Television

Neat idea

By August 7, 2011No Comments

For longer than I’d like to dis­close, I’ve had a very dis­tinct idea of myself as John-Lennon-type house hus­band, rais­ing a rugrat whilst the wife goes off and adds to the invest­ment port­fo­lio or what have you. The child in ques­tion would not be made aware of col­or tele­vi­sion until he or she was at least ten; in the mean­time, he or she would be schooled in the clas­sics. “Today,” I ima­gine myself say­ing to the tod­dler, “we’ll check out Bresson’s Diary of a Country Priest, adap­ted from the nov­el by Georges Bernanos.” I believe that my artic­u­la­tion of this fantasy is one of the sev­er­al reas­ons that…well, nev­er mind. I’m not a dad myself, sur­prise, but if I was one, I’d check out TCM’s sum­mer series “Essentials, Jr.,” which has been air­ing all sum­mer at eight on Sunday nights, unbenownst to me until now.Tonight, ambi­tiously enough, they’re show­ing the 1939 The Hunchback of Notre Dame, star­ring Charles Laughton and Maureen O’Hara. And one does­n’t have to be a dad to appre­ci­ate the fact that funny fel­low Bill Hader, a friend of this blog and a genu­ine cinephile, is the series host, a cool and apt gig for the multi-talented man, so I’ll be tun­ing in to check him out, at least. The web page for the series is here; a splen­did series of Sunday nights seems guar­an­teed for all. 

No Comments

  • jbryant says:

    Really love Dieterle’s HUNCHBACK. Even in such a con­densed form, Hugo’s story is unfor­get­table. Charles Laughton, with help from that strik­ing make-up job, is heart­break­ing, and Cedric Hardwicke is the most chilling Frollo ima­gin­able. As the gypsy Esmerelda, who seems to pull every man she meets into her irres­ist­ible orbit, 18-year-old Maureen O’Hara may not be much of an act­ress yet, but her close-ups are among the most beau­ti­ful ever cap­tured for the screen. The expens­ive pro­duc­tion has some remark­able sets and fx, pho­to­graphed by the great Joseph August. Essentials, Jr. is a great idea – I hope kids are actu­ally watching.

  • Tom Russell says:

    Times like these make me wish Comcast did­n’t take away my TCM and replace it with sev­en­teen dif­fer­ent ver­sions of QVC in HD.

  • jbryant says:

    Tom: That would make my head explode. Condolences.
    My cable sys­tem is actu­ally adding the HD ver­sion of TCM soon, so nat­ur­ally I’m thrilled. Though I have a bit of trep­id­a­tion about how non-HD trans­fers are going to look.

  • jbry­ant – The upcon­ver­ted stuff on TCMHD does­n’t look bad (of course, this also depends on the source and trans­fer). On my pro­jec­tion sys­tem, those non-HD upcon­verts look bet­ter than their SD broad­casts. The genu­ine HD trans­fers look very nice, naturally.

  • brian says:

    Cool! Wish they wer­en’t show­ing Gunga Din, though. They might as well be show­ing Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will.….

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    I don’t think Gunga Din is nearly on the same level as those two films, although I’d def­in­itely ques­tion its inclu­sion in a kids-oriented series. (Also no kid would ever sit through a 3‑hour silent film or a doc­u­ment­ary about speeches).

  • Alexander says:

    I have the HD ver­sion of TCM . And all the movie are look­ing great.

  • jbryant says:

    Come to think of it, Pete, on the rare occa­sion that I watch the stand­ard def ver­sion of TCM on my HD TV (I usu­ally watch it on my SD TV in anoth­er room), the movies look okay, espe­cially if I don’t sit too close. I pre­sume SD movies will con­tin­ue to look like that on TCMHD. Anyway, look­ing for­ward to the switch.

  • Stephanie says:

    I’ve tried for many years to make myself dis­like Gunga Din, but I can­’t. It’s a great movie for the juni­ors, and its empire-worshiping and racially con­des­cend­ing aspects would make for a good dis­cus­sion with the kids dur­ing and after the pic­ture. Also it’s import­ant for the young ‘uns to see Cary Grant as soon as possible.
    It’s by the way, but I under­stand that Lennon was­n’t much of a house­hus­band. That was primar­ily a cov­er story for his cre­at­ive block and his tol­er­ance for the pres­ence of small chil­dren was quite low all his life. Difficult for Sean, even more so for Julian.

  • brian says:

    I don’t plan on going to battle against Gunga Din, but I’d argue that, while maybe it’s not as mor­ally rep­re­hens­ible as Triumph or Birth (if we can meas­ure and com­pare mor­al rep­re­hens­ib­il­ity like that), it’s on the wrong side of the line and deserves notori­ety. Stephanie: Would that every child watch­ing Gunga Din had a con­scien­tious adult on either side ready to point out the film’s racist and imper­i­al­ist tend­en­cies! If we could guar­an­tee that, then Triumph of the Will would be an equally great thing to show on Essentials, Jr. I’m say­ing that without irony. There are more respons­ible Cary Grant flicks to show than GD. I’m not one of those polit­ic­al cor­rect­ness assholes, I swear. I just think it’s a rep­re­hens­ible film.
    Well, that’s all I’ve got to say. 🙂

  • The Siren says:

    What Stephanie said. Also, Brian, while I under­stand and respect what you’re say­ing, these days a par­ent who will both­er with show­ing any 70-year-old black-and-white movie is 99% likely to be con­scien­tious by defin­i­tion. For the 1% of kids who tuned in because the babysit­ter left the room and they acci­dent­ally changed the chan­nel from Nickelodeon or whatever, as a par­ent I’d rate Gunga Din, with Stevens and Joe August behind the cam­era and Cary Grant and Douglas Fairbanks Jr in front of it, as a lot less per­ni­cious than Transformers. I saw it when I was prob­ably about 8 or 9, nobody bothered to explain one damn thing about it to me and I still man­aged to grow up and fig­ure out that Gunga Din was, to say the least, not a wholly accur­ate rep­res­ent­a­tion of colo­ni­al­ism, India, the British Army, or even Kipling himself.

  • Ivan says:

    The ori­gin­al Fright Night not a good movie huh. But the new one is really good? My per­son­al opin­ion is that the ori­gin­al Fright Night was one of the best vam­pire movies made. I haven’t seen the new one yet and hope to go in without being to judge­ment­al, but some­how I just don’t think it will hold a candle to the original.

  • jbryant says:

    Wrong thread, Ivan.