Movies

I Saw God And/Or "Avengers: Age Of Ultron" In IMAX 3D

By May 11, 2015No Comments

Pretty girlPretty girl!

I decided it would be a real fun idea to get fucked up on drugs and go see Avengers: Age of Ultron in IMAX 3D at Sony Lincoln Square, or is it AMC Lincoln Square, and then write a sort of review of it as a pas­tiche of my one-time idol Lester Bangs’ fam­ous 1977 piece  “I Saw God And/Or Tangerine Dream.” This made sense to me for sev­er­al reas­ons, the main one being that Lester had seen God and/or Tangerine Dream at the soon-to-no-longer-be-Avery Fisher Hall in Lincoln Center (and would­n’t it give Lester a stroke to learn that the Hall will soon be giv­en David Geffen’s name!)  and that the Lincoln Square theat­er is just a stone­’s throw away from Lincoln Center, a place Lester found fam­ously ali­en­at­ing and weird (“emer­ging from the sub­ways into this slick esthet­e’s Elysium is like crawl­ing out of a ditch into Jackie Onassis’ iris,” he wrote). It did­n’t make sense for sev­er­al oth­er bet­ter reas­ons, one being I don’t take intox­ic­ants any­more and anoth­er being that even under the influ­ence of Robitussin, which I’m told they don’t make like they used to in 1977 any­more any­way, my abil­ity to con­struct a con­vin­cing Bangs pas­tiche is ques­tion­able at best.

Still, although I would not be mon­et­ar­ily remu­ner­ated for any writ­ing I would do about Avengers: Age Of Ultron, I decided I’d at least take notes. The first thing of note, for me, was that when you pay to see a movie in IMAX at the Lincoln Square theat­er (which I haven’t done since 1999, to see Fantasia 2000, and I WAS fucked up on drugs then, so I don’t really remem­ber it all that well), you actu­ally now get a reserved seat. I chose mine, K22, as close to the front as you ima­gine a row des­ig­nated “K” would be, and appar­ently smack dab in the middle. I was sur­prised to see how many seats were taken on a beau­ti­ful spring after­noon. All the bet­ter, for I would enjoy a genu­inely com­mun­al view­ing experience. 

I was unflanked as I settled into my seat at almost exactly 3 p.m., but this would not last. The row filled.  To my left sat a young African-American fel­low with a skate­board, sport­ing a medi­um sized afro and wear­ing a snappy blue blazer. Ultra present­able; with a smidgen more alt-attitude he could play aux­il­i­ary for TV On The Radio. He was soon joined by a perky blonde in a black minidress. On my right, a young fel­low of Middle Eastern des­cent, it seemed, in a polo shirt; to his right, a young Chinese-American. “I love my row,” I thought. “My row looks like America, just as the Furious films do.”  I was already doing bet­ter than Bangs, who, as he left that Tangerine Dream show, hal­lu­cin­ated “a whole audi­ence of shop­ping bag ladies.” 

The lights dimmed; there were sev­er­al trail­ers, includ­ing one intro­duced by Tomorrowland dir­ect­or Brad Bird, who reques­ted that theat­er­go­ers “Get your tick­ets today,” to which one wag in my row guf­fawed “Sure!” The sub­sequent scene from the film itself whetted MY appet­ite, for sure, but the Chinese-American guy com­plained, “It’s com­ing out in two weeks and nobody knows any­thing about it.” Well, they just showed three and a half or so minutes of it just now, dude; THAT’S not noth­ing, I thought. But I kept my mouth shut. There’s just no pleas­ing some people. 

