Movies

Love power

By May 8, 2012No Comments

B69c698c-ac2c-4742-ad7d-b36ed13ef8ef

While nobody was look­ing, I dashed off a “50 Greatest Film Romances” slide show, or gal­lery, or whatever you want to call it, for MSN Movies. I know that a lot of the read­ers of this blog are driv­en crazy by the format­ting of such fea­tures. But this has its rewards, hon­est. SEE how I was able to work a ref­er­ence to LCD Soundsystem into an entry on, of all things, Ghost! DISCOVER where Buñuel’s That Obscure Object Of Desire ranks on the list! MARVEL at the fact that I got That Obscure Object of Desire on such a list at all! And if you still don’t feel like look­ing at it, to heck with you; one of the MSN muck­ymucks tells me the thing got almost 650,000 page views the first 75 minutes it was up, so nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah.

I trust I don’t need to tell you what the above film pic­tured is. Come on, it’s a good movie. 

No Comments

  • rotch says:

    Well worth the 100 clicks it takes to read.
    Some omit­ted favor­ites: Lady and the Tramp, Chunking Express, Breaking the Waves, Lovers of the Arctic Circle, Amélie.

  • weatherspoon says:

    No Borzage??? Kinda unfathomable.

  • partisan says:

    I too will second CHUNGKING EXPRESS (only one Wong?), LOVERS OF THE ARCTIC CIRCLE, AMELIE. I’d add SPLASH, HIS GIRL FRIDAY, THE THIN MAN (no Powell/Loy at all?), TROPICAL MALADY (much bet­ter than BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN), CHILDREN OF PARADISE, THE EARRING OF MADAME DE, PARIS TEXAS, VOYAGE IN ITALY, A WOMAN UNDER THE INFLUENCE, TROUBLE IN PARADISE, THE MISFITS, THE MAN WITH TWO BRAINS, PETER IBBETSON, and BONNIE AND CLYDE. A spe­cial favor­ite is TESS, but that’s just me. Well, actu­ally that’s only me.

  • Ray says:

    I’m with weath­er spoon. no borzage?!?!?!

  • jwarthen says:

    Went all the way to #1 expect­ing BRIEF ENCOUNTER to pop up momentarily.
    I’m miss­ing most three from 1939–40: SHOP AROUND THE CORNER, LOVE AFFAIR and REMEMBER THE NIGHT. Charles Boyer and Barbara Stanwyck hold the place in my pan­theon that Hugh Grant and Audrey Hepburn occupy in yours.

  • Patrick says:

    The good – put­ting Roman Holiday as high as you did, just a bril­liant film, it some­times does­n’t seem to get the cred­it it deserves, that Wyler guy knew what he was doing. The bad – what the heck is The Apartment doing that far down the list? I thought that one had achieved clas­sic status, maybe that’s only in my own view of things though.…
    Thought I might see Groundhog Day pop up some­where, maybe it does­n’t qualify.

  • db says:

    By includ­ing so many crappy/mediocre/pandering movies (Pretty Woman, Doctor Zhivago, Now Voyager, Gone with the Wind, etc, etc?)in this list, it almost seems like a back­han­ded slap at the whole genre of romantic films.
    When you get around to mak­ing anoth­er such list 20 years from now or so may I suggest:
    – The World of Apu
    – Charulata
    – Crucified Lovers (Mizoguchi)
    – Children of Paradise
    – Pride and Prejudice (Olivier, Garson)
    – Sunrise
    – Lonesome
    – The Scarlet Letter (Lillian Gish)
    – The Idiot (Kurosawa)
    – Some ver­sion of Romeo & Juliet for its sym­bol­ic value
    – The Gold Rush (best screen kiss ever – at the end of the film)
    – Beauty and the Beast (Cocteau)
    – Bright Star
    – The Cranes are Flying
    – Show People
    – Once
    – The Merry Widow (Lubitsh)
    – The Ghost and Mrs. Muir
    – Death Takes a Holiday (put­ting aside the ridicu­lous dialogue)
    – 7th Heaven
    – L’eclisse
    – Compilation of Astaire/Rogers dance numbers
    – Topaze (Harry d’Abbadie d’Arrast)
    – Pennies From Heaven
    – There’s a lot of back­lash against it but I do think “The Artist” works well as a clas­sic romance.
    – I don’t know if 500 Days of Summer is a great film but I think it’s a lot bet­ter than many men­tioned in your list.
    I second men­tions above of Shop Around the Corner, Tropical Malady and Lady and The Tramp.
    Not to say there are not some good movies on the list – espe­cially nice to see a men­tion of Make Way for Tomorrow, which I don’t think I would have thought of.

