Blu-ray

Disgracefully Overdue Face-Saving Blu-ray Consumer Guide, October 2012

By October 18, 2012No Comments

How did this hap­pen? With the best of inten­tions, I threw myself into the ostens­ible May Consumer Guide with rel­ish after post­ing the April edi­tion, and then, as Joseph Heller said, some­thing happened. More than some­thing, a few things. The neces­sit­ies of mak­ing a liv­ing. The warm­ing weath­er. Then the pub­lic pool opened. Then…I split my big toe open on a steel step and got twenty stitches in that toe, and, with no swim­ming options and lim­ited exer­cise options, I figured, “Well, great, I’ll finally get that Consumer Guide sor­ted. Hell, I might be able to get a COUPLE sor­ted if this thing does­n’t heal up quick.” But some­thing else got a hold of me. I was pos­sessed by an artist­ic impulse that con­sumed all of my atten­tion and I thus fin­ished a book that I’d been dick­ing around with for too long. So there was that. In the mean­time the discs piled up, the notes stagnated.

So, I took what was sup­posed to have been some time off to catch up and pro­duce this largely not-exactly-entirely-current-release-oriented assess­ment, to clear the deck and to main­tain the integ­rity of my brand, damn it. The main prob­lem with try­ing to pro­duce one of these things on a con­sist­ent monthly basis is that it’s not remu­ner­at­ive. I don’t under­stand why. Blu-ray mar­ket too eso­ter­ic? Writer too eso­ter­ic? Who can say. If things don’t get too dis­tract­ing I hope to have a nifty hol­i­day CG up before Christmas. I’ll say right now so far that Universal Classic Monsters box is look­ing good. Enjoy. 

 

Black Sunday (Kino Lorber) 

Black SundayEventually the enthusiast’s, or if you prefer, cultist’s cry
of “Fantastic! The chef d’oeuvre of [insert name of cine­mat­ic object of
rev­er­ence] is finally out on Blu ray, and it looks…fantastic” starts to sound
like an inver­ted claim of “Wolf!” even among the con­ver­ted, or at least the
curi­ous. But I’m not just being con­trari­an when I admit to being slightly
under­whelmed by this high-definition ver­sion of Mario Bava’s 1960 breakthrough
(auteur-wise) pic­ture. This is an excel­lent present­a­tion, don’t get me wrong.
Of an English-language only ver­sion, in not-quite 1.66 fram­ing, and…still
show­ing speckles, wear, dam­age. Film res­tor­a­tion has not quite caught up with B
pic­tures yet, and there were times watch­ing this when, for the first time in a
long time, I felt an aware­ness of the ways in which this pic­ture and its maker
were NOT able to tran­scend budget­ary con­straints. I don’t know if it’s the
high-def, I don’t know if it’s advanced age and/or aes­thet­ic cal­ci­fic­a­tion, I
don’t know if it’s because for some reas­on or anoth­er this movie resides in my
film memory a little too close to Murnau’s Nosferatu, but there you have it.
Still. It’s Black Sunday and it’s a good look­ing version—an excel­lent looking
ver­sion, above-mentioned imper­fec­tions notwithstanding—and it has an excellent
audio com­ment­ary from Bava bio­graph­er Tim Lucas, so, there’s all that. —A-

The Color of Money (Disney)

Color Of MoneyHey, remem­ber that Popular Mechanics art­icle I did a few
years ago where I talked about Scorsese edit­or Thelma Schoonmaker agon­iz­ing a
bit over wheth­er to use the awe­some powers of digit­al to turn some aqua-felted
pool tables a little more green, and decid­ing that maybe it was okay after all?
Well, they stu­dio powers that be finally got around to run­ning off a Blu-ray
from that mas­ter. And it looks very delight­ful indeed. Scorsese has said that
he wanted to shoot this Hustler sequel in black-and-white but was soon resigned
to the fact that that wasn’t gonna hap­pen; what we have here is a movie with
muted, almost pas­tel col­ors and long shad­ows. But not a case of out-and-out
desat­ur­a­tion. Bare-bones in the extras depart­ment but very hand­some looking,
and a pretty good movie, too; its com­prom­ises do not look like a very big deal
at all, which is funny con­sid­er­ing the cries of sac­ri­lege that were raised by
some at the time con­cern­ing the very idea of sequel­iz­ing the earli­er poolhall
clas­sic. Now the pic­ture looks more like a product of The Hustler’s era than
this one. Bare-bones. —B+

UPDATE: In the wake of Bob Harris’ scath­ing assess­ment of this disc (http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/321398/a‑few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray) I am giv­en pause, and won­der if my assess­ment was made in too much haste. Please take the above with a grain of salt, and I’ll invest­ig­ate fur­ther and post an update in a sep­ar­ate post in the near future, I hope.)

