Asides

James Gandolfini, 1961-2013

By June 19, 2013No Comments

NFA JGIn Not Fade Away, David Chase, 2012.

David Chase used his secret sharer James Gandolfini in a quietly dev­ast­at­ing way in his fea­ture film writing/directing debut last year, Not Fade Away. Gandolfini plays Pat, the dis­ap­prov­ing dad of ’60s Jersey teen and fledgling rock­er Douglas (John Magaro), and in the early exchanges between the working-class fath­er and the Beatle-boots sport­ing son the words and atti­tudes are con­ven­tion­ally gruff and bluff, stand­ard get-a-haircut stuff goosed with racial and sexu­al epi­thets for extra added dis­com­fort. The dis­com­fort turns out to carry some­thing bey­ond its ini­tial shock value, which the view­er does­n’t get right away. And it seems a little odd, at first; hav­ing cast Gandolfini in the first place, and know­ing all of what the act­or is cap­able of, why give him so seem­ingly little to do? Well, we might think, this is after all a com­ing of age story; the son’s, not the dad’s. 

But Chase is an artist of expans­ive bril­liance and exquis­ite sens­it­iv­ity, per­haps even more sens­it­iv­ity than the tele­vi­sion crit­ics who have built a kind of church on the rock of The Sopranos even know. Later on in the movie, after a par­tic­u­lar fam­ily crisis, Pat dresses up and takes his college-age, still-rocking son to a “nice” loc­al res­taur­ant, a private, favor­ite place of his, a place where he can unwind like a man. Having long not under­stood his son, Pat hav­ing exper­i­enced a per­son­al crisis that has left him at some­thing of a loss, now thinks that his son can under­stand him. And he makes a con­fes­sion to his son. The con­fes­sion is writ­ten in the words that a simple man, or a man who takes pride in believ­ing him­self a simple man, would use; no one, really, is bet­ter at a cer­tain working-class idiom right now than Chase is. And Gandolfini takes the words, and without any affect­a­tion or wink­ing or any kind of act­orly show­ing off, he launches them over an entire emo­tion­al spec­trum; he’s sheep­ish, he’s pride­ful, he’s con­fid­ent, and most of all, he’s free, he’s free…because he thinks his son, who’s maybe a mem­ber of what Otis Redding called “the love crowd,” is a per­son who can com­pre­hend the sense of yearn­ing that Pat is finally allow­ing him­self to fully feel, to feel des­pite the very real danger involved. 

And the finally crush­ing thing about the scene is that Douglas does­n’t get it. At all. He reacts like the kid he still is.  He’s embarassed, he’s why-are-you-telling-me-this; the bluster of the ostens­ibly enlightened young gen­er­a­tion can­’t stand up to genu­ine emo­tion­al rev­el­a­tion. (It’s a tough scene for me per­son­ally, not least because my par­ents split up when I was in my teens, and there was more than one exchange I had with my old man that was rather like the one here.) And the look on Gandolfini’s face as the scene ends is amaz­ing. He nev­er expec­ted to be dis­ap­poin­ted by his son in this way. But because Pat is a decent man, and per­haps not as simple as he believes him­self to be, he does not let the rebuff stick. He begins to encour­age Doug, albeit quietly, with mag­nan­im­ous ges­tures, and an instruc­tion he makes not with words but with a tilt of the head: If you can just get away from this (Jersey, stifling fam­ily. everything), you’ll be all right.

Some crit­ics have called Not Fade Away an exer­cise in nos­tal­gia, and while it cer­tainly does regard the fash­ions of its time with affec­tion and avers that the music of its time was sem­in­al in ways that go way bey­ond what we call mere “pop cul­ture,” it hardly trucks in the kind of tri­umphal­ism one nor­mally asso­ci­ates with cel­eb­ra­tions of good old days. The movie ends with its hero, lost and alone, on the streets of a Los Angeles that’s past the sum­mer of love and about to turn freak­ily ugly, his dreams unreal­ized, far from his friends, with fail­ure behind him and fail­ure likely in front of him. After he declines a ride from a car full of what look like future Mansonites, the night envel­opes him like a shroud, and in that shroud is the shad­ow of his fath­er, and his father­’s own sense of fail­ure, and dis­ap­point­ment in him­self. And without Gandolfini’s pres­ence, and act­ing geni­us, Chase could not have con­jured pre­cisely that shad­ow before bring­ing Douglas’ sis­ter back on screen to dance us out of the dark. 

I don’t think there’s been a screen act­or since Warren Oates who could do what Gandolfini did. His death is a gar­gan­tu­an loss to art.

No Comments

  • Keith Uhlich says:

    I needed this. Thanks, Glenn.

  • Funny, the scene in the res­taur­ant in NOT FADE AWAY was what I’d been think­ing about all night since get­ting the sad news.
    Beautiful stuff, Glenn. Thank you.

  • lipranzer says:

    NOT FADE AWAY was one of my favor­ite movies of last year, and you summed up much of why I loved it so much. Thank you, Glenn.
    I still can­’t believe Gandolfini is dead, and I know we have all the great work he left behind (and I have some fond per­son­al memor­ies of him as well, hav­ing inter­ac­ted with him when he was an occa­sion­al cus­tom­er at the video store I used to work at), but it is indeed a great loss.

  • In between all the hur­ried up trib­utes and tweet­ting war about Gandolfini’s passing, gotta thank you for this beau­ti­ful and well meaned words. Thank you, Glenn.

  • Chris L. says:

    Of all the trib­utes writ­ten and still to come for this sin­gu­lar per­former, there will surely be none so keenly felt and expressed. I too was baffled by the response Not Fade Away received, with some folks seem­ing to con­flate the mean­ings of “mel­an­choly” and “maudlin.” Thank you for gently point­ing out the dif­fer­ence, and maybe prompt­ing a few second looks on a sor­row­ful day.