  • Owain Wilson says:

    I’d have thrown Doc Brown and Clara Clayton’s utterly charm­ing romance in Back To The Future Part III into the list.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    While the exclu­sion of any films by Borzage is indeed lam­ent­able, and per­haps in an import­ant sense inex­cus­able, it can be ration­al­ized. As can the inclu­sion of so many mediocre, or even down­right poor, films, includ­ing some I act­ively dis­like, even. (And I even got to say so in many cases.) Romance is a pop­u­lar, not to say pop­u­list, genre. To com­pile a list of the “greatest” romance films and leave out the most popular/arguably cul­tur­ally sig­ni­fic­ant examples of the genre would be will­fully per­verse, to say the least. (The more per­son­al reas­on that I felt okay in leav­ing off Borzage, not to men­tion Murnau’s “Sunrise,” Murnau’s “City Girl” and Malick’s “Days of Heaven,” among oth­ers, is that they don’t really register for me as genre pic­tures AS SUCH but as, if you’ll excuse the term, cos­mic poet­ic­al works, a list of which I’m still try­ing to talk MSN Movies into running.)
    In any event, 50 is a finite num­ber, which is why these lists always start argu­ments, which can be fun. In anoth­er event, I not only stand by my choices but insist that not one of them (or any of the omis­sions, for that mat­ter) is egre­gious as any movie poll in which the first “Back To The Future” winds up cited as one of the ten greatest films of all time. (See: http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/the-10-best-movies-of-all-time-according-to-the-internet.php) So there.

  • Owain Wilson says:

    Back To The Future IS one of the greatest films of all time!

  • Shamus says:

    Glenn, with respect (and speak­ing as a fan of your work), the argu­ment that bad romantic movies are val­id­ated simply by their pop­ular­ity might also be exten­ded to movies as a whole- movies are a “pop­u­list” art form and “cul­tur­ally sig­ni­fic­ant” movies are more import­ant and note­worthy as a top­ic for con­ver­sa­tion than those movies which are great or even good.
    It might be anoth­er story, of course, if MSN did not let you include with­in the list TROUBLE IN PARADISE, THE LADY EVE, LETTER TO AN UNKNOWN WOMAN, ON DANGEROUS GROUND, TO HAVE AND HAVE NOT, SUNRISE, THE GENERAL, ALL THAT HEAVEN ALLOWS, ZANGIKU MONOGATARI, LOVE AFFAIR (the McCarey ori­gin­al), BITTER TEA OF GENERAL YEN and MOONRISE to name just some fam­ous and truly remark­able romantic movies you did not men­tion. But that does not make any fur­ther dis­cus­sion (how­ever brief) of NOTTING HILL any more inter­est­ing. And if it is bad, why talk about it?

  • I.B. says:

    Holy shit.
    No Leos Carax.
    No Leos Carax.
    No “Audition”.
    No Leos Carax.
    Julia Roberts’ grat­ing mug twice.
    I love you, Glenn, but… screw MSN. BE will­fully per­verse, for Krust’s sake.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Shamus, this is a com­plic­ated issue, but before I address it I wanna make clear that, jok­ing or any­thing else aside, the people I work with at MSN are uni­formly great and well-informed and smart and respect­ful and NEVER hand down dic­tates as to what I may or may not include in a giv­en list. That said, when we’re col­lab­or­at­ing on a list, we do keep in mind the fact that we’re address­ing a mass audi­ence. Do we want to coddle that audi­ence? No. but we don’t want to pat­ron­ize that audi­ence either. You know that bull­shit argu­ment advanced by “film-snob” mock­ers like David Kamp and Dan Kois, that a bunch of smarty pants are oppress­ing them by shov­ing this bor­ing “ART” stuff down their throats? I don’t want to play into that, not one bit.
    While there’s noth­ing I can do about wheth­er or not you find my fur­ther dis­cus­sion of “Notting Hill” com­pel­ling, I’d still defend its inclu­sion on such a list, just as I’d defend the likes of “Ghost” or any of the oth­ers we don’t much care for, on the grounds that, yes, they made an impact on the lar­ger cul­ture, they had an effect on the icon­o­graphy and use of imagery and tropes in romantic films, and so on. Also, “Notting Hill” is not, pre­cisely, “bad” (although in a way it’s kind of, well, awful); it’s a very skill­ful piece of enter­tain­ment engin­eer­ing. Admittedly, my blurb on that pic­ture does­n’t neces­sar­ily reflect or illu­min­ate that.
    If the list had been 100 instead of 50, I can guar­an­tee you that at the very least nine out of the twelve pic­tures you cite would have been included.

  • Owain Wilson says:

    If Glenn had­n’t included the pop­u­lar hits, he’d have to con­tend with mil­lions of MSN’s out­raged mass audi­ence scream­ing “I can­’t believe he did­n’t include NOTTING HILL, GHOST or TITANIC!!!”
    So what dif­fer­ence does it make?