The Conformist (Arrow, Region-B-locked U.K. import)

ConformistBlu-ray mavens very reas­on­ably take excep­tion to slathered
DNR and its echo arti­facts and more. But some­times, when call­ing atten­tion to
it, they don’t, to my way of seeing, 
take into suf­fi­cient account the fact that one doesn’t actu­ally watch a
movie on Blu-ray step­ping through it frame-by-frame, the bet­ter to catch
egre­gious digit­al image arti­facts. Motion pic­tures move. And so, des­pite there
being a cer­tain amount of DNR soft­ness on this disc, the over­all viewing
exper­i­ence of the visu­ally sump­tu­ous Bertolucci film is a pretty impressive
one. It is cer­tainly the best it’s ever looked in home video format. Do I hope
for a cor­rec­ted, more care­fully restored/fixed ver­sion some­where down the line?
I do. In the mean­time, I do not regret pur­chas­ing this, because when I feel
like watch­ing the movie, it offers a better-than-watchable present­a­tion. —B+

Demetrius and the Gladiators (Twilight Time)

Demetrius And The GladiatorsThe sequel to The Robe and a fur­ther demo of the Wonders Of
Cinemascope, it has a weird low-rent qual­ity that’s attrib­ut­able I guess to
Victor Mature’s pres­ence in the lead (sorry Victor) and a more pronounced
sword-and-sandal vibe that the pri­or pic­ture. In any event, it doesn’t push the
view­er to con­vert to Catholicism a whole lot, that’s for sure. Delmer Daves’
sure hand behind the cam­era not­with­stand­ing, this old “4:30 Movie” fave is one
goofy pic­ture. It com­pletely wastes Debra Paget, cast­ing her as a virginal
future mar­tyr who does ZERO snake dan­cing or any­thing.  But it looks pretty great on this disc:
Really sol­id col­ors. Good com­pres­sion. Check out Susan Hayward in lav­ender. A
little sub­dued in the sat­ur­a­tion depart­ment com­pared to The Robe, but still
pretty won­der­ful. —B

Desiree (Twilight Time)

DesireeThis one, if you’ll excuse the inex­cus­able sex­ist metaphor,
really sep­ar­ates the men from the boys in the CinemaScope festishizing
depart­ment. Because it’s kind of a ter­rible movie. Marlon Brando gives one of
his least-engaged per­form­ances (he might have been tran­quil­ized, or think­ing of
buy­ing a house) as Napoleon in this Henry-Koster-directed snooze­fest. As he had
also helmed The Robe, this gig gave him fur­ther oppor­tun­ity to expand on his
the­ory of widescreen. In Contempt Fritz Lang fam­ously com­plains that the
ana­morph­ic format is good only for shoot­ing “snakes and funer­als.” Well, Lang
for­goes coron­a­tions. And recep­tions after coron­a­tions. This motion pic­ture seems
replete with them. On the plus side, it’s a beau­ti­ful trans­fer of excellent
mater­i­als; if one is suf­fi­ciently struck by the par­tic­u­lar­it­ies of a CinemaScope
frame, abstract or not, and has no need of a con­ven­tion­al movie to justify
them, this serves a fine func­tion. —B

Harold and Maude (Criterion)

Harold and MaudeI don’t remem­ber the movie being quite this beau­ti­ful when I
saw it as more or less a child, but I do remem­ber every video ver­sion of it up
to now being suf­fi­ciently ugly as to make me won­der what it was I saw in the
movie in the first place, even. Anyway, now I know. Such a won­der­ful autumnal
look through­out, impos­ing a sort-of real­ity prin­ciple on what is, I finally
real­ize, a work of magic­al real­ism. In terms of dir­ect­or Hal Ashby’s work, it’s
way closer to Being There than to The Landlord. That’s why I don’t mind the
kind of dated counter-cultureish anti-military stuff; it KNOWS it’s out­land­ish caricature
stuff. The lar­ger point being, that this kind of present­a­tion (not even getting
into the extras, which are won­der­ful) is so essen­tial because it can make you
see a movie with fresh eyes. It’s not a repeat view­ing, it’s a redis­cov­ery. I’m
grate­ful for Criterion for help­ing me redis­cov­er this movie and for everything
else they do. —A+

