AuteursAwesomenessBlu-rayDVDImages

Image of the day, 4/22/11

By April 22, 2011No Comments

Wild

Jeff Daniels, Melanie Griffith, some extras, and vari­ous Feelies (vis­ible: Dave Weckerman, Stanley Demeski, the top of Bill Million’s hair) in Something Wild, Jonathan Demme, 1986. As much as I loved the fact that the Feelies were in this film as “The Willies,” the high-school reunion band, I did­n’t think their music was rep­res­en­ted as “accur­ately” as it might have been, even though that IS them play­ing; as gal­van­ic as the sight of Dave singing Bowie’s “Fame” is, it’s not really what the group’s about. I had for­got­ten, though, some­thing very clev­er that Demme does at this point in the scene, right before vil­lain Ray Liotta turns up; the lights go down, and the band starts in on the very evoc­at­ive intro to the song “Loveless Love,” which begins on a note of tent­at­ive lyr­i­cism and then grows more tense and propuls­ive. The music, and the people, change the mood even as the shot itself stays the same; Daniels and Griffith kiss, it’s a magic­al moment, but then the sin­is­ter Liotta enters, frame right, circles behind and sidles into Griffith, just as Bill and Glenn Mercer’s gui­tars are mesh­ing and strum­ming just a little tight­er and a little dens­er. Very cool. Olivier Assayas uses the same song to sim­il­ar effect in Carlos.

The Feelies have an abso­lutely superb new album out (on both CD and vinyl), called Here Before; the Criterion edi­tion of Something Wild comes out on standard-def DVD and Blu-ray on May 10.

No Comments

  • Tom Block says:

    Assayas wanted Feelies songs through­out “Carlos” but they wisely declined the hon­or; “Loveless Love” is god­dam won­der­ful in it, though. I’d totally for­got­ten it’s in Demme’s movie, too.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Actually, Tom, “Forces At Work” is in “Carlos” too, and the accounts of what went down between the Feelies and Olivier are kind of not-quite-accurate, for vari­ous reas­ons of the make-a-long-story-short/lost-in-translation ilk. I myself actu­ally inter­vened a bit with the band, whom I’ve known for almost 35 years (Jesus!), on Assayas’ behalf, and was/remain on the “pro” side of the Feelies-music-in-“Carlos” issue; I did­n’t bring it up in this post because I’ve men­tioned it before, and I did­n’t wanna look like a name-dropping groupie altern­at­ive star-fucker or what have you. (I know there are oth­er “crit­ics” who are totally fine with that, but, you know.) Anyway, since you don’t think the music should be in there, there’s little point in me repeat­ing the story, but let’s just say it was a series of mis­un­der­stand­ings that got fur­ther pul­ver­ized by a pro­duc­tion deadline.

  • Tom Block says:

    Just to be clear, it’s not that I think the music did­n’t belong. What I at least READ some­where is that the band did­n’t want their songs to become so heav­ily asso­ci­ated with a movie about a ter­ror­ist that their body of work would be thought of as “that ‘Carlos’ music” (–my para­phrase). True or not, that’s an impulse I cer­tainly under­stand. I’m cer­tainly inter­ested in the fuller story if you feel like link­ing or recapping… 

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    All right, long story short, from what I know/heard: OA wanted to use a bunch of Feelies songs, most of them from “Rhythms,” one from “Only Life,” and he was look­ing to the U.K. divi­sion of Domino Records, which had recently reis­sued “Rhythms” and “The Good Earth” in the U.K. and Europe (I think). He was also look­ing for songs by oth­er artists, includ­ing Robert Wyatt(!). Domino U.K. gave him a blanket turndown, say­ing NONE of the artists wanted their music used in a movie “about a terrorist/terrorism.” Except Domino was not in an offi­cial pos­i­tion to turn down on behalf of the Feelies, as they were the licensees, not the licensors, of those records (which were reis­sued by Bar/None in the U.S.); Glenn and Bill of the Feelies are in fact now the ones in the pos­i­tion to give the nod. I got OA in touch with them through Mr. Demeski, the per­son in the band I’m closest with. I can­’t speak for Glenn and Bill, but it’s well-known that they are VERY par­tic­u­lar on how their music is used in film IF AT ALL (they turn down almost everything), and there was a long back-and-forth with OA about using vocal por­tions of the songs, stuff like that. Bear in mind that this was all hap­pen­ing lit­er­ally weeks before “Carlos” was screen­ing in Cannes and OA was tear­ing his hair out over this and so much else at the time. Had the parties actu­ally been able to get togeth­er under less frantic cir­cum­stances and estab­lish a rela­tion­ship wherein OA could have shown exactly what he wanted to do and why, would things have turned out dif­fer­ently? Can’t really say. In the end, there’s about four minutes of Feelies music in the pic­ture, which does­n’t sound like a lot giv­en the film’s length but isn’t a little, either. As for the song Olivier wanted from “Only Life” (it was “Higher Ground”) he nev­er was able to loc­ate the licensor (“Only Life” was an A&M release) and I under­stand the Feelies them­selves are at a loss with respect to that as well. (Shades of The Red Crayola’s “Soldier Talk,” which took forever to get reis­sued because the ori­gin­al label Radar was so deeply swal­lowed up by Warner U.K. that nobody knew any­thing about it…and the con­sid­er­a­tion was that the piece of music was such small pota­toes that it was­n’t worth the trouble of find­ing out. [I was actu­ally told by someone in the peri­phery of the cor­por­ate bowels that assign­ing a licens­ing per­son to even look into the mat­ter was deemed a waste of resources.] This is a weird field.)