  • Joel says:

    The matter-of-fact way he announces that he has can­cer prob­ably gave me the biggest laugh/cry of any line-reading in movie his­tory. He was also extraordin­ary in Killing Me Softly. 2012 turned out to be a great year for the act­or. Sad news.

  • Jeff Hill says:

    Cheers to you, Glenn, for pay­ing trib­ute to this immensely tal­en­ted man without resort­ing to the obvi­ous TS ref­er­ences. Nobody ever inhab­ited a char­ac­ter as com­pletely as Gandolfini did Tony (espe­cially impress­ive con­sid­er­ing his real off­screen per­son­al­ity), but there was so much more to his life and art that hope­fully will be more widely revealed now, all the “Tony Soprano Dead” head­lines notwithstanding.….
    This news really, really hurts.

  • Oliver_C says:

    Very sad, and – giv­en that I was watch­ing ‘Killing Them Softly’ only last night – kinda unnerv­ing as well.
    R.I.P.

  • billythrilly says:

    Towards the end of the movie, when Douglas is leav­ing for LA, there’s anoth­er bril­liant act­ing moment from Gandolfini. The son’s driv­ing off and the moth­er says her bit about “men­tal ill­ness” and Gandolfini stops the car and slips his son the hand­ful of cash. Gandolfini’s act­ing is per­fect, the sad look of what could have been as his son leaves.
    Also Glenn, I think the look Douglas gives on receiv­ing the money is the begin­ning of his under­stand­ing of where his fath­er is com­ing from. It’s a small look that sug­gests under­stand­ing the father­’s sense of fail­ure, that, as you say, he exper­i­ences for him­self at the end of the movie.

  • John M says:

    Thanks, Glenn.

  • Kurzleg says:

    @Matt Blankman: This scene imme­di­ately came to mind as well when I heard the news. Up to that point the film had not impressed me, but that scene was like pulling back a cur­tain to reveal the whole pic­ture of things.
    @billythrilly: That’s a spot-on obser­va­tion, and between those two scenes Chase really does­n’t have a movie if Gandolfini isn’t in them.
    I watched “True Romance” again not long ago. It did­n’t impress as much as when I watched it ini­tially. (I espe­cially dis­liked the beat­ing scene with Arquette and Gandolfini due to its bru­tal­ity.) However, the scene with Gandolfini and Pitt at the apart­ment showed how power­fully Gandolfini could play a quiet men­ace. You could see how that per­form­ance might have tipped him for the Tony Soprano role.

  • Petey says:

    But Chase is an artist of expans­ive bril­liance and exquis­ite sens­it­iv­ity, per­haps even more sens­it­iv­ity than the tele­vi­sion crit­ics who have built a kind of church on the rock of The Sopranos even know.”
    It’s true. But we don’t need to refer to Not Fade Away to get that.
    Chase did­n’t only cre­ate a new art form from scratch with The Sopranos. He also made the Citizen Kane of that new art form right out of the gate. No joke.
    And with his untimely passing, it’s worth not­ing that Gandolfini ALSO was an artist of expans­ive bril­liance and exquis­ite sens­it­iv­ity, just giv­en the large can­vas of The Sopranos as our example.

  • skelly says:

    The watch­ing of South Pacific (Bali Ha’i) while the son heads West scene might have been more on the nose than the res­taur­ant scene – but it’s the moment from Not Fade Away that stuck with me.
    Most people live on a lonely island,
    Lost in the middle of a foggy sea.
    Most people long for anoth­er island,
    One where they know they will like to be.
    Bali Ha’i may call you,
    Any night, any day,
    In your heart, you’ll hear it call you:
    “Come away…Come away.”

  • Zach says:

    So sad. A great piece, Glenn, effect­ively tying with Matt Zoller Seitz for best remem­brance of Gandolfini that I’ve read. His line about Gandolfini the man being the sav­ing grace of Tony the char­ac­ter is spot.
    Today I thought of anoth­er great Gandolfini per­form­ance I haven’t heard men­tioned recently – Romance And Cigarettes. An imper­fect but sorely under­rated film, I thought, very much anchored by Gandolfini’s unique blend of cha­risma and deep vulnerability.

  • Kurzleg says:

    @Zach – Thanks for men­tion­ing the Matt Zoller Seitz piece. It’s an excel­lent com­pan­ion to Glenn’s.

  • Joel Bocko says:

    You and me both, Oliver_C. Weird.
    Great trib­ute, Glenn. And it makes me want to see Not Fade Away, a film that – between my love of Sopranos and of 60s British Invasion/pop culture/social por­traits – I should have been very excited about; how­ever I swal­lowed the “lame follow-up to Sopranos; knee-jerk nos­tal­gia” buzz unthink­ingly and nev­er sought it out. Which seems strange to me, giv­en what I know Chase is cap­able of.
    I’d also like to shout out Gandolfini’s vocal per­form­ance in Where the Wild Things Are, which I found rather mov­ing, and which Tony (Dayoub) reminded me of in his piece.
    There’s a “tweet war” over Gandolfini’s death? Good grief, glad I missed it.

  • project77 says:

    You made me ree­valu­ate the entire film. Thank you.

  • The per­form­ance I keep think­ing of is Big Dave in The Man Who Wasn’t There. The scene where Big Dave con­fesses to Ed that he’s being black­mailed is an amaz­ing com­bin­a­tion of pos­tur­ing and suf­fer­ing, that gets deep­er the more one real­izes the com­plic­ated ways that both men are lying.