In Memoriam

Ray Harryhausen, 1920-2013

By May 7, 2013No Comments

EvolutionFrom Harryhausen’s unfin­ished Evolution of the World, late ’30s to 1940. Featured on the indis­pens­ible DVD set Ray Harryhausen: The Early Years Collection.

I can­not speak for every­one who fell in love with the movies at an early age. Still, it stands to reas­on that what enchanted us about movies in our tender years had little to do with the way that cinema could con­vey psy­cho­lo­gic­al nuance, or even neces­sar­ily how dis­tinct­ively it could con­vey a story. No, what got us hooked, I think, was the movies’ abil­ity to show us things we’d nev­er seen before, things we might have dimly ima­gined, or hoped, or dreaded see­ing, but nev­er actu­ally laid eyes upon. The land of Oz. The sun going down on Tara. A twenty or, back in the day, forty-foot high snow globe. The Frankenstein Monster. An—impossible!—invisible man. 

Ray Harryhausen him­self would have been happy to tell you that it was the sight of a giant ape tra­vers­ing and wreak­ing hav­oc on the streets of con­tem­por­ary Manhattan that not only made him love movies but set him on his life’s path. King Kong was the movie. Harryhausen was in his early teens when he first saw it. About fif­teen years later, Harryhausen would work on the effects for Mighty Joe Young.

H,A,BHarryhausen, Forrest J. Ackerman, and Ray Bradbury recon­vene at L.A.‘s Clifton’s Cafeteria for a fea­tur­ette for the Early Years DVD.

It is fas­cin­at­ing that Harryhausen’s two closest child­hood friends, Forrest J. Ackerman and Ray Bradbury, would them­selves become ambas­sad­ors of the fant­ast­ic in the realms of magazines and lit­er­at­ure respect­ively. The tri­um­ver­ate had an incal­cu­able impact on the pop ima­gin­a­tion. What Harryhausen did with clay and plastic and a stop motion cam­era still con­sti­tutes the most dazzling and awe-inspiring body of visu­al effects a single film­maker can lay claim to. Even once you knew the rudi­ments of how stop motion anim­a­tion was done, what Harryhausen accom­plished was unfathom­able. The com­bin­a­tion of his deep under­stand­ing of the fright­en­ing and the grot­esque (as intu­ited via the Greek myths from which he drew so much inspir­a­tion), and his painstak­ing drafts­man­ship, and his lit­er­ally saintly patience yiel­ded cine­mat­ic mir­acles. The lack of a cer­tain kind of seam­less­ness in the films that bear his work is in itself seduct­ive, exhil­ar­at­ing. Watching Jason and the Argonauts, the intro­duc­tion in a scene of a par­tic­u­lar kind of visu­al degrad­a­tion, the then-unavoidable res­ult of matte work, is excit­ing, because it’s a sig­nal, a cue: an indic­a­tion that some kind of mind-blowing effects sequence is about to begin. And then the skel­et­ons start sword­fight­ing with Jason and his men, and the con­scious­ness of the matte work goes away; the action is bril­liantly cho­reo­graphed and com­pletely mind-blowing, because you are con­vinced. Even if you intel­lec­tu­ally know that these images are the res­ult of one man mak­ing near micro­scop­ic move­ments on a mini­ature mod­el and tak­ing a still shot of each one, and keep remind­ing your­self of that, you can­’t not believe that you are watch­ing liv­ing skel­et­ons sword­fight­ing. They’re the stuff of night­mares, as are the harpies who tor­ture Phineas in that pic­ture; and yet there’a also a guiltily gig­gly kick to watch­ing these demon­ic mani­fest­a­tions. Just as the ali­en craft demol­ish­ing the Jefferson Memorial and more in Earth Vs. The Flying Saucers nails the ecstasy of destruc­tion in a pre­cise, painstak­ing way that sub­sequent hyper­trophied deriv­a­tions such as Independence Day nev­er, ever could, not just because of the dif­fer­ences in tech­no­logy but because of a lack of genu­ine per­son­al invest­ment. Harryhausen under­stood the things that we secretly wanted to see and made them hap­pen with his hands and his fin­gers and his lights and his cam­era. He was the not-so-secret sharer of every kid who ever skipped his or her home­work  over the course of a week and instead spent the time get­ting that Aurora mod­el of the Forgotten Prisoner of Castlemare assembled just right. And we knew his name because Forrest J. Ackerman told us about him in Famous Monsters magazine, and because Ray Bradbury wrote “The Fog Horn,” and because Bradbury’s  friend the oth­er Ray took the min­im­ally (albeit beau­ti­fully) described mon­ster of Bradbury’s story and made him into The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms

It’s so easy to bring to mind the for­mid­ab­il­ity of his cre­ations that one may moment­ar­ily for­get their wit. Recall the giant not-quite-chicken of Mysterious Island. (And delight in the fairy tales col­lec­ted on the self-published Early Years DVD col­lec­tion.) And let’s not for­get the human­ity of Mr. Joseph Young him­self, Harryhausen’s trib­ute to the pathos that his mas­ter Willis O’Brien brought to both Kong and the son of Kong. Harryhausen lived a rich, long life, and he left a mag­ni­fi­cent record of it for his fans, includ­ing a remark­able book (An Animated Life), in which the detail­ings of how he made his incred­ible vis­ions only enhances their impact when the movies them­selves are re-viewed. 