In The Mood For Love (Criterion)

In The Mood For LoveThis ended up in 
pretty high pos­i­tion in the Sight And Sound “50 Greatest Films Of All
Time” poll, and there was a lot of grumbling about this on blogs and social
media. And I got it. “Sure,” I said, “It’s PRETTY great, but it’s not Wong
Kar-Wai’s best movie.” Then I got this Blu-ray upgrade and watched it. In the
immor­tal words of Billy Strayhorn, “oh yes I was wrong.”  Well, not WRONG, exactly. This still
might not be Kar-Wai’s best film. But damn, is it strong, and unusu­al, and
beau­ti­ful. I under­stand that a lot of his sig­na­ture visu­als have been picked at
by so many carrion-esque com­mer­cial and music video dir­ect­ors, but that’s not his
fault. And the fact is that they work here, and that he builds up such a
tender, fra­gile, and yet very def­in­ite, emo­tion­al cli­max with his uncannily
beau­ti­ful images and mag­ni­fi­cent manip­u­la­tion of sound that this cer­tainly does
achieve great­ness, and the disc’s high-def upgrade is at times almost literally
breath­tak­ing. Watch it and tell me I’m wrong now. —A+

Jaws (Universal)

Jaws-blu-ray-boxHelluva movie, that’s for sure. Interesting to hear that
even back in the day John Williams couldn’t res­ist lay­ing it on thick…not with
the scary music stuff so much but with the borderline-insipid Gorton’s
fish­er­man sail­ing music every time Quint pulls in and out of port. Said music
is ever more envel­op­ing on the oth­er­wise very well-mixed  sur­round soundtrack. The image has been
un-fucked-around with to the extent that you’d think a very pure filmmaker
super­vised the trans­fer. An excep­tion­al pack­age. —A+

 Lady for a Day (Inception Media)

Lady For A DayEven going to the web­site doesn’t tell you much about who
this “Inception Media” out­fit is, but this seem­ingly anom­al­ous release from the
com­pany is a gift horse cinephiles do not need to look in the mouth. Unlike a
lot…hell, almost ALL…releases of TCM-type movies that aren’t actu­ally put out
on disc in con­junc­tion with TCM, this rendi­tion of a too-little-seen 1933 Frank
Capra movie is really quite beau­ti­ful, very sharply detailed black-and-white
with that lus­cious sil­very qual­ity rel­ished by many of us. And  it’s  crackerjack pic­ture, too. Adapted from a Damon Runyon story with the untransferable-to-Hollywood-title Madame Gimp, it’s an
exem­plary mix of pre-code sass and Capra corn filled with mem­or­able char­ac­ters played by ace char­ac­ter act­ors. Massive. I’m not ask­ing ques­tions: I’m
just pre­order­ing the company’s next vin­tage title, the British com­edy On
Approval
.—A

 The Last of England (Kino Lorber)

Last of EnglandDerek Jarman’s magis­teri­ally pissed-off  cine­mat­ic cri de couer contra
Thatcher’s Britain is an assemblage of foot­age mostly shot on smal­ler gauge
formats and blown up to 35mm, and this was of course entirely purposeful.
Oversaturated col­ors, lots of grain, com­prom­ised focus; that, among other
things, is what these images are made of. This disc presents a trans­fer that is
not as entirely spe­cif­ic as I might have liked: often the amp­li­fied grain gives
way to a more digit­al  vari­ety of
smear. If it happened too often it’d be annoy­ing, but…As Godard demon­strated in
In Praise Of Love, digit­al smear has some of the same express­ive qual­it­ies as
amp­li­fied grain. Hence, this rendi­tion works damn well. A para­dox of  the medi­um, for sure. —B+

 

The Lost Weekend (Eureka!/Masters of Cinema Region-B-locked
U.K. import)

