Asides

Born 100 years ago today: Mr. Gene Kelly

By August 23, 2012No Comments

No Comments

  • Not David Bordwell says:

    For those who want to hon­or Kelly’s leg­acy with a rent­al, might I recom­mend his over­looked dra­mat­ic turn as the cyn­ic­al news­pa­per­man in Stanley Kramer’s INHERIT THE WIND? It’s worth a look for a num­ber of reas­ons: the justly cel­eb­rated per­form­ances of Spencer Tracy and Frederic March; an impress­ively strong sup­port­ing cast fea­tur­ing a ver­it­able Who’s Who of act­ors bet­ter remembered for their later tele­vi­sion roles (Dick York, Harry Morgan, Claude Akins, even Noah Beery Jr. and Norman Fell); and, of course, themes that are per­en­ni­ally rel­ev­ant to our ongo­ing polit­ic­al crisis.
    But for me, Kelly is rev­el­at­ory in this movie as the third lead — the Mephistophelian foil to the high-falutin’ proceedings.
    BTW Glenn, sorry for degrad­ing the dis­course in that oth­er thread last night. I did feel provoked.

  • GK says:

    Thanks NDB, and no sweat; we all get a little hot under the col­lar some­times and I’m hardly an exception.

  • Todd says:

    His films are on TCM all day today.
    Per the pri­or post, “Inherit the Wind” airs at the con­veni­ent 2am time slot.

  • Pinback says:

    I’m glad you included a high­light from “The Pirate”. Performance-wise, I think it’s a career best for Kelly and Garland both, and it’s damn near my favor­ite Minnelli as well.

  • It looks lovely but it was hell to make. Judy was in and out of the bin sev­er­al times dur­ing pro­duc­tion, and she and Minnelli were NOT get­ting along (by this point in her career she referred wrk­ing with Chuck Walters.) Judy liked Gene Kelly enorm­ously but as Fayard Nicholas told me “We had a lot of time to rehearse the ‘Be A Clown’ num­ber with Gene kelly ebcause Miss Garland was.…indiposed.”

  • Pinback says:

    David: In a way, though, I think Garland’s emo­tion­al prob­lems may con­trib­ute to her work in the film. In the early, character-setting scenes, there’s a palp­able, almost scary intens­ity to her long­ing for anoth­er life, and it gives the whole movie a stranger tone than even Minnelli’s fever-dream Caribbean set­tings. As for Kelly, it’s a trib­ute to his pro­fes­sion­al­ism that he was able to give such a ter­rif­ic com­ic per­form­ance in such dire circumstances.

  • Bruce Reid says:

    I’m pre­sum­ing you labeled the screen grab from Words and Music as you did in private joke at the dra­mat­ic image, but just about every photo of Kelly deserves the legend GK!

  • The strangest – in a great way – per­form­ance by Kelly is in, I sub­mit, Siodmak’s CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY. What’s strange about it is, unlike INHERIT THE WIND, Kelly does­n’t dis­tance him­self from the all-smiles song-and-dance man to get in the right place for this Oedipal noir. The sweet, beloved Gene Kelly is right there the whole time, a sick mask for a sick crook.

  • lazarus says:

    I’ll throw in my sup­port for The Pirate. Just screened it for a hand­ful of friends and they all loved it. Not Minnelli’s best work but Kelly and Garland are in top comed­ic form. That open­ing “Nina” num­ber is bril­liantly cho­reo­graphed and performed.
    Visually, the fantasy pir­ate scene is jaw-dropping.
    Dramatically, I think Kelly’s work in For Me And My Gal (and his first big role, if I’m not mis­taken) is often over­looked. I’d argue more was deman­ded of him character-wise on that film than any­thing he did since.

  • Oliver_C says:

    Given Kelly’s car­toon co-star in ‘Anchors Aweigh’, we also have an oppor­tun­ity to segue into a cel­eb­ra­tion of Chuck Jones’ immin­ent centenary.

  • The Siren says:

    There was a cer­tain heel-ishness to almost all of Kelly’s roles, start­ing with his debut in For Me and My Gal, where he delib­er­ately inval­ids him­self out of the army, through even a career peak like An American in Paris, where he uses Nina Foch in a man­ner that the movie bluntly sug­gests is pretty shame­less. Christmas Holiday puts all that in your lap, but it really was­n’t that big a stretch. Singin’ in the Rain may be his “nicest” part, and that’s a flam­ingly egot­ist­ic­al act­or. Kelly’s dan­cing is so incred­ible that as soon as he takes a step you’re on the road to for­giv­ing him. The Young Girls of Rochefort knows it, too–when he shows up it’s like the whole his­tory of the Hollywood music­al came out to play.
    Still, I think it’s part of the mys­tery of his great­ness that he can play these flawed, occa­sion­ally very unpleas­ant men and have major chunks of the audi­ence walk away (includ­ing me) con­vinced of his charm. Carrie Rickey told me that she ref­er­enced the shifti­ness of Kelly’s char­ac­ters in his obit and got the angri­est let­ters of her entire career.
    I have to give a shout-out to Les Girls, the Cukor spin on Rashomon that riffs a bit on Kelly’s slave-driving rehears­ing repu­ta­tion and includes his dead-on funny Brando imitation.