My friend Joseph Failla will be con­trib­ut­ing some remin­is­cences and thoughts later. 

UPDATE: From the February 2004 issue of Première, Joseph Failla’s review of the DVDs of Beast, The Valley of Gwangi, and The Black Scorpion. Joe presen­ted the issue to Harryhausen in per­son at a Lincoln Center event that year. 

The Movies: Watching the onscreen leg­acy of stu­dent and ment­or can be a reward­ing exper­i­ence; when that stu­dent is geni­us anim­at­or Ray Harryhausen (Jason and the Argonauts) and his ment­or the great Willis O’Brien (King Kong), the event becomes extraordin­ary. That’s pre­cisely what’s offered with the releases of these three fine examples of the art of stop-motion anim­a­tion in the giant-monster-and-mass-mayhem-movie-tradition. One comes away with the sen­sa­tion of see­ing life’s cre­ation on screen, rather than it’s destruc­tion – no mat­ter how dark the fantasy turns. 
With Beast (1953), Harryhausen ush­ers in the first of the atom­ic mon­sters in what is his answer of sorts to Kong, the film that changed the course of his life. In this case it’s the Rhedosaurus, a dino­saur more than a 100 mil­lion years old, released from it’s Arctic hiberna­tion by a mil­it­ary blast, that makes it’s way through the ocean cur­rents to it’s nat­ur­al stomp­ing grounds- down­town Manhattan! Based in part on Ray Bradbury’s short story “The Fog Horn”, it’s pretty much the blue­print for the mon­ster cycle that would dom­in­ate the scene for the next dec­ade or so.
The Black Scorpion (1957) has O’Brien call­ing the special-effects shots. While it tells the famil­i­ar story of giant arach­nids run­ning amuck through mod­ern day Mexico, it unex­pec­tedly unleashes the most night­mar­ish mod­el work seen in the entire genre (one could believe these slimy spiders, worms, etc. had crawled out of the infam­ous pit on Kong’s Skull Island). Topping Them! with its prim­al fear factor and look­ing for­ward to the battle­grounds of Starship Troopers, Scorpion is a rare example of the genre run­ning head­long into the hor­rif­ic ima­gin­a­tions of it’s cre­at­ors, with spec­tac­u­lar res­ults. This trio comes full circle with The Valley of Gwangi (1969), Harryhausen’s lov­ing trib­ute to O’Brien- a pro­duc­tion of one of the mas­ter­’s unreal­ized pro­ject’s.  Again refer­ring back to Kong (or Mighty Joe Young) with more than mere sug­ges­tion, Gwangi is anoth­er tale of adven­tur­ers bring­ing back their mon­strous quarry to civil­iz­a­tion for fun and profit. Only this time the worlds of cow­boys and dino­saurs are mel­ded into a kind of pre­his­tor­ic rodeo show. The genres play togeth­er bet­ter than expec­ted; after all, it’s one big fantasy designed to cater to one’s child­like instincts, although there’s noth­ing juven­ile about it. 
The dino­saur effects on dis­play this time are some of the most excit­ing and com­plic­ated yet seen: These “big liz­ards” have per­son­al­ity and actu­ally give per­form­ances, which sep­ar­ates this from much of the advanced techno work achieved today. It took the cre­ation of Gollum in the Lord of the Rings trilogy—with the help of an act­or and a team of com­puter artists—to equal the res­ults that Harryhausen and O’Brien got on their own. 
The Discs: In an appro­pri­ate move on Warner’s part, each film is accom­pan­ied with extras that enrich the view­er­’s per­cep­tion of its art. Beast offers recol­lec­tions of long­time pals Harryhausen and Bradbury (whom you nev­er saw so dis­arm­ingly delight­ful) express­ing their joy at still being kids at heart and at the thrill that only comes from a lifelong love affair with the fant­ast­ic. Gwangi brings us testi­mony and accol­ades from some of today’s tech­nic­al wiz­ards, whose works would be unthink­able without these pion­eer­ing animators.