Lost WeekendI applaud the U.K. label’s burst of enthu­si­asm for
golden-age Hollywood fare: this is one of three such pic­tures Blu-rayed at the
same time by MOC, the oth­er two being Lifeboat and Double Indemnity. Here’s
also to John F. Seitz, one of the very best cine­ma­to­graph­ers Billy Wilder ever
worked with, and the guy who made the blacks in the shad­ows of this dark film
prac­tic­ally palp­able. There is a back­ground con­trast flick­er thang going on
here, and it’s very much in keep­ing with the
film-going-through-a-shutter-at-24-frames-per-second issue, so it has its
integ­rity and place. And once you’re absorbed in the drama you don’t much
notice it. I have yet to look at the afore­men­tioned titles that were part of
this par­tic­u­lar release spurt but I’m awfully excited to. Extras are extensive
and offer some unex­pec­ted stuff, as is cus­tom­ary for this com­pany. —A+

Magical Mystery Tour (Apple)

Magical Mystery TourRichard Lester, after dir­ect­ing the Fab Four in A Hard Day’s
Night
and Help!, opined in a sub­sequent inter­view that the fel­lows make their
next movie them­selves, divorced from the “cult of film.” This tele­vi­sion film,
pulled togeth­er to rally the cre­at­ive forces in the wake of man­ager Brian
Epstein’s death, shows that Lester’s idea was maybe half-good. “We made it up
as we went along,” Paul McCartney says right off the bat in his, good lord,
director’s com­ment­ary. This pos­sibly lysergic-inflected takeoff on a British
tra­di­tion (the mys­tery tour, a day’s out­ing where the pas­sen­gers don’t know
where they’re going) is a mess, and at every turn you’re reminded of how much a
surer hand and eye behind the cam­era and lights would have helped things.
Hence, an arti­fact for Beatlemaniacs only, which cat­egory I am proud to almost
fall into. The movie looks the way it looks, which is very casually-deployed
16mm style, where the lens flares are wholly acci­dent­al and no less lovely for
it. The Surround ver­sions of the (great) songs are pretty hap­pen­ing, Macca’s
com­ment­ary is relaxed and not all that cutesy (he sounds, well, old) and the
oth­er extras, which include a genu­inely inform­at­ive “About The Supporting Cast”
short film with awe­some Ivor Cutler foot­age,  and a cut Traffic num­ber (as in the band, with young fresh-faced Steve Winwood), are pretty hap­pen­ing too. —A 

The Mizoguchi Collection (Artificial Eye Region-B-locked
U.K. import)

Mizoguchi CollectionI can hear you now: “A four-film Mizoguchi box set on Blu-ray?
What the fuck is up?” But don’t get too ter­ribly excited. This British issue
duplic­ated two of the four titles in the domest­ic, standard-def
Criterion/Eclipse col­lec­tion Mizoguchi’s Fallen Women. And, going by A‑B
com­par­is­ons of those pic­tures, 1936’s Osaka Elegy and  Sisters of the Gion, both are the same trans­fers. The beauty
of the movies them­selves aside, they’re not much to write home about: so soft
that the improve­ment provided by the HD upgrade on the British mater­i­al is
barely dis­cern­able. (Of the two Sisters of the Gion has the over­all better
pic­ture, which kinda bites if you prefer Osaka Elegy, as this review­er does. It
is not entirely sur­pris­ing that the post­war (1946) Utamaro And His Five Women
looks the best in this batch. 1939’s The Story Of The Last Chrysanthemums, alas,
is super blotchy. But it’s also The Story Of The Last Chrysanthemums. —B-

Project X (Olive)

Project XI maybe shoulda waited to fin­ish this Guide and taken the
time and filled in a more “dis­tin­guished” release from Olive, some­thing like
The Sterile Cuckoo or even My Son John, but let’s face it: releases such as
this, a late William-Castle-directed sci-fi item made in 1967, are part of the
appeal of the Olive brand. And we’ve got a couple more respect­able Olive titles
down the ways  any­ways. This, Project X matches a sub-Dickean plot­line to a very-television friendly cast
that included Harold Gould, of all people, as some­thing of a bad guy. The
time-travel hijinks are abet­ted by very pecu­li­ar pre-psychedelic effects by
Hanna-Barbara. These have to be seen to be believed. In a sense the whole movie
does. The look is a little gar­ish, evok­ing TV-movie-of-its-time-ness.
As nov­elty Blu-rays go, not ter­rible by a cer­tain stand­ard, but some of your
friends might look at you funny for own­ing it. —B-

