MoviesSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny

"Friends" with "Sushi"

By March 9, 2012January 12th, 202615 Comments

Friends-with-kids

Whaaazzzup, its Adam Scott with Jennifer Westfeldt in Friends With Kids. It occurs to me that Scott, who is quite good in the pic­ture, rather resembles a less-snide Stephen Malkmus, which is a way fo say­ing that he does­n’t resemble Stephen Malkmus in the least. As for Westfeldt, she is indeed tal­en­ted but I some­times have this nag­ging feel­ing that she is in a sense her own Nanette Newman. William Goldman adepts who get this joke may con­sider it unkind, and I agree, it is, and I don’t mean to be, but still. Nagging feel­ings. My review of Friends With Kids for MSN Movies is here. Closing out my MSN review­ing rounds for this week is Jiro Dreams of Sushi

15 Comments

  • FanOfGlennKenny says:

    Enjoyed your review, Glenn. As always!

  • Norm Wilner says:

    I thought I was the only one who used the Nanette Newman story in cas­u­al con­ver­sa­tion. I feel slightly less alone now.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Feeling slightly less alone: that’s what this blog is ALL ABOUT, Norm.

  • D says:

    I would like this movie bet­ter if it were an adapt­a­tion of “The Goat, or Who is Sylvia?”
    Because then it would be Edward Albee or at least like one of those YouTube clips with the baby goats run­ning around in someone’s backyard.
    PS: Nanette Newman! Meow, Glenn.

  • AdenDreamsOf says:

    Glenn, are you say­ing that Scott looks like Malkmus or that he plays char­ac­ters with Malkmus-like personalities?

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Um, “looks like.” What IS a “Malkmus-like per­son­al­ity,” any­way? I ima­gine some­thing like a Nicky Katt in “The Limey,” only he chan­nels his energy into groom­ing rather than put­downs and contract-killings. And then he breeds, so he can lord it over every­body on account of THAT, too. No won­der male magazine writers of a cer­tain age dig him so much.

  • I liked JIRO a bit more than you did, Glenn. From Silverdocs:
    JIRO DREAMS OF SUSHI (Gelb, USA/Japan, 8) Only second-best Japanese food-porn movie ever (maybe it needs a black-hatted Outsider). Seriously, a huge crowd-pleaser and there’s more to it than food porn – it’s also about par­ent­al author­ity, the cre­at­ive pro­cess, team­work, old-school Japan vs. The Kids Today, work eth­ic, and the some­times odd rituals sur­round­ing the food busi­ness. Title char­ac­ter is as lov­able and wise as they come. Really, only flaw is I wanted more – maybe the young­er son, who has slightly more down­scale place and there’s hints of sib­ling rivalry, but even the fact that THAT is repressed is telling. Pure enter­tain­ment from start to finish.

  • ZS says:

    Adam Scott was in Star Trek: First Contact.

  • AdenDreamsOf says:

    Glenn, I’d clas­si­fy a Malkmus-like per­son­al­ity as being on the smug, self-involved side. Personally I’m a huge fan of his music, but I find the way he comes across in inter­views to be sad­den­ing and obnox­ious. He also does­n’t seem to be par­tic­u­larly nice or grate­ful towards his fans/following. Nicky Katt’s char­ac­ter in “The Limey” is too cool to be men­tioned in the same sen­tence as Mr. Malkmus.
    “I embrace this lifestyle”

  • Bettencourt says:

    I love the Nannette Newman/William Goldman ref­er­ence, but I guess we’ll just have to agree to dis­agree over wheth­er Adam Scott is too “phys­ic­ally unpre­pos­sess­ing” to be a lady-killer.
    I’ve nev­er spot­ted him in Star Trek: First Contact, but I do remem­ber him in Hellraiser: Bloodline.

  • Wonderful review! I enjoyed it and love this show as well. It’s really funny when both of these start fight­ing with each oth­er on the show. Thanks

  • bill says:

    Damn it. I wanted to be the first one to announce that he got the Nanette Newman thing.

  • Actually, I always thought Goldman’s com­plaints about Newman under­lined how dumb Goldman could be, even about his own scripts. HIs vis­ion of the Stepford wives as a bunch of Playboy bun­nies would have been amus­ing, and per­haps more appeal­ing as a cheese­cake fest, but it would have totally killed the real satir­ic weight (and genu­ine hor­ror) of the movie, which was ter­ri­fy­ing pre­cisely because it presen­ted Stepford as what ordin­ary life is like. Goldman’s movie would nev­er have become the kind of phe­nom­ena that Forbes’ movie did.

  • bill says:

    Goldman’s movie would have been Ira Levin’s nov­el, which is plenty satir­ic­al, and quite good.

  • But it’s spe­cific­ally the *visu­al* aspect that’s at issue with the cast­ing of Newman, right? And there, Goldman was wrong, and Forbes was right—the Stepford Wives should look like sub­urb­an wives, not center­folds. If Stepford looks like Hugh Hefner’s man­sion, then it’s just a sci-fi movie, not a satire—everyone can walk out of the theat­er, say “My life sure does­n’t look like that,” and go to bed undis­turbed. If Stepford looks like an ordin­ary sub­urb, and the wives look like just-slightly-better-than-ordinary people (allow­ances for movie-ness), then Stepford *is* our world, and you have a truly great, truly unset­tling movie. Goldman’s great tal­ent has always been mak­ing poten­tially unset­tling mater­i­al toothless—he man­aged to have a Nazi doc­tor tor­tur­ing Dustin Hoffman without once mak­ing the audi­ence think of Mengele—and I’m always glad that THE STEPFORD WIVES got away from him, and became some­thing genu­inely terrific.