CriticismEventsImagesSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny

Image of the day, 8/16/11

By August 16, 2011January 12th, 202616 Comments

RR

Robert Ryan, Woman on the Beach, Jean Renoir, 1947

In the absence of much ori­gin­al blog con­tent (busy, busy week, filled with out­side con­cerns), I thought I’d com­mend you to the excel­lent piece my friend Kent Jones has con­trib­uted to MUBI’s Daily Notebook, tied in to New York’s Film Forum’s superb Ryan ret­ro­spect­ive. In the piece, Kent notes a couple of regret­table omis­sions, includ­ing the above-glimpsed Renoir maudit; I myself kind of wish for the inclu­sion of Flying Leathernecks, not a par­tic­u­larly great film, I know, but fas­cin­at­ing for the con­trast of per­form­ing styles—Ryan goes up against John Wayne in that one, and not to push any false dicho­tomy themes here, there is a real fric­tion at work. In any event, there are rar­it­ies that more than make up for the omis­sions, includ­ing a Boetticher double fea­ture that I’m gonna miss if I spend too much more time on this post. 

16 Comments

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    Glenn, sorry for using this plat­form to plug some­thing but since you brough it up, for you or any­one inter­ested in read­ing about THE FLYING LEATHERNECKS, I wrote it up a year ago:
    http://www.cinemaviewfinder.com/2010/08/flying-leathernecks-1951-and-rays.html
    And I’m sure it will come up again in my upcom­ing Nick Ray blogathon.

  • Jacques Rivette’s a big fan of “Woman On the Beach.” And if you’ve seen it you’ll know why. Once many years back I went to see it at the Museum of Modern Art, and Joan Bennett was there. She was­n’t intorud­cued as a “spe­cial guest” or any­thing. I doubt the staff knew she was in the audi­ence. She just wanted to see it again herself.
    As for Robert Ryan my abso­lute favor­ite is “On Dangerous Ground.”

  • jbryant says:

    If I were in NYC, I’d be all over that Boetticher double fea­ture – haven’t seen either before.
    It’s always nice to see anoth­er appre­ci­ation of INFERNO. One night about 2 a.m., my girl­friend and I were get­ting ready for bed, when INFERNO popped up on AMC. Though it had­n’t really been that long since we’d last seen it, we had to watch again, even with the blas­ted com­mer­cials. There was no ques­tion of record­ing it – we did­n’t want to wait. Would love to see it in 3D sometime.
    CAUGHT is in my Netflix Instant queue; look­ing for­ward to see­ing that one again. Other stream­ing Ryan titles: THE BOY WITH GREEN HAIR, ALASKA SEAS, ABOUT MRS. LESLIE, HOUSE OF BAMBOO, ODDS AGAINST TOMORROW and THE DIRTY DOZEN.

  • Tom Block says:

    Kent’s piece is all good but one para­graph in par­tic­u­lar is a motherfucker.

  • Chris O. says:

    Love Ryan’s entrance in “House Of Bamboo.” And for some reas­on in my mind he some­how looks way young­er in that film than in “Bad Day At Black Rock” which came out the same year.
    I won­der how often he and Sterling Hayden were up for the same parts. They eas­ily could’ve (should’ve) played broth­ers in a movie. (I think I’m repeat­ing myself with this post.)

  • Griff says:

    INFERNO is truly a treat in 3D.

  • Stephen Bowie says:

    Robert Ryan is my favor­ite movie star, and I kind of regret that I’ve already seen every single film in Bruce’s series.

  • lipranzer says:

    My favor­ite Ryan per­form­ance is still CAUGHT. The dark places his char­ac­ter goes to in that movie is still chilling.

  • Stephen Bowie says:

    BILLY BUDD is the ulti­mate Ryan per­form­ance, I think. Ustinov is con­tent to set it up as a straight­for­ward light vs. dark Christ allegory, and then Ryan adds so much ambi­gu­ity to Claggart that he throws the movie totally out of whack (in a good way).

  • gs says:

    Sadly, Horizon’s West bit the dust. I guess you can­’t have it all. To add to the list of Ryan mas­ter­pieces not in this series: Anthony Mann’s MEN IN WAR.

  • Stephen Bowie says:

    And MEN IN WAR is amaz­ing on the big screen (not that the Film Forum has one of those, but I digress). Saw it on 35mm in film skool, then screened it again a few days later from an AMC record­ing (yes, I’m that old) to write about it, and was shocked at how much was lost. I still remem­ber the sweat and the beard stubble on Ryan’s face in one of Mann’s pro­file close-ups.

  • Jaime says:

    Was for­tu­nate to see MEN IN WAR at Lincoln Center a few years ago. Apart from its use of screen space (I would pair it with DUCK AMUCK as two films whose prot­ag­on­ists are at war with the mise en scene*), its quiet-quiet-loud sound­scape is also amaz­ing, mad­den­ing. The open­ing, so quiet and sleepy, inter­rup­ted by a shout (“LIEUTENANT!!” if I recall), knocked out the Walter Reade audi­ence as if they were at an early test screen­ing of PARANORMAL ACTIVITY. And, as those of you who’ve seen the film know, the screws just kept on tight­en­ing. What a film.
    * In solid­ar­ity with those who will not be cor­rec­ti­fied on the use of dashes and “grave accents.”

  • gs says:

    I caught MEN IN WAR in a beau­ti­ful print at MoMA a few years ago and was totally caught off-guard by it. It’s strange the film isn’t more lauded and dis­cussed. I would rank it as one of Mann’s greatest works (which is some­thing I don’t toss around lightly), and cer­tainly one of the best American films on war ever made.
    Somehow it has less than a quarter as many votes on IMDb as my least favor­ite of Mann’s films, hor­rendously dull THE GLENN MILLER STORY.

  • Cadavra says:

    Anyone seen Michael Winner’s LAWMAN? Truly one of Ryan’s most under­rated (and bril­liant) performances.

  • jbryant says:

    cada­v­ra: I keep passing up LAWMAN on Encore Westerns because I assume it’s not in OAR. But I see there’s a DVD, so maybe I’ll have to check that out.

  • frankbooth says:

    Sterling Hayden always looked like he just swal­lowed a ran­cid egg. Robert Ryan looked like he just swal­lowed Sterling Hayden.