Re-Animator (Image)

Re-AnimatorOy, how many video ver­sions of this have there been, anyway?
And why do we con­tin­ue to keep buy­ing them? I don’t know the answer to the
first ques­tion, and the answer to the second ques­tion has the ini­tials “B.C.” This is a movie that it’s likely impossible to see with fresh eyes, and
as an excep­tion­ally well-made low budget enter­prise, not shot in such a way
that upping the defin­i­tion is going to res­ult in any­thing rev­el­at­ory. But it’s
a hor­ror clas­sic in excel­lent digit­al shape so if you’re ever loved it,
or B.C., you should def­in­itely get it. —A

Rio Grande (Olive)

Rio GrandeThis 1950 pic­ture is argu­ably the slight­est in the informal
Ford “cav­alry tri­logy” that also include Fort Apache and She Wore A Yellow
Ribbon
. Ribbon is not yet out on Blu-ray, but Apache is, and as it is like Rio
Grande
in black and white, it makes a good point of com­par­is­on. Fort Apache, on
Warner, has deep­er blacks. Rio Grande doesn’t exactly tend to the soft side,
but in some scenes one feels a bit sharpness-deprived. But I’m being picky
here. This is pass­able through­out, and often quite a bit bet­ter. Ben Johnson
and Harry Carey, Jr. at their cutest, and a rip-roaring Dale Evans song, “Aha
San Antone” sung by Ken Curtis/Sons of the Pioneers. (UPDATE: In my haste to men­tion the par­ti­cip­a­tion of the Sons of the Pioneers in this motion pic­ture, I elided a cru­cial point and said the Sons of the Pioneers sang this song. It is depic­ted in the film, rather [as a terse com­menter points out], as being sung by Curtis, Carey, Jr., and Johnson. Who know’s who’s REALLY singing it, though.) What more do you want?
Extras? Forget it, this is an Olive title… —A

The Royal Tenenbaums (Criterion)

Rsz-royaltenenbaumsFor home use, Wes Anderson’s movies need Blu-ray like the
flowers need the rain, like the winter needs the spring, etcet­era. The only way
the com­pany could have improved this pack­age would have been to get the rights
to that Anthology rendi­tion of “I’m Looking Through You” and slap it back on
the final scene. Anyway, buy with con­fid­ence. —A+

 

Summer Interlude (Criterion)

Summer InterludeI’m very much in the midst of explor­ing early Ingmar
Bergman, and the takeaway I’m get­ting is that from the very start of his
movie­mak­ing career in the 1940s, he had com­plete con­fid­ent con­trol of his
tech­nic­al appar­at­us. Every shot, every cam­era move­ment, every cut, is
abso­lutely sure and abso­lutely right. This 1951 tragi-romance is his tenth
fea­ture film, and it moves along like a sail­boat cut­ting through the calmest of
waters on a fleet but quiet wind. The digit­al res­tor­a­tion here is absolutely
stun­ningly beau­ti­ful You see how gor­geous the cov­er shot is? Every frame of
this disc looks that good. Incredible. —A+ 

Too Late Blues (Olive)

Too Late BluesIn which John Cassavetes, fresh (kind of)  from the very raw and real and fraught
Shadows, tries to bring his pre­ferred mode of film­mak­ing to Hollywood. The result
is an odd, not at all bad pic­ture about jazzbo Bobby Darin’s quest not to sell
out…an actu­al con­cern for Darin, so he brings some real insight to the role.
The Olive Blu-ray is sol­id, not very pic­tur­esque. But the pic­tur­esque was never
Cassavetes’ bag any­way. If you are/were build­ing a J.C. lib­rary, this fills a
very sub­stan­tial hole in it. —B+ 

Yellow Submarine (Apple)

