Asides

Something to watch tonight: Monday 4 August

By August 4, 2025No Comments
Asides

Something to watch tonight: Monday 4 August

By August 4, 2025No Comments

Architecton (Kossakovsky, 2024)

A couple of Fridays ago I reviewed this doc­u­ment­ary on RNZ Nights and, in the rush of At the Movies epis­odes since then, failed to bring it to your atten­tion here.

As Emile D. poin­ted out, Architecton is a film that’s right up my alley. Architecture and design? Tick. Meditative visu­als? Tick. No imme­di­ately appar­ent nar­rat­ive but instead a mani­festo that slowly reveals itself? Big Tick.

Architecton is about our built envir­on­ment but, more essen­tially, about the mater­i­als we use to con­struct it. Director Victor Kossakovsky col­lab­or­ated with Italian archi­tect Michele De Lucchi on this poet­ic decon­struc­tion of con­struc­tion, if you will. Or maybe it’s the oth­er way around, as sev­er­al of the scenes are power­ful drone sequences of build­ings in dis­ar­ray, shed­ding their skins as a res­ult of earth­quake (Turkey) or war (Ukraine).

Other scenes take us to build­ings that have been aban­doned by age – no longer fit for pur­pose, they have become shells – or hyp­not­ic shots of stone being quar­ried. Explosions fol­lowed by rubble flow­ing like liquid downhill.

Between scenes, we meet De Lucchi, build­ing a stone circle in his garden in the snow, his help­ers shiv­er­ing as he dir­ects them towards appro­pri­ate rocks. Stone is import­ant to the film, as we also vis­it the two thousand-year-old Baalbek ruins in Lebanon and De Lucchi finally asks his key ques­tion – why do we insist on build­ing in con­crete which is so envir­on­ment­ally tox­ic, requires so much energy to pro­duce, is so dif­fi­cult to recycle and lasts only a few decades?

Architecton reminded me of clas­sic films about the mod­ern world like Koyaanisqatsi, but we don’t have the bene­fit here of a Philip Glass score. I was riv­eted nonetheless.

Editor’s note

Once again, Substack has found a way to make me invest­ig­ate mov­ing this news­let­ter to anoth­er plat­form. That annoys me no end because a) I have encountered no Nazis here and feel like the extent of my Substack exper­i­ence is you lovely people and the oth­er news­let­ters that I sub­scribe to, and b) it’s the best and easi­est con­tent man­age­ment sys­tem I have exper­i­enced. When Substack said they wanted to build a plat­form that was a pleas­ure to write with, I feel they succeeded.

But they are in the pro­cess of screw­ing the pooch, reputationally-speaking, and I think they are get­ting in the way.

Ideally, I would have a sys­tem that was based in my old WordPress site and that kept the archive free for people to dis­cov­er. That’s the leg­acy idea, and I’m frus­trated that my work has ended up in so many dif­fer­ent places, but WordPress doesn’t yet have an email plu­gin that matches the ease and reli­ab­il­ity of Substack, nor is it easy to move paid sub­scrip­tions1.

What I can do is start pre­par­ing for an even­tu­al move by chan­ging the URL of the news­let­ter from substack.funeralsandsnakes.net to newsletter.funeralsandsnakes.net, a change which Substack says can only be done once without los­ing everything and start­ing again. I’ll assess the risk of that and look to make the change in the next couple of weeks. Getting off the plat­form alto­geth­er will take longer.


Funerals & Snakes is a reader-supported pub­lic­a­tion. To receive new posts and sup­port my work, con­sider becom­ing a free or paid subscriber.


Where to watch Architecton

The con­tent below was ori­gin­ally paywalled.

Aotearoa & Australia: Streaming on DocPlay

Canada: Not cur­rently available

Ireland: Not cur­rently available

India: Not cur­rently available

USA: Not cur­rently available

UK: Streaming on BFIPlayer

1

I’d love to be in a pos­i­tion to turn off the paid option and just make everything free but I’m not there yet, and that endorph­in rush of see­ing a noti­fic­a­tion of a new paid sub­scriber still means some­thing to me. 