And here’s Failla’s review of The Early Years, from the May 2005 Première, head­lined “Everybody Loves Raymond:”
The form­at­ive years in the career of an artist is laid out before us in RAY HARRYHAUSEN: THE EARLY YEARS COLLECTION (Sparkhill, $29.95), the miss­ing piece of a cre­at­ive pic­ture that, besides provid­ing delight in and of itself, helps illu­min­ate the better-known work of the legendary stop-motion anim­at­or. While Harryhausen is best known for his stun­ning vis­ions in the likes of The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms, The 7th Voyage of Sinbad, and Jason and the Argonauts, these anim­ated shorts, edu­ca­tion­al films, and unfin­ished dream pro­jects show us for the first time the pro­gress­ive pro­cess by which Harryhausen was able to feed his ima­gin­a­tion into our own. 
This two-disc set presents the archived work (all in excel­lent, restored con­di­tion) that star­ted his long career. Beginning with the Mother Goose Stories series and sev­er­al Fairy Tale shorts (ori­gin­ally pro­duced for screen­ings in schools in the late ’40s and early ’50s), Harryhausen com­bines his unmis­tak­ably pro­fi­cient anim­a­tion skills with child-friendly storytelling. Uncannily, the view­er is drawn to the life­like qual­it­ies Harryhausen imbues his char­ac­ters with, as well as the ever expand­ing fantasy world they inhab­it. Of these, it’s The Tortoise & the Hare that most will regard as the crown jew­el of these treas­ures. By far the most ambi­tious, this short was dis­carded, incom­plete for many years. Fortunately, with the help of a new gen­er­a­tion of stop-motion spe­cial­ists, Harryhausen was recently able to “fin­ish” the film. The res­ults are a seam­less flow of old and new foot­age with Harryhausen’s spir­it run­ning through each frame. 
Digging deep­er into the dis­c’s many pleas­ures, we come across some of Harryhausen’s most intriguing pro­spects in the form of exper­i­ment­al tests and frag­ments. His very early dino­saur foot­age is painstak­ingly detailed in the man­ner of his future ment­or Willis O’Brien’s work on King Kong. Harryhausen’s Elementals (a giant bat­like creature’s attack on Paris!) sticks in the mind among the vari­ous scin­til­lat­ing rem­nants as an unfor­tu­nate missed oppor­tun­ity. Still, all of it is great to see now. 
Peter Jackson and James Cameron are among those step­ping up in the second disc to acknow­ledge their debts to Harryhausen. What makes all this so spe­cial is that he him­self is still around, not only to appre­ci­ate the trib­utes, but to explain in his own words his long jour­ney from inquis­it­ive youth with a single-frame cam­era, to the most revered fig­ure in special-effects his­tory. His con­tinu­ing enthu­si­asm is exquis­itely con­veyed in a reunion seg­ment with Harryhausen and his long­time pals Ray Bradbury and Forrest J. Ackerman as the three relate tales of a lifelong friend­ship bon­ded in a mutu­al love of fantasy and fic­tion. To hear the fam­ous trio speak as if they were kids once more is not only mov­ing but what this disc is all about. 

No Comments

  • Pete Apruzzese says:

    A good long life, a remark­able career. RIP Ray, you’ve earned it.
    Can’t add to your thoughts, Glenn. Just “ditto”.
    I had the pleas­ure of meet­ing him when I worked at the Lake Placid Film Festival and he was a Guest of Honor (at the insist­ence of Guillermo del Toro) back in 2002. Treasured memory – sit­ting and chat­ting with him alone for about 15 minutes in the hotel lobby on the last day.

  • Ian W. Hill says:

    Thanks, Glenn. I was one of those kids read­ing Famous Monsters and build­ing those Aurora mod­els and anim­at­ing plas­ti­cine and play-do and 12″ G.I. Joe fig­ures on Super‑8 my whole child­hood (and up to mak­ing heavily-Godard-influenced arty stu­dent films at NYU that still had to always include a stop-motion sequence). I’m still deal­ing with my feel­ings on this, like a lot of people I see on Twitter, but you got the tone best thus far. Again, thanks, I needed that.

  • Oliver_C says:

    I do remem­ber, at the age of 11 or 12, my art teach­er enthus­ing about the skelet­al war­ri­ors of ‘Jason and the Argonauts’, rhet­or­ic­ally ask­ing his class how ‘death’ could pos­sibly be, be made to appear, so alive.
    In a way, this per­plexed Harryhausen him­self – as recoun­ted in his indeed-excellent ‘An Animated Life’, he could­n’t devise a way for Jason to kill that which was already dead, so had to settle for push­ing them into the Mediterranean.
    R.I.P.

  • Max Alvarez says:

    Thank you, Mr. Kenny, for hon­or­ing the great Mr. Harryhausen. I was for­tu­nate to have a brief transat­lantic tele­phone con­ver­sa­tion with him back in 2001 when I was film coördin­at­or at National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington, D.C. I had been giv­en my strangest assign­ment of all: assemble a pro­gram of Rapunzel movies in con­junc­tion with a museum exhib­i­tion on books based on that fairytale. While I had man­aged to loc­ate a 1979 live-action short sub­ject (“Rapunzel, Rapunzel”) and even a 1978 fem­in­ist tract from Great Britain (“Rapunzel Let Down Your Hair”), there was still a com­pon­ent miss­ing: an anim­ated take on the story.
    As it turned out, Harryhausen had pro­duced and dir­ec­ted “The Story of Rapunzel,” a 10½-minute dimen­sion­al anim­ated ver­sion of the tale, back in 1951, but I had no idea where to loc­ate a 16mm print. I threw cau­tion to the wind and phoned Harryhausen at his London res­id­ence where I found him to be both kind and unas­sum­ing. He gladly referred me to a U.S. film dis­trib­ut­or and was pleased to hear my praises of his work and how priv­ileged I felt speak­ing with him.
    It was a brief phone call that I shall always cherish.