Yellow SubmarineThis charm­ing trifle doesn’t boast the most technically
advanced eth­os of anim­a­tion you’ve ever encountered, which in a way is why a really
tech­nic­ally advanced digit­al ren­der­ing of it is the only way to go. A lot of
the scenes, as befits the psy­che­del­ic moment in which this was made pit very
strong almost primary col­ors against each oth­er and on top of white
back­grounds. For the optim­um effect, stuff bleed­ing into oth­er stuff is
dis­cour­aged. This Blu-ray is bril­liant at that, and the res­ults are gorgeous,
eye-popping. The remixed soundtrack is well-executed and, again, exceptionally
appro­pri­ate to a trippy gestalt. The ori­gin­al mono mix con­tin­ues to work well.
While its cute­ness isn’t to everyone’s taste, again, if you’re a Beatle person,
essen­tial. —A

No Comments

  • lipranzer says:

    I was just re-watching THE CONFORMIST (going through all the political-oriented movies I own). Still my favor­ite Bertolucci movie.
    And I don’t know about any­body else, but IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE is my favor­ite Wong Kar Wei film.

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    I heart B.C. Has any­one heard about FROM BEYOND com­ing to Blu-ray yet?
    Also, SUMMER INTERLUDE is aces, and I’m pretty sure it was a visu­al touch­stone for Wes Anderson when mak­ing MOONRISE KINGDOM. But back to Bergman… tenth fea­ture film? And he had­n’t even broken through yet. How likely is it for a dir­ect­or today to get as many oppor­tun­it­ies to stake his claim as a cinema great without being writ­ten off by even the most patient of today’s critics/scholars?

  • Tony Dayoub says:

    Scratch what I just said about INTERLUDE’s influ­ence on MOONRISE. I was think­ing about Bergman’s SUMMER WITH MONIKA. But everything else I said still applies.

  • preston says:

    Very well said regard­ing HAROLD AND MAUDE.

  • Petey says:

    I do not regret pur­chas­ing this, because when I feel like watch­ing (The Conformist), it offers a better-than-watchable presentation.”
    So how do we move The Conformist up the S&S poll ten years from now?
    As the poster for anoth­er film once noted, “It’s Terrific!”

  • Here’s the movie “Magical Mystery Tour” wanted to be
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90M_oKso3yA
    Many of the shots in “The Last of England” were taken in L.A. Derek, Tilda and Derek’s assistant-boytoy Spring (aka. Rupert Audley) were in town to pro­mote “Caravaggio.” Spring trundled off to The Pleasure Chest for dildos. So Derek, Tilda and I took a stroll up Sunset blvd. where he shot the wains­cot­ting on the build­ings. IOW I was “on the set” of that film, so to speak.
    My favor­ite Wong Kar Wai movie is “Happy Together”

  • Johan Andreasson says:

    @Tony Dayoub: Interesting obser­va­tion on SUMMER WITH MONICA and MOONRISE KINGDOM. I wouldn’t have made the con­nec­tion myself but now I think it’s quite pos­sible you’re right.
    Bergman’s road to inter­na­tion­al star­dom was indeed far from an easy one, and took some patience from all parties con­cerned. His first attempt was SHIP TO INDIA, which was shown in Cannes, and, I believe, his first film Shown in the US.
    Here’s Bergman him­self on the sub­ject in his book ”The Magic Lantern”:
    ”I myself thought I had made a mag­ni­fi­cent film. I was ter­ribly proud of it. Lorens Marmstedt, who had pro­duced it, was­n’t sure what he should think, but he took the film down to Cannes, showed it to vari­ous buy­ers and called home say­ing: ‘You have to cut at least 400 metres, it’s far too bor­ing.’ But I loved every single metre of this mas­ter­piece equally well.
    Just before the première everything was last minute as usu­al, and on that wretched even­ing the copy came dir­ect from the lab to the cinema. I was there with Stina Bergman, Hjalmar’s wid­ow, who had pre­vi­ously been my boss in the script depart­ment at SF and I’d trav­elled up from Gothenburg where I was work­ing at the City Theatre, hav­ing prom­ised to be on the first plane back there in the morn­ing. Well, the film starts and the sound is wrong. I rush out and bang on the door of the machine room, yet noth­ing hap­pens. Back in the stalls I now dis­cov­er that the fourth act is being shown before the third, so once again I’m stand­ing out­side that damned met­al door to the machine room that nobody wants to open for me, scream­ing and bawl­ing. And this at a time when crit­ics actu­ally went to premi­eres and then back to their news­pa­pers to write their copy. When the film finally came to an end there was a ridicu­lously long peri­od of silence, and then we went off to drown our sor­rows at a place (the res­taur­ant Gondolen) next to the Katarina Lift, and that was actu­ally the only time that I’ve drunk so much that I don’t remem­ber a single thing. I was woken up by a news­pa­per boy tread­ing over me in a door­way on Artillerigatan. I went out onto the street, flagged down a taxi and went straight to Bromma airport.
    When I got to the tiny wait­ing room, who should be sit­ting there, well-dressed, smelling good, fresh and awake, read­ing the morn­ing papers that all con­tained ghastly exe­cu­tions of my film, but Hasse Ekman, and with him an Eva Henning, beau­ti­ful as a Lady’s Mantle*. I myself smelt of God only knows what, looked like shit and was the spit­ting image of the Great Failure. I sat at one end of the wait­ing room pray­ing they would­n’t notice me. But Hasse came up to me and said ‘Some of the reviews are bloody awful – but then again, the film was­n’t too good either.’ ‘It would at least have been bet­ter if the acts had been in the right order,’ I said. ‘Are you sure about that?’ he said. And we laughed togeth­er. Then he sat down beside me, and that actu­ally felt rather good.”
    By the way, Hasse Ekman, Bergman’s great rival in the 1940s is long over­due for some inter­na­tion­al recog­ni­tion. For a start his three or four best films would make a very good Eclipse box.