There were sev­er­al oth­er trail­ers, includ­ing one for Fantastic Four, which looks like it’s gonna be a real career high for Miles Teller, and then the main fea­ture began and it was…pretty smash-bangy, a little gen­er­ic, a little on the nose, Downey was­n’t regis­ter­ing for me and…meh. I thought it entirely ris­ible that on the Avenger-jet (or whatever it’s called) ride home, Science Genius Bruce Banner would be sooth­ing his soul via Beats By Dre head­phones, which you don’t have to be a Science Genius to know are com­plete dogshit. But my mal­aise did­n’t last too long, and as the movie settled in to a story line that I had some vague recol­lec­tions of from back when I was a reg­u­lar super­hero com­ic book read­er, I got more in tune with it. Sure I could nit­pick; Ocean’s 13 had a bet­ter pre­text for   Julia Roberts’ and Catherine Zeta-Jones’ non-participation than this movie does for Gwyneth Paltrow’s and Natalie Portman’s. But that really IS a nit, isn’t it. I enjoyed the movie’s con­cep­tion of The Vision, one of my favor­ite Marvel char­ac­ters (because he really DID take the “what does it mean to be human?” ques­tion to places that blew my mind back when I was 16 or so), although I found the pre-Scarlet-Witch-Scarlet Witch’s “I’m not touch­ing you? Am I bug­ging you?” hand ges­tures a little irrit­at­ing, Young Elizabeth Olsen oth­er­wise did a fine job with the char­ac­ter and this title seems to be a good entrée into the world of high-revenue movie­mak­ing for the act­ress. I think of all the dir­ect­ors who do comic-book movie, Whedon is the one who most con­sist­ently gets the closest to the tone of actu­al com­ic books, here spe­cific­ally the Marvel books I found so divert­ing in the ’70s. The know­ing­ness of the humor and the earn­est­ness of the “human­ity will pre­vail” post hip­pie eth­os that so many of the Marvel writers put for­ward is there; Whedon also knows that even when things are a big deal, they’re not SO MUCH of a big deal; he plays cata­clysm for a “whoa!” factor, not to spur genu­ine wor­ries about apo­ca­lypse. He does­n’t get bogged down in heavy­os­ity the way even the admir­able and ambi­tious Christopher Nolan can. Within the gar­gan­tu­an there’s a sense of scale. As for his char­ac­ter­iz­a­tions, there’s noth­ing in them that’s par­tic­u­lar gal­van­ic, or even sur­pris­ing (there really isn’t) but he serves up his com­mon­places with wit and sin­cer­ity and when he offers twists he makes his notes resolve attract­ively any­way. To me there was no real cause for indig­na­tion in the let’s run away/let’s face our respons­ib­il­it­ies push-pull of the Hulk/Black Widow rela­tion­ship, and no mys­tery to Hulk’s self ban­ish­ment at the end (and no, it does­n’t have much or even any­thing to do with Widow). Part of the appeal of the stor­ies these kinds of com­ic books tell is that of a world that ulti­mately makes sense. As loud and as tumul­tu­ous as they can get, they’re still com­fort food. They say everything’s okay and her­oes walk among us. The intric­a­cies of the next chal­lenge are the only part of the story that changes. The Hulk will be back, and many of us will be too. As the lights came up, I got up and shook it off and gave back my 3D glasses and intu­ited that the folks in my row were feel­ing pretty much as I did: that was fun, and now for the rest of the day.

I did not, as it hap­pens, intu­it that any of my row-mates had the the con­vic­tion that this massive enter­tain­ment was not just a massive enter­tain­ment but that it was art, and art that “mat­ters,” at that. Ten or twenty years ago, or maybe it was 25 years ago, it seemed as if every­body who was writ­ing about the arts had read too much Guy Debord; these days I won­der if any­body under the age of 50 has even heard of the guy. Even online crit­ics who don’t seem too crazy about this movie—indeed, espe­cially the people who are kinda ragingly pissed off about it— seem  frantic­ally eager to sur­render their wills and lives and entire sens­ib­il­it­ies over to corporate-produced spectacle.