  • Dale Wittig says:

    For me there’s no ques­tion that THE PIRATE is Kelly’s, Garland’s, Minnelli’s, and Harry Stradling’s best work ever; and I have it on good author­ity that Jack Smith (you know, the guy who dir­ec­ted that oth­er great film about Romantic ste­reo­types and illu­sions in vivid col­or, NORMAL LOVE) loved this film also. Reportedly, Cole Porter was not pleased with the out­come, but it seems he was the sort of guy who ten­ded to look a bit too hard at the bot­tom line. I hap­pen to think that MACK THE BLACK is his best song, or at least that Garland’s rendi­tion of it is the finest music­al num­ber ever put on film.(Much as I like Charles Walters’s work, I wish Judy had let her hus­band dir­ect EASTER PARADE as he had planned. He always wanted to make an Irving Berlin music­al and kept try­ing to put anoth­er one togeth­er for the next twenty years or so.) As for Minnelli’s and Kelly’s later col­lab­or­a­tions, as good as AN AMERICAN IN PARIS is, it’s nowhere near so vibrant and com­plex as THE PIRATE, and it’s a great shame thay were forced to make BRIGADOON rather than the HUCKLEBERRY FINN adapt­a­tion they had planned. (Kelly was to play the Duke to Danny Kaye’s Dauphin, with words and music by Lerner and Lane.) As for Kely’s own dir­ect­ori­al career, I prefer IT’S ALWAYS FAIR WEATHER to the more pop­u­lar SINGIN’ IN THE RAIN among his col­lab­or­a­tions with Stanley Donen and HELLO, DOLLY! to all his oth­er efforts on his own and all of the oth­er music­als of that later era except for Minnelli’s ON A CLEAR DAY YOU CAN SEE FOREVER.

  • James Keepnews says:

    Celebrate Chuck Jones every day, I say, but know that Gene’s dance part­ner in ANCHORS was anim­ated by Messers. Hanna and Barbera. CJ came on the T&J scene only dur­ing the not-so-fresh reviv­al of the char­ac­ters in the 60’s.

  • James Keepnews says:

    Additionally – XANADU. Someone had to type it. And it’s almost…OK. Mr. Kelly’s dance sequence with (per K. Friedman) Ms. Neutron-Bomb is lovely.

  • warren oates says:

    I’m kind of a fan of his under­rated non-musical dir­ec­tion of A GUIDE FOR THE MARRIED MAN. It often lives up to its strange mix of influ­ences, which seem to range from car­toons to silent com­edy, Tashlin and Wilder. Kelly has a feel for sta­ging elab­or­ate comed­ic set pieces that’s def­in­itely related to his gift for choreography.

  • You’re right, Pinback. That’s why she’s a great act­ress (among so many oth­er things.)
    And you’re right too, Sireen. That’s why jacques wanted him in the movie – he’s the lit­er­al embod­i­ment of the musical.

  • Stephanie says:

    For me Garland and Kelly are the great music­al team that nev­er quite happened. Kelly defers to her tal­ent (and pos­sibly her status as the big­ger star) in a way that increases his attract­ive­ness and they sing and per­form togeth­er most charm­ingly. The Pirate is a favor­ite of mine but the two stars are far from their best – I think Kelly over­does things and reverts to his occa­sion­al bad habit of spotlight-hogging and Garland looks wan and thin.
    I will put in a word for Cover Girl and the sen­sa­tion­al “Alter Ego” num­ber – inter­est­ing that Kelly’s ini­tial artist­ic break­through took place away from his home stu­dio – and echo laz­arus’ admir­a­tion for “For Me and My Gal.” I would love to be able to say some­thing pos­it­ive about “Invitation to the Dance” but I can’t.

  • Oscars Daily says:

    What a legend. I’m so excited to watch his films.

  • jbryant says:

    I’m the only per­son I know who always stumps for Gregory La Cava’s film maudit and swan song, LIVING IN A BIG WAY (1947). It’s a mish-mash that messes with the con­ven­tions of at least three dif­fer­ent genres (romantic comedy/returning WWII vet drama/musical), in ways that feel idio­syn­crat­ic and personal.

  • Kelly began his career as the Ultimate Heel – on Broadway in “Pal Joey.”

  • Pinko Punko says:

    I thought he was even fun in The Three Musketeers. but I’m easy. The Siren is right on about the less than per­fectly nice­ness of some of the char­ac­ters though. The screen­play for American in Paris seems like it tries to sig­nal that some­how Milo is the one in the wrong and she’s get­ting what she deserves (look at piano guy’s inter­ac­tion with her- he’s like the Greek chor­us), but Foch and Kelly’s per­form­ances don’t say that. The real trans­gres­sion I think is that the char­ac­ter of Milo is a female in the tra­di­tion­al male role of Svengali or what have you, and soci­ety can­not allow that- the man can­not be kept or neutered so. That’s what I like about the performances- they seem to play against the flow.

  • Actually it’s the tra­di­tionla male role of the “John” with Kelly as her “trick.” He res­ists here being the char­ac­ter he played on stage in “Pal Joey” – which jump-started his career.

  • Gareth says:

    Oddly enough, on the man’s birth­day I came across an art­icle about some of his off-screen activ­it­ies in an old issue of Variety – a three-week trip he took to Senegal, Ghana, Ivory Coast and (what was then) Uper Volta in 1964, under the aus­pices of the US Information Agency. He trav­elled with cans of high­lights from his films. USIA were appar­ently nervous about his recep­tion in Ghana due to polit­ic­al dif­fer­ences at the time – no need, since 3,000 eager auto­graph seekers turned up instead of the expec­ted protests.