  • Peter Labuza says:

    Not to be *that* com­menter, but I’m put­ting this up because it’s up for debate, but if we are refer­ring to Wong Kar-Wai by his last name, we should just say Wong’s “In the Mood for Love,” no? I’ve been told the same with that it’s Jia’s “Platform” and “24 City,” not Zhangkie’s “Platform” etc.

  • partisan says:

    Bloggers were cool to “In the Mood for Love” reach­ing the top 50 of the Sight and Sound Poll? Clearly I need to check out some new blogs.

  • Oliver_C says:

    People actu­ally get worked up about if ‘In the Mood for Love’ fin­ished in eleventy-fifth pos­i­tion and wheth­er or not ‘Chungking Express’ (my own per­son­al fave) was a baker­’s dozen places behind or in front? This site’s aban­don­ment of DVD-only release roundups both­ers me far more.

  • Zach says:

    Hold on – “I’m look­ing through you” was the ori­gin­al track that played over the last scene of Tenenbaums? As in, play­ing over the char­ac­ters leav­ing Royal’s grave, which is now (and for me, will always be) “Everyone” by Van Morrison? While I can­’t say that the former song would­n’t have worked, the Van, fanci­ful con­nec­tion or no, is clearly the right track for those images.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    What can I tell you, Zach. First impres­sion. Twice, even: at a crit­ic’s screen­ing and then at the New York Film Festival.

  • Zach says:

    The plot thick­ens – there are even reports that for some prints, Sloop John B, of all songs, played over the final scene. It seems impossible, at first blush, that ALL of these songs could have been con­sidered, nev­er mind actu­ally worked, espe­cially giv­en the ludicrous intric­acy of Anderson’s films. A quick repeat view­ing of the scene on YouTube shows a pos­it­ively won­der­ful syn­chron­icity – the clos­ing of the gate w/ the end of the first chorus…man, what a fuck­ing great film.

  • Before it was a movie, “The Color of Money” was a nov­el by Walter Tevis, the same guy who wrote “The Hustler”. Anybody upset that Scorsese made a sequel to a film clas­sic is demon­strat­ing their inab­il­ity or lack of interest in doing research or simply read­ing the credits.

  • It’s def­in­itely Van Morrison’s “Everyone” at the end and always has been.
    Even more inter­est­ingly early on in the proceedings –
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl6FbeoXeHQ

  • John M says:

    It seems impossible, at first blush, that ALL of these songs could have been con­sidered, nev­er mind actu­ally worked, espe­cially giv­en the ludicrous intric­acy of Anderson’s films.”
    So, Anderson is a ludicrously intric­ate dir­ect­or, but it seems “impossible” that he might have had three songs in con­sid­er­a­tion for the coda of The Royal Tenenbaums? (Three songs for which grabbing the usage rights would be, to say the least, complicated?)
    Mongo very con­fused. Creativity and ima­gin­a­tion, forever under­cut by the pop­u­lar myth of god-blessed serendip­ity. Synchronicity often comes in the edit­ing, not the oth­er way around. Even when The Great Wes Anderson is at the helm.