  • Tom Block says:

    Jesus. Thanks.
    >four minutes…doesn’t sound like a lot giv­en the film’s length but isn’t a little
    The sound of “Loveless Love” is inex­tric­ably bound up in my mind with the whole movie’s ten­sion and sex­i­ness. Considering it takes up a very few minutes in a 5−1÷2 hour movie, that’s leav­ing a mark.

  • bill says:

    Have I men­tioned before how much I love CARLOS? And I’ll be check­ing out that SOMETHING WILD disc this week­end, too.

  • Funny, caught this film last night on a channel-surfing driveby about 10 minutes in and was imme­di­ately hooked until the end.
    A small fave, not least of all for its won­der­ful, unin­ten­tion­al, freeze-frame evoc­a­tion of down­town NY circa late-80s.
    Still, look­ing at it, I did won­der a bit about the tra­ject­ory of Melanie Griffith’s career. Within a very short peri­od of time, the woman worked with Demme, Lumet, DePalma, Nichols. And then…?
    There were, admit­tedly, all sorts of personal/private stresses involved, but still it’s an odd, mel­an­choly tale. (I’d say a “cau­tion­ary” one but I’m not sure what the les­son would be.)

  • The Siren says:

    Stephen, I don’t know, is it really all that odd? I’d say Griffith’s string of good roles in A pic­tures ended with Nobody’s Fool in ’94 (a movie I like); accord­ing to IMDB that would be the year she turned 37.
    It makes me sad just to type this, but I’m more sur­prised when a lead­ing act­ress’ career *does­n’t* fall off a cliff around that age, wheth­er she’s straight or sober, level-headed and stable or loopi­er than an LA freeway.

  • Have been won­der­ing about the new Feelies – your endorse­ment makes the pur­chase decision easy.

  • jbryant says:

    I don’t think Griffith was ever con­sidered a big box office draw either, des­pite the suc­cess of WORKING GIRL (her only real hit, I believe). Arguably, if she had tried to build on that film’s suc­cess with more romantic com­ed­ies instead of things like PACIFIC HEIGHTS, BONFIRE OF THE VANITIES and SHINING THROUGH, she might have gained a little longev­ity. BORN YESTERDAY was too little, too late, and of course forced com­par­is­on to the great Judy Holliday. Then she had that weird lip job, or whatever, that made her barely recog­niz­able. It’s sad what the busi­ness (and the mar­ket) does to women as they age, or what they do to them­selves to try to remain “viable” in it.

  • Joel says:

    Glenn, please keep drop­ping names and being a star-fucking groupie, as long as you’re talk­ing about the greatest band of all time, the Feelies. I’m actu­ally happy they’re asso­ci­ated with Carlos, because oth­er­wise they would just be asso­ci­ated with Smithereens.
    Stephen: I’m sure that Griffith was honored to work with Lumet, but at what cost? Are people now going to make argu­ments for A Stranger Among Us? I’m a bit of a Lumet fan­boy, but even I have my limits.

  • Mr. Peel says:

    Great as this scene is, I have a par­tic­u­lar soft spot for the one right before this when everything is fine with the two of them, Charlie is finally able to relax and everything stops as they just dance. I love this movie.
    Incidentally, I spot­ted Griffith a my loc­al Starbucks about a year ago and the first thing that came to mind was how the area, Los Feliz, was more the sort of place that Audrey/Lulu would be in. For what it’s worth she looked fine (i.e. lips). I left her alone, much as I wanted to say something.
    As for Lumet, that film was­n’t a hit but does any­one think that it ser­i­ously impacted her star­dom tra­ject­ory? Would things really have turned out any dif­fer­ent otherwise?
    That also makes me want to ask if there has been any talk over the past week of cer­tain dis­rep­ut­able Lumet titles people have a secret fond­ness for. I don’t think I’ve seen GUILTY AS SIN since open­ing week­end but for some strange reas­on I’d kind of like to seek it out.

  • jbryant says:

    Mr. Peel: I actu­ally recall rather lik­ing GUILTY AS SIN, if in no way think­ing it ranked with Lumet’s greats.
    Glad to hear that Griffith may have let her lips return to normal.