MoviesSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny

The current cinema, "Dr. Tongue's 3-D House of Spelunking" edition

By February 4, 2011January 12th, 202614 Comments

07

It is my unpleas­ant duty to report that Sanctum, which maybe could have been kind of fun, is, as a cine­mat­ic exper­i­ence, in Orson Welles’ word, “unre­ward­ing.” My review for MSN Movies is here

I post the above not-quite-pulse-pounding image from the film in order to pose some­thing of an inside-baseball ques­tion: is it just me, or is act­or Ioan Gruffudd (in the fore­ground, with Rhys Wakefield in fuzzy focus) start­ing to look like a movie star ver­sion of cel­eb­rated indie entre­pren­eur John Sloss? Almost makes me wanna “put togeth­er” a “pro­ject” or some­thing. A blog­ger can dream, can­’t he?

Also at MSN Movies, I stay out past my bed­time and can­’t get a word in with Greta Gerwig, with whom I was once acquain­ted socially, on the set of the remake of Arthur. With a bunch of oth­er journ­al­ists, which is why the piece con­tains quotes you may have already seen. I know you’re nev­er sup­posed to say nev­er, again, and all that, but, you know…

14 Comments

  • Kent Jones says:

    Glenn, the “Frozen Peas Spot” is a great favor­ite with my sons, who have laughed along with Welles’ grow­ing exas­per­a­tion for a dec­ade now on car trips. It reaches an early peak with this immor­tal com­ment: “Find me a way to start a sen­tence by emphas­iz­ing the word ‘in’ and I’ll go down on you.”

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Indeed, Kent. I’m also very fond of the dark inton­a­tion of “Him. Your FRIEND.” And, of course, “That’s bad copy!” is immor­tal, and unfor­tu­nately too fre­quently useful.

  • Chris O. says:

    Are you two excited and/or appre­hens­ive about “The Other Side Of The Wind?”

  • Kent Jones says:

     ‘Crumb-crisp coating’…ooh, ‘crumb-crisp’ – that’s tough.”
    Chris O., what exactly do you mean? Has anoth­er announce­ment been made? I haven’t heard any­thing. There have been so many attempts to get the film fin­ished, cir­cu­lated, incor­por­ated in a doc­u­ment­ary or some com­bin­a­tion there­of that I will believe it when it actu­ally happens.

  • Chris O. says:

    Just this Guardian art­icle that came out last week:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/jan/23/orson-welles-last-film-release
    Has the same thing been said many times before (includ­ing the tease “we’ll know in a few weeks”)? The “raw foot­age” con­cern is inter­est­ing and I’m curi­ous to know more.

  • James Keepnews says:

    I saw the announce­ment for this, too. I guess Gary Graver has been show­ing 20-odd minutes of this in dif­fer­ent set­tings over the years, but I nev­er thought there was enough work­able foot­age for the work to be even remotely feature-length. Mo’ deets?
    Of course, apro­pos the good doc­tor, I always think of John Candy’s peer­less Welles on the promo for SCTV’s Liberace Xmas Special, sprecht­sim­min’: “Good King Wenceslas looked out/On the Fest of Stephen/The snow laid roundabout/Deep, and crisp…and crunchy…‘Crunchy’? Did I say ‘crunchy’? I’m sorry, Lee…It’s the crew! I could nev­er do Shakespeare with you people!”

  • bill says:

    What is it you want, in the *depths* of your ignor­ance?” That, and the immor­tal “I’ll go down on you” are obvi­ously the clear win­ners, but I’ve also always liked “It’s full of things that are only cor­rect because they’re *gram­mat­ic­al*”, because Welles is get­ting into a dis­tinc­tion there that’s lost on too many people.
    And I’m with Kent regard­ing THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WIND. I feel like Bogdanavich was say­ing the same stuff about 8 years ago. When reli­able people start to con­firm that they’ve seen it, then I’ll begin to believe.

  • Lex says:

    ROOMMATE POWER.
    Minka. Michalka. Meester.
    Of course not one movie blog I read is talk­ing about this movie.
    So what if it was­n’t screened. Why would­n’t a Wells or Turan or Poland go out and see it on their own dime?
    LOOK AT THEM. Three of the hot­test women ever all shiny in Screen Gems light­ing, guar­an­teed #1 Movie this week­end. No one’s review­ing it.
    MICHALKA POWER.

  • Oliver_C says:

    Now go get your fuck­ing tire deal­er­ship, Lex POWER.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Wow, Lex. Oliver C REALLY does­n’t like you.
    But lemme tell you: I am FEELING you on this whole “Roommate” busi­ness. You can just ask my MSN Movies edit­or (or you COULD ask, if I deigned to put you in touch with him, which there’s really no need for me to do), who would tell you how thor­oughly dis­ap­poin­ted I was to learn there were no screen­ings. And I TOTALLY would have been will­ing to go on my own dime, and write it up, had not cir­cum­stances thrown vari­ous mon­key wrenches into my sched­ule all week. God knows it would have been a more use­ful and pleas­ur­able expendit­ure of time this morn­ing than sit­ting around wait­ing for a FedEx pack­age while get­ting into a piss­ing match on Twitter turned out to be.
    I may yet go see it this week­end. Or maybe buy a bootleg DVD from the lady who trolls up and down Court Street selling such items. I am actu­ally eager to check it out, as they say.

  • Kent Jones says:

    Chris O., first of all I’m assum­ing you’ve seen the stuff that Welles screened dur­ing the AFI trib­ute, which is on YouTube. And I think there’s some oth­er stuff on ONE-MAN BAND. All of it is dazzling.
    The film does exist in some assembled form minus the last shot, which Peter B would pre­sum­ably execute. But exactly what that form is and the degree to which it con­forms to what Welles would have made is up for debate. And the mater­i­al is tricky on so many dif­fer­ent levels. At a cer­tain point, there was a thought that the movie would remain unfin­ished and live with­in a doc­u­ment­ary about the story of its lengthy gest­a­tion, its seizure by the French courts as a con­tested asset of the Iranian gov­ern­ment after the Islamic revolu­tion, and its final lib­er­a­tion. Over the years, there have been many, many attempts, involving Graver, Oja Kodar, Bogdanovich, Joe McBride and oth­ers (includ­ing (Stefan Droessler). At this point, even if the Shah’s daugh­ter and Kodar come to an agree­ment, Beatrice Welles and her “law­yer” will undoubtedly step in put the squeeze on who­ever comes for­ward with financing.

  • Matt Blankman says:

    James, that’s one of my all-time favor­ite SCTV bits. “I’m sorry, Lee – no money is worth this.” (As he grabs a tur­key leg while storm­ing off.)

  • Chris O. says:

    Thanks, Kent. I have seen the YouTube clips, but did not know that about a pos­sible doc­u­ment­ary where the film could be embed­ded. That alone (and, of course, all the pos­sib­il­it­ies therein) is an intriguing idea. But it sounds like there are more parties to con­tend with and sat­is­fy than, say, those regard­ing Beatles rights. I assume announce­ments and art­icles such as the one I pos­ted from the Guardian hap­pen every once in a while to get the buzz going and the ball rolling as it were, wheth­er true pro­gress is made or not. Here’s hop­ing, though.

  • otherbill says:

    Speaking of “IN July”, I always thought the fol­low­ing was just glor­i­ous. God bless Maurice LaMarche and his obses­sion with that outtake.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlXEC8kcbqc