Architecton (Kossakovsky, 2024)

A couple of Fridays ago I reviewed this doc­u­ment­ary on RNZ Nights and, in the rush of At the Movies epis­odes since then, failed to bring it to your atten­tion here.

As Emile D. poin­ted out, Architecton is a film that’s right up my alley. Architecture and design? Tick. Meditative visu­als? Tick. No imme­di­ately appar­ent nar­rat­ive but instead a mani­festo that slowly reveals itself? Big Tick.

Architecton is about our built envir­on­ment but, more essen­tially, about the mater­i­als we use to con­struct it. Director Victor Kossakovsky col­lab­or­ated with Italian archi­tect Michele De Lucchi on this poet­ic decon­struc­tion of con­struc­tion, if you will. Or maybe it’s the oth­er way around, as sev­er­al of the scenes are power­ful drone sequences of build­ings in dis­ar­ray, shed­ding their skins as a res­ult of earth­quake (Turkey) or war (Ukraine).

Other scenes take us to build­ings that have been aban­doned by age – no longer fit for pur­pose, they have become shells – or hyp­not­ic shots of stone being quar­ried. Explosions fol­lowed by rubble flow­ing like liquid downhill.

Between scenes, we meet De Lucchi, build­ing a stone circle in his garden in the snow, his help­ers shiv­er­ing as he dir­ects them towards appro­pri­ate rocks. Stone is import­ant to the film, as we also vis­it the two thousand-year-old Baalbek ruins in Lebanon and De Lucchi finally asks his key ques­tion – why do we insist on build­ing in con­crete which is so envir­on­ment­ally tox­ic, requires so much energy to pro­duce, is so dif­fi­cult to recycle and lasts only a few decades?

Architecton reminded me of clas­sic films about the mod­ern world like Koyaanisqatsi, but we don’t have the bene­fit here of a Philip Glass score. I was riv­eted nonetheless.

Editor’s note

Once again, Substack has found a way to make me invest­ig­ate mov­ing this news­let­ter to anoth­er plat­form. That annoys me no end because a) I have encountered no Nazis here and feel like the extent of my Substack exper­i­ence is you lovely people and the oth­er news­let­ters that I sub­scribe to, and b) it’s the best and easi­est con­tent man­age­ment sys­tem I have exper­i­enced. When Substack said they wanted to build a plat­form that was a pleas­ure to write with, I feel they succeeded.

But they are in the pro­cess of screw­ing the pooch, reputationally-speaking, and I think they are get­ting in the way.

Ideally, I would have a sys­tem that was based in my old WordPress site and that kept the archive free for people to dis­cov­er. That’s the leg­acy idea, and I’m frus­trated that my work has ended up in so many dif­fer­ent places, but WordPress doesn’t yet have an email plu­gin that matches the ease and reli­ab­il­ity of Substack, nor is it easy to move paid sub­scrip­tions1.

What I can do is start pre­par­ing for an even­tu­al move by chan­ging the URL of the news­let­ter from substack.funeralsandsnakes.net to newsletter.funeralsandsnakes.net, a change which Substack says can only be done once without los­ing everything and start­ing again. I’ll assess the risk of that and look to make the change in the next couple of weeks. Getting off the plat­form alto­geth­er will take longer.


Funerals & Snakes is a reader-supported pub­lic­a­tion. To receive new posts and sup­port my work, con­sider becom­ing a free or paid subscriber.


Where to watch Architecton

The con­tent below was ori­gin­ally paywalled.

Aotearoa & Australia: Streaming on DocPlay

Canada: Not cur­rently available

Ireland: Not cur­rently available

India: Not cur­rently available

USA: Not cur­rently available

UK: Streaming on BFIPlayer

1

I’d love to be in a pos­i­tion to turn off the paid option and just make everything free but I’m not there yet, and that endorph­in rush of see­ing a noti­fic­a­tion of a new paid sub­scriber still means some­thing to me.