Asides

The current cinema

By July 3, 2012No Comments

Savages-movie-image

Oliver Stone’s unre­ward­ing Savages, star­ring Taylor Kitsch and Aaron Johnson, reviewed for MSN Movies.

As I note in my review, Katy Perry: Part of Me makes Truth or Dare look like Gimme Shelter, but on its par­tic­u­lar terms it does its job bet­ter than the Stone. Which does­n’t mean I think you ought to see it, necessarily. 

No Comments

  • Thomas Early says:

    Loved the review, with the excep­tion of a (per­haps sub­lim­in­al) sub­sti­tu­tion of “firm­a­ment” for “fun­da­ment” –unless there’s a joke I’m miss­ing, which would­n’t be the first time.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Good call, TE. It WAS one of those sub­lim­in­al goofs and I’ll see about fix­ing it! Thanks!

  • bill says:

    As someone who has read Winslow’s nov­el, I can assure you that your review has con­vinced me that Oliver Stone did everything his power to faith­fully trans­late it to the screen. If you get me.

  • warren oats says:

    When I saw the trail­er for SAVAGES I could not believe that Oliver Stone made this film. It seemed like a joke. His oth­er fail­ures in the past have at least been inter­est­ing in some way, but everything about this screamed obvi­ous and deriv­at­ive. Like what McG would do if he felt the need to broad­cast that he could be “edgy.” Man, even U‑TURN looks like a mas­ter­piece com­pared this this hunk of junk. And I know he’s got oth­er prom­ising pro­jects in devel­op­ment, includ­ing a My Lai film, a film about Custer’s Last Stand, one about the first CIA guys into Afgahnistan and a fas­cin­at­ing TV pilot.

  • Bettencourt says:

    I remem­ber the My Lai film (I think it was called some­thing like “Pinkville”) was almost about to film with Bruce Willis and Channing Tatum (did they retitle it “G.I. Joe Retaliation”?) a few years ago before they pulled the plug, I think due to some MGM mishegas.

  • Dan Coyle says:

    Bill: Having read Winslow, whose work while enter­tain­ing just DRIPS “Failed screen­writer”, I get ya.

  • En olé, että pal­jon verkossa lukija olla rehellin­en, mutta sivus­toil­lasi todella mukavaa, keep it up! Menen eteen­päin ja kir­jan­merkki sivus­tosi pal­ata myöhem­min. Kaikki best.pretty arvokasta tav­araa kaiken mielestäni tämä ansait­see kir­jan­mer­kin, kiitos..

  • Rand Careaga says:

    You should prob­ably sit down with the Merchant-Ivory “Savages” from forty years ago as a pal­ate cleanser.

  • Petey says:

    When I saw the trail­er for SAVAGES I could not believe that Oliver Stone made this film. It seemed like a joke. His oth­er fail­ures in the past have at least been inter­est­ing in some way, but everything about this screamed obvi­ous and derivative.”
    You can­’t judge a book by its trail­er, y’know.
    (And U‑Turn actu­ally WAS a masterpiece.)

  • The Merchant-Ivory “Savages” us a mas­ter­piece. The screen­play is by Michael O’Donohue and the great (and greatly fucked-up) George W.S. Trow.

  • James Keepnews says:

    Straight up, DE – I adore SAVAGES, a ber­serker black com­edy of man­ners like no oth­er, and cer­tainly like noth­ing else in the M‑I song­book. As I’ve remarked on oth­er occa­sions, I’ve always wanted to ask Sam Waterston approx­im­ately how much LSD-25 was con­sumed dur­ing its mak­ing, to the nearest pound. Cannot ima­gine why it isn’t dis­cussed more.

  • Lawrence Fechtenberger says:

    If any­one needs any more encour­age­ment to see the Merchant/Ivory SAVAGES, let me add this: Thayer David in a loincloth.
    What more can you want?

  • That plus a title song by Bobby Short, Kathleeen Widdoes in drag, and the delight­ful Astha Puthli.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    I believe you’re all bury­ing the lede, which, if I recall cor­rectly, is, SAM WATERSTON NUDE.

  • Joel says:

    Everything being said here about the Merchant-Ivory SAVAGES makes me want to watch it right now, part­cu­larly the screen­writ­ing cred­it for Trow.

  • Rand Careaga says:

    All togeth­er now:
    We don’t need no black­birds to bye-bye!
    Or hooty owls to ask us “Who?” or “Why?”
    Wallabies and sheep need not apply!
    All we want are sleep­ing dogs that lie!
    Forgive us all you ASPCA’s…
    We’re going through a most dis­tress­ing phase!
    Now borzois, box­ers, even Old Dog Trays
    Are vic­tims of our very latest craze!
    We’re…
    Steppin’ on the spaniel
    Fallin’ off a log.
    Syncopate it, and ya’ll
    Be put­tin’ on the dog!
    No dif­fer­ence if it’s a ped­i­greed or a mutt, I know
    It doesn’t mat­ter when you’re doin’ that strut, hi ho!
    Steppin’ on the spaniel
    It’s on the up and up.
    Syncopate it, and ya’ll
    Be poun­cin’ on the pup!
    So close your eyes and give these guys a big smooch right now
    As you’re jump­in’ up and down and step­pin’ on the pooch, bow wow!
    Oh, we’re step­pin’ on the spaniel
    Fallin’ off a log.
    Syncopate it, and ya’ll
    Be put­tin’ on the dog!
    Daschounds, set­ters, know their bet­ters, and must submit
    Every rover has come over, to get with it!
    Steppin’ on the spaniel
    Isn’t it a lark.
    Syncopate it, and ya’ll
    Be bar­kin’ after dark.
    So close your eyes and give these guys a big smooch right now
    As you’re jump­in’ up and down and step­pin’ on the pooch, bow wow!

