ActorsHousekeepingMovies

Morgan, a suitable case for treatment

By January 6, 2012No Comments

StreetSmart

Come on, you’d use that as a head­line too, if you could. Anyway. Over at MSN Entertainment, in com­mem­or­a­tion of his upcom­ing feting at the Golden Globes, I give the once-over to Morgan Freeman and his screen career, cit­ing ten of his best pieces of work in chro­no­lo­gic­al order. Remember when he was a real badass bad guy instead of a kind of lordly suave bad guy, as in more recent work such as Wanted or (God spare you) Lucky Number Slevin? If you don’t, you really need to check the man out in Street Smart, from back in 1987, in which he cost­arred with Christopher Reeve. Damn. 

No Comments

  • edo says:

    Glenn! I know you don’t like the film, but surely Freeman’s per­form­ance in SE7EN is a not­able one in his career? It fits the wise man advising young­er, white men cat­egory some­what, but here with a world wear­i­ness and a cyn­icism that isn’t nearly so inspirational.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Agreed, Edo, except that it’s just so EXPECTED, you know? I’d really prefer to turn people on to his work in “Nurse Betty” than praise ANOTHER film that every­body’s seen (the oth­er being “Shawshank”)…

  • bill says:

    I’ve long wanted to see STREET SMART. I should prob­ably do that. Especially after see­ing DEATHTRAP and real­iz­ing how good an act­or Reeve could be.

  • James Keepnews says:

    You play rough!”

  • Josh Z says:

    I believe you meant to say that Driving Miss Daisy gets a lot of “flack” for its polit­ics, not “slack.” Unless I’m mis­read­ing you entirely, which is possible. 🙂

  • Oliver_C says:

    Freeman could hardly have played any­thing oth­er than a “lordly suave bad guy” in ‘Wanted’, giv­en that an entirely accur­ate adapt­a­tion of the ori­gin­al story would – as I believe David Cronenberg once said of ‘Naked Lunch’ – have cost $300 mil­lion and got itself banned in every coun­try in the world.

  • bill says:

    Also, NURSE BETTY is an odd and inter­est­ing film.

  • lipranzer says:

    One film Freeman’s great in that does­n’t get nearly enough men­tion is JOHNNY HANDSOME. I’m not the Walter Hill fan many people I know are, but this is a great old-school crime movie (des­pite the fact you pretty much know what’s going to hap­pen), and one of the reas­ons for its great­ness is Freeman’s turn as the utterly cyn­ic­al sher­iff hound­ing Mickey Rourke. The scenes between Freeman and Forest Whitaker as an ideal­ist­ic doc­tor are some of the finest act­ing I’ve seen from either of them.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    This is what that damn doc­tor could­n’t under­stand, huh Johnny?”

  • AdenDreamsOf says:

    Glenn, I’m so glad to hear you like “Nurse Betty”, and recog­nize Freeman’s good work in that film. “Nurse Betty” is LaBute’s most invent­ive and unpre­dict­able film (at least that I’ve seen…I nev­er bothered with ‘Posession’). Everyone in that film gives a first rate per­form­ance, and “Nurse Betty” has an odd and some­what dark warmth and heart that is largely miss­ing from LaBute’s mis­an­throp­ic and abras­ive body of work. It’s a good one, and I think it will find a big­ger fol­low­ing in the future.

  • lazarus says:

    Wasn’t Nurse Betty the first LaBute film where he did­n’t write the screenplay?
    Would explain the sur­pris­ing heart and warmth. And it’s a great film, but I think his earli­er work is really what made him dis­tinct. In The Company Of Men and Your Friends And Neighbors are cer­tainly mis­an­throp­ic but they were very well-done.

  • AdenDreamsOf says:

    @ Lazarus, I agree with you that ‘In The Company of Men’ and ‘Your Friends And Neighbors’ are both very mis­an­throp­ic while being well-written, acted, and executed. Those films along with ‘The Shape of Things’ are the closest of his films that rep­res­ent the style and themes (and struc­ture) that most often appear in his stage work.
    Personally, I like ‘Nurse Betty’ the most because it feels so dif­fer­ent from the rest of his films.
    (Then again, ‘The Wicker Man’, ‘Death At A Funeral’, and ‘Lakeview Terrace’ don’t feel like LaBute movies, but they’re also all so bad)

  • lazarus says:

    He may have been a hired dir­ect­or for Nurse Betty (not sure how he became involved with the pro­ject), but yeah it’s a great film and cer­tainly does­n’t belong with that hack work you men­tioned at the end.
    Looks like David Gordon Green is tak­ing some notes from that playbook.

  • Michael Dempsey says:

    Morgan Freeman’s por­tray­al of a psy­cho­path in “Street Smart” has nev­er been sur­passed and has rarely been equalled for stark yet work­aday human-too-human terror.

  • AdenDreamsOf says:

    @ Lazarus Your con­nec­tion between how LaBute and Gordon Green’s careers have both turned into major hack­work in the past two years could not be more astute. That being said, at least Neil LaBute is still writ­ing com­pel­ling and ori­gin­al plays while he makes bad movies for a paycheck. Gordon Green is just mak­ing bad movies. I would give him points for his work on ‘Eastbound & Down’, but I mostly get the impres­sion that Jody Hill is the brains behind that oper­a­tion and Green is just one of the hired hands behind the camera.

  • Oliver_C says:

    Green may be tak­ing notes from a play­book in LaBute’s pos­ses­sion, but Michael Lehmann must’ve been the one who wrote it. 🙂