Movies

They just didn't care

By November 10, 2011No Comments

09

One thing I did not get into in my review of Jack and Jill for MSN Movies was just how (ostens­ibly) insult­ingly sub-pro forma is its actu­al film­mak­ing. It isn’t even just a mat­ter of how obvi­ously its indif­fer­ent redemption-narrative struc­ture is the Avid-enabled equi­val­ent of a very sloppy but­ter sculp­ture. The indif­fer­ence is felt in almost every aspect: the ward­robe, the makeup (nobody could be bothered to make poor Katie Holmes look as if she actu­ally had blood run­ning through her veins), the pro­duc­tion design (pretty much what you’d get if you decided to shoot a film Dogme style on an actu­al stu­dio back­lot, if you get my mean­ing), the spe­cial effects (the twin stuff makes Paul Henreid’s 1964 Dead Ringer look state-of-the-art). Adam Sandler’s “knack” for phys­ic­al com­edy is such that when his boy-and-girl twin char­ac­ters put aside their dif­fer­ences and unite for a double-dutch routine, the fact that both Sandlers went to their trail­ers and were replaced by stunt doubles is giv­en not quite the amount of cam­o­flauge we recall from the hil­ari­ous break-dancing sequences of the videos for George Harrison’s “Got My Mind Set On You” (a lot point elided in the recent Scorsese doc­u­ment­ary) and Lou Reed’s “I Love You Suzanne.” As has been remarked else­where, the “qual­ity” “con­trol” over at Happy Madison pro­duc­tions has been nonex­ist­ent for some time, but this is the first time it really hit home for me just how mind­ful Sandler, dir­ect­or Dennis Dugan, and the rest of the per­pet­rat­ors are with respect to keep­ing over­head down. Good lord.

No Comments

  • rotch says:

    But Pacino him­self brings such unseemly bravado to the film’s inco­her­ent send-up of both his image and what’s left of his tal­ent that his scenes are stomach-churningly com­pel­ling, warp-driving into a meta zone in which self-loathing and self-regard are sucked into some kind of black hole, twirled togeth­er, and pulped into cos­mic dust.”
    That line could almost get me into the theatre. Almost.

  • Ivan says:

    Lordy, I *love* that expres­sion on the poor extra’s face in the lower right hand part of the photo you’ve provided–in her mind, she’s think­ing, “This is pay­ing off Yale Drama School, this is pay­ing off Yale Drama School…”

  • Unkle Rusty says:

    Well, I am sure you have all seen this, but.…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3npY7MTcl7E

  • Perhaps someday someone will write a mono­graph com­par­ing Sandler’s Columbia out­put dir­ec­ted by Dennis Dugan with Jerry Lewis’ films of the 60s.

  • Spartickes says:

    Please tell me the tile is an inten­tion­al MST3K reference.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Spartickes: Indeed, noth­ing but. “The Attack of the Eye Creatures” epis­ode, as I recall.

  • It’s almost—almost!—inspiring how little the Happy Madison crew care about the movies they make. As that awful buddies-go-camping-movie-that-I-can’t-be-arsed-to-look-up made clear, they’re a bunch of d00ds who can­’t quite believe they’re paid enorm­ous sums of money to roll out of bed and goof around in nice loc­a­tions while attract­ive P.A.s bring them munchies. Nice work if you can get it, and much like the ori­gin­al Rat Pack movies, a lot of the audi­ence is there to soak up the vibe of responsibility-free hanging out with your buds (hence the import­ance of the “loy­alty to his pals” image of Happy Madison pro­duc­tions). It may even be a bonus to rel­ish in identi­fy­ing with the con­tempt the people on screen feel for what they’re doing and those who watch them do it.

  • Glad you men­tioned poor Katie Holmes, Glenn, because I’ve noticed that recently, too – she looked like hell in “Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark,” as well, with deep circles under her eyes, even before the little wee beast­ies showed up. (And the one laugh she got in this film – being shocked at find­ing her hus­band in a dress – was­n’t the one I think she wanted.)
    Al, though. Al. MAN.

  • Escher says:

    I give Dennis Dugan a modic­um of slack for hav­ing dir­ec­ted BRAIN DONORS, which is way fun­ni­er than it ought to be, and more than a bit under­rated; and, of course, for ZOHAN, which could be the most rad­ic­al thing any stu­dio has released in the past half-decade.

  • jbryant says:

    I really liked ZOHAN, too, and hoped it signaled a new level of ambi­tion in Sandler and Dugan. I haven’t seen their sub­sequent col­lab­or­a­tions though.

  • KKA says:

    This reminds me some­how of the old Henry Rollins rant about how the cre­at­ors of the TV show ‘Friends’ were for­cing their audi­ence to eat the shit off their shoe just because they would, and they asked for more! Not sure if any­one else came to this con­clu­sion, but Sandler may be today’s finest gradu­ate of the ‘Human Centipede’ school of film­mak­ing. While he cer­tainly did­n’t invent this par­tic­u­lar style, his abil­ity to clearly com­mu­nic­ate his cre­at­ive inten­tions to his audi­ence, anus-to-mouth is cer­tainly impress­ive in today’s pop­u­lar enter­tain­ment culture.