I don’t think the endgame of the high/low cul­ture debate was meant to be “Now that we have com­ic book movies that have char­ac­ter devel­op­ment, we can throw out Rules of the Game; it’s no longer rel­ev­ant.” And I mean, you know, to a lot of people who are big boost­ers of this sort of thing Rules of the Game was nev­er in their wheel­house to begin with, but they really want to be acknow­ledged as being just as smart as people for whom…well, this has all been gone over over and over again and nobody’s going to give any ground. And it’s got­ten so that I can­’t even thor­oughly enjoy a com­ic book movie that I rather want to like.  So fuck it. I reserve the right to laugh out loud, and heart­ily, and with undis­guised deri­sion, at the phrase “we’re going to talk about Black Widow…like adults.” 

Nabokov fam­ously said that the first “shiver of inspir­a­tion” for Lolita was “promp­ted by a news­pa­per story about an ape in the Jardin des Plantes, who, after months of coax­ing by a sci­ent­ist, pro­duced the first draw­ing ever char­coaled by an anim­al: the sketch showed the bars of the poor creature’s cage.” I revere an ostens­ibly high­brow film like Alexei German’s Hard To Be A God in part because it is the work of an artist in pur­suit of  genu­ine free­dom. This obser­va­tion will not make me a lot of friends, but I think if you spend a great deal of time in earn­est rumin­a­tion over, say, the ostens­ibly anti- fem­in­ist com­prom­ises applied to Black Widow’s “char­ac­ter arc,” ulti­mately you’re just grous­ing about the interi­or dec­or­a­tion of your cage. But hey, that’s your prerog­at­ive.  But that is not a prerog­at­ive I feel I’m obliged to take ser­i­ously any longer, is all. 

Now I sup­pose it would be apt to trot out Bangs’ “I will say good­bye to you” bit from his Elvis Presley obit, but that would be melo­dra­mat­ic. I’m not going any­where and neither are people who want to talk about Black Widow like etc. etc. The more apt trope would be Robert De Niro and Gerard Depardieu in the railroad-track piss­ing match at the end of Bertolucci’s 1900. It’s a living. 

No Comments

  • george says:

    All you can do with these movies is enjoy them for what they are (and the two dir­ec­ted by Joss Whedon have been funny and enter­tain­ing). I can­’t join the crit­ics who see the rise of the super­hero movie as the death of cinema. I grew up as a Marvel geek, and I was read­ing those same ’70s com­ic books you were read­ing, Glenn. So part of me is thrilled to see these char­ac­ters on the screen.
    But, as you said, some people would like to toss out RULES OF THE GAME (and CITIZEN KANE and VERTIGO and THE SEVENTH SEAL and so on). Who needs ’em, now that we have AGE OF ULTRON and THE DARK KNIGHT RISES? A lot of super­hero fans – par­tic­u­larly the ones over 40 who are still going to the com­ic shop every week – des­per­ately want respect for their favor­ite genre. It’s not enough that these movies make bil­lions; they also want rave reviews and Oscars. As we’ve learned, any cri­ti­cism of a super­hero movie can make them go berserk.
    Screw ’em. The 20 years I spent immersed in the Marvel Universe (and the Essentials reprints of old Marvel com­ics on my shelves) gives me the right to cri­ti­cize super­hero movies that fall short. Since Whedon won’t be back for the third Avengers movie, I just might skip it. But that’s 3 years off, so who knows?

  • Josh Z says:

    I think Godzilla would qual­i­fy as Elizabeth Olsen’s intro to high-revenue moviemaking.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    I would respect­fully dis­agree, split­ting the admit­tedly slight dif­fer­ence between “entrée” and “intro;” Olsen’s part in “Godzilla” was an almost insult­ing afterthought—not “sustainable!—while in “Age of Ultron” she’s a sig­ni­fic­ant recur­ring char­ac­ter in a huge franchise.

  • Oliver_C says:

    I have a couple thou­sand super­hero com­ics in the attic myself, but I once said I would­n’t pay to see a Marvel movie until they got round to mak­ing one star­ring Razorback (ideally, shot on Super-16 and in Arkansas). The thing is, I’m not joking.