  • Claire K. says:

    Sam Waterston nude, you say?! I thought the best cinema offered us in that vein was the shower scene from THE KILLING FIELDS.

  • Lex says:

    Anyone who’s not stoked for this should be waterboarded.
    Can’t believe Kenny can snidely write off Stone’s ENTIRE FILMOGRAPHY, Jesus.
    On a pos­it­ive Glenn Kenny note, I really enjoyed his per­form­ance as the lech­er­ous Italian act­or in TO ROME WITH LOVE.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Well, Lex, My Close Personal Friend Ron Goldberg™ just the oth­er night at din­ner expressed the opin­ion that, for a long run in the ’90s, what Stone did with sound and visu­als was noth­ing short of GENIUS, so you’ve got him in your corner, for what it’s worth. And I still like “U‑Turn.” Although I was shocked to see that, my memory of it to the con­trary, it, too, is over 120 minutes.

  • Lex says:

    Stone’s ’86 to ’96 run is the best run of any dir­ect­or, ever, in the entire his­tory of cinema, kind of like Scorsese x Spike x 100. He was the most excit­ing thing going.
    The idea that you were sit­ting there watch­ing JFK or NBK all annoyed and flip­pant and “eh, whatever, I guess if you like THAT kinda thing…”
    But whatever. Movies should be a PUMMELING. A full ASSAULT on the senses. Subtlety is the enemy of art, and def­in­itely the enemy of awesomeness.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Point taken. I was fully into the pum­mel­ing “Natural Born Killers” was giv­ing me right up to the point that the words “Too Much TV” were pro­jec­ted onto Harrelson’s chest. And “JFK” was so crazy and propuls­ive that I almost bought it. In any case, I was­n’t a “film crit­ic” at the time, just a pay­ing enthu­si­ast who was well-satisfied in the cat­egor­ies you imply and not to con­cerned about the oth­er shit. But hon­estly, those pic­tures recol­lec­ted in tran­quil­ity, or re-watched on disc or Blu-ray…lotta prob­lems. Stone always had admir­able balls and took risks that no one would think of tak­ing, and always without fear of the poten­tially ris­ible res­ult (i.e. “The Doors”). While he’s to be com­men­ded for that, and while his films often con­tain risks that pay off, there’s also a feel­ing on my end of the over­heated­ness fall­ing flat after the ini­tial impact. As for “Savages,” well…it does make one miss whatever the spe­cif­ic things were that A. Kitman Ho brought to the table.

  • bill says:

    I will hap­pily write off Stone’s entire filmography.

  • Oliver_C says:

    All the pum­mel­ing of ‘Natural Born Killers’ mat­ters not one whit, giv­en that Stone wusses out and pulls his punch right at the very end, by not stick­ing with the ori­gin­al ending.

  • Petey says:

    My Close Personal Friend Ron Goldberg™ just the oth­er night at din­ner expressed the opin­ion that, for a long run in the ’90s, what Stone did with sound and visu­als was noth­ing short of GENIUS”
    Exactamundo. The Stone/Richardson col­lab­or­a­tion was immense.
    My ini­tial com­ment on walk­ing out of JFK was: “Jesus Christ. Experimental film for the masses.”
    Stone has a bunch of fail­ures in his filmo­graphy, and even his suc­cesses have major issues. I mean, let’s say that 80% of Natural Born Killers works, and 20% is pound­ing mice with sledge­ham­mers. But who cares about the 20%? The flick burned bright as hell on ini­tial view­ing, and still burns pretty brightly re-watched on Blu-Ray.
    (The concept that you remem­ber U‑Turn’s 125 minutes as a crisp 95 minutes sorta goes to my lar­ger point. The fact that the dude is prob­lem­at­ic is over­whelmed by the dude’s skills. I would­n’t recom­mend Any Given Sunday to ANYONE, and I have no desire to seek it out on home video for a second view­ing, but I will note that I was pleas­antly hyp­not­ized dur­ing my time watch­ing it in the cinema.)
    I’m going to see Savages this com­ing week, and all I expect is that it’ll be a hel­luva lot more inter­est­ing than almost any oth­er widely released sum­mer movie, even if some parts don’t work…

  • Petey says:

    And I’ve always thought stu­di­os ought to rep­lic­ate the “Garbo Laughs” mar­ket­ing for oth­er films.
    Not only should the ori­gin­al Savage’s poster have read, “Sam Waterson Nude”, but Moulin Rouge’s poster should have read, “Jim Broadbent Dances”.

  • Zach says:

    It IS true that at one point Stone was doing excel­lent things with sound & image that more or less tran­scen­ded the clunk­i­ness of his ideas about his­tory, human nature, etc, not to men­tion some truly bad dia­logue. I haven’t seen much of that lately (and I nev­er did see U Turn.) He’s the slightly obnox­ious runt of the film brat litter.
    Pace bill, I would­n’t write off his entire filmo­graphy, since there is some good stuff in there. JFK, for all of its kooki­ness, is an amaz­ingly well-told and enter­tain­ing yarn. Wall Street may not be the most ori­gin­al story of tempta­tion and cor­rup­tion, but it sure is fun and lively. When Stone is really cook­ing, the res­ults are sol­id, but he seems to have slipped quite a bit since his heyday.
    Maybe the fact that he’s one of the few main­stream guys will­ing to call US Imperialism what it is, and make a Chavez film (partly) as a fuck-you to the Corporate State, is what makes me give him a pass overall.