AuteursEventsGreat ArtMovies

...he was an English guy...

By October 1, 2012No Comments

Larab_stl_20_h

If you’re of the opin­ion that they don’t make ’em like they used to, you are abso­lutely cor­rect. If you’re peeved that it’s more and more dif­fi­cult to see the ones they used to make on a big screen, that’s abso­lutely cor­rect too. So I would sug­gest you carve out some time and put your money where your com­plaints are this com­ing Thursday, October 4, when David Lean’s still-remarkable, relent­lessly thrill­ing 1962 pic­ture Lawrence of Arabia plays in a 4K digit­al res­tor­a­tion for one show­ing only (at 7 p.m.) in theat­ers across the coun­try, includ­ing one near you, I would expect. You can find out more at the Fathom Events web­site here. I can­’t ima­gine it’ll be any­thing less than thrill­ing. I saw a pri­or res­tor­a­tion of the movie at the Ziegfeld some years back and it was one of my favor­ite moviego­ing exper­i­ences ever. So don’t wait for the upcom­ing Blu-ray; see it big, if you can. The present­a­tion will also fea­ture some nice extras, includ­ing intro­duc­tions from Omar Sharif and Martin Scorsese. 

No Comments

  • Joel Gordon says:

    …he came to fight the Turkish.
    Wow. I haven’t heard a HOLLYWOOD KNIGHTS ref­er­ence (if that’s what this is) since my fath­er died in 1997. It’s a movie that changed the way I heard both the LAWRENCE score and the song “Volare.”

  • Joel Bocko says:

    Maybe my favor­ite movie. I’ve seen it thrice on the big screen but oddly enough I equally treas­ure the home view­ings in which I first fell in love with the film. Although how, as a kid, I watched it stretched out to fill a square frame without sus­pect­ing some­thing was up is bey­ond my under­stand­ing now.

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    Seeing the res­tor­a­tion in 70mm (back in ’89, ’90?) was one of the best the­at­ric­al exper­i­ences I’ve ever had. How many times does one get the chance to enjoy an inter­mis­sion, entr’acte, etc., anymore?

  • Without ques­tion the queerest film (in every sense of the term) to ever win the Oscar. Innovatve,thrilling and ori­gin­al in almost every scene ti akes one weep for the crap we’re being spoon fed these days. O’Tolle s three times taller than the real Lawrece but he makes us con­nect with the man while main­tain­ing his enig­mat­ic per­sona in every way. Kids, don’t try this at home.
    THIS is 70mm – not The Masturbator”!
    AND I AM A RIVER TO MY PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!

  • Fernando says:

    Glenn, I can­not thank you enough for bring­ing this to my atten­tion. LAWRENCE OF ARABIA is a film I have delib­er­ately res­isted see­ing because I only want to see it in a theat­er (same with THE SHINING, which screens here in Chicago this week­end, glory be). I shall res­ist no longer.

  • Joe says:

    WOW!!!! I’m so glad I read this blog!! I totally missed this!! THANK YOU, from the bot­tom, top and middle of my heart.
    “You tread heav­ily; but, you speak the truth.”

  • Chris H says:

    Well, it’s not as excit­ing as a Fathom Events show­ing of Glenn Beck’s life alter­ing moment, but I may try and attend anyway.

  • bill says:

    I shall be see­ing this Thursday evening.

  • Bruce says:

    It’s worth not­ing that my loc­al theat­er (Cinemark Century Theater, Evanston, IL) lists two screen­ings: 2pm and 7pm.

  • Brian says:

    Thanks for this, Glenn– we went online and got our tick­ets right after read­ing your post. I’ve seen LAWRENCE before, but nev­er on the big screen. Can’t wait.

  • Joel Bocko says:

    A word of advice regard­ing the over­ture: any­one attend­ing this should make sure they arrive early. I saw Lawrence on the big screen a few years ago and the Jarre score over a black screen was accom­pan­ied by many “oomphs” and “excuse me“s in sur­round sound; I received sev­er­al bumps on the knee (and likely oth­er view­ers received sev­er­al bumps from my knee). When the screen lit up and the show star­ted, there was tre­mend­ous applause, and it was­n’t just for the stir­ring music…

  • A. Campbell says:

    Are all show­ings in 4K?? I’ve only ever seen it twice, both times in 70mm. I’d be temp­ted to catch it this way but, alas, I have to be on the road.

  • Gareth says:

    Thanks again for the pub­lic ser­vice: I had also res­isted see­ing this until a big-screen oppor­tun­ity arose and it was just ter­rif­ic, with the over­ture, inter­mis­sion and all. Worth the wait, to be sure!

  • Wil McMillen says:

    Too bad it’s only 4K, or, in oth­er words, a 35mm show­ing. Not that I’m nit­picky or anything.

  • KDR says:

    Waited my entire life (thirty-eight years, to be pre­cise) to see this film, as I knew that I needed to SEE IT BIG! or not at all. Anyhow, I was caught the NYFF screen­ing a couple weeks back and I not dis­ap­poin­ted. In fact, I was com­pletely and utterly floored. (Special thanks to Alice Tully Hall’s glor­i­ous 36′ x 50′ [h x w] screen.) They really don’t make ’em like this any­more, and man, are we ever the poorer for it.

  • Cicero Ril says:

    Still think Olivier’s the best: Res Ipsa Loquitur ‑the facts speak for themselves!