’50s news­print dra­mas, I still gotta go for “Deadline, U.S.A,” and Bogart.
    “That’s the power of the press, baby! The power of the press. And there’s noth­ing you can do about it.”
    sigh.

  • jbryant says:

    Aw, jeez, now I gotta sell some plasma or some­thing and score this thing. Big Webb fan-boy, so the lack of print­er­’s ink in my blood should­n’t be an issue. If “Mel Cooley” and “Floyd the Barber” are on board, that’s just gravy.
    I also need to re-see PETE KELLY’S BLUES pretty bad (I think I have enough plasma). Have seen and dug the DRAGNET fea­ture and THE D.I. As for THE LAST TIME I SAW ARCHIE, well, I’d watch it again in a heart­beat, but yeah, “inef­fable” is one way to describe it. The epis­od­ic struc­ture and bursts of broad humor make the film feel like 3 or 4 sit­com epis­odes strung togeth­er. Webb’s visu­al ima­gin­a­tion, so evid­ent in his oth­er film and TV work, is only fit­fully appar­ent. Nonetheless, there’s some good stuff, almost all of it between Webb and Robert Mitchum, who work very well togeth­er in a subtle com­ic style. An entire film in that tone might have been aces, but the belabored wack­i­ness of some of the sup­port­ing cast did­n’t work for me.

  • jbryant says:

    Peter: Well, there ya go. I had to rent an old VHS from Eddie Brandt’s video store in North Hollywood to see it a few years back. Now it’s just a click away. The DRAGNET fea­ture is there, too. Now if they’d just get the oth­er Webb films on there.

  • Paul Duane says:

    The oth­er weird place Jack Webb turns up is in the list of recom­mend­a­tions at the back of the Incredibly Strange Films book. There, right along­side Andy Milligan and the rest of the sick crew, is a list­ing for Webb’s drill ser­geant melo­drama, The D.I., which (I hate to admit) I haven’t yet man­aged to track down.
    Nice to see a men­tion for the great work of weirdo schol­ar­ship that is the Psychotronic Encyclopaedia. Whatever else I do in my life, get­ting a byline in Michael Weldon’s Psychotronic Video magazine is always going to be one of my proudest achievements.

  • Griff says:

    Excellent com­ment­ary on my favor­ite Webb pic­ture. Of all of the major news­pa­per pic­tures, I give this one par­tic­u­larly high marks for pay­ing care­ful atten­tion to the actu­al work and details – not just the “nuts-and-bolts jar­gon” – of city room activ­ity. Yes, it’s melo­dra­mat­ic, sen­ti­ment­al, corny… but it also has a cer­tain elec­tri­city and drive. Some of its strength, oddly, derives from its determ­ined “this is a day like any oth­er day” atmo­sphere. Though a major plot thread involves an endangered child, much of the pic­ture’s real interest emerges simply from the inter­play of the char­ac­ters and the work we see them per­form; they do this daily, bring­ing out the morn­ing paper is an import­ant job. [Webb and Bowers deserve cred­it for res­ist­ing the tempta­tion to involve thugs or gang­sters in the film’s plot; this is above all a human story.] Nice work from Conrad, Webb and the col­or­ful sup­port­ing cast; David Nelson isn’t bad in the thank­less role as the green copy­boy, but it’s an unima­gin­able con­tinu­ity flaw for us to accept that he could be a Korean War vet.
    Now, MGM, how about PARK ROW?

  • Escher says:

    A few years back, on his “Whoops I’m an Indian” cd, Hal Willner built an abso­lutely bril­liant track called “Do You Hear Me (No Pie)” around a Jack Webb dia­logue sample from THE D.I.

  • christian says:

    THE LAST TIME I SAW ARCHIE shows that Jack Webb had less com­ic sens­ib­il­ity than Otto Preminger. It’s more of a William Bowers film though.