  • george says:

    Oliver C: Why no Moon Knight movie? That’s what’s bug­ging me.
    Glenn and Josh Z: Elizabeth Olsen said in an inter­view that ULTRON felt like her first block­buster. Most of her GODZILLA scenes were filmed in a house, so it seemed like a small indie drama to her.
    And, yes, she was sadly wasted in GODZILLA. The mil­lions of people who saw her for the first time in that movie prob­ably wondered why she was con­sidered such a prom­ising actress.

  • colinr says:

    So…two thumbs up?
    I’ve sur­pris­ingly not seen a Marvel movie since the 2005 Fantastic Four film. But call me when we get to the multi-verse stuff and the zom­bie ver­sions of the Avengers.
    But (said pre­sump­tu­ously on my part) if doing some of these films seem­ingly pushes Chris Evans into doing Snowpiercer, Chris Hemsworth into Cabin In The Woods or Blackhat, or Scarlett Johansson into Under The Skin (or appar­ently the live action ver­sion of Ghost In The Shell) in a des­per­ate attempt to find some bal­ance, I’ll be rel­at­ively OK with that. Maybe Elizabeth Olson will end up in anoth­er Martha Marcy May Marlene-type film soon.

  • HTS says:

    I’ve nev­er been knocked out by Evans and Hemsworth, but luc­rat­ive employ­ment for great tal­ent is the one sav­ing grace of fran­chises. The Harry Potter movies were a much bet­ter example of this.
    Mike Nichols once said that so many of the best act­ors he had worked with were liv­ing from check to check, even as they were being lauded for their work. It was­n’t until they did a “rock­et ship movie” (his endear­ing descrip­tion for it) that they were finally able to relax.

  • Clayton Sutherland says:

    Glenn, I enjoyed the Avengers sequel well enough (more for Whedon’s play­ful­ness than the action bar­rage), but I think most of us are wait­ing for your write-up on Mad Max: Fury Road. Whether you get paid for it or not, you know it’s gotta be worth it.

  • Maciek says:

    This is the best thing I’ve read this week. Thank you.

  • Asher says:

    So are there really these people who are big boost­ers of Avengers movies and who want to be acknow­ledged as being just as smart as people who write about Renoir? Who are they? I guess I read the wrong (or the right) film blogs.

  • george says:

    Asher: there are people who think the Avengers movies are super­i­or to any­thing Renoir ever did. I’ve met such people, unfortunately.

  • Cadavra says:

    Hey, bet­ter David Geffen than David Koch!

  • Jesus Lepe says:

    This may sound like a petty com­plaint, but why can­’t any­one make a decent 3D movie? Maybe it’s me, or the theat­ers I go to… but I haven’t seen 3D util­ized well in some time (maybe since Krull).

  • Asher says:

    I mean, I’m sure that a major­ity of Americans would rather watch the Avengers than any of Renoir’s films, and would even find his work fairly dull, if they ever saw any of it. What I haven’t encountered, though, is someone who has that sort of view and wants to be “acknow­ledged as being just as smart as people” who prefer Renoir to the Avengers. People like that, in my exper­i­ence, aren’t inter­ested in being acknow­ledged as smart. Now, on the oth­er hand, I think there are lots of people who would ser­i­ously argue that Mad Men is bet­ter than Sirk (which isn’t much less ridicu­lous), and people like that do tend to want to be taken very seriously.

  • george says:

    I had more fond­ness for “nerd cul­ture” when it was a cult­ish thing. Forty years ago, being a fan of sci-fi, fantasy or super­her­oes was like belong­ing to a secret soci­ety. It was NOT main­stream and NOT con­sidered cool by most people, and cer­tainly not by most adults.
    But now that nerd cul­ture is THE main­stream pop cul­ture of the United States, it has become very tiresome.
    Or as Simon Pegg put it: Nerd cul­ture won, and it’s dumb­ing us down.
    http://www.vulture.com/2015/05/simon-pegg-has-nerd-culture-made-us-dumb.html

  • Oliver_C says:

    To para­phrase the eld­erly Pauline Kael: if I’d known pulp was all we were going to end up with, I would­n’t have cham­pioned it so much.