DVDMoviesMusic

Nobody cares about your personal opinion of The Rolling Stones.

By July 30, 2008No Comments

Shine_2

When Martin Scorsese’s Shine a Light hit theat­ers in April, it gave movie crit­ics, myself included, a chance to play at being rock crit­ics, without the cut in pay. Everybody had to weigh in on just what they thought of the group. (I was amused to learn that The New Yorker’s Anthony Lane not only had a “lifelong indif­fer­ence” to the band, but he had nev­er thought much of Talking Heads until see­ing Stop Making Sense. I’d bet real money that Lane was gaga for Orange Juice back in the day, though.) It sure was fun, kinda, but rather missed a point, which is that hav­ing an opin­ion on The Stones these days is like hav­ing an opin­ion about Mount Rushmore. No one really gives a shit. 

With that in mind, I con­duc­ted a little thought exper­i­ment in approach­ing the just-released DVD of Shine A Light. I would try to for­get that I knew who or what The Rolling Stones were, and take the pic­ture in only as visu­al and aur­al inform­a­tion. Let the cul­tur­al bag­gage loose. 

It’s an impossible stance or atti­tude to main­tain, I know, but it’s worth try­ing on. I think Light works very well as a con­cert film, but the yield of imagery that’s simply strik­ing in and of itself is pretty stag­ger­ing, espe­cially for a putat­ive doc­u­ment­ary. Those wav­ing hands that seem to threaten to pull Richards into an unnamed inferno. This strangely noble profile:
Shine_1

There’s quite a bit more through­out. That The Stones pull off the per­form­ances cap­tured here is a test­a­ment to the band’s preter­nat­ur­al stam­ina; the ima­gin­at­ive­ness with­in the film’s frames is a test­a­ment to Scorsese’s con­tin­ued cre­at­ive vitality. 

No Comments

  • colinr says:

    I sup­pose you know when you are get­ting old when dis­cus­sion moves from Beatles and Stones films to reas­sess­ing the impact the Spice Girls and S Club 7 films had on 90s cul­ture, and what we can learn about soci­ety from their teenybopping.

  • Herman Scobie says:

    Have seen Der Stones in con­cert five times this cen­tury, and Scorsese’s film is a much bet­ter exper­i­ence: bet­ter seats, bet­ter sound. Especially admire how he refrains from banal reac­tion shots of the audi­ence. Only cri­ti­cism is that I could have done with the guests–except for Buddy Guy, of course.

  • Eric says:

    I always took Lane for more of a Josef K fan. Oh well, what do I know?

  • Steve says:

    I can pic­ture Lane “get­ting down” to the Fire Engines. I think David Denby would have been more into New York’s No Wave scene.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Denby’s cas­sette archive of DNA gigs is legendary.

  • MovieMan0283 says:

    I was dis­ap­poin­ted to dis­cov­er Shine a Light was a con­cert film. I thought it would be a sur­vey of their career, hope­fully with the emphas­is on the Brian Jones years, kind of like No Direction Home. Too bad.

  • I’m not sure I under­stand your point Colinr. Almost from the begin­ning, Rock & roll has always tried find ways to cash-in on what the “kids” are listen­ing to. The Spice Gorls movie was not that dif­fer­ent from any of the unwatch­able Elvis movies. Sure, Elvis was coool­er, but he sure could­n’t carry a movie. For every Spice Girls movie, there’s a movie like Ted Demme’s hip-hop com­edy Who’s The Man?, a won­der­ful homage to both comedy-team movies and Cotton Comes to Harlem.
    The Stones con­cert movie was way under­val­ued by crit­ics, even the ones who gave it “pos­it­ive” notices. The way Scorsese shoots each song gives the num­bers ther own visu­al tempo. The audi­ence’s response to cer­tain lyr­ics are ter­rif­ic, espe­cially dur­ing “Shattered” and “Just My Imagination.”
    My favor­ite bit is when, dur­ing “All down the Line,” Jagger uses his arms to orches­trate the horn sec­tion. Then, the cam­era slowly pulls back to show Jagger from head to toe as his moves his body from side to side. It’s an old move if his, but it still charms. And Scorsese frames it beautifully.
    And is it me, or does­n’t it seem reas­on­able for good con­cert movies to have a lock on at least a Best Sound Oscar nom­in­a­tion? The sound mix on Shine A Light (espe­cially in IMAX) ha yet to be topped this year. But you know it won’t get any love come Oscar time.

  • colinr says:

    That’s true Aaron – I had for­got­ten all those Elvis and Monkees movies for a minute there!

  • Edward Wilson says:

    The only thing good about the movie is the behind-the-scenes pro­logue. The con­cert itself is hor­ribly banal. The Stones seemed to be play­ing their songs rough­er, more aggress­ively than they should sound, prob­ably to keep up with mod­ern rock. In fact, once the con­cert star­ted, I found myself skip­ping from song to song on the DVD hop­ing I’d find a rendi­tion I liked, but to no avail. Didn’t even fin­ish watch­ing it.
    Then, the next time I used my iPod, I put on my Stones playl­ist top hear them properly.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Oh, I don’t know, Edward—I’ve heard worse live Stones (“No Security,” any­one?). The only live record of the band that out­strips the record­ings is “Get Your Ya-Yas Out,” with Mick Taylor bring­ing it for the likes of “Oh, Carol” and “Midnight Rambler.” I don’t think the music­al perfs in “Shine A Light” are bad—but if I wanna just LISTEN to the Stones I’ll always go to the stu­dio stuff.