Curse-frankenstein-horror-dracula

Joseph Failla, my movie-going pal from the late 1960s on, and a some­time DVD review­er for Première back in the early aughts, wrote me with some remin­is­cences and obser­va­tions on the late Christopher Lee, which I repro­duce below: 

It was my moth­er who first intro­duced me to the world of Christopher Lee when she bought me the Famous Films issue #2, CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN / HORROR OF DRACULA magazine, which fea­tured both Hammer clas­sics in pictori­al form. Except for the cov­er art, all the pics used were in black and white, the magazine did, how­ever, get across the unique tone of the films. Already hav­ing a back­ground in Karloff and Lugosi, I knew (so to speak), I was­n’t in Kansas any­more. It thrilled me to read a film in com­ic book form, in a sense this  became my first keep­sake of an actu­al movie.
 
And this brought me into the orbit of Christopher Lee, who would have such a pres­ence out­side the con­fines of hor­ror and fantasy that when the time came for me to widen my view into oth­er genres, Lee was still there in full force. Although I was nev­er quite able to sep­ar­ate him from the humble Hammer pro­duc­tions where I first learned of him, he remained a recog­niz­able, cha­ris­mat­ic and endur­ing con­nec­tion to my own youth as my movie appre­ci­ation and under­stand­ing con­tin­ued to grow.
 
To explain the longev­ity of my rela­tion­ship with Lee and his films, the first time I saw Lee onscreen in a theatre was in DR. TERROR’S HOUSE OF HORRORS in 1964. The first time I saw HORROR OF DRACULA, it was on Super 8 black and white film, pro­jec­ted on a sheet in a friend’s gar­age, even though it was only snip­pets of the film’s high­lights, it was extremely excit­ing to exper­i­ence in any form regard­less. It would be anoth­er 30 years before I could see a 35mm print with slightly faded col­or, pro­jec­ted prop­erly in a legit­im­ate theater.
 
While HORROR OF DRACULA can­not be beat for shocks, taut­ness, and the team­ing of Lee with Peter Cushing, I may actu­ally prefer DRACULA HAS RISEN FROM THE GRAVE as my favor­ite Lee Dracula film since it’s the most reli­gious of the series, mak­ing the struggle between good and evil even more profound.
 
Lee was the best of all pos­sible Fu Manchus in some of the oddest films made about the character. 
 
He was a great Bond vil­lain in one of the weak­est Bond films. Which led to him say­ing about play­ing a Bond vil­lain, his only regret was “you can only do it once”. 
 
A favor­ite Lee per­form­ance was a rare turn as the hero bat­tling sin and deprav­ity in THE DEVIL RIDES OUT, a won­der­ful flip side second fea­ture with HORROR HOTEL, star­ring Lee as his own dev­il wor­ship­ping “oppos­ite number” .
 
His expert swords­man­ship was on full dis­play in Lester’s THREE and FOUR MUSKETEERS. It was here he seemed to inher­it the same fate of Basil Rathbone, who also could slice up any of his fel­low per­formers but was not allowed to win any of his screen sword scuffles as we could not ask for a more effect­ive villain.
 
One of the great strengths of Jackson’s Rings Trilogy of films is the cast­ing, even down to the smal­lest of roles. But no act­or was made bet­ter use of in this series than Lee him­self. He was a most believ­able prac­ti­tion­er of the black arts, hav­ing demon­strated an affin­ity for such mis­chief in a host of pri­or films set­ting the found­a­tion for a evil film per­sona in stone.
 
Perhaps now his involve­ment in the STAR WARS pre­quels will garner a little more respect for the much dis­liked recent series of chapters. I for one could­n’t have been hap­pi­er to see Lee join the ranks of STAR WARS in any capa­city but his Count Dooku, while recall­ing his goth­ic vil­lainy, com­plete with cape and castle bring more of a sense of sym­metry and com­ing full circle with the ori­gin­al tri­logy than any oth­er ele­ment I could ima­gine. Although belated, Lee would now join his former screen part­ner Peter Cushing once again as a par­ti­cip­at­ing co-star, at least in spirit. 

No Comments