  • John M says:

    Noticing now that Zach qual­i­fied his obser­va­tion with “at first blush,” and am regret­ting the some­what smug tone of my com­ment. Sorry, Zach.
    What’s so enviable/interesting about a dir­ect­or like Anderson is that his sense of rhythm is so ingrained that even when he lays out options or falls upon a happy acci­dent, the res­ults are harmonious.

  • Asher says:

    Debra Paget’s also used as a good girl in Anne of the Indies – a good wife any­way – but that works.

  • Not David Bordwell says:

    @Asher:
    My wife’s devoted to ANNE OF THE INDIES (strong iden­ti­fic­a­tion with Anne Bonney), but has­n’t been able to find this any­where (well, Region 1) on DVD. I’d be inter­ested to know where it can be had/seen.
    @GK:
    Would it feel fresh­er if you watched the first 20 minutes or so of DRACULA 2000 right after BLACK SUNDAY? I take it you felt the effects seemed cheesier on this view­ing, but for my money, the frying-egg eye­balls in the re-animating witch’s skull is pretty queas­ily effect­ive, bar­gain base­ment be damned.

  • Is your wife fam­il­air with Jacques Rivette’s “Noroit”?

  • Professor Bubbles says:

    I saw the Sloop John B ver­sion of Tenenbaums at an advance screen­ing. It also still had the “real” Hey Jude at the begin­ning, and as a res­ult the instru­ment­al in the final ver­sion always feels wrong to me. Elliott Smith was appar­ently con­sidered to do a cov­er of it at some point, but that did­n’t pan out.
    Anderson did a Q&A at the screen­ing where, as I remem­ber it, he said that Sloop John B was def­in­itely not going to be in the final film, and he was still try­ing out every song he could think of to find some­thing suit­able that would­n’t involve a Beatles-esque legal/financial quag­mire. The implic­a­tion was he was hav­ing great dif­fi­culty find­ing the right match. Personally, I think the Van Morrison works best of all the known choices, but it seems like a last minute com­prom­ise, with the tan­tal­iz­ing pos­sib­il­ity that the per­fect sync-up is still out there some­where wait­ing to be dis­covered. Or the ver­sion you saw first is the “cor­rect” one. Or per­haps there is no song writ­ten by human hands that could quite live up to the Platonic movie in your head. In any event, it was pretty clear that the final choice was not masterplanned.
    I say leave Van Morrison be and put the Beatles’ Hey Jude back in and you got a deal for that Super Awesome Definitive Edition.

  • A note to the “Anne of the Indies” fan: The Spanish DVD is region free. I own it, and played it on my Macbook.

  • You can rent/buy ANNE OF THE INDIES from Amazon Instant Video.

  • Every time I see the title ANNE OF THE INDIES, I assume it’s some new Greta Gerwig vehicle with Mark Duplass as the male ingénue.

  • jbryant says:

    I con­cur that Debra Paget is fine as a “good girl” in ANNE OF THE INDIES. While it’s undeni­able that fans of THE INDIAN TOMB will con­sider most oth­er Paget films to be marred by an unfor­tu­nate absence of hot temple dance action, they may well find some com­pens­a­tion in her oth­er con­sid­er­able charms.

  • Paula says:

    Ah ha, San Antone” is not sung by Ken Curtis and the Sons of the Pioneers in Rio Grande. It is sung by Ken Curtis (also play­ing gui­tar), Harry Carey, Jr., Ben Johnson and Claude Jarman, Jr. The first six notes of the song also com­prise Johnson’s char­ac­ter­’s music­al motif in the score.

  • Zach says:

    @ John M – no wor­ries, and I agree with the over­all thrust of your com­ment. It’s easy to assume, with someone as good as Anderson, that he’s able to spon­tan­eously cre­ate such stuff as the con­clu­sion of Tenenbaums. But I’m sure there’s plenty of tri­al and error, there is frus­tra­tion, there are dead ends. It’s a pro­cess, like the fella says – but the magic is in mak­ing it seem so inev­it­able, so perfect.