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    No Carax, no Beinex, either. No Lynch! Maybe next year I can pitch “50 Most Messed-Up Romantic Movies.” As to the idea of “Screw MSN,” per­haps I.B. has for­got­ten the man­tra “PAYZ THA DOCTAS BOI.”

  • Peter Labuza says:

    Awesome list as always, Glenn. I’ve added “Two for the Road,” “Barefoot in the Park,” “A Man and a Woman,” and “An Affair to Remember” to my list.
    Will of course throw out more love as many have to “Chungking Express,” which makes me first believe that love can truly exist every time I watch it.
    I’ll also throw out some love for the Joe Mankiewicz-directed “The Ghost and Mrs. Muir,” which is oddly ador­able and won­der­fully per­formed by Rex Harrison and Gene Tiennery.

  • Shamus says:

    Glenn, I was not impugn­ing MSN- after all, they do have a busi­ness to run. Also, I DID find what you had to say about NOTTING HILL very amus­ing (apo­lo­gies if I did not make that clear) pre­cisely because you found it so emet­ic. I was only ques­tion­ing your some­what tenu­ous reas­on­ing for includ­ing them over some­thing by Borzage and Lubitsch and Murnau.
    And so far as that goes, it might be argued that few films have had the same impact on film­mak­ing and pop­u­lar icon­o­graphy as SUNRISE espe­cially in terms of cre­at­ing the stand­ard tropes of film noir and the femme fatale, or IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT for set­ting out the defin­it­ive nar­rat­ive for the romantic com­edy etc. etc. But I agree with Owain Wilson that these kinds of lists can­’t sat­is­fy every­body so I’ll drop it.

  • I.B. says:

    I’m a hip-hop illit­er­ate. And I use Linux!

  • ATK says:

    beau­ti­ful, love the theme song to TWWW,

  • Happy Together
    Weekend
    Tropical Malady

  • Man, y’all is cranky! I’m just impressed GK man­aged to work in so many passing ref­er­ences to great anti-romances, and great romances made in a style that would just drive too many people away from the whole list. Plus that New Yorker car­toon about Love Story made its inclu­sion totally worth it, and this list has inspired me to add That Hamilton Woman and Barefoot in the Park to my queue, so the Fuzzwife will be very pleased indeed.
    As I’ve made clear before, I’m deep in the anti-Eastwood camp, but Bridges deserves to be here because the Eastwood/Streep romance is so power­ful that it turns that soppy Mary-Sue-bait of a book into a genu­inely decent flick. In a weird way, it reminds me of Bryan Singer’s X‑Men movie, demon­strat­ing that sol­id emo­tion­al com­mit­ment can turn the sil­li­est premise into a piece of cinema. And Brokeback, geez, yeah—the afore­men­tioned Fuzzwife and I spent the first twenty minutes think­ing it was the worst thing we’d ever seen, but were rapt by minute 50 and dev­ast­ated by the end. Ledger reminds me of Brando in The Godfather—it’s a per­form­ance so styl­ized it dares you to think it merely weird, then totally con­vinces you (or con­vinced me, at any rate) that this was the only way to make this private per­son sub­ject him­self to the camera.
    While I appre­ci­ate some of the per­verse sug­ges­tions on this board, some of ’em, man, I dunno. The Cranes Are Flying is one of the best damn movies ever, but I dunno that I’d call the cent­ral love story a great romance—it’s sort of delib­er­ately gen­er­ic. The john and hook­er in I Am Cuba, now there’s a great anti­dote to Pretty Woman. The one nit I really would pick it choos­ing In the Mood For Love over Happy Together—both are great movies, but Happy Together is the one that’s got a great romance at its heart, even if the end­ing delib­er­ately under­cuts some of the assump­tions of a great romance. Boys may come and boys may go, but your favor­ite city is forever!

  • MarkTLancaster says:

    Had a great time read­ing the first half of these 50 selec­tions on my lunch time here at the office. Your brief com­ments about each film are enter­tain­ing and inform­at­ive. It’s a shame MSN makes the nav­ig­a­tion so clunky. I’ll have to do a lot of click­ing (and page load­ing) to get back to where I was when I return to this tonight!

  • Olaf says:

    Glenn, I would like to add “The Clock” (I was very sur­prised you did not include this), “Swing Time” and/or “Top Hat”, the already men­tioned “Letter from an Unknown Woman” and one of the all-time Maggie Cheung greats “Comrades – Almost a Love Story” (which, sadly, is not avail­able on DVD…)
    Ohh, and what about “Pillow Talk”???

