Movies

The current cinema, 420 edition

By November 3, 2011No Comments

A-very-harold-and-kumar-3d-christmas-photo_612x466

I endeavor to wear my know­ledge of sub­stance abuse lightly in my review of A Very Harold And Kumar 3D Christmas, a film that made me laugh and laugh and laugh and as such enhanced my true appre­ci­ation of my under­stand­ing that my true appre­ci­ation of art begins in pleas­ure. I got less pleasure—but still some, still some!—from Tower Heist, which, as I endeavor to explain in my review, also for MSN Movies, is a game but ulti­mately failed stab at cre­at­ing a TNT Classic. 

No Comments

  • Sorry I missed the “All-Media” of this one, but I’m up to my ears in Roman Polanski.
    As for “Tower Heist” I would­n’t see it if you paid me.
    Well I would if you paid me a LOT, but that’s it.

  • ZS says:

    I can­’t wait to see Harold and Kumar tomorrow!

  • colinr says:

    That reminds me to ask what you think of Gregg Araki’s Smiley Face – the stoner com­edy star­ring Anna Faris in which John Cho also appears?

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    BIG “Smiley Face” fan. One of the biggest, perhaps.

  • Bettencourt says:

    I remem­ber being pretty dis­ap­poin­ted in Smiley Face (okay, it was a Gregg Araki film that did­n’t have Joseph Gordon-Levitt, so my expect­a­tions wer­en’t TOO high). I thought Faris was ter­rif­ic, fear­less as ever, but it seemed weird to base a farce on a stoner who gets more stoned than usu­al one day. This is already a char­ac­ter who’s at the bong before noon. Sort of like a fish-in-slightly-saltier-water story.
    Also, am I the only one who thinks that most Araki films (includ­ing Kaboom) feel like they were filmed in a rehears­al room at a com­munity col­lege? I don’t know what it is – the ambi­ent sound, the art direction…
    Still, I’m greatly look­ing for­ward to H&K 3D, to an almost embar­rass­ing degree. That “who are you look­ing at?” joke in the trail­er espe­cially cracks me up.

  • Bettencourt says:

    Actually, the line might actu­ally be “who are you talk­ing to?”

  • colinr says:

    Glad to hear that about Smiley Face – I still have some catch­ing up to do with Araki’s back cata­logue (the exper­i­ence of The Doom Generation left me a little too traumatised!)
    “I got less pleasure—but still some, still some!—from Tower Heist”
    It actu­ally sounds sur­pris­ingly tol­er­able, which at least is a step up! Mark Kermode, the BBC’s film crit­ic just got through review­ing the film on their news chan­nel with the same ambil­avence, end­ing his review with the pre­sum­ably tech­nic­ally cor­rect com­ment “It’s Brett Ratner’s best film!” Talk about back­han­ded com­pli­ments though!

  • colinr says:

    *ambi­val­ence* – I can usu­ally spell cor­rectly, honets!

  • I still can­’t decide if the fun­ni­est bit in Smiley Face is the Garfield speech or the Jane Lynch scene. But the former is def­in­itely the most accur­ate depic­tion of stoned­ness ever on film.

  • Shawn Stone says:

    Tower Heist: Yes, the busi­ness with the car is, um, labored. It’s like Ratner can­’t res­ist milk­ing some­thing that would been bet­ter cut down to just the shot with the maid vacu­um­ing in the foreground.
    Then there was the added fun of Eddie Murphy break­ing into the old Golf + Western build­ing. You can­’t go home again.