  • Zach says:

    I’ll admit, I scanned the com­ments before actu­ally read­ing the list, and I was look­ing for exactly one name: Leos Carax. Really, all of his movies eas­ily mer­it inclu­sion (except maybe MERDE), although Lovers on the Bridge prob­ably comes closest to fit­ting the “pop­u­lar genre” cri­terion that you chose.

  • Tom Russell says:

    Very nice list, and I’m kinda half-embarrassed to admit, softie that I am, that I’ve gone all wobbly for sev­er­al of the films that aren’t really that great, as you go into on some of your notes. (To save myself some embar­rass­ment, I won’t say which ones… Okay, so, Love Story. But that’s the only one I’ll… oh, and Ghost. But, ser­i­ously, the oth­ers are secrets I’ll take to my grave!)
    Nice to see Moonstruck on the list; I had just seen it for the first time a few weeks back, and quite adored it. And, of course, City Lights.
    A per­son­al favor­ite of the genre for me is Room with a View– I guess I should also admit that I’m some­thing of a nut for well-mounted and attractively-photographed if artist­ic­ally quite “ordin­ary” peri­od romances of a cer­tain gen­teel dis­pos­i­tion, when I know isn’t the most pop­u­lar, or per­haps even aesthetically-justifiable, of stances. For the same reas­on, I’m quite taken with Enchanted April. The Young Victoria is a film of more recent vin­tage that tackles the (sub)genre with quite a bit more oomph and a style/wit/felicity with the cam­era; I was not sur­prised to see Scorsese pro­duced it, and Scorsese him­self dir­ec­ted Age of Innocence, which is peri­od romance with quite a bit more personality.

  • warren oates says:

    Not exactly “romances” but from a list on my hard drive called “hon­est love stories”:
    contempt
    pos­ses­sion (1981)
    scenes from a marriage
    trust
    oasis
    sunrise
    l’atalante
    annie hall
    before sunset
    boy meets girl
    all the real girls
    happy together
    lov­ers on the bridge
    in the mood for love
    min­nie & moskowitz
    ali: fear eats the soul
    four nights of a dreamer

  • I first met Leos Carax when Juliette Binoche was doing press for “The Unbearable Lightness of Being.” He was trail­ing after he like a small whipped puppy. I was the only mem­ber of the press in l.A. who knew who he was and wanted to talk to him. “les Amants du pont-Neuf” and incred­ibly expens­ive “pas­sion pro­ject” that saw three pro­duc­tio com­pan­ies die from it was still being shot at the time. I asked him about it as I’d loved “Boy Meets Girl” and “Mauvais Sang.” He aid he did­n’t know if ti would ever be fin­ished. But it was. And with the com­ple­tion of the film came the end of his affair with Binoche.
    Hey, she broke her leg water ski­ing on the Seine for him, ya know.
    “Les Amanta du Pont-Neuf” remains the greatest cel­lu­loid monu­ment a film dir­ect­or has ever con­struc­ted to the glory of his girlfriend.

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    A great list is one in which you keep say­ing to your­self, “There can­’t be a film that will top that one,” and yet the next one does. While I’m sure there will be the inev­it­able grous­ing by those who did­n’t see one of their favor­ites lis­ted, you sure come close with this com­pre­hens­ive set of recommendations.

  • LLJ says:

    Fine list, though I still think Brief Encounter deserved a place in there, con­sid­er­ing both its main­stream pop­ular­ity (at least in the UK) and crit­ic­al piza­zz dur­ing its time.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    OK, I’ll come clean: I COMPLETELY SCREWED UP with respect to “Brief Encounter.” I know I ration­al­ized it in the text, but it was a BAD RATIONALIZATION, and it abso­lutely should be in that fifty. Apologies.
    (Whew, I feel a little bet­ter. Confession really IS good for something…)

  • bill says:

    BRIEF ENCOUNTER is a great movie, Glenn. What the hell.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    DUDE! I EFFED UP! I ABROGATED MY RESPONSIBILITY! I freely admit it!
    Look at it this way: now “Encounter” ‘s great­ness will remain with­in the proven­ance of Those In The Know, who can con­tin­ue to Feel Cool about it.

  • bill says:

    It would be nearly impossible to feel any cool­er than I already do.

  • Go for someone who makes you smile because it takes only a smile to make a dark day seem bright.…lol.

  • J. Priest says:

    After avoid­ing it for many years, I even­tu­ally gave the #1 pick a chance and was sur­prised by how much weight it had to it. It’s not without its cheese, and it does stretch a bit here and there, but Grant and Kerr were superb, and the idea of love earned through pain, suf­fer­ing and sac­ri­fice on both ends feels very hon­est. I was hop­ing to catch McCarey’s “Love Affair” at Lincoln Center last year – it was a restored print, and it’s still not avail­able on DVD. Unfortunately, it was can­celled because of the hur­ricane threat…